�� Chapter One

�� Proof The Jews Are Not Israelites

Near the time of Christ, there once existed a metropolis city, which was a trade center for the then known world. This city of wealth was once destroyed in 146 B.C., and its treasures carried off to Rome. But Julius Caesar restored it a hundred years later, and the Roman colony flourished so much that it soon became one of the most prominent centers in Greece. Some would say that in the 2nd century it was the richest city in Greece.

This city was a city of wealth, of luxury and of immorality. It seemed to have one quality that marked it as a commercial hot spot of its day, for it is said that "Jews flocked to it." That city was ancient Corinth, the chief city in the Roman Province of Achaia. This is the city that Paul spent at least a year and one-half preaching the Gospel and encountering the full force and fury of the "Jews."

Times does not seem to change much do they? The same problem is facing most of the major cities in America today. The commercial cities we have in the United States are fast becoming breeding cesspools of corruption and all manner of evil. Could this be caused by a "Jewish" society and their influence? Many wonder!

Strong's Concordance more or less defines the words "Jew" and "Jews" as: "in the sense of a country, i.e., a Judean." The word "Jew" is used 22 times in the King James Version of the Bible in the New Testament, and the word "Jews" is used 172 times and 170 times of those are from the same #2453 as the above "Jew" definition. There are another 6 times the plural word "Jews'" is used and all but one of these is this #2454. So for the 200 times, the words: "Jew, Jews, and Jews'" are used in the New Testament, at least 197 occasions are referring to a Judean in the sense of from a place, i.e., as from a country.

The 1828 Webster's Dictionary refers to the first letter in the "J" section thus: "A modern addition to the English alphabet."� The words used prior were Iew, Iewe, Iewes. The use of the English terms, "Thee" and "Thou," were always used in reference to first person singular or plural, since the phonetic use of the word "Iew" is the same as "you," thus insulting.

The Compton�s Interactive Encyclopedia relates the following in reference to the letter �J�: THE LETTER J. The history of the letter J is linked with the history of l. The Romans and their European successors used l both for the vocalic "i" and for the consonantal "y" (as in the English word "yet"). The English letter J did not come into existence until the end of medieval times, when scribes began to use a tailed form of "i," with or without the dot, next to the short form of "i" (1). When printing was invented, the tailed form of "i" (2) was often used for an initial "i," which is usually consonantal. Not until the 17th century, however, was the distinction between J or j as a consonant and l or i as a vowel fully established. (Compton�s Interactive Encyclopedia)

The question still haunts many and they have often asked just who are these people the Bible calls "Jew, Jews, and Jews'"? Why were these people not just simply called "Judeans," "Israelites," or "Judeans whose religion was Judaism?"

This is the age old word problem of society problem that is surrounded with so many, many, lies and deceptions. "The fear of the Jews" syndrome that plagues society today. Much of it as a result of the so-called holocaust which we have been told 10,000 times 10,000 that the Germans cremated 6-million Jews during WWII.� This story has installed a guilt complex in the American people, until the word Jew has become a non speakable word, and if one dares to utter the word except in reverence and humility they will be attacked by both Jews and Christians. Therefore, we have prepared this study to prove to you and any other thinking American that the bulk of these people called "Jew" or "Jews" in the Bible, were not and are not of the House of Israel or of the House of Judah.

Then who are these people who have plagued the pages of history for so, so very long? The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia defines "Jew" as the same word of Strong's #2453 in the following words: "'Jew' denotes originally an inhabitant of Judah, (2 Kings 16:6 applies to the two tribes of the Southern Kingdom) but later the meaning was extended to embrace all descendants of Abraham." (James Orr, Volume III, page 1675)

The question which faces us here is WHO had the authority and the power that: "extended the meaning to embrace all descendants of Abraham?" Mr. Orr goes on to say in his definition that: "'Jews' (always pl.) is the familiar term for Israelites in the Gospel (esp. in John), Acts, Eph. etc." This definition only serves to confuse the issue even more, who, how, when and why was such confusion entered into society and the Holy Scriptures? Why, if the term "Jew," refers to Israelites, did they not just simply call them Israelites or Judeans, whose religion was Hebrew? This sure seems to be the more correct terminology. It appears from all our readings that the Jews of all ages, always do best what their father, the devil does - and that is lie. (John 8:44)

The Greek words used for "know and knowledge" seem to carry somewhat of a different context or concept than todays English words do. In both the Hebrew and Greek tongue these words carried the connotation - "to know fully." "Knowledge strictly is the apprehension by the mind of some fact or truth in accordance with its real nature... Knowledge is distinguished from 'opinion' by its greater certainty. The mind is constituted with the capacity for knowledge, and the desire to possess and increase it. The character of knowledge varies with its object.

Know: Thayer�s Definition: #1097� ginosko‑

1) to learn to know, to come to know, to get a knowledge by perception, to feel, to become known

2) to know, to understand, to perceive, to have knowledge of

a) to understand

b) to know

3) a Jewish idiom for sexual intercourse between a man and a woman. (Compare Gen. 4:1)

4) to become acquainted with, to know

Knowledge: Strong�s Concordance: #1921� epiginosko (ep‑ig‑in‑oce'‑ko); from 1909 and 1097; to know upon some mark, i.e. recognize; by implication, to become fully acquainted with, to acknowledge: KJV‑‑ (ac‑, have, take) know (‑ledge, well), perceive.

The senses give knowledge of outward appearances; the intellect connects and reasons about these appearances, and arrives at general laws or truths; moral truth is apprehended through the power inherently possessed by men of distinguishing right and wrong in the light of moral principles; spiritual sympathy...The highest knowledge possible to man is the knowledge of God, and while there is that in God's infinity which transcends man's power of comprehension, God is knowable in the measure in which He has revealed Himself in creation, and supremely in Jesus Christ who alone perfectly knows the Father, and reveals Him to man..." (The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, pp. 1815-1816)

The problem with knowledge is that it can "enlarge" a man's ego. St. Paul, who is said to have authored the book of 1st Corinthians, penned these words in the 8th Chapter verses 1 and 2: "...we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth. And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know."

In these passages, Paul was addressing, primarily, the pagan ritual of things offered to idols and their influence upon Christian fellowship with the heathen community, but the concepts of knowledge are for general application. Paul shows that a conceited knowledge is not a good thing. But the man who understands that love is for more important than knowledge has a handle on "knowing" and the limits contained therein. True love for you neighbor {fellow Israelite} has a real concern that consults the interest of others.

There can be found a common evidence of ignorance in a person and that evidence is a conceit of knowledge. That is why Paul said, "if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he knoweth nothing as yet he ought to know." Many believe that Paul used these words here, because of the arrogance and forcefulness of the Jews, whose religion was Judaism {Traditions of the Elders - at that time in history} and their attitudes towards the "goyium," i.e., White Israelites. These Jews always want to be in control and more or less run the show.

The person who knows most, is the one who best understands his own ignorance and the imperfections of human knowledge. The vain and conceited person, that "thinks" he knows everything, is drunk on his own imagination, a real Jewish trait. He should examine himself to see if he really knows any thing alright. It surely is one thing to know truth and another thing to know truth as it ought to be known. When truth is known alright it will duly improve our knowledge. For God said: "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge {why?} BECAUSE THOU {you} HAST {have} REJECTED KNOWLEDGE {therefore God will}, I will also reject thee..." (Hosea 4:6)

The man or woman who truly knows the YHWH of True Israel are taught and guided into knowing truth aright, and so must the living of his/her life accordingly. The man or woman who has a vain and conceited opinion of him/herself is impeding the leadership and/or guidance of the Holy Spirit. This kind of knowledge can not be bought or sold. True wisdom does not come from books or personal experience, but rather from YHWH, His son and His Holy spirit.

If the "Jew" word problem and society problem had never been introduced into society things might have been different, but it is there, it is a real live issue of today, for you and I. We have to obtain truth aright from Scripture, history, both secular and Biblical, and from letting the Holy Spirit guide us into all truth, see John 14. "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." (Matthew 7:20)

Now, let us return to the wicked, commercial and immoral city of Corinth, that according to scholars, "Jews flocked to this trade center." (Acts 18:1-18; Romans 16:21; 1 Corinthians 9:20) In Acts 18 we find that Paul encountered the Jewish problem first hand.

1). There were some Jews (and/or Judeans) there, along with some Greeks.

2). Paul reasoned with them, some opposed him and blasphemed and he said their blood would be on their heads.

3). Some Judeans believed in Christ. Jews lived among Israelites and Greeks in Corinth.

4). Upset Jews rose up in insurrection against Paul in strife.

5). The Jews instilled fear and silence in Corinthians, making them afraid to speak the truth.

�6). The deceived Judeans had to have a teacher (Paul) to show a more perfect knowledge of YHWH and Christ.

7). Apparently all Jews did not worship God.

8). Paul is accused by Jews before the Roman court.

9). The court cleared Paul of any wrong.

10). The Jews took their contempt out on another person.

There are many people who live in Texas and are called Texans. But all these Texans are not of the same race, region, or religion. There are some True Israelites (Hebrews) in Texas. We are sure that there are some Jewish Texans also. How can one tell one from the other. There is probably no way one can, unless, they tell you who they are or what they are or we can see their fruits which produce evidence. If a person is asked if he is Jewish or an Israelites, we feel that a true Israelite would tell all he knows about his religion. But Jews, back then and even today, are almost always afraid of the truth. John 8:44 says that the father of the Jews is the devil and a liar. Apparently the real nature (part of the definition of know, supra) of the Jew is trickery, deception and lies. True Israelites know that it is wrong to lie instinctively.

Who Are The Pharisees

And Are The �Jews� Israel?

The children of the promise are the literal descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, whereas the children of the flesh are children from other unions such as the descendants of Ishmael and Esau. It also dealt with the genealogies of Christ and the Pharisees and it was concluded that the Pharisees at the time of Christ, like Ishmael and Esau, while of the seed of Abraham, were not children of the promise.

If the Pharisees, who were also called Jews, WERE NOT CHILDREN OF THE PROMISE, who then is a Jew and who is an Israelite? We will save the subject of Israelites for another publication and just deal with Pharisees and Jews. However, this story begins with Abraham, who had eight children: Isaac from Sarah; Ishmael from the handmaiden Hagar; and six others from Keturah; not counting the daughters.

Of all these children only one child became the child of the promise and that was Isaac. Isaac only had two children: twin boys named Esau and Jacob. But again, only one child was the child of the promise and that was Jacob. Later God would change his name to Israel. Jacob/Israel had twelve sons from two wives and two handmaidens and each of these sons, as descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, became children of the promise. (Genesis 38)

At this time we are only interested in one of those sons named Judah. Judah had five sons, two of whom God killed, but only two of the remaining three were children of the promise. Throughout Biblical history there have been numerous conflicts between the children of the flesh born in juxtaposition to children of the promise, and some are listed below:

Abel vs. Cain;

Shem vs. Ham (Canaan);

Isaac vs. Ishmael;

Israel vs. Moabites/Ammonites (Lot's children);

Jacob vs. Esau/Edomites;

Israel vs. Amalakites, and

Pharez and Zerah vs. Shelahites.

These conflicts between the children of the Promise and the children of the Flesh are later described in Scripture as being conflicts between the good seed and the tares. Scripture records a strange story in the events surrounding the births of each of these children.

Without getting into a lengthy discussion, Cain and Abel were born subsequent to the fall and of course Cain slew Abel; Canaanites were cursed because Ham uncovered the nakedness of his father, yet Noah cursed Canaan - not Ham; Moabites/Ammonites due to an incestuous relationship between Lot and his two daughters; Esau is recorded as fighting with his twin brother Jacob in the womb of his mother; Amalakites {of Esau} from the relationship between a concubine and Esau's son born of Esau's Hittite wife; and Shelah born of a Canaanite wife of Judah.

�� The First Jews

First let us make it abundantly clear that there were no Jews prior to the 1700s, for the lett �J� had not been invented prior to that time. �J: This letter has been added to the English Alphabet in modern days; the letter I being written formerly in words where J is now used. It seems to have had the sound of y, in many words, as it still has in the German. The English sound of this letter may be expressed by dsh, or edth. A compound sound coinciding exactly with of g, in genius; the French j, with the articulation d preceding it. It is the tenth letter of the English Alphabet. (Noah Webster�s First Edition of an American Dictionary of the English Language 1828 Edition)

Genesis 5:2‑3: �Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth.� Please note that neither Cain nor Able is mentioned in Adam�s line. Therefore, we can conclude from this that neither Cain nor Able were Adam�s children. For if they had God certainly would have instructed that they be noted as such.

Neither is there any mention of Cain and Abel in the Chronology of Adam listed in 1^st Chronicles: �Adam, Sheth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalaleel, Jered, Henoch, Methuselah, Lamech, Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.� (1 Chronicles 1:1‑4) By this we know that none of the offspring of Cain were the seed of Adam, and were the seed of the Devil, just as Christ told us in John 8:44.

The very first people, that of the descendants of Adam, Seth, Abraham, Isaac (Whom we, the White Race is named after as instructed by Jacob/Israel in the 48^th chapter of Genesis). �The Angel which redeemed me from all evil, bless the lads; and let my name be named on them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac; and let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth.� (Genesis 48:16) This has been fulfilled, in that the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people of the earth have been called �Anglo-Saxons� after the name of Isaac. And they have, have also, been called after Jacob/Israel because they have been called Israelites. These same people have always occupied the center of the earth, for they can be found to have created nations and civilizations just north and south of the equator.

However, we must mention here that Esau as the brother to Jacob; so he was never an Israelite; but his seed would have been of mixed blood, because of his marriage to the Hittite women: �And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite.� (Genesis 26:34) Then we are told in Genesis 28:8‑9: �And Esau seeing that the daughters of Canaan pleased not Isaac his father; Then went Esau unto Ishmael, and took unto the wives which he had Mahalath the daughter of Ishmael Abraham's son, the sister of Nebajoth, to be his wife.� Thus we can see clearly that neither Esau nor any of his descendants were Israelites. But all of his children from that time on could be classified as Jews. Also, his descendants could be called brothers to the Arabs, because he married one of Ishmael�s daughters.

The first time that a mixed multitude is mentioned in the Bible is in Exodus 12:37‑38: �And the children of Israel journeyed from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand on foot that were men, beside children. And a mixed multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and herds, even very much cattle.� Then the mixed multitude is mentioned again in Nehemiah: �Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.� (Nehemiah 13:3)

The Jewish Encyclopedia, states: "EDOM IS IN MODERN JEWRY.� (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41) Which is a true statement, based on the above information that we have seen in the Scriptures. The Jews know this and they know they are not Israelites because they have admitted it, both here and in: Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: "STRICTLY SPEAKING IT IS INCORRECT TO CALL AN ANCIENT ISRAELITE A �JEW� OR TO CALL A CONTEMPORARY JEW AN ISRAELITE OF A HEBREW." (A brief History of the Terms for Jew, in the 1980 Jewish Almanac)

There was another group of mixed breeds which came back from the Babylonian captivity with some of the True Israelites which returned to build the Temple. During this time the priests found that many of the Israelites had married into the other races, and had strange wives (meaning they were not Israelites) and were told to separate themselves from them: �Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.� (Nehemiah 13:3)

The Shelah Connection

To understand that the Pharisees at the time of Christ and those of Jewry in the 20th century are at least partial descendants of the children of the flesh, we must go back and begin with Judah, Jacob's 4th son of Leah and his descendants. The story of Judah's marriage and descendants is recorded in Genesis, Chapter 38.

�� Genesis, Chapter 37 ends with Joseph being sold into Egypt and the story of Joseph starts again in Chapter 39. It is both interesting and strange that Chapter 38 should be placed at this particular place in the Scriptures about a subject totally unrelated to the former and latter chapters.

�� We are told in verse 1 that Judah "went down from his brethren." This appears to have been an act of poor judgement such as later Dinah exhibited and was raped due to her poor judgement. We are not told the reason for Judah's poor judgement but it begins the history of conflict between Judah and his brothers which will continue till the later separation of the nation into the House of Israel and the House of Judah.

�� Judah, being separated from his family ties, could and did fall prey to the women in the land who were not his kinsmen according to the flesh. We are told that Judah: "...saw there a daughter of a certain Canaanite, whose name was Shuah; and he took her, and went in unto her." (Genesis 38:2)

This connection was contrary to the will of God and Judah should have known better from his upbringing if not the example of his fathers. His indiscretion or poor judgement in forming an alliance with the people in the land was a crime that produced bastard children. If this bastardization of Israel was to continue the chosen people would soon be assimilated into surrounding heathenism and would no longer be God's chosen people. Thus we see the necessity for God to separate His people from these heathen peoples. In any event Judah took a Canaanite for a wife and had three bastard sons {sons born from mixed seed}: Er, Onan, and Shelah. We say bastard sons because in the Old Testament a bastard was a child born from a mixed marriage with an Israelite and another race. (See Strong's Concordance) When the time came that Er, Judah's eldest son, was to have a wife, Judah obtained for him a woman named Tamar.

We are not told how or why, but Er was "wicked in the sight of the Lord" (Genesis 38:7) and the Lord slew him. We are not told what this wickedness was but the word used here also means evil and mischief and these definitions lead many to believe this evil had something to do with the law. Being raised by his Canaanite mother, he would have become indoctrinated in the ways of the pagan Canaanites - not the ways of the Lord.

According to the law, Onan, Er's younger brother, had to marry Tamar and raise up seed to his elder brother, Er. However, Onan was wicked also, and refused to do this, spilling his seed on the ground. (Genesis 38:9) This was probably because of the threat of losing the inheritance {that is, he would be raising up seed for his brother}, again, possibly from the training he received from his Canaanite mother.

In any event, God also slew Onan. Once again, according to the law Tamar should have been given to the third son, Shelah, that he might raise up sons for his elder brother. However, by this time Judah must have been just a little bit concerned. After all, Tamar had already been the wife of two of his sons and both had been killed by the Lord. Thus it is easy to understand his reluctance. Scripture tells us that Judah told Tamar to wait until Shelah was older; however, when he got older Judah failed or refused to give Tamar to Shelah. Tamar waited and waited but Shelah eventually took another for a wife, apparently with his father's blessing.

It is recorded in the 45th chapter of the book of Jasher that Tamar was a daughter from the genealogy of Elam, the son of Shem. That she was a daughter of Shem makes sense in view of what Judah said when he found out she was pregnant with child. Scripture records that it was reported to Judah that: "Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt."� (Genesis 38:7)

Stoning was the normal mode of capital punishment at that time in history - death by fire was not the normal procedure used to execute someone. Therefore it is significant that Judah pronounced death by burning for that was reserved for priests' daughters who brought disgrace upon the sacred office. The law states: "And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." (Leviticus 21:9) Since Judah pronounced death by fire we are able to conclude that she must have been the daughter of a priest. However, one would think that if she was, she should be aware of the law prohibiting mixed marriages. But perhaps that was not the case.

Tamar could have been imported from another geographical area as was Rebecca for Isaac. Thus at the time of her arrival and marriage to Er and Onan she could have been unaware of the covenant God had made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel. Not being aware of the covenant she would not know that the two men she married were half Canaanite and half Israelite and not legitimate heirs to the promise.

By the time Shelah had taken another wife, Tamar was probably educated in the covenant relationship with God and realized that even if she was given to Shelah, any sons from that union would not produce a bloodline heir. This is about the only logical reason for her to play the harlot, entrapping Judah to become the father of her children (Pharez and Zerah) at the risk of being put to fiery death. It would also partially explain Judah's response when he found out that he was the father and stated: "She is more righteous than I; forasmuch as I gave her not to Shelah my son." (Genesis 38:26)

Although Judah may not have totally understood or admitted that his marriage to a Canaanite was in violation of the law, he is, at least, acknowledging that Tamar should have been the mother of children of the birthright. He must have understood this birthright problem sooner or later, as the scepter was not passed to Shelah, Judah's third and only surviving son from Shuah, but to Judah's firstborn son from Tamar who was named Pharez. This is evidenced by the fact that Pharez's name appears in the genealogies of Christ in Matthew 1:3 and Luke 3:23.

The union of Judah with Tamar produced the twin births of Pharez and Zerah, and once again Judah had three sons: 1). Shelah, who was a bastard {� Canaanite & � of Judah} by his Canaanite wife; 2). Pharez; and 3). Zerah, the latter two both from Tamar. Pharez and Zerah being the sons of Judah, the son of Jacob/Israel, and Tamar the daughter of the genealogy of Shem, were full-blooded Israelites even though they were born out of wedlock. The whole story is recorded in Genesis 38. These births produced three descendant lines from Judah which we will call Pharez-Judah, Zerah-Judah, and Shelah-Judah. The question now becomes, what happened to the three descendants of Judah: Pharez, Zerah and Shelah? It will simply be stated at this point in the study that Pharez and Zerah were children of the promise whereas Shelah was a child of the flesh and destined to become the father of the Pharisees. This study will not be concerned with Pharez and Zerah - only the family of Shelah will be addressed.

�� Shelah-Judah

We need to keep in mind the fact that a strict genealogy was kept on each tribe. Even though Shelah was a bastard son of Judah, his genealogy is given in Scripture and his descendants can be traced to the city of Elath. In Chronicles it is recorded:

"The sons of Judah; Er, and Onan, and Shelah: which three were born unto him of the daughter of Shua the Canaanite.� And Er, the firstborn of Judah, was evil in the sight of the LORD; and he slew him. And Tamar his daughter in law bare him Pharez and Zerah. All the sons of Judah were five. The sons of Pharez; Hezron, and Hamul. And the sons of Zerah; Zimri, and Ethan, and Heman, and Calcol, and Dara: five of them in all. And the sons of Carmi; Achar, the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed. And the sons of Ethan; Azariah." (1 Chronicles)

Verse 3 is unusual, as once a name is dropped from the promised seed line it usually does not appear in later genealogies. For example the descendants of Cain do not appear in the genealogies of Adam in Genesis, Chapter 5, or Matthew 1 or Luke 3. It is difficult to determine exactly when the Book of Chronicles was written, however verse 1 of chapter 9 states:

"So all Israel were reckoned by genealogies; and, behold, they were written in the book of the kings of Israel and Judah, who were carried away to Babylon for their transgression." (1 Chronicles 9:1)

Since the first 8 chapters deal with the genealogies of Adam to this statement in verse 1 of chapter 9, which refers to the Babylonian captivity, it seems apparent that this portion of Chronicles was not recorded until sometime after the Babylonian captivity (600 B.C.) - perhaps by Ezra or Nehemiah.

Again, all of Judah's sons must be important or they would not be recorded in Scripture, especially since the descendants of Shelah were not children of the promise. It should be noted that verses 5 and 6 list the descendants of Pharez and Zerah, and verse 8 begins with Ethan, a son of Zerah.

What is missing here are the sons of Shelah. But verse 7 seems to be completely out of place as it lists the genealogy of a person named "Carmi."

Carmi is not one of the five sons of Judah, nor is he listed in the Genealogies of Pharez or Zerah. The name also appears in 1 Chr. 4:1, but it is still unclear whose son he was. However, it is most interesting that his son "Achar" is referred to as "the troubler of Israel, who transgressed in the thing accursed." (You can read the story about the thing accursed in Joshua 6:18) While it appears impossible to prove it, it is suggested that "Carmi" and his son "Achar," the troubler of Israel, were in the genealogy of Shelah.

We mentioned that these names were also listed in Chronicles, chapter 4, as follows: "The sons of Shelah the son of Judah were, Er the father of Lecah, and laadah the father of Maresbah, and the families of the house of them that wrought fine linen, of the house of Ashbea, And Jokim, and the men of Chozeba, and Joash, and Saraph, who had the dominion in Moab, and Jashubilehem. And these are ancient things. These were the potters, and those that dwelt among plants and hedges; thee they dwell with the king for his work." (1 Chronicles 4:21-23)

Again there is no mention of "Carmi" nor his son "Achar," but her we do have a reference to these descendants of Shelah being "men of Chozeba." Chozeba was a town in southwestern Judah and is also the town of Chezib of Gen. 38:5 and Achzib of Joshua 15:44. The words Chezib, Achzib or Chozeba mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "failing." It is also interesting that Shelah-Judah was born in Chezib (Genesis 38:5) and it appears that his descendants centuries later inherited this same city.

In Joshua we find that: "This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah by their families; even to the border of Edom the wilderness of Zin southward was the utter most part of the south coast. And Keilab, and Achzib, and Mareshah; nine cities with their villages." (Joshua 15: 1, 44) Thus we see that the town of "Achzib" was given to some descendants of Judah. Achzib or Chozeba was located in the valley of Elath. ELATH WAS IN OLD EDOM in the valley of Elath and north of Adullum. The word "Adullum" should ring a bell as that was the place where Judah went down from his brothers and took a Canaanite for a wife. This was on the extreme southern border of the Southern Kingdom of Judah at the northern end of the Gulf of Aquabah.

In fact most scholars seem to be in agreement that this area was actually outside the land inherited by Judah. This would make some sense as we know that a bastard could not even enter the congregation, even unto the tenth generation; (Deuteronomy 23:2) therefore it would also make sense that these Shelahites, being bastards, could not inherit land belonging to the children of the promise.

But this does not mean that they could not be given land on the southern border of Judah. The city of Elath was next to Ezion-geber, which would later become Solomon's seaport. Remember now that these Shelahites are � Canaanite, and the word Canaanite is defined in Strong's Concordance as merchants and traders. Doesn't it seem logical that merchants and traders would congregate in the cities, and especially in and around a busy seaport where they could engage in trade, commerce, and industry?

There is another reference to this city named "Achzib" in the Book of Micah where it states: "The house of Achzib shall be a lie to the kings of Israel." (Micah 1:14)

Is it just a coincidence that Shelah was born at "Chezib" which is basically the same word as Achzib? Is it coincidence that the word "Achzib so closely resembles and has the same meaning as "Achar," the troubler of Israel? Remember these words mean "lying," "deceptive," "disappointing," or "falling." Was it not a lie that Shelah was a true child of the promise? Would not their existence next to and/or as a part of Israel make any claim they would make as being a descendant of Abraham, (John 8) entitled to receive the promises, a lie or at the least a clever deception?

Jews From Elath

Elath or Eloth was a part of the land of Edom belonging to the descendants of Esau who were called Edomites an later Idumeans. Apparently Elath and Ezion-geber came under the control of Israel in 1040 B.C. by David's conquest of Edom as recorded in 2 Samuel 8:13-14. This land is also mentioned as being under the rule of Solomon in approximately 1000 B.C.(1 Kings 9:26; 2 Chronicles 8:17) The land passed back into Edomite control in 890 B.C. during the days of Jehoarm, king of Judah. (2 Kings 8:20-22) 80 years later in 810 B.C., the city of Elath was rebuilt� under the kingship of Azariah or Uszziah.(2 Kings 14:21-22 and 2 Chr. 26:1-2) This historical background brings us to the time of the "Jews from Elath" as recorded in 2 Kings, Chapter 16, which states: "In the seventeenth year of Pekah the son of Remaliah Ahaz the son of Jotham king of Judah began to reign. Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to war; and they besieged Ahaz, but could over come him. At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath..." (2 Kings 16:1, 5-6)

Keep in mind that the time frame is approximately 750 B.C., which is around 200 years after the split of Israel into the Houses of Judah and Israel in 975 B.C., and just before the beginning of the Assyrian captivity in 721-745 B.C. By this time Jotham was the king of Judah {the two southern tribes of Judah and Benjamin}, and Pekah was the king of Israel {the 10 northern tribes}.It is the king of Syria, and Pekah, the king of Israel {not Judah}, who formed an alliance and went� to war against the House of Judah. During that war they were unable to take Jerusalem, but Rezin, king of Syria, was able to recover the city of Elath and "drave the Jews from Elath."

As previously stated, Elath was far south of the area inherited by Judah and was given to Shelah as an inheritance. Again this was probably done because as a bastard, he could not enter the congregation of Israel nor inherit with the children of Israel. Remember, these people were part Canaanite, and in Strong's Concordance the word "Canaanite" means merchants and traders. Merchants cannot be merchants except in populated areas and therefore would have a propensity to migrate towards the cities, so it is logical to conclude that they were the ones who resided in Elath and were driven there-from.

It was from this area called Elath, and this area alone, that Rezin "drave the Jews." Ahaz, king of Judah {Southern Kingdom}, was still in Jerusalem and was never defeated nor was he driven anywhere. Pekah, king of Israel {Northern Kingdom}, apparently returned home. Therefore, whatever "Jews" were driven from Elath were only a small portion of people located South of Judah - not all of the House of Judah, and none of the House of Israel. Therefore, the word "Jews," as used in this verse does not include any people from the House of Israel and probably none from the House of Judah. This limits the use of the word "Jew" in the Old Testament to a very small group of people who resided in the town of Elath, who were most likely descendants of Shelah.

Scripture does not tell us where these so-called "Jews from Elath" went after being driven from Elath, but being traders and merchants they would be city dwellers, and it is probably safe to assume that they moved north to the walled city of Jerusalem. After Rezin "drave the Jews" from Elath the area was again populated but this time by Edomites.

The word "Jews" is used for the first time in Scripture in the King James Authorized (KJA) version in this verse. If you own a 1592 copy of the Geneva Bible, or a 1611 King James version and will open it to this verse you will not find the word "Jew."

According to the Jewish Encyclopedia: "Up to the seventeenth century this word was spelled in the Middle English in various ways:...Ieue, Ieu, Iwe, Iewe, Iue... corresponding to the Hebrew...a gentile adjective from the proper name 'Judah' seemingly never a;;lied to member of the tribe {of Judah}, however, but to members of the nationality inhabiting the South of Palestine. It appears to have been afterward extended to apply to Israelites in the North..." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VII, p. 174)

If you will once again look at 2 Kings 16:6 in an original 1611 KJA version, you will find one of these words - You will not find the word "Jews."� And probably more interesting in this quote is the fact that the word "Ieue,' etc., was never applied to the tribe of Judah but to a nationality "inhabiting the South of Palestine." The encyclopedia fails to point out who these people were but it has previously been shown that the land South of Judah was occupied by the Shelah branch of Judah - a bastard son from his Canaanite wife.

According to Biblical scholar Alexander Schiffner: "The first reference to any Jews in Scripture is found in 2 Kings 16:6. The name was applied TO A REMNANT OF JUDAH�S DESCENDANTS OF THE SHELAH BRANCH. Shelah-Judah was born in Chezib (Genesis 38:5) and his descendants centuries later inherited his territory. (Joshua 15:1, 13, 44) REMEMBER A STRICT GENEALOGY WAS KEPT OF EACH TRIBE AND BRANCH. (2 Kings 16:5-7; 1 Chr. 2:1-15; Ezra 2:59, 62, 64; Matthew 1:1-25; Luke 3:23-38)

Chezib, (Genesis 38:5)� Achzib (Joshua 15:44) and Chozeba (1 Chronicles 4:21-22) refer to one and the same place. it was a town in the lowlands of western Judah and was given to the Shelah branch of Judah for their inheritance. (Joshua 15:1, 13, 44) This then was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah BY THEIR FAMILIES.' The word Chezib, Achzh or Chozeba means 'deceptive' or 'failing' and the place received its name from a winter spring or brook, which failed in the summer heat. {Symbolic of the failing of the Shela branch of Judah under trial}. It was the place where Judah was at the time of the birth of his half-breed son, Shelah. (Genesis 38:5)

In 1 Chronicles 4:21-22 it is called 'Chozeba.' it is in the valley of Elath and north of Addulum. Note 2 Kings 16:6 - the first reference to this branch of Judah; 'the Jews of Elath.' The Jews are the remnant' of 'Yehudim' of Judah. This branch of Judah rejected Christ. They are the open witness, 'The shew of their countenance doth witness against them - their tongue and their doings are against the Lord - they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not.' (Isaiah 3:8-9)." (From the "Five Sons of Judah," written by Alexander Schiffner, editor, Prophetic Herald, Spokane, WA)

James Fox, the author of several books, wrote of Shelah: "The reason for the divergence of facial appearance between the true Hebrew or Abrahamic White-Race Men, and the Jews, is that the patriarch Judah disobeyed God's will at the outset by marrying a Canaanitish woman called 'Shua' (Genesis 38:1-5), producing descendants all half-castes, later known as 'Jews.' (The Glorious Majesty of His Kingdom, J.S. Fox, 1 st ed., 1958, p. 10)

According to these authors, the "Jews of Elath" were the 'remnant' of 'Yehudim' of Judah, and verses 5 and 6 of 2 Kings, chapter 16, are the first reference to the mongrel Canaanite branch of Judah where they are referred to as "Jews." (Actually "Ieue," etc., in the 1611 KJA Version) The use of the word "Jews" in 2 Kings 16:6 rather than "Ieues" has added to the misconception that the Jews are all of Israel, when it is obvious that in this verse only a small group of people were implied - those living in Elath - which omits the entire northern ten tribes and the majority of the House of Judah.

The major problem with the Jew in Any-town USA's conversations is that the word carries so many definitions and so few seem very want to know fully what he is really talking about or referring to when he uses the term "Jew."

Most so-called (c)hristians of today, even those who are of Israelite stock, and are not aware of it, don't want to hear the words, concepts and truth contained in this study. Those of Israelite heritage may find some fulfillment in Jeremiah's words, found in Chapter 5:30-31 which sound all too familiar: "A wonderful and horrible thing is committed in the land; The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and my people love to have it so; and what will ye do in the end thereof?"

Some think that the King James Version is the only correct version. This version was written in 1611, but it for sure contains some errors. Look at John 4:22, where Christ tells the woman of Samari: "Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship; for salvation is of the Jews." This is a primary script for the problem we face today, for any discerning true Christian Israelite should see this is not a true statement, but rather a false one based on its own merits.

Any Christian should realize the truth that SALVATION DOES NOT COME THROUGH ANY RELIGION, BUT THROUGH JESUS THE CHRIST.

The Ferrar Fenton version, which comes from the original Greek text, says: "the salvation comes from among the Judeans." Now which way should we Israelites come to know fully the truth of this verse? If Christ came out of the region of Judea and the Hebrew tribe of Judah, then He is the way, the truth and the life. (John 14:6) Paul planted the first Christian Church in Corinth, teaching that Christ is the Salvation for HIS people. But we hear the resounding common statement, but Pontius Pilate said that He was "King of the Jews." But did he really say that as most, deceived, Judeo-Christians believe?

There are some who say, "Thank God! My Savior Was Not A Jew!," that there is a historical record found in the Achoko Volume in the Congressional Library in Washington, D.C., containing an official record of one of Pilate's correspondences.

He states on pages 137-139: "The Archoko record gives an eye-witness account from Pontius Pilate, who testified that Jesus did not look like, or act like a Jew. Here is the account as it appears in this official record: To Tiberius Caesar, Emperor of Rome Noble Sovereign, Greetings: '...Among various rumors that came to my ears there was one in particular that came to my attention. A young man it was said, had appeared in Galilee, preaching with noble unction a new law in the name of the God who sent him. At first I was apprehensive that his design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled.

Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day in passing by the place of Siloe, where there was a great concourse of people, I observed in the midst of the group a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus.

This I could easily have suspected, so great was the difference between him and those who listened to him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance an almost celestial aspect. He appeared to be about thirty years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between he and his hearers with their black beards and tawny complexions!...

Never have I heard in the words of the philosopher, anything that can compare with the maxims of Jesus. One of the rebellious Jews, so numerous in Jerusalem, asked Jesus if it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar, he replied: 'Render unto Caesar the things which belong to Caesar, and unto God the things which are God's...

I wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with him at the praetorium and he came."� (Think now for a moment on your own, without having some Judeo-Christian preacher tell you that this is fantasy. What would be so strange in this? Even though this meeting is not recorded in the Gospels, we know that most of what Christ did during His three years of public ministry was never recorded.� (See John 21:25)

Pilate's report to Caesar continues: 'You know that in my veins flows the Spanish mixed with Roman blood...When the Nazarene made his appearance, I was walking in my basilic, and my feet seemed fastened with an iron hand to the marble pavement, and I trembled in every limb as does a guilty culprit, though the Nazarene was as calm as innocence itself. When he came up to me and stopped, and by a signal sign seemed to say to me, 'I am here!' though he spoke not a word. For some time I contemplated with admiration and awe, this extraordinary type of man, a type unknown to our numerous painter...There was nothing about him that was repelling in its character and I felt awed and tremulous to approach him.

Jesus, I said to him at last, 'Jesus of Nazareth, for the last three years I have granted you ample freedom of speech (It is not recorded anywhere, either in the Gospels, or Roman historical records, that the Romans ever attempted to suppress Christ's ministry) nor do I regret it. Your words are those of a sage. I know not whether you have read Socrates or Plato, but this I know, there is in your discourse a majestic simplicity that elevates you above those philosophers...'your blood shall not be spilled,' I said, with deep emotion, 'you are more precious in my estimation on account of your wisdom than all the turbulent and proud Pharisees who abuse the freedoms granted them by Rome. They conspire against Caesar, and convert his bounty into fear, impressing on the unlearned, that Caesar is a tyrant who seeks their ruin...i will protect you against them. My praetorium shall be an asylum both day and night.' I am our obedient servant, Pontius Pilate."

You can accept this letter, as we do, since it makes sense, or dismiss it as most of your Judeo-Christian preachers and church Bible scholars will do. But, think for yourself! Doesn't it make sense to you that the Jews would try and suppress this truth? There is one point in the aforementioned passage of Acts 18 that most folks seem to over look. Paul came to Corinth and planted the first Christian Church with the True Israelite inhabitants who apparently were worshiping Judaism out of ignorance. With little success at first, but a s a rational, as well as spiritual preacher, Paul reasoned with all Jews (Both non-Israel and True Israel) not with force or violence but by fair arguing he won some over to his own opinion.

In verses 9 and 10, Paul had a vision. Each of us ought to know fully this vision and effectively grasp its meaning in our lives, today, as White Israelites. We read in the King James Version: "Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace: For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city."

We should renew our own commission "be not afraid of the Jews."� That means be not afraid of the magistrates of the city, county, state or federal for they have no power against you but what is given them from above. We are pleading, like Paul, the cause of heaven and we need to do it boldly. We should not be afraid of their words, nor dismayed at their quirky looks and fraudulent judgments. At the right times we should speak, and not hold back.

We should let no opportunity slip by without speaking in defense of Christianity and in opposition to the Jews and their hideous Judaism. We should not speak shyly or with caution, but up front, plainly and fully and with courage. We need to speak out in the liberty of the Spirit that becomes an ambassador for Christ.

Paul did speak up and the "Jews" rose up against him, but the Lord went to court with him and threw out his accusers by the hand of a person in high position.

In this city that "Jews flocked to" you must remember that Corinth was a very profane and wicked city, full of impurity of all kinds and idols of all kinds. Yet in this great evil heap, with all its contempt for White Christian Israelites, i.e., the wheat, it sure seemed to human knowledge that the chaff would over come, but in this ore that seems to be all dross, there is gold. Even in Corinth, Christ had much people. So we need to unseat this "fear of the Jews syndrome" and expose their evil, wicked plot to destroy all Christianity. This needs to be done today, before time runs out. Have you come "to know fully" the truth about Judaism and Christianity?

In verses 12-17 of Acts, Chapter 18, we find another of Paul's many trying times with the Jews {worshipers of Judaism - Traditions of the Elders}. Paul is accused by member of this Jewish sect before the Roman Governor, Gallio. Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, that is he was the proconsul for this province of the Roman Empire. In modern words this Jewish sect filed a frivolous complaint in a Roman court against Paul and Gallio was to be the presiding judge.

Paul was rudely apprehended with violence and fury in broad day light. These Jews cared little for public peace and justice, so they made insurrection. To me this means that they used disturbance of the public peace and force, i.e., vi et armis, to apprehend Paul. They had little concern for his welfare or the safety of others. They, as they do today, already had pronounced Paul guilty in the media of their day. Just as they had at the trials of Christ. These enforcers hurried Paul off, probably in chains, to the judgment seat before Gallio. Paul was allowed no time, whatsoever, to prepare for his trial. Sounds like a familiar patriot scenario of arrest today, does it not?

Paul, much like Christ, is falsely accused before Gallio (v. 13). What was the formal charge? "This fellow persuades men to worship God contrary to the law." My what a crime! Paul must have been "anti-Semitic." These Jews could not charge him with persuading men not to worship God at all or to worship other Gods. (See Deut. 13:2) So the only trumped up charge they could accuse him of breaking was "that he was attempting to persuade men to worship God in a way contrary to the law."

Now what in the world would you consider as being "contrary to the law." Does this sound a familiar alarm today? Sure it does! If you act "contrary" to the "law" of Title 26, your state motor vehicle "laws," or your property appraisal and collection "laws," see how fast you will be jerked up before some judgment seat and be made to pay for your "crimes."

The Romans allowed the Jews in all their provinces the observation of their own law. But, remember in verse 2, it is recorded, that Jews had been commanded to leave Rome. I wonder why? Did they have a Jewish problem in the society of that day?

But who would enforce Jewish law in such a city of idols and corruption? Should all persons therefore be prosecuted as criminals, who worship God in any other way than that prescribed by the tenets of Judaism? The big question before Gallio is, "Does Roman toleration include a power of imposition?" Could Roman law force Paul or anyone to stop practicing any activity contrary to what the "Jews" call their law?

You must remember that the Jewish religion hates Christ and all goyium, i.e., White People. This is why the Jews of Corinth were so uptight against Paul for he was preaching Salvation through the Blood of Christ. This tenet of Israelite Christianity is unacceptable then and today for the Jews of this Pharisaism, i.e., Judaism.

How the so-called (c)hristian of today can use the term Judeo-Christian is a gigantic mystery to many. When will the little "c" Christians come "to know fully" that these are two diametrically opposites. Just like black against white, not verses cold and light verses dark?

Paul was charged unjustly. Are White Israelite patriots ever charged unjustly, for violating some phantom law? Do they have ample opportunity to be tried in courts of certified common law venue where justice, fairness and real law prevails? Rarely, if ever, not since about 1861 have justice been had in such courts.

Paul had a different circumstance at this hearing than most patriots are usually afforded today. Gallio had a sweet nature and was sympathetic and apparently a stickler for the letter of the law. For Gallio reasoned that the Jews in their own law, had in it a promise of a Prophet whom God would raise up to them, and they should listen to him and/or hear him.

And Paul only persuaded people to believe in this Prophet, who was to come and to hear Him, which was all according "to the law." For this Prophet came not to destroy the law, but to fulfill it. Paul's teaching contradicted Judaism, partially the idea of Christ being the Messiah.

At the first hearing or, perhaps, a better way to put it, is no hearing at all, for Gallio dismisses the cause and states that he will not take any cognizance of the issue, at all (v. 14-15). Paul was just about to make his defense which he apparently became so eloquently accustomed to doing. (See Acts 24-26) Paul was about to present evidence that would prove that he did not teach men to worship contrary to the law, when Gallio rules that he will not be troubled with this case and will not pass sentence upon it nor even allow himself the trouble of examining it.

He, Gallio, was very capable of doing the part of a judge in any matter properly placed before him to take cognizance of. He said to the Jews, that were the prosecutors, "If it were a matter of wrong, or wicked lewdness," if you could charge the prisoner with theft or fraud, with murder or plunder or any act of immorality.

We would be bound to hear you with your complaint or accusations. Just because these Jews were loud and noisy and rude petitioners of this court, there was no valid reason to give them a hearing in any obvious unjust case. If the petitioner's cause had been just then it would have been the duty of Gallio or any magistrate to cause justice to be done. That means redress the injured party to be afforded his right(s).

Then Gallio would pass comment and give the court's sentence upon the party causing the injury. If the complaint had merits even though not made with all the decorum of a judicial case, Gallio would have felt bound to hear the petitioner, no matter how rude and noisy they were in presenting it. But Gallio will not and did not allow these Jews a chance to make a complaint to him for something not within his jurisdiction (v. 15). Oh, if we had a few judges and magistrates today of the caliber to determine rightful venue and jurisdiction. This Jude would not allow the Jews to burden his patience by hearing it nor would he burden his conscience with passing judgment upon this matter. And when the Jews hollered and screamed more and more, he found them in contempt of "his" court and drove them from the seat of judgment (v. 16). Then he called the next cause. Bravo, Bravo!!!

This passage makes one think that Gallio conducted himself in a dignified and honorable mode. If only we had judges today who possessed this character. He did not want to, nor even pretend to judge spiritual things that he did not really understand. This judgment would be left to the Jews in matters regarding their religion of Judaism. Yet he would not allow, the Jews to make him {Gallio} their instrument or tool of malice and pretend to pass judgment against Paul {he was following the example Pilate showed when he washed his hands of the matter concerning Christ, and told the Jews to do what they would, but he would have nothing to do with killing Christ}. Gallio looked upon this matter as not within his venue and jurisdiction and he did not intend to meddle in this affair anymore than a dismissal.

Gallio seems to have understood the law better than he did religious and/or worship. Whether Christ was the Messiah and of God, was not the issue before his court and he felt no need to take "judicial notice" of the law of any God. Whether the Gospel teachings of Christ the Messiah was of divine origin or not as these were not questions of words and names (v. 15) as Gallio scornfully and profanely called them. These are valid concerns for Christianity and Judaism but not for a Roman Court, and he felt because of his ignorance of Judaism and Christianity, he did not want to inquire very far into them.

"In 1923, TROTSKY, and LUNATCHARSKY PRESIDED OVER A MEETING IN MOSCOW ORGANIZED by the propaganda section of the Communist party TO JUDGE GOD. Five thousand men of the Red Army were present. THE ACCUSED [Almighty God] WAS FOUND GUILTY OF VARIOUS IGNOMINIOUS ACTS AND HAVING HAD THE AUDACITY TO FAIL TO APPEAR, HE [God] WAS CONDEMNED IN DEFAULT." (Ost Express, January 30, 1923. Cf. Berliner Taegeblatt May 1, 1923. See the details of the Bolshevist struggle against religion in The Assault of Heaven by A. Valentinoff (Boswell); The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 144‑145)

Then like today, a great contempt was placed upon the court by the Jews and/or Greeks. For they took Sosthenes and beat him in open contempt of Gallio's dismissal of the case against Paul. Look what happened, recently, in California and other places. If the Jews of Judaism can't have it their way against Christians, they will take it out in some other manner. They were enraged against not only Paul, but also against Gallio and his court of justice. They wanted to be their own prosecutors and if Gallio would not rule in their favor, they would become their own judges and executioners. Apparently the contempt showed what the Jews did, and it did not come before Gallio's court. Gallio cared for none of those things (v. 17) is a puzzling concept of a man who somehow tried to help Paul for whatever reason.

If we can presume that this means that this judge is calloused against the things that bad men do to good men, except when brought into his jurisdiction, we find a flaw in the character of this Roman judge. As a judge he should have protected Sosthenes as much as he did Paul. But the facts point out that he did not. This kind of indifference carries just-us attitudes that compliments tyranny. His do-nothing attitude is evidence of one of Isaiah's writings: "that truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter, and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey."� (Isaiah 59:14-15) Sounds like modern day news reporting, doesn't it?

Our courts today appear to adhere to the concept that justice somehow means just-us and all outsiders (non-Jews) will fall in line under its power to be administered by our controlled and/or deceived judges. So ask yourself, is there a "Jew" word problem; or a society "Jew" problem? Can I come "to know fully" the difference between Jewish Judaism and real true Israelite Christianity:

The mixing of the two religions don't mix anymore than trying to mix oil and water. Those who are truly seeking truth have at one time or another had a man/woman sent from God to witness of the Identity Movement and usually they simply ignored it the first time. Then God in His wisdom would send another.

This time the messenger would be so convincing that the Truth Seeker would set out to prove him {or the material if it were a book or some other written information} wrong. To prove it a false concept. Then they found that the more they studied and learned they found that they have been lied to and deceived by a lot of so-called Christian folks. They came to believe that this was more out of ignorance on their part than deliberate, for they are deceived and content, most of them, to live therein.

But when the Lord reveals much more of His Word to them, they decide to re-educate themselves and find that the process is a never ending one. Because as they learn more, God will reveal more - making the Scriptures "seek and ye shall find" ever more true. They soon found that the Identity teachings were more on line than fundamental Christianity as taught in the churches, on TV and radio today.

It appears to them that the more they study, research and meditate, the more the world pulls at their time just to make ends meet. So they know how the world will pull at you as you attempt to learn the truth. The Jew today still works as they did in the hay-day of Corinth to keep True Israelite Christians so busy that they don't have time to stop and smell the roses and find real truth.

It will only be with the help of YHWH {Almighty God} that the financial prison most of us fined ourselves caged in, will open and free us, swinging open the doors of liberty. Such liberty produces the time and resources needed to wage successful campaigns against the onslaught of deceit, lies and deception in todays (c)hristian parishes or folds. Corinthians were famous for their cleverness, inventiveness and artistic sense. They prided themselves in the embellishment of their city and in the adornment of their heathen temples. But, not a single Corinthian ever distinguished himself in literature. Sound Jewish?

The Adamic Man, White People of Israelite, i.e., Hebrew stock, are the chosen seed of Israel's race. They need to come to know fully who they are, and what they are. Their heritage demands fulfillment here in this American land, the New Jerusalem as spoken of in the Scriptures. Jesus the Christ, the Salvation of Israel, did not come to the Jewish people. in fact He came against almost everything they stand for. He came to the White Israelites, Matthew 15:24 states: "I am not sent, but TO THE LOST SHEEP of the House of Israel." (See James 1:1; John 10:14 & 27)

Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following: "STRICTLY SPEAKING IT IS INCORRECT TO CALL AN ANCIENT ISRAELITE A �JEW� OR TO CALL A CONTEMPORARY JEW AN ISRAELITE OR A HEBREW." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3)

The World Book omits any reference to the Jews, but under the word Semite it states: "Semite...Semites are those who speak Semitic languages. In this sense the ancient Hebrews, Assyrians, Phoenicians, and Carthaginians were Semites. The Arabs and some Ethiopians are modern Semitic‑speaking people. Modern Jews are often called Semites, but this name properly applies ONLY TO THOSE WHO USE THE HEBREW LANGUAGE. The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, BUT THEY HAVE MIXED WITH OTHER PEOPLES UNTIL THE NAME �JEW� HAS LOST ALL RACIAL MEANING." Who are the Jews and where is the proof of their existence today? The Jewish Encyclopedia, states: "EDOM IS IN MODERN JEWRY." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41) There is only one nation in the world that can prove ancestral ties with Edom, and the Jews themselves claim that dubious distinction. To help answer this question further, we refer you to the excellent book (which should be required reading) entitled "Who is Esau-Edom?" (Bby Charles A. Weisman, copyright 1991, 2nd Edition: May 1992, paperback 128 pages, approx. $8.00. Order from Weisman Publications, %11751 W. Riverhills Dr. #107D, Burnsville, MN 55337) This little book cover the life, history, genealogy, prophecy, predestination and modern identity of Biblical Esau.

Another excellent booklet by Pastor Bob Hallstrom is entitled "Who Are the Pharisees, and the "Jew" Are they Israel?" (Order from: The Gospel of the Kingdom, % P.O. Box 9411, Boise, Idaho 83707, Phone (208) 375-3425) If you don't understand the information in these two books, you will be unable to properly understand the central focus of the Scripture. The Dake Annotated Reference Bible, while being a scholarly effort, it provides annotations and perspectives which suffer from the authors lack of an informed basis regarding the true identity of the "Jews," Pharisees, Hebrews, and Israel. In the last century Bram Stocker wrote the book Dracula and in his book he was describing the Jews from the very beginning of their drive to "occupy" our bodies and souls from the very beginning of the Luciferian infiltration of our society.

�� Chapter Two

�� Academia Proves

�� Jews Are Not Israel

There are hundreds of books {most of which are Jewish Encyclopedias and history books} available for study, which prove that over 90% of the JEWS OF THE WORLD ARE NOT A SEMITIC PEOPLE, but few people other than historians ever bother to read them. Following are just a few: "Chazars: A people of Turkish origin whose life and history are interwoven with the very beginnings of the HISTORY OF THE JEWS OF RUSSIA...driven on by the nomadic tribes of the steppes and by their own desire for plunder and revenge...In the second half of the sixth century the Chazars moved westward...The kingdom of the Chazars was firmly established in most of south Russia long before the foundation of the Russian monarchy by the Varangians...At this time the kingdom of the Chazars stood at the height of its power and was constantly at war...At the end of the eighth century...the chagan (king) of the Chazars and his grandees, TOGETHER WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF HIS HEATHEN PEOPLE, EMBRACED THE JEWISH RELITION." (Benjamin Freeman, Facts Are Facts)

It is because of the teachings of you Judeo-Christian ministers that the Jews have all but destroyed our once great republic and changed into a damnable democracy. Do you teach these things because you fear the Jews more than God? Or is it more a money game, you can�t get as much money as normal because when people find out that the teachings about the Jews is false?

[[Omitted portion for copyright reasons]] -- See http://www.khazaria.com/khazar-diaspora.html

In Genesis 3:15 we are told: "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed ..." The important thing to note is that there are two lines of descent here - the seed or descendants of the serpent (Satan), and the other, the descendants of Eve (the woman). The word "woman" is used later in Scripture to describe those who comprise God's Kingdom. Satan, also, has a kingdom, for it says in Luke 11:18: "If Satan also be divided against himself, how shall his kingdom stand?" The subjects of his kingdom are obviously the seed of the serpent or Satan. Christ recognized the existence of this evil line when he blamed them for all the blood shed beginning with the slaying of Abel. (Matthew 23:35)

There are two kingdoms in the world today - the kingdom of good and the kingdom of evil; the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Satan. We know that believers in Christ, or Christians, comprise God's Kingdom, but who are Satan's subjects? Let us see if we can identify them from the Scriptures.

There are a people or race which the Bible speaks of in various places as "enemies" of God, "filthy dreamers," "devils," "serpents," "enemies of all righteousness," "princes of this world," "those that are lost," "vipers," and "contrary to all men." The blood of the true Judahite, who originally numbered little more than 40,000 had become thoroughly obliterated by the amalgamation of the people of Ashdod, Moabites, Ammonites, Perizzites, Jebuzites, Canaanites, Egyptians, Hittites, Amorites, Amalekites and finally Idumeans. It was the Idumeans who took control of the country of Judea and furnished the Herodian line of rulers.

Following is how the Pharisees came to be in "Moses' Seat" when Christ was born. They had many enemies at the beginning and the Sadducees were the first of these enemies. To see a "small" portion of the distortions of the Pharisees on the Bible, in eliminating the Chief Engineer, the God of Intelligence, planning, approachability is seen under the caption "History of the Pharisees," pages 665‑666, of the Jewish Encyclopedia.

Her brother, Simon ben Shetah, had been waiting for such an opportunity. The continued civil war resulted in the sons of Alexander Jannaeus, Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, in 63 B.C., going hat in hand to Pompey, Caesar's Roman General in Syria, asking him to invade Palestine and slaughter their respective opponents. This is how Rome happened to be in power when Christ was born. The full story can be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia under "Pharisees." "It is difficult to state at what time the Pharisees, as a party, arose, Josephus first mentions them in connection with Jonathan, the successor of Judas Maccabeus. (Josephas in his Ant. 13, 5:9)

Under John Hyracanus (135‑105 B.C.) they appear as a powerful party opposing the Sadducean proclivities of the king, who had formerly been a disciple of theirs, though the story as told by Josephus is unhistorical. (Ant. 13, 10:5; Comp. Jubilees, Book of, and Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs) The Hasmonean dynasty, with its worldly ambitions and aspirations, met with little support from the Pharisees, whose aim was the maintenance of a religious spirit in accordance with their interpretation of the Law.

Under Alexander Jannaeus (104‑78 B.C.) the conflict between the people, siding with the Pharisees, and the king became bitter and ended in carnage. (Ant. 13, 13:5; 14, 1:2) Under his window Salome Alexander (78‑69 B.C.), the Pharisees, led by Simeon ben Shetah, came to power; they obtained seats in the Sanhedrin, and that time was afterward regarded as the golden age, full of the blessing of heaven. But the bloody vengeance they took upon the Sadducees led to a terrible reaction, and under Aristobulus (69‑63 B.C.) The Sadducees regained their power. (Ant. 13, 16:2; 14, 1:2)

Amidst the bitter struggle which ensued, the Pharisees appeared before Pompey asking him to interfere and restore the old priesthood while abolishing the royalty of the Hasmoneans altogether. (Ant. 14, 3:2)

The defilement of the Temple by Pompey was regarded by the Pharisees as a divine punishment of Sadducean misrule. After the national independence had been lost, the Pharisees gained in influence while the star of the Sadducees waned.

Herod found his chief opponents among the latter, and so he put the leaders of the Sanhedrin to death while endeavoring by a milder treatment to win the favor of the leaders of the Pharisees, who, through they refused to take the oath of allegiance, were otherwise friendly to him. (Ant. 14, 9:4; 15, 1:1; 10:4; 11:5‑6) Only when he provoked their indignation by his heathen proclivities did the Pharisees become his enemies and fall victims (4 B.C.) to his bloodthirstiness. (Ant. 17, 2:4; 6:2‑4) But the family of Boethus, whom Herod had raised to the high‑priesthood, revived the spirit of the Sadducees, and thenceforth the Pharisees again had them as antagonists; still, they no longer possessed their former power, as the people always sided with the Pharisees. (Ant. 18, 1:4)

In King Agrippa (41‑44 A.D.) the Pharisees had a supporter and friend, and with the destruction of the Temple, the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees.

Henceforth Jewish life was regulated by the teachings of the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older, priestly tradition. Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thoughts of the Jews for all the future."

Any Human characteristic such as Intelligence or Love is "obnoxious verbiage" when attributed to God, and was eliminated, explained away, and the shell kept for the Jews "shell game" of cheating the gullible Christian. Attributing Intelligence to God, is to the Jew an "anthropomor�phism," a big word for a pagan idea, the idea that humans alone are intelligent.

Judaism would best be described as a rite or compendium of rites, for, if one lends belief to the presentations of the Jewish lawgivers, one must bear in mind that they studied among the initiates of Babylon, and become the pupils of Chaldean magic who were the fathers of Voodooism, a name given to the magic practices and rites taught to the Babylonians by Saragon [Cain].

The closer one studies the history of the Jews, the clearer it appears that they are neither a religious entity nor a nation. The absolute failure of Zionism which has been a desperate effort on the part of certain international Jewish leaders to bind all the Jews of the world into a national entity, whose territory would have been Palestine, proves the futility of such an effort. Judaism is not a religion and the Jews are not a nation, but they are a sect with Judaism as a rite. The obligations and rules of the rite for the Jewish masses are contained in the Talmud and Schulchan Aruk, but the esoteric teachings for the higher initiates are to be found in the Cabala. Therein are contained the mysterious rites for evocations, the indications and keys to practices for conjuration of supernatural forces, the science of numbers, astrology, etc. Thus, all the vestiges of the ancient religion of Israel had been destroyed except certain ceremonial rites which were still allowed by the Idumeans. At this point the Jews and Idumeans merged and became as one. The Jewish Encyclopedia (1925 - edition) under "Edom" states, "from this time the Idumeans ceased to be a separate people..."

Since Jerusalem was destroyed in A.D. 70, the Jews have continued to absorb proselytes from all races. The ancient monuments presenting a physiognomy characteristic of the Hittites reveals the total eradication of Israelitish features. History proves that neither literally or spiritually can the modern Jew claim to be Abraham's descendants, and their claim to the Holy Land is therefore without foundation. The Pharisees and the Sadducees were Jews as we know. John recognized them for what they were when he said in Matthew 3:7: "Oh generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?" Our Lord enlarges on this when He excoriates the Jews in the 23rd chapter of Matthew and calls them hypocrites; "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" (Matthew 23:33) Here we find Christ confirming John's description of these people.

In John 8:44 Jesus describes the Jews in these words, "Ye [Jews] are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own for he is a liar and the father of it." This statement rules out any attempt to establish brotherhood or unity between Christians and Jews as there cannot be "brotherhood" where there are different fathers. Christians have God as their father and Jesus Himself says the Jews have Satan as their father.

We are told in 2 John 7, 9, 11: "For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and antichrist...Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed; for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds." Note this text well. It refers to the Jews who reject Christ. If we so much as wish them good luck, we are as bad as they are in the sight of God.

In Galatians 2:4 we are told, "And because of false brethren brought in unawares, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage..." Jude 1:4, 8 tells us: "For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ...Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities."

Someone, at this point, will always ask, "Doesn't the Bible say we are to love our enemies?" Yes, it does. We must be careful, however, not to love God�s enemies, for God will not hold us guiltless if we do. 2 Chronicles 19:2, "Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord."

The Babylonian Talmud, which is the Jewish holy book, contains the very things which Jude so severely condemns. Benjamin Freedman in his book "Facts are Facts" lists some of the things which Jude calls "speaking evil of dignities." They are as follows: Midrasch Talpioth (225) - Christians created to minister to Jews always. Iore Dea (153,2) - Jews must not associate with Christians. Abhodah Zorah (15b) suggests Christians have sex relations with animals. Iore Dea (198,48) clean female Jews contaminated on meeting Christians. Makkoth (7b) innocent of murder if intent was to kill a Christian. Sepher or Israel (177b) If Jew kills Christian, he commits no sin. Zohar (11,64b) Christian birth rate must be diminished materially. Orach Chaim (57,6a) Christians more to be pitied than sick pigs. Zohar 2 (64b) Christian isolators likened to cows and asses. Kethuboth (3b) The seed of a Christian is valued as seed of beast. Eben Haezer (44,8) marriages between Christians and Jews null. Zohar (1,286) Christian isolators are children of Eve's serpent. Rosch Haschannach (17b) Non-Jew souls go down to hell. Hilkoth Akum (ch.lx) forbidden to celebrate Easter and Christmas. Abhodah Zarah (78c) Christian feast days are despicable, vain and evil. Sanhedrin (58b) To strike a Jew is like slapping the face of God. Iore Dea (148,12h) hide hatred for Christians. Choschen Ham (183,7) keep what Christians overpays in error. Babha Kama (113b) It is permitted to deceive Christians. Babha Kama (113a) Jews may lie and perjure to condemn a Christian. Zohar (1,160a) Jews must always try to deceive Christians.

The above excerpts from the Talmud, as listed by Mr. Freedman, form a clear explanation of why the Bible calls them "filthy dreamers" and "turning the grace of God into lasciviousness" and that we are not to admit them into our home on pain of incurring God's displeasure. By their own writings they are condemned, speaking evil of dignities. Being mindful of the fact that Jesus informs us in John 8:44 that these people are the progeny of Satan, it is amazing how some so-called Christians go out of their way to cultivate their good will.

We are told in Acts 13:6,9, "And when they had gone through the Isle of Pathos, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Bar-Jesus...Then Saul, filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him, and said, 'O, full of all sublimity and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?'" Here Saul (Paul) identifies the Jew as a child of the devil and an enemy of all righteousness.

We can further identify them as "princes of the world" in John 14:30, "...for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me." John 16: 11, "...the prince of the world is judged." John 12:31, "Now is the judgment of this world, now shall the prince of this world be cast out." These texts refer to Satan as the Prince of this world and both Jesus and Paul refer to the Jews as children of the devil, therefore they are princes in Satan's realm.

The Jews, because of their hatred for Christ, made it difficult and dangerous for Him to carry on His work in Judea. John 11:7-8, "Then after that, saith He to His disciples, Let us go into Judea again. His disciples say unto Him, Master, the Jews of late sought to stone thee and goest thou thither again?" In Luke 4:43-44, Jesus said, "I must preach the Kingdom of God to other cities also for therefore am I sent. And He preached in the synagogues of Galilee."

In John 6:70-71; 7:1 we find these words, "Jesus answered them, Have I not chosen you twelve and one of you is a devil? He spake of Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, for it was he that should betray Him, being one of the twelve. After these things Jesus walked in Galilee, for He would not walk in Jewry because the Jews sought to kill Him." The only Judean Jew among Christ's disciples was Judas. The rest were Galileans. Judas came from a small town in Judea called Kerioth, and he was known as Ishkerioth or Iscariot meaning "man of Kerioth."

It is plain that His disciples did not consider themselves Jews of the type found in Judea or they would not have remonstrated with Him against going again to Judea because of fear that the Jews would stone Him. Indeed, the Jews themselves knew that Peter was not a Jew but a Galilean because of his accent for they said in Matthew 26:73, "surely thou art also one of them for thy speech betrayeth thee." Also mark 14:70, "surely thou art one of them for thou art a Galilean and thy speech agreeth thereto." It is clear that the Benjamites or Galileans were the ones who accepted Jesus and became Christians while the badly mongrelized people who called themselves Jews who resided for the most part in Judea, refused to accept Him.

Let us now take up the astounding admission by the Jews themselves that they are not of the chosen seed, or the "children of promise," which line descended from Abraham through Isaac and Jacob. John 8:33, "They {Jews} answered Him, We be Abraham's seed and were never in bondage to any man, how sayest thou that we shall be made free?" Here they plainly state they were never in bondage. God's elect, His Chosen People, were in bondage in Egypt. The House of Israel, or the ten tribes comprising the Northern Kingdom, were in bondage to Assyria and the House of Judah was in Bondage to Babylon, yet these Jews say they were never in bondage to any man!

Jesus replied to their claim that they were of the seed of Abraham in the 37th verse which says, "I know that ye {say ye} are Abraham's seed but ye seek to kill me because my word hath no place in you." This presents us with a dilemma. If these people were of the seed of Abraham as Jesus says, how does it happen that they were not in bondage in Egypt with all of the Israelites? The solution to this apparent contradiction is found in the 39th verse, "If ye {Jews} were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham."

Here we have a distinction between the children of Abraham and the seed of Abraham. If the Jews had been of the chosen line and the "children of promise," they would have descended from Jacob Israel and would have been in bondage in Egypt, but since they deny they were ever in bondage, their descent must necessarily have been through Jacob's brother, Esau, whose descendants were never in bondage.

Genesis 36:8-9, "thus dwelt Esau in Mount Seir: Esau is Edom and these are the generations of Esau, the father of the Edomites, in Mt. Seir." The name of the Edomites at the time of Christ was Idumeans. About 125 years before the time of Christ, war broke out between the Judahites of Judea and the nation of the Idumeans. The Judahites under Hyracanus triumphed over the Edomites, as a condition of peace, they demanded that the Edomites or Idumeans must be circumcised and accept the religion of Israel, or face annihilation. The Edomites accepted the terms and were absorbed into the nation of Judea. In time they completely dominated their erstwhile conquerors so that by the time of Christ, traces of the descendants of the House of Judah had all but vanished.

In Romans 9:13 it says, "As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated." Romans 9:7-8 clarifies the matter a little more, "Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, in Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, they which are the children of the flesh (Esau), these are not the children of God: but the children of promise (Isaac) are counted for the seed." The children of the promise are of the righteous line extending from Adam through Isaac and Jacob, while the children of the flesh are those of the Satanic line who trace their ancestry from Cain.

David asked that the Lord blot the Jews out of the Book of the Living. Psalm 69:21, 24, 27-28: "They gave me also gall for my meat and in my thirst they gave me vinegar to drink. Pour out thy indignation upon them and let thy wrathful anger take hold of them. Let them be blotted out of the Book of the Living and not be written with the righteous." We would do well to follow David's example when he says in Psalm 139:21-22, "Do I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? Am I not grieved with those that rise against thee? I hate them with a perfect hatred, I count them my enemies."

There are some who will say that it was not the Jews who killed Jesus, but the Romans. Paul pins the crime squarely on the Jews when but Peter, John, Luke and Paul pins it squarely on their shoulders. (Luke 24:20; John 19:14-18; Acts 2:36; 4:3-10; 5:30; 10:39; 13:27-29; and 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15) It is true the Romans soldiers cast lots for His garments, but of those, Jesus said in Luke 23:34, "Father forgive them for they know not what they do." The Jews well knew what they were doing, for they said to Pilate, "Let His blood be upon us and on our children."

There is no record in all of the Scriptures where Jesus ever forgave the Jews. Because of their very nature, it is difficult to see how they can be included in God's great plan of redemption.

Someone says this is not true, and they will quote John 12:32 in support of their position. "And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men un to me." Does this mean that Jews will be drawn to Jesus at some future date?

The answer is found in 1 Thes. 2:15, where Paul says, "Who hath killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men (Adamites)." The Jews, then, being contrary to all men (Adamites) are not apparently classed as men (Adamites) but are evil spirits in human form which cannot be drawn to Jesus.

Our Lord spoke in parables solely for the purpose of keeping the truth from them. It was not part of His plan that they should understand and be converted. {Given equal rights with us and be allowed all of the privileges given to the Adamic race, including intermarrying with our race}. We find this record in the following text, Matthew 13:10-11, "And the disciples came and said unto Him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you (Adamites) to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven, but to them (Canaanites) it is not given." Mark 4:11-12, "And He said unto them (Adamites), Unto you (Adamites) it is given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God but to them (Canaanites) without, all these things are done in parables that seeing they may see and not perceive and hearing they may hear and not understand lest at any time they should be converted and their sins should - In other words, Christ is saying don�t try to convert the Jews let them die in their sins so they will face judgment {Through, Lucifer, in human form mating with Eve he produced Cain who then went out of the Garden of Eden and mixed his half Luciferian and Angelic seed with that of some of the pre-Adamites living outside of the Garden of Eden). Be forgiven them." (Note: According to Malachi Martin a former Jesuit priest and former high ranking official in the Vatican and also the author of over 20 best selling books exposing the Vatican in world politics, Pope Alexander III estimated that 133,306,668 Angels had sided with Satan against God and were cast down onto the earth in dis-embodied form. The Decline and Fall of the Roman Catholic Church, by Malachi Martin)

Other authors have estimated that the "mixed multitude" Adamites who had lost their first estate by mixing with the Canaanites (Cainites) and were in Palestine at the time of Christ totalled no more than 20,000 out of the entire population. The number of all the Jews, descendants of the mating of Lucifer with Eve and his descendants mating with pre-Adamites and later Adamites, could not have been more than a few hundred thousand at the time of Christ.

According to the Jews in their own Talmudic and Zohar writings these bodiless fallen Angels roam the earth without bodies until those of them who have mated with pre-Adamites or Adamites (mixed seed of fallen Angeles and others) until those of their kind with physical bodies produce offspring into which their evil spirits can enter into and reside within.

To these "vampires" who still had enough of the spirit of God in them so they could still understand what Jesus had to say, this presented a unique opportunity. Christ was preaching to the "Lost Sheep of the House of Israel" or Adamites who had lost their psychic abilities when they were transferred from their first birthplace in "heaven" into the Earth or were "born again" of water (woman) into physical forms here as part of the Adamic race.

The message of Christ was to� these "Lost" Adamites to restore their lost memory of what they had been and what they had been taught before being transferred her onto the earth (terrestrial plane) from "heaven" or the (celestial plane). If the Canaanites who still had some of the genes of Eve (Adamic) in them still functioning could understand even part of the message of Christ which was not meant for them but for the Adamic race, they could feign being the true Adamites and even though they would be rejected by the early Church they could use their ill gotten knowledge to the point where they could use their "conversion" to become familiar with Adamic men and women wherein they could seduce their minds or bodies or both.

Their mating with the unsuspecting Adamites would give them even more receptacles into which their Satanic spirits could be injected into and therefore they would produce new "Jews" (Cainites) to work towards the day when all 133,000,000 of them would inhabit physical bodies which would then be the time when their leader the antichrist (Lucifer) would again appear to lead them and their cohorts (pre-Adamites and Adamites who were mentally seduced and were made into "Jews of the spirit" their bodies were under the control of evil spirits.

In 1955 the late Maj. Gen. George Van Horn Moseley wrote an open letter to the New York Times stating that he believed that there were not 6-million Jews in the United States at that time, but approximately 30-million. He said that he had studied the Talmud and other Jewish writings and was aware of the fact that the World Almanac in reporting the number of "Jews" who participate in Satanic services at those synagogues or are registered contributors and members.

He noted that according to Jewish religious practices Jews who are under 13 and have not received their Bar Mitzvah are not counted, non-religious Jews are not counted and the Jews do not consider women to be equal and "human" and thus female Jewesses are also not counted in the figures.

Of course, those who have "Jewish" genes but mixed with other races or attend churches of other religions are also not counted in the official World Almanac totals. Thus, the number of Jews in any given country can be conservatively figured at four times the official number reported by the World Almanac.

How many half Jews, quarter Jews, eighth Jews, etc., are possessed by Satanic (evil spirits) and are carrying out the Luciferian program whether they realize it or not? How many non-Jews by race have been conditioned by "Christian" televange-lists and their local "Christian" ministers and priests to view the Luciferian Jews as "God's Chosen People" and have more love and loyalty in their hearts for the Jews than they do for those of their own Adamic race? How many of those "Christians" have been conditioned to the point where the Satanic spirits of the Jews have been able to enter into their bodies and take control of their lives?

The World Almanac has put the number of Jews in the world at around 17-million for the past 50 years and Jewish publications keep complaining that the numbers of Jews in the world is decreasing not increasing. What these Jewish leaders are talking about is that the number of Jews who attend the synagogues and observe every Jewish ritual are decreasing but in reality Jews who are Jews by race but don't participate in any synagogue but carry on either knowingly or unknowingly the war of Lucifer against Christ.

To help clarify the meaning of some parts of this presentation, we have a comments to help establish a basis for our mutual understanding. We are using Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language 1989, to define "victim, snare, and infest" as follows:

* Victim: "1. a person who suffers from a destructive or injurious action or agency. 2. a person who is deceived or cheated, as by his own emotions or ignorance or by some impersonal agency. 3. a person or animal sacrificed, or regarded as sacrificed. 4. a living creature sacrificed in religious rites."

* Snare: "2. anything serving to entrap, entangle, or catch unawares; trap. 5. to catch or involve by trickery or wile..."

* Infest: "to haunt or overrun in a troublesome manner, as predatory bands, destructive animals, or vermin do."

* America: The word "America" means "The Kingdom of Heaven." Did our school teachers and our preachers ever explain to us the true meaning of the word "America?"

Wouldn't it be considerate if we were to be informed as to the true meaning of the name of our beloved homeland? Has the Establishment been hiding something from us relating to our true identity? Corporate public schools (government controlled) teach us that this Continent was named after Amerigo Vespucci.

However, these corporate government schools neglect to teach our children the meaning of Amerigo Vespucci's name. Professor Miskovsky (Oberlin College) brought out some interesting facts about the word "America."

The Latin masculine singular for the word "Amerigo" is "Americus" and the feminine singular is "America." The old Gothic form for the word "America" is "Amel Ric." "Amel" means "heaven" and "ric" means "kingdom." "Amel Ric" is found in the German language as "Emmerich" or "Himmelreich." Thus "Amel Ric," "Emmerich," "Himmelreich," "Amelukah," "Amerucah," and "America" became words for "The Kingdom of Heaven!" The word "kingdom" means government or governmental jurisdiction. the government of Heaven (from outer space) is to be fully implemented on earth as we are told in the "Lords Prayer."

Strong's Concordance gives the word "Meluwkah" for "kingdom," "Amelukah" and "Meluwkah" are related. A professor by the name of Odlum indicates that the letter "l" and "r" are sometimes interchangeable. The Hebrew "Meluwkah" became "Merukah" and "Amelukah" became "Ameruch," the later being the Latin form of the word "America." Who is America that she would be blessed above every other nation along with the other Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Celtic and kindred peoples in the world (Isaac's Sons - Saxon's) "Christian" nations, today are prophetically carrying out exactly what Israel is supposed to do in the last days.

We {the White Anglo-Saxon, Germantic, Celtic and kindred people are the descendants of the Ten Tribed Northern Kingdom of Israel which included people of the Southern Two Tribes. We migrated North and west beyond the Caucuses Mountains into Asia and on to the America's. Information about this migration over time is plentiful and well documented. We are the House of Jacob and we are suffering Jacob's troubles.

The Encyclopedia Americana calls Hyrcanus a Jewish high priest [135‑105 B.C.] who forced the Idumeans to become "Jews." Idumea is the Greek for Edomites.

The works of Josephes relates how the Idumeans were forced to accept Judaism. In the Bible Esau, Edo, Mt. Seir and Idumea are interchangeable for the offspring of ESAU, Jacob's twin brother. So now we are aware that the story of America does not begin with Columbus, but with Abraham who "looked for a City (system) which hath Foundations, whose Builder and Maker is God." (Hebrews 11:10) References for the information about America was from: Ewing Curtis Clair; Kingdom Digest; March, 1968 and Basics of National Identity by M.O. Andrews. The Voice of Liberty, % 692 Sunnybrook Drive, Decatur, Georgia 30033, 2nd printing 1979.

"And to the woman {the true seed remnant of Israel - not the Jews} were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness {North America} into her place, where she is nourished for a time and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent." (Revelation 12:14)

* Serpent: For the identification and definition of our use of the word "Serpent" we will quote Scriptural passages attributed to the sayings of Jesus, the Christ, but first we need to put you on the trail of the "Pharisees" and the "Sadducees" to whom Jesus frequently speaks directly in the flesh. And Christ speaks about their generation (serious study will reveal their mixed racial lineage, hence the attention their "generation").

The mixed mongrel generation (race) of people who today call themselves Jews, from their own publications, clearly lay claim and trace their identity to being the physical flesh and blood descendants of the Scriptural Pharisees and the Sadducees.

Perhaps it can be understood now why The World Book Encyclopedia states: "The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name Jew has lost all racial meaning."

One account published by the Jewish historian Louis Finkelstine in his two volume History of the Jews. In this work, he explains that the Pharisees and Sadducees were {are} Jews. Finkelstine also speaks of Jews making slaves of Christians.

In another work by Louis Finkelstine. The Pharisees, 2nd Ed., Vol. I. The Jewish Publication Society - 1940, pp. xx-xxi., we find the following quote: "The apogee of Pharisaism is the Talmud of Babylonia...Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name...the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives unaltered."

From the Epilogue section chapter 9 subtitle Character Roles & Identity from the book Who is Esau-Edom, quoting the entire chapter: "There is one thing that is unmistakably evident regarding the Bible and that is, it is about a particular race of people-the direct descendants of Adam later called Israel. They are the main characters in God's Script - the Holy Bible. Esau-Edom is� secondary character in this Script.

Only when we know and identify the white European people as the Israel people, and the Jews as the Edomites, do things in the world make complete sense. When the roles of Jacob and Esau are identified, we see that everything is happening exactly as written in the Scriptures.

The problem the world has been plagued with is a case of mistaken identity and unknown identity regarding the roles God has assigned to Esau and Jacob. Esau does not like the role he has been assigned {or shall we say the role that he has earned}. He thus has been trying to rewrite the Scriptures and alter in the minds of Christians their identity and the identity of the Jews in the Scripture. Thus it is believe that Esau {Jews} is Jacob {God's Chosen People}, and Jacob {the White Race} is just a 'gentile.'

No one can deny that the Jews are a most unique and unusual people. That uniqueness exists because of their Edomite heritage. No other people fit the characteristics and follow the role of Esau-Edom so completely as do the Jewish people. The Jews follow the role that their ancestors the Edomites had followed. The Jew, however, is not just the descendant of Esau-Edom, but also of the other individuals and tribes that have intermarried with Esau. This would include the Hittites, the Canaanites, the descendants of Japheth through Gomer, Togarmah, Magog, and Ashkenaz, and the descendants of Ham through Canaan, Cush, and Nimrod, as well as the Israelites and Judahites that mixed with them {contrary to God's Law}.

Thus, in a sense, the Jews do not have a heritage in the Bible, and yet they do not. As mongrels or hybrids, the Jews do have some biological roots extending back to Abraham and the patriarchs. But as mongrels, they can never possess the birthright or claim true heritage of the original or pure Adamic race. For it is written: 'A mongrel shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord.' (Deuteronomy 23:2) 'Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude.' (Nehemiah 13:3)

Mixed Adamites, those possessing both Adamic and non-Adamic blood, can no more be a part of heir of the Adamic race that one who is entirely of another race. The law will not allow the Jews to inherit the birthright or the kingdom regardless of the fact that they have Adamic blood in them. These same mongrels and 'mixed multitude' tried to tell Christ that Abraham was their father, but Christ said: 'I know that you are Abraham's seed; but you seek to kill me because my word has no place in you...I speak that which I have seen with my Father; and you do that which you have seen with your father...If you were Abraham's children, you would do the works of Abraham. You do the deeds of your father.' (John 8:37-41)

Christ made the implication that these 'Jews' had another father aside from Abraham, and their response was 'We be not born Of fornication; we have one Father, even God.' But Christ said; 'If God were your Father you would love me.' (v. 42). Can you think of anyone that hates Christ more than these people known as Jews today? The Jews cannot represent the Adamic line, they can only claim to be of those lines from Adam that were either rejected by God or who had violated the law through interracial marriages. Esau-Edom falls under both of these classes. The Edomites were a mongrelized and rejected people throughout the entire Bible.

Conspiracy and Conflict: It should by now be seen why talk of an 'International Jewish Conspiracy' makes no sense to the general public. They don't see or understand anything of the kind because they do not know the identity of the characters in the Scriptures of God-the Bible-or their roles in that Scripture. Why would the Jews, which the entire church world holds up as the apple of God's eye, want to harm or destroy White Christians?

As heirs of Esau, the Jews are destined to act according to an assigned role. The Jews need not be part of a conspiracy to dominate the world, or a plot to kill Christians or to destroy their civilization. The Jews, or some of them, are used by God to execute His plans in the earth. Jews follow this role in God's Scripture and have been doing these things and will continue to do them whether or not they have any plans or knowledge of doing them. A lion kills to eat because God had assigned such attributes to its ancestors {race} when He created them. They cannot help what they are or what they do, they act in such a manner because it is ingrained within their constitution to do so. Likewise {you will note upon study and observation that} the Jew is hostile, abrasive, hateful, ungodly, a destroyer, and a usurer because such attributed and roles {or prophecies} were assigned to the ancestors of the Jews - Esau/Edom. A Divine Plan for Evil: All of Christendom is united in the belief that all of the ills and troubles of this world are the result of an invisible, spirit, a devil or Satan, which is in competition with God for control of this world.

We must always remember to mistrust the obvious and that which is popular, for such things are often the opposite of what they appear. The Bible supplies us with scores of illustrations in support of this hypothesis. Many biblical messages reveal that the popular belief and ways of the people are contrary or opposite to the ways of God. As Jesus Christ stated: 'For that which is highly esteemed among men is an abomination in the sight of God.' (Luke 16:15)

Likewise, that which is exalted by man, God will make low, and that which is of low degree, God will exalt. (Luke 1:52-53; 10:15; James 1:9-10) There is perhaps nothing that is more highly esteemed and exalted by the church world than these God-cursed heathen mongrels called 'Jews' today. There could be no greater evidence that these Jews are not God's people than the universal belief that they are. Thus the organized church world, which has been influenced by Jewish indoctrination, had to have a scapegoat for certain evil things that happen. They teach that our adversary is either something spiritual, such as an invisible devil, or is something yet to come, such as the future antichrist. In other words, our foe is something we cannot fight against because it is not physical or not yet physically here.

The result is that the Jew, our real physical enemy, the one we can fight, or expel out of our land, or kill, is free to assail us at will because the Judaized churches say they are God's Chosen People. In a speech, 'Given by Senator Joseph McCarthy, six months before his mouth was closed forever: George Washington's surrender: 'And many of the people of the land became Jews.' (Esther 9:17) The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century.

Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that 'a holy war will now being in America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.' Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction: 'Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government.

That government they believe to be divine will be the British Empire [under the control of the Jews]. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry [Lucifer - as Albert Pike disclosed in Morals and Dogma].' And indeed George Washington was a Mason, and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army.'

Cornwallis well knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of World Catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control could be accomplished through a false religion. What he predicted has come to pass!!! Of that, there is no longer any doubt. A brief study of American religious history will show that Masonry and Judaism has infused into every church in America their veiled Phallic Religion. Darby and the Plymouth Brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell [both Jews] started Jehovah Witnesses' in order to spread Judaism throughout the world under the guise of Christianity. Also we have: 'As Jewish Maurice Samuel in his 'You Gentiles,' (1924) p. 13 stated, 'there are essentially two peoples as spiritual forces in the world - Jews and White Christian people.' It is not a conflict between God and a supernatural devil which Judaized theologians invented. Jewish 'scholars' have promoted both the devil and future antichrist concepts.

They know that as long as the Christians believe that imaginary spooks are the 'evil forces' which are to blame for their problems., conflicts, wars, etc., they will never see that it is the Jew who God has assigned as an evil force here and now. The result is that Christians will never lift a finger against the menacing Jew as their European ancestors had done occasionally. Our adversaries are whoever God assigns to that role or who He has made with an evil, ungodly disposition.

Thus throughout all Biblical history the adversaries of God's people were always 'flesh and blood people, usually those of some other race. Yes, the evil, destructive and hostile Edomite Jews were made that way by God: 'I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.' (Isaiah 45:7) 'Behold, I have created the smith who blows the coals in the fire... and have created the waster to destroy.' (Isaiah 54:16) 'The Lord has made all things for himself, yes, even the wicked for the day of evil.' (Proverbs 16:4)

Evil, wicked persons are a part of God's plan of this world, persons who would be against His order, His law and His people. No supernatural devil exists in this plan. 'but could we not preach the word of God to these wicked {Esau} Edomite-Canaanite Jews converting them to righteousness? No, for God says they are born that way and will not turn: 'The wicked are estranged from the womb; They go astray as soon as they are born, speaking lies.' (Psalm 58:3-4)

These Edomite-Canaanites are born with un-Godly traits. God didn't tell Joshua to convert them. He told Joshua to slay them. God promises their destruction not their conversion. (Psalm 58:10) Even if raised in a righteous environment the Edomite will still be wicked. (Isaiah 26:10) Thus Esau-Edom and his Canaanite brethren are not an extinct and no longer existing people {as they would have you believe}. They are in the world today, and they are still at their ancient task of defying God today, and attempting to corrupt and destroy God's true Israel people. They are still in God's Script acting out their role in the world. But their final scene draws near and their time of destruction is at hand."

From: Adam and Cain, p. 178, by Wm. N. Murray, former Governor of Oklahoma (1951): "Mr. W. Smith, who was for many years private secretary to Billy (William Ashley) Sunday, the Evangelist, makes a statement on oath before a Notary Public of Wayne, Michigan.

The statement is to the following effect: President Coolidge shortly before his term of office expired, said publicly that he did not choose to compete again for the Presidency of the United States. Shortly afterwards, Billy Sunday interviewed him. Coolidge told him that after taking office, he found himself unable to carry out his election promises or to make the slightest move towards clean government. He was forced and driven by threats, even murder-threats, to carry out the orders of the Jews. Billy Sunday made public this statement of Coolidge. There followed a general attack upon the Evangelist. Then his son was framed and committed suicide, whilst the father's death was hastened in sorrow for the loss." With this background in mind, we can better understand our use of the definition of the word "Serpent" as used by Jesus Christ. From the Scriptures then, Esau-Edomite Jews {Pharisees and Sadducees} are identified as "Serpents" by Jesus The Christ.

�� Chapter Three

�� What The Jews Believe And Teach

This study is about Judaism and what the Jewish Rabbi�s actually teach about non-Jews, especially Christians. It is not exhaustive because such a book would take literally volumes to present all the teachings of Judaism, but is our attempt at putting it into a small compressed booklet form. This is necessary because our people have been taught in the public (fools) school system to read only one or two pages of something and dismiss everything else. Or to read a small pamphlet or booklet and accept that as written proof of a subject instead of a complete study. We will start with the origin of the word anti-Semitism.

Anti-Semitism: The word anti-Semitism was an invention; H.H. Beamish, in a New York address, October 30 ‑ November 1, 1937: "In 1848 the word �anti‑Semitic� was invented by the Jews to prevent the use of the word �Jew.� The right word for them is �Jew�"

�� We are told by Jewish authorities the same thing: "It was (is) the instinctive policy with the mass of the Jewish nation, a deliberate policy with most of its leaders, not only to use ridicule against anti-Semitism but to label as 'anti-Semitic' any discussion of the Jewish problem at all, or, for that matter, any information even on the Jewish problem...If a man alluded to the presence of a Jewish financial power in any region, for instance, in India, he was an anti-Semite.

If he interested himself in the peculiar character of Jewish philosophical discussions, especially in matters concerning religion, he was an anti-Semite. If the emigrations of the Jewish masses from country to country, the vast modern invasion of the United States, for instance (which has been organized and controlled like an army on the march), interested him as an historian, he could not speak of it under pain of being called an anti-Semite.

If he exposed a financial swindler who was a Jew, he was an anti-Semite. If he exposed a group of Parliamentarians taking money from the Jews, he was called an anti-Semite. If he did no more than call a Jew a Jew, he was an anti-Semite. You cannot long confuse interest with hatred, the statement of plain and important truths with mania, the discussion of fundamental questions with silly enthusiasm, for the same reason that you cannot long confuse truth with falsehood. Sooner or later people are bound to remark that the defendant seems curiously anxious to avoid all investigation of his case...I say it was a fatal policy; but it was deliberately undertaken by the Jews. Christians must face them in this country (America). The Jew should be satisfied here. I was here forty‑seven years ago; your doors were thrown open to the Jews and they were free. No he has got you absolutely by the throat;� that is your reward." (Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, pp. 160-161)

If you have ever had any business dealings with the Jews you probably noticed that they very seldom kept their word, even a written contract, in the business you conducted with them. Well the reason that their word is not worth a plug nickel, so-to-speak, is because of the Kol Nidre Oath they take every year when they celebrate the Day of Atonement.

Kol Nidre: It is the prologue of the Day of Atonement services in the synagogues. It is recited three times by the standing congregation in concert with chanting rabbis at the alter. After the recital of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer the Day of Atonement religious ceremonies follow immediately. The Day of Atonement religious observances are the highest holy days of the "Jews" and are celebrated as such throughout the world. The official translation into English of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is as follows: "All vows, obligations, oaths, anathemas, whether called 'konam,' 'konas,' or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement unto the next, (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths."

The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer are referred to in the Talmud in the Book of Nedarim, 23a‑23b as follows: "And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare, every vow which I make in the future shall be null (1). (His vows are then invalid) providing that he remembers this at the time of the vow." (Emphasis in original) A footnote (1) relates: "(1)...The Law of Revocation in advance was not made public." (Emphasis in original text)

The greatest study of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer was made by Theodor Reik, a pupil of the [I]nfamous Jewish Dr. Sigmund Freud. The analysis of the historic, religious and psychological background of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer by Professor Reik presents the Talmud in its true perspective. This study is contained in "The Ritual, Psycho‑Analytical Studies." In the chapter on the Talmud, page 163, he states: "The text was to the effect that all oaths which believers take between one Day of Atonement and the next Day of Atonement are declared invalid."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms that the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer has no spiritual value as might be believed because it is recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement as the prologue of the religious ceremonies which follow it.

The secular significance of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is forcefully indicated by the analysis in Vol. VI, page 441: "The Kol Nidre has nothing whatever to do with the actual idea of the Day of Atonement...it attained to extraordinary solemnity and popularity by reason of the fact that it was The first Prayer recited on this holiest of days."

Being amazed at this revelation on about the Kol Nidre, I happened to notice in the index the "Star of David." So I decided to look it up and see what the Jewish Encyclopedia had to say about it and found the following.

YThe �Sacred� Star of David: Non‑Jews have been drenched with propaganda that the six‑pointed "Star of David" is a sacred symbol of Jewry, dating from David and Solomon, in Biblical times, and signifying the pure "monotheism" of the Jewish religion. In actuality, the six‑pointed star, called "David's Shield," or "Magen David," was only adopted as a Jewish device in 1873, by the American Jewish Publication Society, it is not even mentioned in rabbinical literature.

Y Magen Dawid ("David�s Shield" - The Star of David): �The hexagram formed by the combination of two equilateral trianglesY; used as the symbol of Judaism. It is placed upon synagogues, sacred vessels, and the like, and was adopted as a device by the American Publication Society in 1873, the Zionist Congress of Basel, hence by 'Die Welt (Vienna), the official organ of Zionism, and by other bodies.

The hebra kaddisha of the Jewish community of Johannesburg, South Africa, calls itself 'Hebra Kaddisha zum Rothn Magen David,' following the designation of the 'red cross' societies...It is noteworthy, moreover, that the shield of David is not mentioned in Rabbinical Literature.

�� The 'Magen Dawid,' therefore, probably did not originate within Rabbinism, the official and dominant Judaism for more than 2,000 years. Nevertheless a David's shield has recently been noted on a Jewish tombstone at Tarentum, in southern Italy, which may date as early as the third century of the common era. The earliest Jewish literary source which mentions it, the 'Eshkol ha‑Kofer' of the karaite Judah Hadassi (middle of the 12th cent.) says, inch. 242: 'Seven names of angels precede the mezuzah: Michael, Garield, etc...Tetragrammation protect thee!

And likewise the sign called 'David's shield' is placed besides the name of each angel.' It was therefore, at this time a sign on amulets. In the magic papyri of antiquity, pentagrams, together with stars and other signs, are frequently found on amulets bearing the Jewish names of God, 'Sabaoth,' 'Adonai,' 'Eloai,' and used to guard against fever and other diseases. Curiously enough, only the pentacle appears, not the hexagram. In the great magic papyrus at Paris and London there are twenty‑two signs sided by side, and a circle with twelve signs, but neither a Pentacle nor a Hexagram, (Wessely, i.e. pp. 31, 112) although there is a triangle, perhaps in place of the latter.

�� In the many illustrations of amulets given by Budge in his 'Egyptian Magic' (London, 1899) not a single Pentacle or Hexagram appears. The Syncretism of Hellenistic, Jewish, and Coptic influences did not therefore, originate the symbol. It is probable that it was the Cabala that derived the symbol from the Templars. The Cabala, in fact, makes use of this sign, arranging the Ten Sefirot, or spheres, in it, and placing in on Amulets. The pentagram, called Solomon's seal, is also used as a talisman, and Henry thinks that the Hindus derived it from the Semites [Here is another case where the Jews admit they are not Semites.

Can you not see it? The Jew Henry thinks it was derived originally FROM THE SEMITES! Here is a Jew admitting that The Jews are not Semites!], ('Magic dans l'lude Antique,' p. 93, Paris, 1904) although the name by no means proves the Jewish or Semitic origin of the sign. The Hindus likewise employed the hexagram as a means of protection, and as such it is mentioned in the earliest source, quoted above. In the synagogues, perhaps, it took the place of the mezuzah, and the name 'Shield of David� may have been given it in virtue of its protective powers.

The hexagram may have been employed originally also as an architectural ornament on synagogues, as it is, for example, on the cathedrals of Brandenburg and Stendal, and on the Marktkirche at Hanover.

�� A pentacle in this form, (a five pointed star is shown here), is found on the ancient synagogue at Tell Hum. Charles IV, prescribed for the Jews of Prague, in 1354, a Red Flag with both David�s Shield and Solomon�s Seal, while the Red Flag with which the Jews met King Matthias of Hungary in the fifteenth century showed two pentacles with two golden stars. The pentacle, therefore, may also have been used among the Jews. It occurs in a manuscript as early as the year 1073. However, the six‑pointed star has been used for centuries for magic amulets and cabalistic sorcery." (See pages 548, 549 and 550 of the Jewish Encyclopedia)

The religion practiced by the Pharisees in Jesus' time was based exclusively on the Babylonian Talmud. This, according to Rabbi Morris Kertzer, "The Talmud consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries after the birth of Jesus. It is a compendium of law and lore. It is the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish Religious Law and it is the textbook used in the Training of Rabbis."

The Talmud: In his lifetime Michael Rodkinson, the assumed name of a "Jew" who was one of the world's great authorities on the Talmud, wrote "History of the Talmud." This classic on the subject was written by Michael Rodkinson in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi Isaac M. Wise.

History of the Talmud: In his "History of the Talmud" Michael Rodkinson, on page 70, states: "Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it? Can we ourselves review the ideas, the statements, the modes of reasoning and thinking, on moral and religious subjects, which were current in his time, and must have been evaluated by him during those thirty silent years when he was pondering his future mission (Christ, during these thirty years, had sailed to England with His uncle, Joseph of Armatheia, where He built the first church in England. It is known today as Glastonbury and the land it sits on has never been taxed by the British Government. The Jews tried to destroy it many years ago, but failed. Although badly damaged it still stands today)? To such inquiries the learned class of Jewish rabbis answer by holding up The Talmud...and the question becomes, therefore, an interesting one to every Christian. What is the Talmud? The Talmud, then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Christ, was called the Traditions of the Elders and to which he makes frequent allusions."

Arsene Darmester in the book "The Talmud" states: "Judaism finds its expression in the Talmud, it is not a remote suggestion and a faint echo thereof, but it...has become incarnate, in which it has taken form, passing from a state of abstraction into the domain of real things. The study of Judaism is that of the Talmud, as the study of the Talmud is that of Judaism...they are two inseparable things...they are one and the same...the Talmud, is a complete expression of religious movement, and this code of endless presumptions and minute ceremonials represents in its perfection the total work of the religious idea...The miracle was accomplished by a book, The Talmud...The Talmud is composed of two distinct parts the Mishna and the Gemara; the former the text, the latter a commentary upon the text...term Mishna we designate a collection of decisions and traditional laws embracing all departments of legislation, civil and religious...This code, the work of several generations of rabbis...nothing can equal the importance of the Talmud unless it be the ignorance that prevails concerning it...This explains how it happens that a single page of the Talmud contains three or four different languages, or rather specimens of one language at three or four stages of degeneracy...many a Mishna of five or six lines is accompanied by fifty or sixty pages of explanation...is law in all its authority; it constitutes dogma and cult; it is the fundamental element of the Talmud...The daily study of the Talmud which among Jews begins with the age of ten to end with life itself necessarily was a severe gymnastic for the mind, thinks to which it acquired incomparable subtlety and acumen. To establish for Judaism a 'Corpus Juris Eccleiastict!'"

This is how the articles look in the Talmud itself:

Sanhedrin, 55b-55a: "What is meant by this? - Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilty (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be beastally abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5)."

(footnotes)

"(1) The reference is to the passive subject of sodomy. As stated in supra 54a, guilt is incurred by the active participant even if the former be a minor; i.e., less than thirteen years old. Now, however, it is stated that within this age a distinction is drawn.

(2) Rab makes nine years the minimum; but if one committed sodomy with a child of lesser age, no guilt is incurred. Samuel makes three the minimum.

(3) At nine years a male attains sexual matureness.

(4) Lev XVIII, 22

(5) Rashi reads ("xxx") (Hebrew characters, Ed.) instead of ("zzz") (Hebrew characters, Ed.) in our printed texts. A male, aged nine years and a day, who commits etc. There are thus three distinct clauses in this Baraitha. The first-a male aged nine years and a day - refers to the passive subject of pederasty, the punishment being incurred by the adult offender. This must be its meaning: because firstly, the active offender is never explicitly designated as a male, it being understood, just as the Bible states, Thou shalt not lie with mankind, where only the sex of the passive participant is mentioned; and secondly, if the age reference is to the active party, the guilt being incurred by the passive adult party, why single out pederasty: in all crimes of incest, the passive adult does not incur guilt unless the other party is at least nine years and a day? Hence the Baraitha supports Rab's contention that nine years (and a day) is the minimum age of the passive partner for the adult to be liable."

Sanhedrin, 55b: "A Maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition (Sexual Intercourse), and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)."

(footnotes)

"(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving.

(3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew.

(4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction 'to his wife but not to his neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse."

Sanhedrin, 69a: "'A man'; from this I know the law only with respect to a man: whence do I know it of one aged nine years and a day who is capable of intercourse? From the verse, And 'if a man'? (2)-He replied: such a minor can produce semen, but cannot beget therewith; for it is like the seed of cereals less than a third grown (3)."

(footnotes)

(2) 'And' (') indicates an extension of the law, and is here interpreted to include a minor aged nine years and a day.

(3) Such cereals contain seed, which if sown, however, will not grow."

Sanhedrin, 69b: "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declare her fit...All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.

(footnotes)

(1) i.e., she becomes a harlot whom a priest may not marry (Lev XXL,7.).

(2) so that if he was nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is invalidated from the priesthood; whilst if he was less than eight, Beth Shammai agree that she is not."

Kethuboth, 5b: "The question was asked: Is it allowed (15) to perform the first marital act on the Sabbath? (16). Is the blood (in the womb) stored up (17), or is it the result of a wound? (18).

(footnotes)

"(15) Lit., 'how is it'?

(16) When the intercourse could not take place before the Sabbath (Tosaf)

(17) And the intercourse would be allowed, since the blood flows out of its own accord, no would having been made.

(18) Lit., or is it wounded? And the intercourse would be forbidden."

Kethuboth, 10a-10b: "Someone came before Rabban Gamaliel the son of Rabbi (and) said to him, 'my master I have had intercourse (with my newly wedded wife) and I have not found any blood (7). She (the wife) to him, 'My master, I am still a virgin'. He (then) said to them; Bring me two handmaids, one (who is) a virgin and one who had intercourse with a man. They brought to him (two such handmaids), and he placed them on a cask of wine. (In the case of ) the one who was no more a virgin its smell (1) went through (2), (in the case of) the virgin the smell did not go through (3). He (then) placed this one (the young wife) also (on the cask of wine), and its smell (4) did not go through. He (then) said to him: Go, be happy with thy bargain (7). But he should have examined her from the beginning (8)."

(footnotes)

"(1) i.e., the smell of wine.

(2) One could smell the wine from the mouth (Rashi).

(3) One could not smell the wine from the mouth.

(4) i.e., the smell of wine.

(5) Rabban Gamaliel

(6) To the husband.

(7) The test showed that the wife was a virgin.

(8) Why did he first have to experiment with the two handmaids."

Kethuboth, 11a-11b: "Rabba said, It means (5) this: when a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as �a girl who is injured by a piece of wood.'"

(footnotes)

"(5). Lit., 'says.'

(6) Lit., 'here,' that is, less than three years old.

(7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."

Kethuboth, 11a-11b: "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."

(footnotes)

"(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."

Hayorath, 4a: "We learnt: (The law concerning the menstruan occurs in the Torah but if a man has intercourse with a woman that a waits a day corresponding to a day he is exempt. But why? Surely (the law concerning) a woman that awaits a day corresponding to a day is mentioned in the Scriptures: He hath made naked her fountain.

But, surely it is written, (1)- They might rule that in the natural way even the first stage of contact is forbidden; and in an unnatural way, however, is (that the ruling might have been permitted) (3) even in the natural way (4) alleging (that the prohibition of) the first stage (5) has reference to a menstruant woman only (6). And if you prefer I might say: The ruling may have been that a woman is not regarded as a zabah (7) except during the daytime because it is written, all the days of her issue (8)."

(footnotes)

"(13) Lev. XV, 28.

(14) Cf. supra p. 17, n. 10. Since she is thus Biblically considered unclean how could a court rule that one having intercourse with her is exempt?

(15) Lev XX, 18.

(1) Ibid. 13. The plural "xxxx" (Hebrew characters, Ed.) implies natural, and unnatural intercourse.

(2) Why then was the case of 'a woman who awaits a day corresponding to a day' given as an illustration when the case of a menstruant, already mentioned, would apply the same illustration.

(3) The first stage of contact.

(4) In the case of one 'who awaits a day corresponding to a day'; only consummation of coition being forbidden in her case.

(5) Cf. Lev XX, 18.

(6) Thus permitting a forbidden act which the Sadducees do not admit.

(7) A woman who has an issue of blood not in the time of her menstruation, and is subject to certain laws of uncleanness and purification (Lev XV, 25ff).

(8) Lev XV, 26. Emphasis being laid on days."

Abodah Zarah, 36b-37a: R. Na"ham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it...From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.

(footnotes)

(2). Even through he suffered from no issue.

Sotah, 26b: "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is no adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)...As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?"

(footnotes)

"(4) She would not be prohibited to her husband for such an act.

(5) farausag near Baghdad v. BB. (Sonc. Ed.) p. 15, n.4. He is thus distinguished from the earlier Rabbi of that name.

(6) Deut. XXIII, 19.

(7) Money given by a man to a harlot to associate with his dog. Such an association is not legal a adultery.

(8) If a man had a female slave who was a harlot and he exchanged her for an animal, it could be offered.

(9) Are an abomination unto the Lord (ibid).

(10) Viz., the other two mentioned by the Rabbi.

(11) In Num. V. 13. since the law applies to a man who is incapable.

(12) Lev. XVIII, 22. The word for 'lying' is in the plural and is explained as denoting also unnatural intercourse.

(13) With the other man, although there is no actual coition."

Yebamoth, 55b: "Raba said; for what purpose did the All- Merciful write 'carnally' in connection with the designated bondmaid (9), a married woman (10) and a sotah (11)? That in connection with the designated bondmaid (is required) as has just been explained (12).

That in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum (13). This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated (14); what, however, can be said, according to him who maintains (that for such an act one is) guilty? The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman (15). Since it might have been assumed that, as (a wife), even after her death, is described as his kin (16), one should be guilty for (intercourse with) her (as for that) with a married woman, hence we are taught (that one is exonerated).

(footnotes)

(9) Lev. XIX,20.

(10) Ibid. XVIII,20.

(11) Num. V, 13.

(12) SUPRA 55a.

(13) Since no fertilization can possibly occur.

(14) Shebu., 18a, Sanh. 55a.

(15) Even though she dies as a married woman.

(16) In Lev. XXI, 2. where the text enumerates the dead relatives for whom a priest may defile himself. As was explained, supra 22b, his kin refers to one's wife."

Yebamoth, 103a-103b: "When the serpent copulated with Eve (14) with lust. The lust of the Israelites who stood at Mount Sinai (16) came to an end, the lust of idolaters who did not stand at Mount Sinai did not come to an end."

(footnotes)

"(14) In the Garden of Eden, according to tradition.

(15) i.e., the human species.

(16) And experienced the purifying influence of divine Revelation."

Yebamoth, 63a: "R. Eleazar further stated: What is meant by the Scriptural text, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh (5)? This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with Eve.

(footnotes)

"(5) Gen. II, 23. emphasis on This is now."

Yebamoth, 60b: "As R. Joshua b. Levi related: 'There was a certain town in the Land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an enquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day (14), and rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest (15)."

(footnotes)

"(13) A proselyte under the age of three years and one day may be married by a priest.

(14) And was married to a priest.

(15) i.e., permitted to continue to live with her husband."

Yebamoth, 59b: "R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest (4). Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human being (5), though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of stoning (6), is nevertheless permitted to marry a priest (7).

(footnotes)

"(4) Even a High Priest. The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not so regard such an intercourse either.

(5) A beast.

(6) If the offense was committed in the presence of witnesses after due warning.

(7) In the absence of witnesses and warning."

Yebamoth, 12b: "R. Bebai recited before R. Naham: Three (categories of) woman may (7) use an absorbent (8) in their marital intercourse (9), a minor, a pregnant woman and a nursing woman. The minor (10) because (otherwise) she might (11) become pregnant, and as a result (11) might die...and what is the age of such a minor? (14). From the age of eleven years and one day until the age of twelve years and one day, one who is under (15), or over this age (16) must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner."

(footnotes)

"(7) (so Rashi. R. Tam; Should use, v. Tosaf s.v.)

(8) Hackled wool or flax.

(9) To prevent conception.

(10) May use an absorbent.

(11) Lit., 'perhaps.'

(14) Who is capable of conception but exposed thereby to the danger of death.

(15) When no conception is possible.

(16) When pregnancy involves no fatal consequences."

Yebamoth, 59b: "When R. Dimi came (8) he related: It once happened at Haitalu (9) that while a young woman was sweeping the floor (10) a village dog (11) covered her from the rear (12) and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest.

(footnotes)

"(8) From Palestine to Babylon

(9) (Babylonian form for Aitulu, modern Aiterun N.W. of Kadesh, v. S. Klein, Beitrage, p. 47).

(10) Lit., 'house.'

(11) Or 'big hunting dog' (Rashi), 'ferocious dog' (Jast.), 'small wild dog' (Aruk).

(12) A case of unnatural intercourse.

Kethuboth, 6b: "Said he to him: Not like those Babylonians who are not skilled in moving aside (This means a man who has intercourse with a virgin in such a way that he does not destroy her maiden head). (7), but there are some who are skilled in moving aside (8). If so, why (give the reason of) 'anxious.? (10) for one who is not skilled. (Then) let the[m] say: One who is skilled is allowed (to perform the first intercourse on Sabbath), one who is not skilled is forbidden? Most (people) are skilled (11). Said Raba the son of R. Hanan to Abaye' If this were so, then why (have) groomsmen (12) why (have) a sheet? (13)- He (Abaye) said to him: There (the groomsmen and the sheet are necessary) perhaps he will see and destroy (the tokens of her virginity) (14).

(footnotes)

"(7) i.e., having intercourse with a virgin without causing a bleeding.

(8) Thus no blood need come out, and 'Let his head be cut off and let him not die!' does not apply.

(9) If the bridegroom is skilled in 'moving sideways.'

(10) He need not be anxious about the intercourse and should not be free from reading Shema' on account of such anxiety.

(11) Therefor the principle regarding 'Let his head be cut off and let him not die!' does not, as a rule, apply.

(12) The groomsmen testify in case of need to the virginity of the bride. V. infra 12a. If the bridegroom will act in a manner that will cause no bleeding, the groomsmen will not be able to testify on the question of virginity.

(13) To provide evidence of the virginity of the bride. Cf. Deut.XXII,17.

(14) It may happen that he will act in the normal manner and cause bleeding but he will destroy the tokens and maintain that the bride was not a virgin; for this reason the above mentioned provisions are necessary. Where however he moved aside and made a false charge as to her virginity, the bride can plead that she is still a virgin (Rashi)."

For years we have studied and researched as much as possible so as to know about Satan's schemes and the methodologies he employs for each deception. And these studies encompassed the history of mankind's seduction of Satan, from its genesis to our modern times. Without doubt, and with a high degree of certainty we believed there were no more dark mysteries that needed uncovering.

We came across some interesting material. Material, which reeks blasphemy and even till this day has bewildered our ability to comprehend how for the most part, that such blasphemous information had remained hidden from public viewing. And more astounding except for a short period during the medieval times and a few other rare occurrences this material also has for the past two thousand years been kept hidden from the Christian community.

This material which is of Jewish origin is known as the Babylonian Talmud (oral law) and Zohar (hidden mysteries/wisdom). And contrary to that, which is commonly taught throughout Christianity that the Torah (written law, which consist of the five books of Moses, also known as the Pentateuch) is the primary teaching of Judaism is a Deliberate Deceptive Lie, the two ancient Jewish Teachings (Babylonian Talmud and Zohar) are the true essence of Judaism. At the time of Christ, the Talmudic teachings, which were taught by the Scribes and Pharisees, was known as the 'Traditions of the Elders'. And the Zoharic teachings were then known as 'Merkabah.'

The rabbis of Judaism teach that Moses received three teachings from God on Mount Sania. Which are, the written law (the Torah), the commandments or oral law (the Talmud, Mishnah) and the hidden mysteries/wisdom (the Zohar). Perspectively, the rabbi reads or recites passages from the Torah.

Talmud, on the other hand is the interpretation of the Torah. And the Zohar is the hidden or deeper meaning of the Torah. In essence, when a rabbi teaches Torah, he expounds from the Talmud. And when a rabbi or an elite (Tzadik) of Judaism, Hassidic (ultra orthodox) want to understand the deeper meaning of Torah, they study or contemplate Zohar.

The scope of these two ancient teachings is voluminous. Where the Hebrew version of the Talmud encompasses 26 volumes and the English translation known as the Soncino edition contains 16 volumes. And the Zohar (which is also known as the 'Book of Splendor') is not as large as the Talmudic work, but also is quite extensive with the English Soncino edition covering 4 volumes.

Note, within the scope of this article it would be impossible to expound on the teachings of the Talmud to great length. Notwithstanding, it is my hope that from this article, the reader would at least ascertain a key that could open the door to understanding the grandest of all the hidden mysteries' of Satan. And more importantly, because a large percentage of the New Testament writings warn us of these blasphemous teachings of the Scribes and Pharisees (Rabbinical Judaism), it is also my hope that the reader attain a greater understanding of the Truth which the Gospel contains.

Prior to our present knowledge of the true teachings of Judaism, I perceived Judaism as a religious body, who had failed to emulate the teachings and writings of the Old Testament. However, from my own research reviewing large segments from both the Talmud and Zohar writings, we now know that our earlier perception of Judaism was immensely off based. In other words, we now know that the Jews did not fail in their efforts to live accordingly to the written law, instead what they did, by the Talmudic teachings they rewrote God's commandments in such away and to such a degree that God's commandments became corrupt and non effective. Also, I now have a better understanding why Jesus was so adamant in declaring judgment and condemnation upon the Scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees:

NKJV Luke 11:52; "Woe to you lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge. You did not enter in yourselves, and those who were entering in you hindered."

KJV Matthew 16:6; Then Jesus said unto them, "Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."

In order to grasp the significance and depth of these heretical teachings; let us examine excerpts from the Babylonian Talmud.

Note: Warning, the following material to some may be repulsive and disillusioning. Nevertheless, as incredible and shocking it is, the following are excerpts verbatim taken from my own private collection of Soncino's English edition of the Babylonian Talmud.

The Talmud:

The Bible:

Exodus 20:3; "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet, Rabbi Says; Regarding Devotion to Other gods, There are Ways that are Permissible � "Mishnah. He who gives of his seed (His children) to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does both."

"Gemara. The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R. Abin said: Our Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship is not idolatry. For it has been taught, [if one causes his seed to pass through the fire,] whether to Molech or to any other idol he is liable [to death]. R. Eleazar son of R. Simeon said: If to Molech, he is liable; if to another idol, he is not." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 64a)

�� *******

Exodus 20:7; "Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain." Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet, Rabbi Says; If Your Anger is not Directed towards God, it is Permissible to Profane God's name �� "For blasphemy is an indictable offence only if it is mentally directed against God. If however, one reviles the Divine Name, whilst mentally employing it to denote some other object, he is not punished. Consequently, since the essence of the offence is mental, the slight action is disregarded." (Footnote #17, Talmud Mas. Sanhedrin 65a)

Exodus 20:4; "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:" Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet, Rabbi Says; Only when the Last Stroke is made is the Thing Considered an Idol � "When, however, he reaches the cupola in which the idol is placed [He must not build]. Said R. Eleazar in the name of R. Johanan: If, however, he did build, the pay he received is permitted. This surely is obvious: it is a case of appurtenances of idols, and appurtenances of idols, whether according to R. Ishmael or according to R. Akiba, are not forbidden till actually worshiped! � Said R. Jeremiah: It is necessary in the case of the idol itself. This would be right according to the one who holds that [to derive any benefit from] the making of an idol for an Israelite is forbidden forthwith, but from the making of one for an idolater, not until it is worshiped. In that case this is very well; but according to the one who holds that even when made for an idolater [any benefit] is forbidden forthwith, what is there to be said?;� But, said Rabbah b. �Ulla, the statement is necessary in regard to the last stroke of work; for what is it that makes the idol fit for worship? It is its completion; and when is the completion brought about? With the last stroke. But the last stroke does not constitute the value of a perutah! Consequently, he holds the opinion that the wage is earned from the beginning to the end [of the work]." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Avodah Zarah 19b)

Exodus 20:8‑10; "Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work.

But the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:" Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet, Rabbi Says; Only for the Purpose of Destruction, is work Permissible during Sabbath � "One is not liable for desecrating the Sabbath when his work is destructive; but if he demolishes a house in order to rebuild, it is regarded as constructive. Now, extinguishing a wick, thereby destroying its light, is the equivalent of demolishing a house; if the purpose is to save the wick to be used again later, it is analogous to demolishing a house to build on the same site, since it is the wick which is extinguished and the wick which is to be relit. But if the purpose is to save the oil or the lamp, it is analogous to demolishing a house in order to rebuild elsewhere, for whereas the wick is extinguished, it is the oil or lamp that is saved for subsequent use." (footnote: Talmud ‑ Mas. Shabbath 31b)

�� *******

Exodus 20:12; "Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee." Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet, Rabbi Says; It is Permissible to Strike Parents As long as You do not Wound Them � "Mishnah. He who strikes his father or his mother is liable only if he wounds them. In this respect, cursing is more stringent than smiting, for, he who curses [his parents] after death is liable, whilst he who smites them after death is not." (Talmud Mas. Sanhedrin 85b)

Yet, Rabbi Says; it is Permissible to Curse Parents As long as You do not use God's name � "Mishnah. One who curses his father or his mother is not punished unless he curses them by the divine name. If he cursed them by an attribute, R. Meir held him liable, but the sages ruled that he is exempt." (Talmud Mas. Sanhedrin 66a)

Exodus 20:13; "Thou shalt not kill." Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet, Rabbi Says; Only if the Assailant directly Caused the Death is he Responsible � "Mishnah. The following are decapitated: a murderer, and the inhabitants of a seduced city. A murderer who slew his fellow with a stone or an iron, or kept him down under water or in fire, so that he could not ascend thence, is executed. If he pushed him into water or fire, but so that he could ascend, yet he died, he is free [From Death]. If he set on a dog or a snake against him [And they killed him], he is free from death. But if he caused a snake to bite him [By putting his jaws against him] � R. Judah ruled that he is executed; the sages, that he is not."

"Or kept him down under water. The first clause teaches the extreme limit of the law, and so does the last. Thus, the first clause teaches the extreme limit of the law, that though he himself did not push him [into the water], yet since he could not ascend, [through being held down], and so died, he is executed. The last clause likewise teaches the extreme limit, that though he actually pushed him into the water, yet since he could have ascended, but died, he is free from death." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 76b)

"Raba said: If one bound his neighbor and he died of starvation, he is not liable to execution. Raba also said: If he bound him in the sun, and he died, or in a place of intense cold and he died, he is liable; but if the sun was yet to appear, or the cold to make itself felt, he is not. Raba also said: If he bound him before a lion, he is not liable: before mosquitoes, [who stung him to death] he is. R. Ashi said: Even before mosquitoes, he is not liable, because these go and others come." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 77a)

"It has been stated: If one overturned a vat upon a man [who then died of suffocation], or broke open a ceiling above him,� Raba and R. Zera [differ]: One ruled that he is liable, the other that he is not. It can be proved that it was Raba who ruled that he is not liable, for he said: If one bound his neighbor and he dies of starvation, he is not liable." "Raba said: If one thrust his neighbor into a pit, in which there was a ladder [so that he could have climbed out], and then another came and removed it, or even if himself hastened to remove it, he is not liable [for the victim's death], because when he threw him in he could have climbed out. Raba also said: If one shot an arrow at his neighbor, who was� holding a shield, but another came and snatched it away, or even if he himself [the thrower] hastened to do so, he is not liable, because when he shot the arrow its force was spent." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 77a)

"Our Rabbis taught: If ten men smote a man with ten staves, whether simultaneously or successively, and he died, they are exempt. R. Judah b. Bathyra said: If successively, the last is liable, because he struck the actual death blow. R. Johanan said: Both derive [their rulings] from the same verse, And he that killeth kol nefesh [lit., �all life�] of man shall surely be put to death. The Rabbis maintain that kol nefesh implies the whole life; but R. Judah b. Bathyra holds that� kol nefesh implies whatever there is of life." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 78a)

"If he set on a dog or a snake against him, etc."

"R. Aha b. Jacob said: If you will investigate [the grounds of the dispute, you will learn that] in R. Judah's opinion the snake's poison is lodged in its fangs, therefore, one who causes it to bite [by placing its fangs against the victim's flesh] is decapitated, whilst the snake itself is exempt. But in the view of the Sages the snake emits the poison of its own accord; therefore the snake is stoned, whilst he who caused it to bite is exempt." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 78a)

�� *******

Exodus 20:14; "Thou shalt not commit adultery." Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet, Rabbi Says; When a Woman has Sexual Intercourse with a Boy the Degree of Wrong is as Being Injured by a Piece of Wood;� "GEMARA. Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown‑up woman makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood. When I said it before Samuel he said: �Injured by a piece of wood� does not apply to flesh. Some teach this teaching by itself: [As to] a small boy who has intercourse with a grown‑up woman. Rab said, he makes her [as though she were] injured by a piece of wood; whereas Samuel said: �Injured by a piece of wood� does not apply to flesh. R." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Kethuboth 11b)

Yet, Rabbi Says; When a man has Intercourse with a Little Girl it is Nothing � "Raba said. It means this: When a grown‑up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this, it is as if one puts the finger into the eye; but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown‑up woman he makes her as �a girl who is injured by a piece of wood.� and [with regard to the case of] �a girl injured by a piece of wood.� itself, there is the difference of opinion between R. Meir and the Sages." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Kethuboth 11b)

Yet, Rabbi Says; A Little Girl must be Three Years Old to have Intercourse; "An objection was raised: A girl of the age of three years and even one of the age of two years and one day may be betrothed by intercourse; so R. Meir. But the Sages say: Only one who is three years and one day old." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Nidah 44b)

Yet, Rabbi Says; If a Little Girl is Forced to have Intercourse before She is Three, No Problem, on the Third Time it is as Though a Finger Being Dipped in Honey;� "Our Rabbis taught: A story is told of a certain woman who came before R. Akiba and said to him, �Master, intercourse has been forced upon me when I was under three years of age; what is my position towards the priesthood?� �You are fit for the priesthood�, he replied. �Master�, she continued, �I will give you a comparison; to what may the incident be compared? To a babe whose finger was submerged in honey. The first time and the second time he cries about it, but the third time he sucks it.�" (Talmud ‑ Mas. Nidah 45a)

Intercourse with Animals..."This represents the view of R. Meir, while Rab holds the same view as R. Eleazar. If [Rab holds the same view] as R. Eleazar, what was the object of pointing to her previous carnal intercourse when [her prohibition] could have been inferred from the fact that she was a harlot, R. Eleazar having stated that an unmarried man who cohabited with an unmarried woman with no matrimonial intention renders her thereby a harlot!

R. Joseph replied: When, for instance, the woman was subjected to intercourse with a beast, where the reason of �previous carnal intercourse may be applied but not that of harlot. Said Abaye to him: Whatever you prefer [your reply cannot be upheld], If she is a be'ulah she must also be a harlot; and if she is not a harlot she cannot be a be'ulah either! And were you to reply: This case is similar to that of a wounded woman, [it may be pointed out] that if [the disqualification should be extended to] unnatural intercourse also, you will find no woman eligible to marry a [High Priest [since there is not one] who has not been in some way wounded by a splinter! No, said R. Zera, in respect of a minor who made a declaration of refusal."

Yet, Rabbi Says; A Women who had Intercourse with an Animal is Eligible to Marry a Priest � "R. Shimi b. Hiyya stated: A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest. Likewise it was taught: A woman who had intercourse with that which is no human being, though she is in consequence subject to the penalty of stoning, is nevertheless permitted to marry a priest." "When R. Dimi came he related: It once happened at Haitalu that while a young woman was sweeping the floor a village dog covered her from the rear, and Rabbi permitted her to marry a priest. Samuel said: Even a High Priest. But was there a High Priest in the days of Rabbi? � Rather, [Samuel meant]: Fit for a High Priest."

"Raba of Parzakaia said to R. Ashi: Whence is derived the following statement which the Rabbis made: Harlotry is not applicable to bestial intercourse? � It is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot, or the price of a dog, and yet we learned that the hire of a dog and the price of a harlot are permitted because it is said, Even both these, two only but not four." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Yevamoth 59b)

�� *******

Exodus 20:15; "Thou shalt not steal." Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet, Rabbi Says; "Scripturally, Only the Abduction of Human Beings is to be Considered Stealing � "R. Josiah said: From Thou shalt not steal. R. Johanan said: From They shall not be sold as bondsmen. Now, there is no dispute: one Master states the prohibition for stealing [i.e., abduction], the other Master for selling [the kidnaped person]. "

"Our Rabbis taught: Thou shalt not steal;� Scripture refers to the stealing of human beings. You say, Scripture refers to the stealing of human beings; but perhaps it is not so, the theft of property [lit., �money�] being meant? � I will tell you: Go forth and learn from the thirteen principles whereby the Torah is interpreted. [one of which is that] a law is interpreted by its general context: of what does the text speak? of [crimes involving] capital punishment: hence this too refers [to a crime involving] capital punishment."

"Another [Baraitha] taught: Ye shall not steal: The Writ refers to theft of property. You say thus, but perhaps it is not so, Scripture referring to the theft of human beings? I will tell you: Go forth and learn from the thirteen principles whereby the Torah is interpreted,[one of which is that] a law is interpreted by its general context. Of what does the text speak? of money matters; therefore this too refuse to a money [theft]." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 86a)

"It was taught: R. Phinehas b. Yair said that where there was a danger of causing a profanation of the Name, even the retaining of a lost article of a heathen is a crime. Samuel said: It is permissible, however, to benefit by his mistake as in the case when Samuel once bought of a heathen a golden bowl under the assumption of it being of copper for four zuz, and also left him minus one zuz. R. Kahana once bought of a heathen a hundred and twenty barrels which were supposed to be a hundred while he similarly left him minus one zuz and said to him: �See that I am relying upon you.� Rabina together with a heathen bought a palm‑tree to chop up [and divide]. He thereupon said to his attendant: Quick, bring to me the parts near to the roots, for the heathen is interested only in the number [but not in the quality]. R. Ashi was once walking on the road when he noticed branches of vines outside a vineyard upon which ripe clusters of grapes were hanging. He said to his attendant: �Go and see, if they belong to a heathen bring them to me, but if to an Israelite do not bring them to me.� The heathen happened to be then sitting in the vineyard and thus overheard this conversation, so he said to him: �If of a heathen would they be permitted?� � He replied: �A heathen is usually prepared to [dispose of his grapes and] accept payment, whereas an Israelite is generally not prepared to [do so and] accept payment." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Baba Kama 113b)

Exodus 20:16; "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor." Thus saith the LORD�!

Yet Rabbi Says; Burn the books of the Minim (pseudonym for Christians) � "The blank spaces and the Books of the Minim (Christians), we may not save them from a fire. R. Jose said: On weekdays one must cut out the Divine Names which they contain, hide them, and burn the rest. R. Tarfon said: May I bury my son if I would not burn them together with their Divine Names if they came to my hand. For even if one pursued me to slay me, or a snake pursued me to bite me, I would enter a heathen Temple [for refuge], but not the houses of these [people] (Christians), for the latter know (of God] yet deny [Him], whereas the former are ignorant and deny [Him], and of them the Writ saith, and behind the doors and the posts hast thou set up thy memorial. R. Ishmael said: [One can reason] a minori: If in order to make peace between man and wife the Torah decreed, Let my Name, written in sanctity, be blotted out in water, these, who stir up jealousy, enmity, and wrath between Israel and their Father in Heaven, how much more so; and of them David said, Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? And am I not grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate then with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. And just as we may not rescue them from a fire, so may we not rescue them from a collapse [of debris] or from water or from anything that may destroy them" (alluding to Christians). (Talmud ‑ Mas. Shabbath 116a)

�� *******

Exodus 20:17; "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor's." Saith the LORD�!

Yet Rabbi Says; It is Permissible to Steal a heathen's (Gentile) Lost Property � "R. Bibi b. Giddal said that R. Simeon the pious stated: The robbery of a heathen is prohibited, though an article lost by him is permissible. His robbery is prohibited, for R. Huna said: Whence do we learn that the robbery of a heathen is prohibited? Because it says: �And thou shalt consume all the peoples that the Lord thy God shall deliver unto thee�; only in the time [of war] when they were delivered in thy hand [as enemies] this is permitted, whereas this is not so in the time [of peace] when they are not delivered in thy hand [as enemies].

His lost article is permissible, for R. Hama b. Guria said that Rab stated: Whence can we learn that the lost article of a heathen is permissible? Because it says: And with all lost thing of thy brother's: it is to your brother that you make restoration, but you need not make restoration to a heathen. But why not say that this applies only where the lost article has not yet come into the possession of the finder, in which case he is under no obligation to look round for it, whereas if it had already entered his possession, why not say that he should return it. Said Rabina: And thou hast found it surely implies that the lost article has already come into his possession." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Baba Kama 113b)

Rabbi Says, Heathens (Gentiles) are not Considered as Man, but Instead are on a Level as Animals � "�Or uses oil of anointing. Our Rabbis have taught: He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle or vessels is not guilty; if over heathens or the dead, he is not guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is written: Upon the flesh of man [adam] shall it not be poured; and cattle and vessels are not man. Also with regard to the dead, [it is plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called corpse and not man. But why is one exempt in the case of heathens; are they not in the category of adam? � No, it is written: And ye my sheep, the sheep of my pasture, are adam [man]: Ye are called adam but heathens are not called �adam. But is it not written: And the persons [adam] were sixteen thousand? � Because it is used in opposition to cattle. But is it not written: And should I not have pity on Nineveh [that great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons [adam]? � This too is used in opposition to cattle. Or, if you wish, I might explain it in the light of what a Tanna recited before R. Eleazar: Whosoever is subject to the prohibition �he shall not pour� is subject to [the law] �it shall not be poured [over him]�; but he who is not subject to �he shall not pour� is not subject to �it shall not be poured [over him]�." (Talmud ‑ Mas. K'rithoth 6b)

Rabbi Says, Heathen's Prefer having Intercourse with Israelite Cattle over Their Own Wives � "Said Mar �Ukba b. Hama: Because heathens (Gentiles/Cutherans) frequent their neighbors� wives, and should one by chance not find her in, and find the cattle there, he might use it immorally. You may also say that even if he should find her in he might use the animal, as a Master has said: Heathens prefer the cattle of Israelites to their own wives, for R. Johanan said: When the serpent came unto Eve he infused filthy lust into her. If that be so [the same should apply] also to Israel! �" (Talmud ‑ Mas. Avodah Zarah 22b)

Note, the passages which follow are those which the Talmudic Rabbis portray Jesus Christ. The pseudonym Balaam, is used in place of Jesus' name. The reason the Jewish editors used the pseudonym is because of earlier persecutions and censorship from the secular‑Christian communities over the past 2,000 years. Furthermore, it is extremely important to note that even though the Talmud advocates a coming Messiah, the Messiah that is advocated is not Jesus Christ but an entirely different Messiah. We mentioned this because throughout Christendom today, many false Judeo-Christian teachers are teaching that the Talmudic writings allude to the coming Messiah.

Yes, it is true that a Messiah is coming. However, as Christians we are taught that the Messiah has come already, and the next coming we await is His second coming. Therefore, since we are waiting for Messiah's second coming, the Messia which the Talmud alludes to obviously differs from the Messiah, Jesus Christ.

Rabbi Says, Jesus was a has‑been Prophet that was Cursed by God, Thereafter� Lowered to the Status of Soothsayer � "Balaam (Jesus) also the son of Beor, the soothsayer, [did the children of Israel slay with the sword].40 A soothsayer? But he was a prophet! R. Johanan said: At first he was a prophet, but subsequently a soothsayer.41 R. Papa observed: This is what men say, �She who was the descendant of princes and governors, played the harlot with carpenters.�42" (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 106a)� parenthesis mine

Sanhedrin 106a footnotes:

(38) V. ibid, XXV, 1‑9: since Israel was thus seduced and punished through his advice, as stated above, he demanded payment.

(39) So Balaam, demanding a reward, lost his life.

(40) Joshua XIII, 22.

(41) As a punishment for wishing to curse Israel he was degraded from a prophet to a soothsayer.

(42) �Shipdraggers,� (v. Rashi). Herford, Christianity in the Talmud, p. 48, suggests that Balaam is frequently used in the Talmud as a type for Jesus (v. also pp. 64‑70). Though no name is mentioned to shew which woman is meant, the mother of Jesus may be alluded to, which theory is strengthened by the statement that she mated with a carpenter. (The Munich MS. has recorded in the margin instead of hrcd, i.e., singular instead of plural)

Rabbi Says, regarding Talmud pseudonyms, Balaam alludes to Jesus, and Considered anti‑Christian � "A certain min3 (Christian) said to R. Hanina: Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was? � He replied: It is not actually stated, but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days,4 [it follows that] he was thirty‑ three or thirty‑four years old.5 He rejoined: Thou hast said correctly; I personally have seen Balaam's Chronicle, in which it is stated, �Balaam (Jesus) the lame was thirty years old when Phinehas the Robber killed him.�6 Mar, the son of Rabina, said to his sons: In the case of all [those mentioned as having no portion in the future world] you should not take [the Biblical passages dealing with them] to expound them [to their discredit], excepting in the case of the wicked Balaam (Jesus): whatever you find [written] about him, lecture upon it [to his disadvantage]. (Talmud ‑ Mas. Sanhedrin 106b)

Sanhedrin 106b footnotes:

(3) Heretic, v. Glos.

(4) Ps. LV, 24.

(5) cf. p.471. n. 1.

(6) [According to the view that all the Balaam passages are anti‑Christian in tendency, Balaam being used as an alias for Jesus, Phinehas the Robber is thus taken to represent Pontius Pilatus, and the Chronicle of Balaam probably to denote a Gospel (v. Herford op. cit. 72ff.). This view is however disputed by Bacher and others: cf. Ginzberg, Journal of Biblical Literature, XLI, 121.].

Rabbi converses with Onkelos, who allegedly via magical arts (altered state of consciousness) spoke to Jesus in Hell � "Onkelos son of Kolonikos was the son of Titus's sister. He had a mind to convert himself to Judaism. He went and raised Titus from the dead by magical arts, and asked him; �Who is most in repute in the [other] world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He said: Their observances are burdensome and you will not be able to carry them out. Go and attack them in that world and you will be at the top as it is written, Her adversaries are become the head etc.; whoever harasses Israel becomes head. He asked him:..." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Gittin 56b)

Rabbi Says, Jesus is in Hell, Boiling in Semen �� Continuing from Gittin 56b "...what is your punishment [in the other world]? He replied: What decreed for myself. Every day my ashes are collected and sentence is passed on me and I am burnt and my ashes are scattered over the seven seas. He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He asked him: Who is in repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever.

1). He then asked: What is your punishment? He (Jesus) replied: With boiling hot semen.

2). He then went and raised by incantations the sinners of Israel.3 He asked them: Who is in repute in the other world? They replied: Israel. What about joining them? They replied: Seek their welfare, seek not their harm. Whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. He said: What is your punishment? They replied: With boiling hot excrement, since a Master has said: Whoever mocks at the words of the Sages is punished with boiling hot excrement. Observe the difference between the sinners of Israel and the prophets of the other nations who worship idols. It has been taught: Note from this incident how serious a thing it is to put a man to shame, for God espoused the cause of Bar Kamza and destroyed His House and burnt His Temple." (Talmud ‑ Mas. Gittin 57a)

Mas. Gittin 57a footnotes:

(1) Deut. XXIII, 7.

(2) Because he enticed Israel to go astray after the daughters of Moab. V. Sanh. 106a.

(3) [MS.M. Jesus].

Author's note: The 'he' in item (2) is alluding to Jesus Christ..

�� *******

From having read the above material, if I could tell you that this material was no longer in vogue, you might find relief from the nauseous feeling you may now have. Unfortunately that is not the case, for the Talmud even in our modern times is still the most important learning aid in equipping Jews who want to become rabbis, and the most popular study aid for any Jew who feels the need to become acquainted with their religious roots and heritage (Judaism).

However, do not take my word of the popularity and importance of the Babylonian Talmud in modern day Jewry...! Yet, consider the words of one of the most honored scholars in Israel today, Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz. Who in 1988 received Israel's highest honor, 'The Israel Prize.' Adin Steinsaltz, made the following statement in his book titled, 'The Essential Talmud' page 3: "If the Bible is the cornerstone of Judaism, then the Talmud is the central pillar, soaring up from the foundations and supporting the entire spiritual and intellectual edifice. In many ways the Talmud is the most important book in Jewish culture, the backbone of creativity and of national life. No other work has had a comparable influence on the theory and practice of Jewish life, shaping spiritual content and serving as a guide to conduct."

A spiritual war between forces of darkness (Satan's devilish army) and the forces of Light (God's Angelic army).� The war is to determine whether God's Truth will be proclaimed, or Satan's lies will continue to hold many victims in bondage. Should God's Angels prevail, eyes will see that could not see, and ears which could not hear will hear. Thus exposing the lies, blasphemous writings and teachings which Satan began incorporating into the religious belief system of God's chosen people, three thousand years ago. Which encompass a total of 1500 years of compiling and formulating. Lies that even from the beginning corrupted God's chosen people.

The following is a summary of references to Jesus in the Talmud:

Sanhedrin 67a: Jesus referred to as the son of Pandira, a soldier. Mother a prostitute.

Kallah 1b. (18b): Illegitimate and conceived during menstruation. Mother a Prostitute.

Sanhedrin 67a: Jesus was hanged on the eve of Passover.

Toldath Jeschu: The Birth of Christ related in most shameful expressions.

Abhodah Zarah II: Christ referred to as the son of Pandira, a Roman soldier, a Prostitute Mother.

Schabbath XIV: Christ again referred to as the son of Padira the Roman soldier.

Sanhedrin 43a: On the eve of Passover they hanged Jesus.

Schabbath 104b: Called a fool and no one pays attention to fools.

Toldoth Jeschu: Says Judas and Jesus engaged in a quarrel with human excrement.

Sanhedrin 103a: Suggested corrupts his morals and dishonors self.

Zohar III (282): Died like a beast and buried in animal's dung heap.

Hilkoth Melakhim: Attempt to prove Christians err in worship of Jesus.

Abhodah Zarah 21a: Reference to worship of Jesus in homes unwanted.

Orach Chaiim 113: Avoid appearance of paying respect to Jesus.

Iore Dea 150, 2: Do not appear to pay respect to Jesus by accident.

Abhodah Zarah (6a): False teaching to worship on the first day of Sabbath.

Following are references to Christians:

Kerithuth (6b p. 78): Jews called men, Christians are not called men.

Makkoth (7b): Innocent of murder if intent was to kill Christian.

Sohar (II 64b): Christian birth rate must be diminished materially.

Schabbath (116a) Tos: Gospels called volumes of iniquity, heretical books.

Schabbath (116a): Talmudists agree that the books of Christians are to be burned.

Chullin (91b): Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share.

Hilkoth Akum (V. 12): Quote Scriptures forbid mentioning the Christian God.

Choschen Ham (226 1): Jew may keep lost property of Christian found by Jew.

Babha Kama (113b): It is permitted to deceive Christians; Jew may lie and perjure to Condemn a Christian; Name of God not profaned when lying to Christians.

Kallah (1b p. 18): Jew may perjure himself with a clear conscience.

Schabbouth Hag. (d): Jews may swear falsely with subterfuge wording.

Zohar (1 160a): Jews must always try to deceive Christians.

Choschen Ham (425 5): Jews are not to prevent the death of a Christian.

Hilkkoth Akum (x,1): Do not save Christians in danger of death, instructed to let die.

Abhodah Zarah (25b)T: Even the best of the Goim [Christians] should be killed.

Sepher Or Israel 177b: If Jew kills a Christian he commits no sin.

Zohar (11 43a): Extermination of Christians necessary.

Hilkhoth Akum (x,1): Make no agreements and show no mercy to Christians.

Hilkhoth Maakhaloth: Christians are idolaters.

Abhodah Zarah (22a): Do not associate with gentiles, they shed blood.

Abhodah Zarah (22a): Christians have intercourse with animals.

Iore Dea (198, 48): Female Jews contaminated when meeting Christians.

Makkoth (7b): Innocent of murder if intent was to kill a Christian.

Zohar II (64b): Christian likened to cows and asses.

Kethuboth (110b): Psalmist compares Christians to beasts.

Sanhedrin (74b) Tos: Sexual intercourse with Christian same as intercourse with beast.

Kethuboth (3b): The seed [children] of Christians valued same as the seed of a beast.

Iore Dea (337, 1): Replace dead Christians like you would a lost cow or ass.

Schabbath (116a) Tos: Gospels called the volumes of iniquity, and heretical books.

Schabbath (116a): Talmudists agree the books of Christians are to be burned.

Chullin (91b): Jews possess dignity even an angel cannot share.

Sanhedrin (58b): To strike a Jew is the same as slapping the face of God.

Zohar (1, 25b): Those Jews who do good to Christians never rise when dead.

Iore Dea (148, 12H): Jews are to hide their hatred for Christians.

Babha Bathra (54b): Christian property belongs to the first Jew claiming it.

Choschen Ham (193, 7): Keep any overpayment Christians make in error.

Babha Kama (113b): It is permitted for a Jew to deceive Christians.

Iore Dea (157, 2) H: Jew may deceive Christians.

Babha Kama (113a): Jew may lie and perjure himself to condemn a Christian.

Babha Kama (113b): The name of God is not profaned when a Jew lies to Christians.

Kallah (1b, p. 18): Jew may perjure himself when lying about Christians.

Schabbouth Hag (6d): Jews may swear falsely by the use of subterfuge wording.

Zohar (1, 160a): Jews must always try to deceive Christians.

Choschen Ham (425, 5): Do not prevent a Christians death.

Iore Dea (158, 1): Christians who are not Jews' enemies must also die.

Hilkkoth Akum (X,1): Jews are not to save Christians in danger of death.

Sanhedrin (59a): Christians who study the Jews' "Laws" {Talmud} to be put to death.

Zohar (1, 25a): Christians are to be destroyed when no danger of discovery.

Abhodah Zarah (26b)T: Even the best of the Goim [non‑Jews] should be killed.

Sepher Or Israel (177b): If a Jew kills a Christian he commits no sin. He has done God a service.

Alkut Simoni (245c): A Jew shedding the blood of a Christian is offering a sacrifice to God.

Zohar (II, 43a): Extermination of Christians is a necessary sacrifice to God.

Zohar (L, 38b, 39a): A Jew to receive a high place in heaven if he kills a Christian.

Hilkhoth Akum (X,1): Jews are to show no mercy to a Christian.

Kallah, 1b, (18b): "Jesus was illegitimate and conceived during menstruation."

Scabbath XIV: "Jesus is referred to as the son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish Prostitute."

Sanhedrin, 103a: "This passage suggests that Christ corrupted His morals and dishonored Himself."

Sanhedrin, 107b: "This passage states that Christ seduced and destroyed Israel."

Hilkoth Melakhim: Suggests that Christians sin by worshiping Jesus Christ.

Abhodah Zorah (15b): Suggests that Christians have sexual relations with animals.

Chaggigah, (15b): "A Jew is considered to be good in the eyes of God, in spite of Any sins he may commit."

Babha Kama (113b): "The name of God not profaned, if a Jew lies to a Christian."

Kelhubath (11a‑11b): "When a grown‑up man has had intercourse with a little girl...It means this: When a trown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this [See Footnote] three years old it is as if one puts the finger into the eye [Again See Footnote] tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl three years old."

Tract Mechilla: "Almighty God studies the Talmud standing, because He has such respect for that book."

Sanhedrin (59a) & Abohodah Zarah 8‑6: "Every goy [non‑Jew] who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die."

Szaaloth-Utszabot The Book of Jore Dia 17: "A Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim [non‑Jew] asks if our books contain anything against them."

Simeon Haddarsen fol. 56‑D: "When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves."

Midrasch Talpioth 225‑L: "Jehovah created the non‑Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non‑Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night."

Nadarine, 20, B; Schulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "A Jew may do to a non‑Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat."

Josiah 60, 6, Rabbi Abarbanel to Daniel 7, 13: "As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, and He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope's palace. The He will start a merciless war on non‑Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: 'I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the goyim."

Schulchan Aruch Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "A Jew may rob a goy [non‑Jew] that is, he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him."

Schulchan Aruch Choszen Hamiszpat 348: "All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples [This is what the Jews use for justification to steal the land of the Palestinians]. An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to mortality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general."

Tosefta, Erubin VIII, 1: "On the house of the goy [non‑Jew] one looks as on the fold of cattle."

Tosefta, Abhodah Zarah VIII, 5: "How to interpret the word 'robbery.' A goy [non‑Jew] is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is not forbidden to do all this to a goy."

Schulchan Aruch Edit, I, 136: "All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day of reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of� before-hand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all."

Schulchan Aruch Orach Chaim 539: "At the time of the Cholhamoed the transaction of any kind of� business is forbidden. But it is permitted to cheat a goy [non‑Jew], because cheating of goyi at any time pleases the Lord."

Schulchan Aruch Choszen Hamiszpat 388: "It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

Livore David 37: "If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death."

Abhodah Zarah 26b Tosephoth: "A Jew who kills a Christian commits no sin, but offers an acceptable sacrifice to God."

After reading these verbatim quotations from the countless other similar quotations which you will find in the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud in the English language are you of the opinion, that the Talmud was the "sort of book" from which Jesus "drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world" on "moral and religious subjects"? You have read here verbatim quotations and official footnotes on a few of the many other subjects covered by the "63 books" of the Talmud.

And on and on, and on it goes, for 63 volumes of filth and blasphemy. This is what the Jews are taught in their synagogues. Do you after reading these words, believe the Christian religion got its start from this kind of blasphemy and filth?

These are just a few selected from a very complicated arrangement in which many references are obscured by intricate reasonings. Speaking of the "Tradition of the Elders," Jesus said: "Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders?...But he [Jesus] answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?...ye have made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition." (Matthew 15:3‑6)

Jesus said a second time: "Then the Pharisees and scribes [The Jews] asked him [Jesus], Why walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders...He [Jesus] answered and said unto them...Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition." (Mark 7:5‑9)

Paul said of the "Tradition of the Elders." "Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." (Colossians 2:8) Peter also spoke of them. "Forasmuch as ye know that ye [Jews] were not redeemed...from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers." (1 Peter 1:18) So Jesus' teaching could not have possibly come from this blasphemous book. The Babylonian Talmud is the Jewish holy book, used in the training of rabbis, taught in the synagogues by the rabbis and studied by the Jews from an early age until death.

Without any question, The Talmud (Known to Jesus in His time on earth in a flesh body as "The Tradition of The Elders") stands as the Supreme Authority of Jewish Law [Their lies to the contrary notwithstanding], philosophy and ethics; it contains the unchanging moral code by which the religious and social life of the Jews has been regulated to this day. The Jews believe in the teachings of the Talmud and act in accordance with its commands. Whereas the teachings of the Christian Bible are available to all, for it is to be found everywhere.

On the other hand, only a very few non‑Jews have even so much as heard of the Talmud, and still fewer know of its teachings, for it is scores of volumes in length and shrouded in secrecy by the Jews. Are you naive enough to believe that a religious book which encourages incest, such as the Sanhedrin volume of the Talmud does, or unnatural intercourse, or rape of non‑Jews; or bestiality, as found in this filthy book; do you believe this could be the basis of Jesus' teaching?

This is what the Judeo-Christian ["Minister"] teach, when he tells you that we have a Judeo‑ Christian culture. "It is highly probable that the bulk of the Jew's ancestors 'never' lived in Palestine 'at all,' Which Witnesses the Power of Historical Assertion Over Fact." (H. G. Wells, The Outline of History)

�� Chapter Four

�� Serpent

"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he {serpent} said unto the woman {Eve}, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden." (Genesis 3:1)

1). Snakes are to be feared, and it is not abnormal to fear them. To prove that even such Godly men as Moses were/are afraid of snakes, we present the following from the Book of Exodus. We begin with Moses standing before the burning bush: "...the Lord said unto him, What is that in thine hand? And he {Moses} said, A rod. And He {God} said, Cast it on the ground. And he cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses fled from before it." (Exodus 4:2‑3)

(2). So we can see that even Moses fled before a serpent/snake! It scared him and he fled from it. Because man has a natural fear of them. Yet here in Genesis Chapter Three, we have Eve having a discourse with a serpent/snake! With no fear. I do not believe it for a minute. I don't know about you, but I do not believe that Eve was having a conversation with a literal snake! Not for a minute. That is simply to far‑ fetched to be believed literally.

(3). If a snake had come up to Eve she would have ran for Adam to protect her from it. She would not have simply stood or sat there and had a casual conversation with it. No! A thousand times No!!! She would not have just sat there and said: "Hello how are you?" or some such nonsense. She simply would not have done that at all.

4). Serpent is a strange word when we look at it in the scriptures. It is translated from many different words, but it is used 38 times in the Old Testament. And is translated, basically, from four different words. But let's only deal with one #5175 in Strong's Concordance. It appears 31 times and every time it is translated serpent. Now keep in mind there are three other words that are also translated serpent in the Scriptures. And the total words are used some 71 times in all the Scriptures. 38 times as serpent and about 24 times as dragons.

5). What is a dragon, you ask. Well this presentation is about serpents not dragons and to get into a long discussion about dragons would take us away from our intended subject. So we shall leave that for others to contemplate. This is because we have a problem here in Genesis 3:1 with Eve talking with this thing called a serpent.

6). Now the scriptures say the serpent was more subtil. Well what does this word mean. To arrive at a proper answer we will turn to Strong's Concordance again. Which says the word "serpent" is "Nachas" or "naw‑khawsh" (#5175). Which is a non‑ Israelite name according to (#5176) ‑‑ "Nachash;" the same as #5175; the name of two persons appar. non‑Isr. It also means according to #5175 a snake (from its hiss): serpent. From the #5172 which means to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; gen. to prognosticate ‑‑ enchanter, learn by experience, diligently observe.

7). Also, we find the following from the Second College Edition, New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 1300: 1. A snake, esp. a large or poisonous one. 2. A sly, sneaking, treacherous person. 3. Bible Satan, in the form he assumed to tempt Eve. 4. Music an obsolete, coiled, brass wind instrument of wood covered with leather. The American Dictionary of the English Language, by Noah Webster 1828, Facsimile First Edition, published by the Foundation For American Christian Education relates that serpent means among others: a subtil or malicious person.

8). The word prognosticate means to: 1. To foretell or predict, esp. from signs or indications. 2. To indicate beforehand. (Second College Edition, New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 1135) The 1828 American Dictionary relates: 1. To foreshow; to indicate a future event by present signs. A clear sky at sunset prognosticates a fair day. 2. To foretell by means of present signs; to predict. "I neither will nor can prognosticate To the young gaping heir his father's fate." So now we can see that the word "nachash" is linked to foretelling things. Or its linked to witchcraft (whisper a magic spell) and humanism. It's linked to anything, other than the Word of God.

9). Now let's look again at this word serpent, and we will see that every time it appears in the Bible, it does not mean a serpent/snake. That sometimes it means either a person or a nation. For example when Jacob/Israel was relating the gifts which were given to the various tribes of Israel we find the following: "Dan shall be a Serpent by the way, an Adder {snake} in the path, that biteth the horse heels..." (Genesis 49:17)

10). Is someone going to try to convince us that Dan was to become a snake. I don't think so. Do you? It is merely a figure of speech. It means that the tribe of Dan would, or the people of the tribe of Dan would display the attributes of being sly, cunning, deceitful.

11). The wicked are described as serpents/snakes: "The Wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a Ser[emt: They are like The Deaf Adder that stoppeth her ear." (Psalm 58:3‑4)

12). Evil and violent men are described as serpents: "Deliver me, O Lord, from The Evil Man: preserve me from The Violent Man; Which imagine mischiefs in their heart; continually are they gathered together for war. They have sharpened their tongues Like A Serpent; Adders' poison is under their lips. Selah." (Psalm 140:1‑3) Thus we can see by these verses, anyone who is evil or wicked is described as being a serpent or snake.

13). Now let's examine nations because they are also very important to this presentation. Turn to the Book of Isaiah where we find: "In that day the Lord with His sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing Sserpent even leviathan that crooked Serpent; and He shall slay the dragon that is in the sea." (Isaiah 27:1)

14). We see here that the Leviathan is a crooked and piercing serpent. It appears this is an allegory, talking about the enemies of Israel.

15). The nations that came against Israel are compared to this thing which is also described as a serpent. And it appears that this would be a reference to the Grecian, Turkish and Roman Empires of that day. This is generally accepted when one looks at the narratives of the Bible.

16). Now let's look at Jeremiah 8:17 for another: "For, behold, I will send Serpents, cockatrices, among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite you, saith the Lord."

17). Here again we are not talking about actual serpents/snakes. Not at all. We are talking about nations which will becoming against Israel. They will not be charmed and they will bite you. At this point some will ask what do you mean they will not be charmed.

18). For an answer turn to the Book of Second Kings Chapter Seventeen we find Assyria came against what was left of Israel, and they told the Assyrians they would pay them a ransom if they would not come in and harm them. That's charming them is it not? But if they will not be charmed, then they will not accept their money, gold, silver or other valuables. They will come in and bite you and destroy you. That is what Jeremiah is telling them. So we can clearly see, They Are Not Serpents At All, they are the enemy of Israel, who will come against them.

19). There is another like story in Amos 9:3 and another in Isaiah 14:29. Those are good stories and you should read them very carefully.

20). We find allegories being used all through the Scriptures. No one has a problem with Juda being called a lion's whelp (Genesis 49:9); Zebulun as a foal and an ass's colt (Genesis 49:11); Issachar as a strong ass (Genesis 49:14); Naphtali as a hind {A red deer ‑‑ one that is fully grown} (Genesis 49:21); Joseph as a bough {branch or limb of a tree} (Genesis 49:22); Benjamin as a wolf (Genesis 49:27); All the tribes as a lion (Numbers 23:24; 24:9); Gad as a lion (Deuteronomy 33:20); Dan as a lion's whelp (Deuteronomy 33:22); Jesus as a Lamb (Throughout the Book of Revelation); Israel as a speckled bird (Jeremiah 12:9); A nation of the East as a ravenous bird (Isaiah 46:11); Preachers as fishers (Jeremiah 16:16); Pharaoh King of Egypt as a young lion and a whale (Ezekiel 32:2) and Herod as a fox. (Luke 13:32) When the word "lion" is used for Judah, we are trying to really emphasize the strength of Judah. And when we use the word "serpent" we think of something sly, wicked, evil, cunning, something that hides from us, has venom, that is strong and dangerous. And that is why the word serpent is used many times as an allegory in the Scriptures.

21). There are many more allegories which could be presented but we believe this should suffice. Was any of these men such an animal or thing? Of course not! It is simply a description of the characteristics of these separate individuals.

22) Then we have the false doctrine of the Pharisees, Sadducees and Herod described as Leaven. (Matthew 16:12)

23). Thus we can clearly see that it is not at all unusual for a word to be used to illustrate something more impressively. And that is what we are talking about.

24). Most Christians do not have any trouble with any of these in the various verses of Scriptures until we get to Genesis 3:1. For example if we go a little further we find: "...thou shalt bruise His heel." Everyone knows that Scripture. And we find another one "...It shall bruise thy head..." and no one has any problem relating that to our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and the evil one {which most people believe to be Satan}. Nobody has a problem with that.

25). Then: Why is it a problem when someone comes along and says The Serpent Is Not A Snake! To some people that is a real problem;� they want that Serpent to be a Snake!!! And they will scream and rant like a spoiled child if someone disagrees with them.

26). In our opinion that Serpent never was a snake! In my opinion that serpent was a live flesh and blood person. In my opinion it was no spiritual being, and that is not meant to refute the Satan doctrine at all. We are simply saying that this thing we had in the flesh, in the body, in the Garden of Eden, was not an invisible, negative entity. It was not a snake that walked on two feet.

27). Let's look at some of the characteristics of this particular serpent in Chapter Three Verse One. One of the things we know, is that it is more wise than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. Is that not what it says? There word is subtil but we will deal with that a little later.

28). What is wisdom a trait of? Can you show us any animal in the animal kingdom which can be wise, that can be sly, that can be crafty? They only do what they do by instinct, they do not do it from reason. No animal operates from reason.

29). Now one can condition response them, by exposing them to altering good with bad conditions depending upon what they do in response to the stimuli given them. But that is merely training them, that is not teaching them wisdom, that is not teaching them to reason.

30). Oh, the experiments with monkeys, where some scientists say they have taught a monkey to talk ‑‑ but again that is only the animal being taught to make certain sounds as a result of varying stimuli given them. That is not the same thing. That is

not the same thing as being born with the ability to think and reason.

31). Another thing about this serpent that everybody agrees upon, is that it walked erect like a man. This is a natural human trait. It is not the natural reaction or trait of any animal, much less a snake. You cannot find this ability in snakes.

32). They do not stand up. Oh there may be some species which have small legs or the semblance of legs but more than likely, if the scientists would be honest, they are a species of lizard and not a specie of snake. There are some snakes which can raise their heads up quite a bit, but still, they cannot stand erect.

33). It has been said that apes are a form of the erectus, but that is simply not true. They spend most of their time moving about on both their (hands) and feet.

Oh they can stand erect for short periods of time but their natural position is on all fours. And even when they are standing erect they are bent over, they have a slight hump to their back because that is not their normal stance.

34). And besides that, can you imagine Eve standing or sitting in the Garden of Eden and a great harry ape suddenly dropping out of a tree beside her and speaking to her. She would have been gone like a bolt of lightening. She would not have stayed there with such an animal.

35). Now the third thing about this serpent was the ability to talk. To speak like a man. Well things are getting worse all the time for those who want that serpent to be a snake. There has never been a snake with the ability to talk ‑‑ not then and not now, nor at any time in the foreseeable future. They simply cannot do so. They do not even have any vocal cords. Oh some will say what about the ass which spoke to Balaam. Well let's look at it for just a moment. "And Balaam rose up in the morning, and saddled his ASS, and went with the princes of Moab. And God's anger was kindled because he went: and the Angel of the Lord stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his ASS, and his two servants were with him. And the ASS saw the Angel of the Lord standing in the way..." (Numbers 22:21‑23)

36). According to Strong's Concordance the word "ass" or "attuwn" #860 which is the same as "eythan" or "ethan" which means: "from an unused root (mean, to continue); permanence; hence (coner) permanent; spec. A Chieftain:� hard, mighty, rough, strength, strong."

37). So Balaam was riding upon a strong Chieftain. Not a Jackass as we know. We also find that the word "ass" can also mean a #2544 "chamowr" or "Canaanite." As black men were used to carry burdens and people in ancient times; and some of the Canaanites were black, it is quite possible that Balaam was being carried by a strong black Canaanite Chieftain. Which would explain the "ass'" ability to talk.

38). Now if we are going to attribute the talking in Genesis Chapter Three of a snake, then it would appear that in this respect Satan has more power than God in that he was able to make a serpent, who has no vocal cords, nor any organs capable of making or forming words, speak.

39). The fourth thing about this serpent, was his gift of reason; which is expressed by his statement "...hath God said." That's reasoning. That's questioning. That's showing an ability to think, to reason. Thus, the serpent had four attributes:

(1) He was wiser {more subtil} than any beast of the field,

(2) He could walk erect,

(3) He could speak, and

(4) He had the ability to think and to� reason.

40). One does not find those things in snakes: Not then and not now. Those traits cannot be found in any animal or snake which has ever existed upon the face of the earth. They are found, only in what we call today, the humanoid species.

41). Then there is the problem of a snake or an ape coming up to Eve and speaking to her without her running away. It is simply more than we can accept. It could not, it did not happen that way. But he was, whatever he was, more cunning and wiser than any beast of the field. Or any other species of beast.

42). We can solve all these problems if we recognize that Adam and Eve were the first of the White Race {which we will explain later}. Which would not preclude the existence of other so‑called humanoids existing along with them. With this, the problem simply goes away. It does not exist any more, because it would make it possible for another humanoid to exist at the same time as Adam and Eve. This would also make it possible for someone to appear before Eve and not frighten her away. Because she has seen him before, and has probably talked to him before. It would not be a mystery to her, it would be no surprise either.

43). Suppose that Adam and Eve were the only two people in the whole world and Eve walks around a tree and there is someone there. And it's not Adam! What is she going to do. She is going to scream for Adam and tell him: Adam you are not going to believe what I have found. She would be concerned. No matter what it was, unless it was someone she had seen before.

44). Now if we assume that the serpent is another humanoid and not a snake, then the problem goes away. Because the other races of the world can walk, talk, think, reason and have wisdom. The only thing left is what does the word "subtil" mean. Once again let's turn to Strong's Concordance for an explanation. It is #6175 "aruwm" or "aw‑room" and means: cunning (usually in a bad sense), crafty, prudent, subtil. This word "aruwm" has been translated only one time as subtil (Genesis 3:1) and the other ten times it has been translated as crafty or prudent.

45). Webster's gives a little different spelling, it spells "subtil" as "subtle" and gives the following definitions:

(1) Thin, rare; tenuous; not dense or heavy [a subtle gas].

a) Capable of making or noticing fine distinctions in meaning, etc. [a subtle thinker].

b) Marked by or requiring mental keenness [subtle reasoning].

(3) Delicately skillful or clever; deft or� ingenious [a subtle filigree].

(4) Not open or direct; crafty; sly.

(5) Delicately suggestive; not grossly� obvious [a subtle hint].

(6) Working insidiously; not easily detected [a subtle poison]. (New World Dictionary of the American Language,� Second College Edition, pp. 1420‑21)

46) Webster's 1828 Christian Dictionary� gives the following:

(1) Thin; not dense or gross; as subtil� air; subtil vapor; a subtil medium.

(2) Nice; fine; delicate. "I do distinguish plain Each subtil line of her immortal�� face."

(3) Acute; piercing; as subtil pain.

(4) Sly; artful; cunning; crafty;� insinuating; as a subtil person; a� subtil Adversary.

(5) Planned by art; deceitful; as a subtil scheme.

(6) Deceitful; treacherous.

(47) Had Eve come into an adversary situation. You bet your boots she did. She had met with a wise adversary; a deceitful and treacherous adversary.

"We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own." (You Gentiles, by Jewish Author Maurice Samuels, p. 155); �You are right! This reproach of yours, which I feel for certain is at the bottom of your anti‑Semitism, is only too well justified; upon this common ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you and defend you against any accusation of promoting Race Hatred...We [Jews] have erred, my friend, we have most grievously erred. And if there is any truth in our error, 3,000, 2,000 maybe 100 years ago, there is nothing now but falseness and madness, a madness which will produce even greater misery and wider anarchy. I confess it to you openly and sincerely and with sorrow...We who have posed as the saviors of the world...We are nothing but the world' seducers, it's destroyers, it's incinderaries, it's executioners...we who promised to lead you to heaven, have finally succeeded in leading you to a new hell...There has been no progress, least of all moral progress...and it is our morality which prohibits all progress, and what is worse ‑‑ it stands in the way of every future and natural reconstruction in this ruined world of ours...I look at this world, and shudder at its ghastliness: I shudder all the ore, as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness..." (The World Significance of the Russian Revolution, by George Lane‑Fox Pitt‑Rivers, July 1920); "We Jews, who have posed as the saviors of the world.

We are today, nothing but the worlds seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners. There is no further doubt that the influence of the Jews today justify a very careful study and cannot possibly be viewed without serious alarm." (The World Significance of the Russian Revolution); "The Christians are always singing about the blood. Let us give them enough of it! Let us cut their throats and drag them over the altar! And let them drown in their own blood! I dream of the day when the last priest is strangled on the guts of the last preacher." (Jewish Chairman of the American Communist Party, Gus Hall); "Wars are the Jews harvest, for with them we wipe out the Christians and get control of their gold. We have already killed 100‑million of them, and the end is not yet." (Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn)

"You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why...Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the Arch-Plotters of Universal Wars and the Chief� beneficiaries of those wars.

We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!...You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge. What of it?...You make much noise and fury about undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and your government, and the very thoughts you think every day?...'

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right...we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?

�� If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization...

You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders, we are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. We {Jews} have been at the bottom of not merely of the latest war {WWI} but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it...Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone. But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history.

We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long way off. We still dominate you...Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you ever-lastingly ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to accept in full...We have merely divided your soul, confused your impulses, paralyzed your desires...

So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why...You Christians worry and complain about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is.

The influence, on the other hand, is certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you appear to realize...That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we did when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our crimes...

You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. It is the truth, and I cower at your discovery...We undoubtedly had a sizable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were the prime movers in the bourgeois democratic revolutions of the century before last, both in France and America. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They benefitted us...You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?" (Marcus Eli Ravage [Big Destruction Hammer of God], member of the staff of the New York Tribune, "A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine, January-February, 1928)

Perhaps it can now be understood why The World Book Encyclopedia by the following, states: "The Jews were once a sub‑type of the Mediterranean race, but they have mixed with other peoples until the name Jew has lost all racial meaning."

Judeo-Christian Heritage Is A Hoax: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians. That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the author-initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote: "As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity; and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as the Jewish-Christian traditions exists only in Christian or secularist fantasy."

There is no doubt this is true! And the fantasy exists in Christian and Secularist minds only because it was implanted there by the persistent propaganda of the masters of intrigue of the ADL-AJC Network. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that knowledgeable theologians, Jewish and Christians who constantly allude to "our Judeo-Christian heritage" are for their own specious purposes perpetuate a grotesque and fantastic hoax.

Boston: A Harvard Divinity School professor, John Strugnell, was removed this week as chief editor of the Dead Sea Scrolls not only because of his poor health, but because of a tirade against Israel and Judaism, his colleagues said.

The remarks, in which he called Judaism "a horrible religion" that "should have disappeared," came as a surprise to some colleagues working with him to decipher the ancient texts of the Old Testament. Strugnell made the remarks in a recent interview published in Haaretz, a Tel Aviv newspaper. In the Haaretz interview, Strugnell, 60, said he was not against Jews but their religion, according to an account soon to be published in the Biblical Archaeology Review. "I can't allow the word anti-Semitism to be used," he is quoted as saying, "Anti-Judaist, that's what I am."

a). Speaking to the scribes, Pharisees (Esau-Edomite Jews), Jesus said: "Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets." (Matthew 24:32)

b). Speaking to the scribes, Pharisees (Esau-Edomite Jews) Jesus said: "Ye Serpents, ye generation {race} of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" (Matthew 23:33)

c). And in John 8:44 Jesus said of the Pharisees and other Esau-Edomite Jews: "Ye are {descendants} of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it..."

d). And in verse 47 Jesus relentlessly continues to identify the Pharisees and other Esau-Edomite Jews for exactly what they are by telling them and us, as students of the Word of God, that they are definitely NOT of God: "He that is of God hearth God's words: ye therefore hear them not; because ye are not of God."

e). "Then took they {Esau-Edomite Jews} up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by." (John 8:59) From the Scholarly "Dakes's Annotated Reference Bible, 19th printing 1988, we become aware of the following interesting information, all on page 104 of the New Testament section: That Jewish Claims that the Jews {identified above as Serpents by Jesus} were somehow befitting of the "Chosen People" category is absolutely and consistently refuted by Jesus the Christ as shown below:

f). "Jewish claim of being children of freedom refuted by Jesus." (1 John. 3:8; Romans 6:16-23 - notation 9)

g). "Jewish claim of being children of Abraham refuted by Jesus." (Cp. Romans 2:28-29; 9:6 - notation 9)

h). "Jewish claim of being children of God refuted by Jesus." (John 3:15; 1 John 3:8-10 - notation 11)

I). "Jewish claim of His nationality and source of power refuted by Jesus." (Luke 1:35; Matthew 1:18; 3;16-17; Acts 10:38 - notation 12) The Dake's Annotated Reference Bible is the product developed from Finis Jennings Drake's approximately 100,000 hours and over a period of 43 years of searching the Scriptures.

The very short Scriptural Book of Obadiah deals with the future destruction and sin of Edom. The Day of the Lord, the restoration of Israel {Anglo-Saxon's; Isaac's Sons a hidden treasure} and the Messiah's Eternal Kingdom {Government}. In referring to the "extermination of Edom" (Dake's phrase page 889 supra)

j). Obadiah 18 states: "And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the Lord hath spoken it."

k). And we read in Romans 9:13: "As it is written, Jacob I loved, but Esau have I hated." (Also Malachi 1:3)

l). And from the Book of Jasher 26:17 we read that "Esau was a designing and deceitful man."

m). Question: If the house of Jacob {descendants} and the house of Joseph {descendants} are to "devour" {destroy} the house of Esau {descendants} in The Day of The Lord, which is yet to happen, then there must be, today, here and now, literally physical descendants of all three "houses" living here physically on earth - is this not correct? Consequently, it would appear that it is vitally important for each of us to know which house {descendants} to whom we belong or to whom we don't belong - after all we don't want to be lining up with the losers do we?

Do you want to be among the house of fire, so as to devour the stubble or do you prefer to be a supporter of the house of stubble? Jesus Christ was not a Jew. He is a Divine Creation sharing lineage from the tribe of Judah {the pure seed branch}. A Jew is not an Israelite and a Jew is not a Hebrew. And a Jew is not a Judean as you have been lead to believe. But this is another study which requires detailed examination. We hope to be able to provide you at another time. We know this is a very touchy subject but the truth is the truth. Ye the Bible says He was accused of being "King of the Jews." But this was Pilate mocking the Jews. Also remember the Jews were mocking Jesus. The translators should have put the word "Judean" in this passage. If you will study this issue, you will find mistranslations which tend to be misleading.

�� Following is an expose on Jewish Ritual Murder which is currently being conducted just as it has for centuries.

Chapter Five

Jewish Ritual Murder

On May 1, 1989, the Oprah Winfrey show had as its guest a person who, as a young girl, was forced to participate in a ritual in which a Christian infant was sacrificed. The amazing thing about this guest is that she was not affiliated with some unknown radical blood letting cult, but that She Was A Jew.

According to an article on the show in the "Chicago Tribune," the woman was "undergoing long‑term psychiatric treatment," apparently because of her horrible experience. The news paper article is quoted below in its entirety.

Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale

On Ophrah Show

�� Chicago Tribune, 5/7/89

�� New York Times News Service

The the report stated: "Hundreds of television viewers and the leaders of several Jewish and civil liberties organizations have protested allegations on a popular talk show last week that some Jews practice ritual killing of children. The allegations were made by a guest using the pseudonym Rachel on 'The Oprah Winfrey Show,' a widely viewed syndicated talk show. During the program, broadcast Monday, Winfrey introduced the guest as someone who was undergoing long‑term psychiatric treatment for a multiple personality disorder. The woman told Winfrey that she had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of children and had been a victim of ritualistic abuse.

The guest also said of such practices: 'there's other Jewish families across the country. It's not just my family.' The assertions were made during a program that focused on the cult murders of at least 13 people whose bodies were found last month near Matamoros, Mexico.

The woman's comments provoked hundreds of angry phone calls and letters to Jewish and civil liberties groups, spokesmen for the groups said in interviews late last week. Jeffrey Jacobs, the chief operating officer of Winfrey's production company, Harpo Productions Inc., denied Winfrey had acted irresponsibly in broadcasting the interview since she had emphasized on the show that the guest spoke only for herself. He added that Winfrey and her producers would meet with representatives of the Jewish and civil liberties groups next week in Chicago, where the show is taped. Winfrey was traveling Friday, Jacobs said, and was unavailable for comment. Early in the interview Winfrey said, 'This is the first time I have heard of any Jewish people sacrificing babies, but anyway ‑‑ so you witnessed the sacrifice?'

The woman responded: 'Right. When I was very young, I was forced to participate in that, and which I had to sacrifice an infant.' The guest was repeatedly identified by Winfrey as being Jewish. At one point, the woman asserted that {Jewish} Ritual sacrifices occurred in other Jewish families around the country and that they were known to the police."

Could Jewish

Ritual Murder Still Exist?

At one time or another the Jews have been expelled from every country in Europe. And in almost every case it was over the charge of Ritual Murder.

�� The most objective book on this subject available is "Jewish Ritual Murder" by Arnold Leese is available from "The Truth At Last," P.O. Box 1211, Marietta, Georgia 30061, for $3.50 per copy. The accusation was that during the Jewish feasts of Purim and/or Passover extremist Hassidic Orthodox Jewish sects would sacrifice a Christian youth for his blood. It was then dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes or bread for eating in order for the Jews to gain atonement in the eyes of God. It is possible that Purim blood might sometimes have been held over for the Passover.

The History of Jewish

Human Sacrifice

The ancient Khazar Jews along with� other of that Near East era followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet.

The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be� beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned alive. In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown out their screams. The Carthaginians also were worshippers of Baal and sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in Syracuse in 310 B.C., they cast the sons of 500 nobles into a fiery pit, or Tophet, from a scaffold shaped in the likeness of the god Baal.

One expose of the subject of Ritual Murder was written in great detail by Arnold S. Leese, entitled "My� Irrelevant Defence on Jewish Ritual Murder," London, 1938. Addressing the issue of sacrifices, Mr. Leese states: "Let a Jew speak for us here: ‑‑ ... 'Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1904, Vol.� VII, p. 650) to be 'without any religious convictions.' wrote what he himself described as 'an impartial study of the history and sociology of the Jews.' calling his book L'Antisemitisme; in the 1904 edition of this, Vol. II, p. 215, he writes, after mentioning the accusations against the Jews of Ritual Murder: 'To this general belief are added the suspicions, often justified, against the Jews addicted to magical practices. Actually, in the Middle Ages, the Jew was considered by the people as the magician par excellence; one finds many formulae of exorcism in the Talmud, and the Talmudic and Cabalistic demonology is very complicated. Now one knows the position that blood always occupies in the operations of sorcery. In Chaldean magic it had a very great importance...Now, it is very probable, even certain that Jewish magicians sacrificed children; hence the origin of the legend of ritual sacrifice.'"

A book entitled "The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam," indicates that the Talmudic god of the Jews [Not the God of Christians] is a blood loving god: "The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to the lord, viz: (1) that of Paschal holocaust [Easter sacrifice ‑‑ the Feast of Purim]; (2) that of circumcision." In other words, the Jews have a god which finds blood pleasing. In the words of Mr. Leese, "What sort of a people is this whose god finds the blood obtained from mutilation of human genital organs as 'pleasing?'"

Quoting from the Jewish writer Charles A. Weisman's Book "Who is Esau-Edom?": "During the Middle Ages Jews were found guilty of ritual murder of Christians in England; at Norwich in 1146, and Lincoln in 1225; in France at Blois in 1171; and in northern Italy at Trent in 1475. The Jewish Encyclopedia lists 121 Ritual Murder cases from 1146 to 1900, which were tried in courts. Many of the listings show convictions and the mode in which guilty Jews were executed." (This is referenced to The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. III, (1903) pp. 266-67)

Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?": "From 1900 to the 1939's there have been about another twenty cases of ritual murder by Jews. Even to this day there are reports of ritual murder of {Christian} children by certain extremist Hasidic Orthodox Jewish� sects." (The Pharisees were originally identical with the Hasidim or Hasidic sect of Judaism. The Jewish Encyclopedia Vol. IX (1905) p. 661)

Continuing from "Who is Esau-Edom?": "Abortion has become an overt means of child sacrifice which Jews have instituted under their de facto law (So they could get blood for their fiests more easily and make it harder for Christians to realize that it is their children the Jews are murdering). A more covert means of {Christian} child sacrifice has been by their infamous 'ritual murders, which Jews have been accused through the ages.' In this practice 'the blood of the sacrificed gentile {Christian Child} is mixed with flour to make the unleavened bread eaten at Passover.'" (The Illustrated Atlas of Jewish Civilization, Ed. Martin Gilbert, MacMillan Pub. Co., 1990, p. 125)

Even though God commanded circumcision, there is no way a reading of Scripture shows that God intended that the procedure turn into a bloody ritual. Besides that, it seems apparent that when Christ nailed the blood ordinances to the cross, he also nailed the circumcision to the cross. "Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing." (Galitans 5:2) Make no mistake about it, the god of the Jews is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel!!! And if it were the same God; the manner in which the Jews worship is administered is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord our God.

According to Leese there are two specific periods of time for Ritual Murders by the Jews: "The two principal feast days associated with Ritual Murder have been (1) Purim, and (2) Passover, the latter� at Easter and the former about one month before it.

When a Ritual Murder occurred at Purim, it was usually that of an adult Christian who was murdered for his blood...the blood was dried and the powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried blood of a Purim murder might sometimes be used for the following Passover.

When a Ritual Murder was done at Passover, it was usually that of a [Christian] child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who was not only bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding the side in imitation of the murder of Christ.

The blood taken from the child was mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the passover bread [Then eaten - A type of Jewish Blood ritual was apparently still common even in 1903, as the Jewish Encyclopedia for that year, in discussing the method of performing a circumcision, states that the person performing the ritual: "...takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided." (Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. IV, p. 99) The Jewish circumcision rite requires that this mixture of the mohel's sputum, wine and blood from his mouth be mixed into a larger batch of wine. From this, all the Jewish guests drink and celebrate by singing and dancing]." (Ritual Murder, p. 7)

There is little doubt that the Jews and other historians who are possessed by the spirits of the Jews claim that the "Dark Ages" were from 493 A.D. to 711 A.D. What they mean by the "Dark Ages" is that the Christian Church kept the Jews under control and countered their every move to put their Satanic battle plan into motion. During the "Dark Ages" they were countered by brave Christian souls like St. Bernard and others who led forces which confined them to their own ghettoes where they could not mix their blood with those of our Adamic people or killed them outright.

The main war of the "Jews" against the Adamites began in Russia when the Avars {Khazars}, a pre-Adamic, Esau-Edom, Japeth, Canaanite and several other races, invaded the country about the year 560. The Avars would have completely overrun Europe and mixed their mongol seed with those of the Adamites had not been for the Adamic Slavs and their Allies. The Adamic Slavs drove the Avars back and then shored up the defenses in the Balkans with the allies the Bulgars.

About 700 A.D., the Khazars, after "converting" to Talmudism {Judaism} overwhelmed the Adamic Slavs in Russia while Mongols who had been won over to Islam also attacked Russia and Europe. The Mongols occupied Russia from 1241 to 1300 and only due to the persistence of the Slavs were the Mongols kept from completely over running all of Adamic Europe. The first "conversions" of the Russians to Christianity is estimated to be in 867 A.D. and the full "conversion" of {White} Russia in the year 898 A.D. From that point on it was more or less a Christian millennium wherein all the nations of Europe kept the Luciferian/antichrist Jews under control for 900 years until the Illuminati and other secret societies the Jews had formed were able to make temporary gains through the French and other revolutions in Europe. The Christian Adamic Tsars of Russia fought back and this started the first "Russian" invasion of America and Europe from 1800 to 1914 when 2-million Canaanite/Khazars invaded America and another 260,000 invaded England and Palestine.

The so-called "Russian" invasion of America that the televangelists and other so-called "Christian" preachers rant and rave about took place from 1800 to 1914 and then in 1917 the Jewish Khazar Luciferian terror was launched against the Adamic russian people by the agents of Lucifer who were funded, transported and supported by the pseudo "Christian" government of America which had a satanic spirit cast over it and a blindness which drove it on to exterminate the Adamic ruling class of Russia.

"Who is blind, but my servant? or deaf, as my messenger that I sent? who is blind as he that is perfect, and blind as the Lord's servant? Seeing many things, but thou observest not opening the ears, but he heareth not." (Isaiah 42:19-20) The United States has been built, ruled and governed by Satanic doctrines and secret societies almost from its very beginning when the Puritans were driven from England because of their opposition to the pro-Jewish revolutionary activities. These same pro-Jewish advocates also landed on our shores to begin undermining Christianity in America.

Satanic Freemasonry also was established before the Revolution and many of the "Christian" leaders such as George Washington, were Masons and even Benjamin Franklin was in league with the Mason and subversive forces in Europe which were "hell bent" on destroying the Christian monarchies of Europe and establishing "Democracy" {mobocracy} in America.

Franklin later came to his senses and wrote his famous letter attacking the assault of the Jews on America while still remaining a member of revolutionary and secret societies imported into the United States from the Jewish control "Democracies" of Europe.

The second and last "Russian" revolution in America has been taking place since 1965 and since that time over 1-million Jews from Russia have invaded America and another 700,000 have "invaded" Palestine. Even as this is being written the Canaanite-Esau-Edomite/Khazars have the upper hand in Russia and Eastern Europe because of the unlimited financial and political backing they have from their co-religionists living in the United States, France and England. The "Russian" invasion of the Middle East and the United States is already taking place, now, not in the future.

The question is, whether it will be re-enforced by the Canaanites/Esau-Edom-Khazars in the Soviet Union and their Yeltsin's or will it be Crushed by the remaining Adamites in Eastern Europe, denying it the aid of the Jews and their spiritual allies in those countries? The "Revere" had this to say concerning Jewish persecutions of the Christians, "The Long series of Jewish crimes begin with the crucifixion of Christ.�

"One of the finest things ever done by the mob was the crucifixion of Christ. Intellectually it was a splendid gesture. But trust the mob to bungle the job. If I'd had charge of executing Christ, I'd have handled it differently. You see, what I'd have done was had Him shipped to Rome and fed Him to the lions. They could never have made a Savior out of mincemeat!" (Rabbi Ben Hecht)

In the 3rd century A.D. the Jews in Jerusalem perpetrated a number of massacres against Christians whom they used to kill under church lights. In 608 A.D. the Jews of Antioch attacked Christians and burned them in the streets including Bishop Anstas. In 614 A.D. the Jews, led by Benjamin of Tiberias, burned Christian churches and monasteries.

When Emperor Heraclius reconquered Palestine and brought the Jewish murder for investigation, he asked him why he had committed such atrocities against Christians, whereupon the latter repled, "Because they are enemies of my faith."

St. Justian, who was killed by the Jews in 615 A.D. said, "The Jews were behind all the persecution of the Christians, they killed Christians whenever they could, and wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith."

St. Basil, who died in the fourth century, said, "In the past, heathen and Jews used to fight, but now they both fight Christianity."

St. Clement warned the Christians of Corinth against the intrigues of Jews which caused the death of thousands of Christians. Someone says that all Jews cannot be bad and the fact that Paul was a Jew prove it. Let us see what the Scriptures say about it. Paul tells us in Romans 11:1 that he was an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin.

Yet we find him saying in Acts 22:3, "I am verily a man which am a Jew..." Why did Paul say that? Because the Jews were beating him and would have liked to kill him. Acts 21:27-32, By saying that he was a Jew and one of them, Paul hoped they would desist and leave him alone.

He explains this further in 1 Corinthians 9:20, where he says, "And unto the Jews I became as a Jew." Note that he did not say "became a Jew" or "was a Jew" something entirely different. Paul says he became "as a Jew" so that he might gain the Jew.

Did Paul mean that he hoped to "gain the Jew" for Christ? Oh, No Paul knew the Jews were "contrary to all men" and that they were responsible for the death of Christ. He knew that it was impossible to make Christians of them. Paul had only one reason for claiming to be "as a Jew" and that was to bring an end to their abuse of him, as his very life was in danger. Knowing that Jews always stick together, he felt that by claiming to be one of them they would not be so apt to kill him.

On page 66 of the book, "The True Sabbath," by Cottrell, are these words: "According to the celebrated historian, Neander, the writings of the early fathers such as Origen, Polycarp, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Justin Martyr, Eusebius and others were so counterfeited and adulterated that no confidence can be placed in them."

Just who is this authority, Neander, whom certain religionists love to quote. For the answer, we turn to the book, "Waters Flowing Eastward" by I. Fray. On page 99 are these words, "Neander, the founder of Spiritual Christianity, is a Jew." It is obvious that his attacks on early Christians and their leaders is motivated by their statements concerning Jews of that day.

The many sects, denominations, creeds, and what not of today owe their existence to the pernicious habit of spiritualizing or phantomizing the Scriptures. By so doing, the Bible can be made to say anything they want it to say.

Thus, we have constant bickering, proselyting and squabbling among the various groups and churches which make up our Christian community. All this confusion can be traced to one man, Neander. He was of the race John calls a generation of vipers. Jesus calls them vipers and sons of Satan and asks them how can they escape the damnation of hell.

John tells us they are deceivers and antichrist. Jude called them ungodly men, filthy dreamers, ordained of old to be condemned. Paul calls the Jew a children of the devil, enemy of all righteousness and contrary to all men. David says he hated them with a perfect hatred and asked that they be blotted out of the Book of Life. We are forewarned in Acts that some of these people would infiltrate our churches and seek to subvert us.

In Spain, Jews who feigned "conversion" to Christianity were known as Marranos. These were welcomed into the Christian community until it was discovered that their Christianity was all a sham. When Jewish holidays came around, these Marranos secretly observed the rituals in their homes as laid out by Judaism. They had, in fact, never given up their Jewish practices but had joined Christian churches for, as the Bible says, purposes of subversion Revelation 2:9, "...know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews {Judeans}, and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan." Revelation 3:9, "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews {Judeans} and are not but do lie."

As we pursue our study of this mysterious people comprising the "synagogue of Satan," it may be helpful to consider the opinions of prominent historical persons to aid us in properly evaluating them. Mr. A.H. Ramsey, in his book, "The Nameless War," records these following statement:

Seneca 4 B.C. "The customs of this accursed people have grown so strong that they have spread through every land."

St. Justin 116 A.D., "The Jews were behind all the persecution of the Christians. They wandered through the country everywhere hating and undermining the Christian faith."

Mohammed 570 A.D. "It is incomprehensible to me why one has not long ago expelled these death-breathing beasts... are these Jews anything else but devourers of men?"

Martin Luther 1483 A.D. "How the Jews love the book of Esther, which is so suitable to their bloodthirsty, revengeful, murderous appetite and hope. The sun has never shown on such a bloodthirsty and vindictive people who cherish the idea of murdering and strangling the heathen. No other men under the sun are more greedy than they have been and always will be as one can see from their accursed usury. They console themselves that when their Messiah come, he will collect all the gold and silver in the world and divide it among them."

Voltaire, 1694, "The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and inextinguishable hatred of all peoples by whom they are tolerated and through whom they are enriched."

Napoleon, "I decided to improve the Jews; but I do not want any more of them in my kingdom; indeed I have done all to prove my scorn of the vilest nation in the world."

Benjamin Franklin, 1789, "There is a great danger for the United States of America. This great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in every land which the Jews have settled they have depressed the normal level and lowered the degree of commercial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated. They have created a state within a state, and when they are opposed, they attempt to strangle the national financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain.

For more than 1799 years they have lamented their sorrowful fate - namely that they were driven out of the motherland. Gentlemen, if the civilized world should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires, they cannot live among themselves; they must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race." (Note: The Federal Reserve Corporation dictates economic policies; created the 'national debt' by usurping the power of the people; stealing by fraud their power to coin, mint and regulate the value of money in America. The fed is a leach, sucking the life blood out of this nation's economy! The Federal Reserve Corporation is a privately held closed corporation with all the stock held by Jews!)

�� If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than two hundred years, they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed our lives, personal property and freedom. If the Jews are not excluded within two hundred years, our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews while they remain in the counting houses gleefully rubbing their hands. I warn you Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children's children will curse you in your graves.

Their ideas are not those of Americans, even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The Leopard cannot change his spots. The Jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter, they will imperil our institutions - they should be excluded by the constitution."

How deadly accurate Benjamin Franklin's words are as we see the creeping paralysis of Jewish communism undermining American traditions, changing our laws and corrupting our institutions.

According to the King James Charter, the Mayflower Compact and several Supreme Court decisions, this country is a Christian Nation, yet we permit as appointees, bureaucrats, department heads and advisors, hordes of antichristians who have swarmed into government service and are busily enforcing their unamerican ideologies on our national way of life.

We have now examined these people in light of the facts derived from historical records as well as the Holy Writ. Let us now call upon science for confirmation of the fact that Jews are not as other people.

The Scientific American for March 1957 recorded the results of a study conducted by Stephen P. and Leslie C. Dunn of the inhabitants of the Jewish Ghetto of Rome where, for more than 2000 years, they have been more or less segregated from the rest of the city. Comprehensive blood tests of this group, which has been genetically isolated in the midst of the metropolis, reveals the following startling facts:

1). The blood of the Jewish community of Rome discloses a mysterious RH gene�� which is not present in White Christians.

2). Blood typing laboratories are puzzled by the unusual serological reaction it produces.

3). It is difficult to decide whether the blood is RH positive or RH negative.

4). The Ghetto population shows definite biological differences from Roman Christians.

5). Tests are now being conducted in Israel on Jews from all parts of the world in an� attempt to find the cause for these differences.

We have news for them. If they want to know the cause of these differences, they need only read John 8:44 and find out who their father is. Obviously, the blood of the "children of the devil" will be different from that of the Christians. A report from Copenhagen, Denmark, written by John Hilliby of the New York Times, a fingerprint study by two Jewish scientists.

�� The researchers are Dr. Leo Sachs of the Weizman Institute in Israel and Dr. M. Bat-Miriam of the Israeli Institute for Biological Research. Following are excerpts from that Dispatch: "The problem, Dr Sachs said, was to decide how widely scattered members of the race could be subjected to the same physical tests. He chose fingerprinting because the characteristic pattern of loops, whorls and arches was not subjected to what evolutionists call selective forces; that is, they are not adaptable. They also gave statistically valid evidence of hereditary similarities in otherwise widely different populations."

By examining all ten fingerprints of each of 4,000 Jews now resident in Israel, but who originally lived in Poland, Germany, Iraq, Egypt, Morocco, Yemen, Bulgaria and Turkey, Doctors Sachs and Bat-Miriam considered that they had got 40,000 characteristic "dabs" of the many migration streams.

"The frequency of the relationship of the loops, whorls and arches of the prints to one another gave the researchers a series of numerical factors that, when compared with the samples of non-Jews, showed that there were unique qualities in the Jewish prints..." There was, Dr. Sachs said, an unmistakable "Mediterranean component" in the eight population samples studied, and its character was unlike the prints of non-Jewish people among whom the Jews had been living often for centuries!

The Bible record designating these people as a serpent Race and different from their Christian neighbors is upheld and corroborated historically and scientifically. It seems like a miracle and almost unbelievable, but the facts speak for themselves, and we Christians can be great comforted in the fact that the Book of Books is once more vindicated and proven true.

The B'nai B'rith Messenger on June 17, 1955, carried the following message on page 26: "There must be rewriting of the Christ story for Christians which will for all time eradicate the myth that the Jews killed Christ." We, Christians, can assure these people that the Christ story is already written. It is called the Holy Bible. We Christians will fight to the death to defend it.

We hear a great deal these days about the "brotherhood of man." There is an organization of Christians and Jews which promulgate this theory. In associating themselves with Jews, the Christians are indirectly promoting atheism, for to advocate brotherhood without Christ is to advocate atheism. If a Jew can be brother to a Christian without accepting Christ, it means that God can be his father without accepting Christ.

If� access to God without Christ is possible then Christ is unnecessary. If we believe that Christ is unnecessary, then we are atheists. It is deplorable that Christian dupes cannot see through this devilish scheme. The union of Christians with the seed of the serpent, the synagogue of Satan, is an abomination in the sight of God. Some ask, "If the brotherhood of Man is unscriptural, why does the Bible say we are all of one blood as in Acts 17:26?"

People who quote this verse know, or should know, that the word "blood" does not occur in the original and is omitted from the authorized version. Also the neuter gender is used. If man was meant, it would have been in the masculine gender. The text should be rendered "and hath made of one species all nations of men to dwell..." Homo Sapiens. The same way we refer to the dogs belonging to the canine species. The Jews, as we know, are not included or referred to in this text, as they come under a different classification, the Serpent Race, and are contrary to all men.

Jewish author Maurice Samuel, in his Book, "You Gentiles," page 155 says: "We Jews, we the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will destroy because we need a world of our own."

The "Jewish World" of February 9, 1883, stated: "The great ideal of Judaism is that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a Universal Brotherhood of Nations ‑‑ a greater Judaism, in fact ‑‑ all the separate races and religions shall disappear." (Jewish World, February 9, 1883)

At this point it is well for us to be reminded of the following excerpt from a report delivered by Mr. Oudendyke, Netherlands Minister at Petrograd, Russia, on Sept. 6, 1918, concerning the situation in Russia. At that time the Netherlands Minister was acting for the British Ambassador and the report was presented to parliament in London. "The foregoing report will indicate the extremely critical nature of the present situation. The danger is now so great that I feel it my duty to call the attention of the British and all other governments to the fact that if an end is not put to Bolshevism in Russia at once, the civilization of the world will be threatened. This is not an exaggeration, but a sober matter of fact; and the most unusual action of German and Austrian consuls-general, before referred to, in joining in protest of Neutral legations appears to indicate that the danger is also being realized in German and Austrian quarters.

I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless, as above stated, Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one farm or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by the Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. The only manner in which this danger could be averted would be the collective action on the part of all powers.

I am also of the opinion that no support whatever should be given to any other socialistic party in Russia, least of all to social revolutionaries, whose policy is at the moment to overthrow the Bolsheviks, but whose aims in reality are the same, visavis, to establish proletariat rule throughout the world. Social revolutionaries will never right nay foreign power, and any profession which they may now make in this sense is merely a tactical move in their struggle with the Bolsheviks."

In the confrontation between the Arabs and the Jews, President Nixon has bluntly informed the American people that we are deeply committed to the Jews.

In California and across the nation, tens of thousands of our youth are being brain-washed into taking the mind-destroying drug LSD; and many of these young people are committing suicide, attempting to gouge out their eyes or otherwise maim themselves. And it has been shown that LSD is manufactured in Israel and smuggled into this country.

So why should we be deeply committed to the protection of our worst enemy, an enemy that is not so-secretly destroying us with biochemical warfare? As the result of the study of excerpts from the Talmud, evidence from the Bible, statements from noted non-Jews throughout history, statements from Jews themselves and their leaders, and finally evidence developed by their own scientists in the field of Biology, we are justified in arriving at the following conclusion, namely:

1). That the Jews in their capacity of being "contrary to all men" are in a� category not commonly associated with the Biblical concept of the family of man.

2). Christians, by virtue of their acceptance of the sacrifice our Lord Jesus Christ made on the stake, are assured of eternal life. The Jews, being of the "father, the devil," have no such assurance, hence their only concern is with enjoying the "good life" which they now have.

3). That they have a deep an undying hatred of Christians and Christianity in general.

Note the hate programs of TV against the Christian people of Germany. It is unceasing and unrelenting. Indeed, it was the Jewish hatred of Christian Germany which brought World War II. Samuel Untermeyer, president of the World Jewish Economic Federation, upon returning from a world wide meeting of Jews in Amsterdam, Holland, made a speech on radio station WABC, Columbia Broadcasting system in N.Y.C. on Aug. 6, 1933, in which he said the Jews of the world had declared war on Germany and would starve them to death. That was six years before any Jew had been punished and before military war was initiated in 1939.

"The Gulag Archipelago, 'he informed an incredulous world that the blood‑maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty‑six million victims in Russia from 1918 to 1957! Solzhenitsyn cited Cheka Order No. 10, issued on January 8, 1921: 'To intensify the repression of the bourgeoisie.'" (Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago) The founder of the Irgun terrorist organization, Vladimer Jabotinsky, Jewish Communist who wrote in the January issue of Natcha Retch, 1934: "The fight against Germany has been carried on for months by every Jewish community, conference, congress, trade organization, by every Jew in the world.

There is reason to believe that our part in this struggle will be of general value. We shall let loose a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany's ambition to become a great nation again, to reconquer her lost territories and colonies. Our Jewish interests on the other hand, demand the complete destruction of Germany. The German nation is collectively and individually a danger to us Jews."

Rabbi M. Perizweig, head of the British section of the World Jewish Congress, speaking in Canada, stated: "The World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years." (Toronto Evening Telegram, Feb. 26, 1940) In Walter Winchell's column in the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner on Dec. 7, 1966, appeared these words - "Merchants report a boycott of German goods in the U.S." Despite the fact that Germany and the United States has contributed billions of dollars to keep the economy of Israel alive, there is no gratitude in the breast of the Jews.

4). That upon their heads has come "all the righteous blood shed upon the earth from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar." (Matthew 23:35; Revelation 18:24)

�� Chapter Six

�� Proof That America

�� Is A Conquered Nation

Date of Surrender: 1930 Ratified by Congress: 1933: Terms: The Geneva Law which established a National Bankruptcy Contract under "Silent Judicial Notice" to include all {corporate} U.S. citizens in a fraudulent Social Security scheme previously declared illegal under the positive law of nations.

First Act of Surrender Passage of H.J. Res. 192 which removed the U.S.A. from the Gold Standard and made it impossible for the Nation to "pay" its debts. Setup a Credit Commune with "limited liability."

1). Tribute: Taxation without Representation exacted by {corporate} U.S. officials as� an extortion payment to the Federal Reserve {a private [Jewish controlled] banking syndicate} and other agencies of the United Nations; front organization for the World's Ruling Elite.

2). Edpatriation of Jobs and Industries: Utilization of taxpayer supported agencies such as OPIC and AID to export American resources overseas.

3). Destruction of State and National Boundaries: Regionalization of 30 of the 50 states by removing boundary descriptions from the State Constitutions. The signing of International Trade Agreements such as GATT {General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs} and NAFTA {North American Free Trade Agreement} to destroy "non-tariff trade barriers" and create an economic merger among Pan American countries.

4). Promotion of Crime and Slave Labor Through Alien Immigration: A Welfare State Immigration policy that attracts non-contributing undesirables to destroy the Standard of Living and provide a future inducement toward communist revolution and slavery for all citizens.

5). Disposition of The Spoils of War: Systematic looting of the Nation's wealth by {Jewish controlled} International Corporate pirates and {Jewish controlled} banking privateers under Admiralty's "Questions of Prize." Privatization of the Nation's infrastructure through sale of Public Assets to foreign principals was established by Presidential Executive Order No. 1203 (1992).

6). Siege Mentality In A Police State: Pillaging of U.s. citizens through Draconian federal forfeiture laws that violate their civil and constitutional rights on the pretext of a phony "Drug War." Bankruptcy and Emergency Powers such as the International Economic Emergencies Act, Title 50 USC 1701-1706, are used improperly by U.N. sponsored government operatives to justify military "hits" upon political dissenters whom are arbitrarily labeled as enemies of the "New World Order." (i.e., Randy Weaver, David Koresh, Ralph Daigle, Gordon Kahl and many others).

7). Disavowal of The Loyalty Oath and Treason: Secretary of the Treasury is an employee of the International Monetary Fund (IMF, an independent foreign corporation) and "Receiver in the National Bankruptcy. (See: Reorganization Plan No. 26, 5 USCA 903, Public Law 94-564) U.S. District Court Judges are immune from civil torts and are members of an "independent judiciary" paid by the {foreign} IMF-controlled Treasury Department. The Civil Service Commission suspended the loyalty oath (See: The Stewart Case, 1970) for its federal employees and many agencies have transferred allegiance to the U.N. through "Service Agreements" and "Memorandums of Understandings" (MOUs). The U.S. Marshall's' Oath to the Constitution under 28 USC 563 was deleted (Congressional Record, H7935, 9/22/88 - House) and subverted to INTERPOL, et ed., by U.N. mandate 22 USC 263(A). These wholesale repudiations of governmental accountability to the people under Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution should be construed as a hostile takeover and Act of War.

8). Subversion of The Constitution By International Treaty: Passage by Congress of unlawful (i.e., under Color of Law) legislation designed to overturn the Constitution. The following list contains highlights from U.S. legislative History:

a). The Federal Reserve Act 1913 - abrogated Article 1, Sec. 8, clause 5 and 6.

b). H.J. Res. 192 (1933) - suspended the Gold Standard and Gold Clause.

c). Coinage Act of 1956 - Debased the specie coin (Article 1, Sec. 10, clause)

d). P.L. 94-564 (1971) - removed convertabilty of U.S. dollar into gold.

e). Declaration of INTERdependence (1976) - nullified national spirit and purpose.

f). P.L. 95-147 (1977) - declared insolvency.

h). U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1992) - set aside the Bill of Rights.

I). P.L. 102-14 (1991) - which allows the execution of Christians in America.

9). Unilateral Disarmament: The creation of an Arms Control and Disarmament Agency under P.L. 87-297 and described in State Department Paper 7727, along with the non-incorporation of the 2nd Amendment into the 14th Amendment protections against the states, indicates that our {their} criminal government will eventually declare martial law so that they can launch a "military enforcement action" to confiscate firearms from all law abiding citizens. Government's hidden agenda to kill off the hard-core Christian conservative has now been revealed by the Randy Weaver incident in Idaho and the Waco burn-out and the following information from the "Citizen's Claw" {Citizens For Constitutional Law (CLAW) P.O. Box 441 Morongo Valley, CA 92256 makes that charge a valid one.

Make No Mistake An American Holy War Has Begun In America: It is very hard for anyone to seriously believe that there could be a deliberate program in this country designed to destroy a specific religion. But all of the evidence of recent years bears it out, such as: prayers forbidden in schools, abortion on demand, padlocking of Christian churches for refusing to take a license from the state, the jailing of Christian home-schoolers, making it a hate crime to speak out about homosexuals and its jail-time for anyone refusing to hire or to house same.

Then we have the effort by the NEA to destroy the family relationship and turn children against their parents and to charge child abuse if scolded or punished for misbehavior. The passing out of condoms in schools to encourage all forms of perverted sex and to destroy the Christian Morals. Anyone with eyes to see should see that the Christian way of life is being deliberately targeted for extinction and the Idaho murders and the Waco burn-out is apparently the beginning of open Christian persecution in this country. When it becomes the "policy" of a government to target or to destroy a long-established religion {genocide}, Those who practice that religion have the moral and legal right to declare a Holy War in progress so as to save themselves.

Christians at the Elim Mission Station in Rhodesia were such convinced pacifists that, even within a few kilometers of Marxist Mozambique during a vicious war they refused to be armed. They had neither a fence nor dogs to protect them. They refused to allow the security forces to station some guards for their protection. When terrorists visited Elim the missionaries provided them with food and medical supplies. Then one fateful night the Black terrorists {ZANLA} guerrillas, as their way of saying thank you and because of the pacifism of the Christians, herded the 9 men and women missionaries and 4 children into one of the fields. In front of the parents they hacked the children to death. Then in front of the husbands they raped and tortured the women to death. Finally they brutally murdered the men. Yet so effectively had their pacifist doctrine neutralized them that there was no attempt at resistance. The men stood by and watched ruthless Black Terrorists butcher their loved ones. {Don�t you think for a moment the Jews and the blacks in this country will not do the same for White Christians in America if they get the chance!}

Again in November 1987 a similar massacre took place at New Adams Farm in Zimbabwe {Rhodesia}. Their sincere belief in pacifism disarmed these 16 Christians and made them helpless victims to a slaughter by Black Terrorists. Never forget this. Whenever a government sends its agents to disarm you, it is the universal signal to shoot with a clear conscience, needing no one�s permission but your own. The example set for at Lexington perfectly illustrates a fundamental principle of Americanism, which is: Never Give Up Your Guns, Never! Your gun is the great equalizer. Better to have one and not need it, than to need one and not have it.

In his oft-repeated speech in the Roman Senate, Cicero, in 42 B.C. spoke these words: "A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly. The traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor - he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation - he works secretly and alone in the night to undermine the pillars of a city - he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resists. A murderer is less to be feared." So it is with the Jew, he has always been a traitor to every country and people that he has lived in and with!

"Once to every man and nation,

�� comes the moment to decide,

In strife of truth with falsehood

�� for the good or evil side.

Then the brave man chooses,

�� while the coward stands aside.

Til the multitudes make virtue

�� of faith they had denied.

Though the cause of evil prosper,

�� yet 'tis truth alone is strong.

Yet that scaffold sways the future

�� and behind the dim unknown

Standeth God within the shadow,

�� keeping watch above His own."

�� Chapter Seven

�� Zionism's Master Plan

�� For

�� World Power

Published at the risk of persecution, character assassination, social, economic and physical liquidation. Before the Mercury Magazine came into its present ownership, it was owned and controlled by a noted patriot by the name of Russell Maguire. He was a man of wealth and intelligent business initiative. He became alarmed over what he knew to be Zionism's Master plan for World Power. A documented research manuscript came into his hands and he had the courage to publish it.

Following its publication, he was the victim of attempted blackmail, physical threat, danger of assassination and the complete sabotage of his business enterprises. His life became so harassed that he left America for an isolated island home where he felt he could be safe from harassment, persecution and the risk of death itself.

Herewith is the Manuscript that this courageous patriot had the courage to reproduce.

�� A Chronology of the

�� Zionist Master Plan for World Domination

Virtually all of the items included in this chronology are direct quotations from Zionists or from their books. (I.B. means "International Banker," A.M. means "American Mercury," p. means "page," MMM means "Money Made Mysterious."

�� 1896

Theodore Herzl published "The Jewish State." It became the Zionists' bible. The following exact quotes are from Herzl's book:

1). "When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of all revolutionary parties, at the same time, when we rise, there rises also our terrible power of the purse." (p. 10)

2). "...the longer Anti-Semitism lies in abeyance the more fiercely will it break out." (p. 4)

3). "Universal brotherhood, is not even a beautiful dream. Antagonism is essential to man's greatest efforts." (p. 42)

�� 1897

1). Lord Edmond Rothschild of London and Jacob H. Schiff of New York City, two of the Elders of Zion, got Theodore Herzl (of Austria) to arrange for the World Zionist Congress at Basel, Switzerland; 197 delegates met there and laid out a plan of World Conquest with plans for a World Government.

Herzl founder of Zionism, in opening the meeting, raised his right hand and repeated an ancient oath of the Talmudists: "If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, may my right hand forget its cunning." Herzl also said at this meeting: "We are one nation. We are neither American nor Russian Jews, but only Jews!" He also said: "With a few exceptions that do not figure at all, the entire press of the world is in our hands."

2). Dr. Mandelstam said on August 29 at the opening of the Zionist Congress of 1897: "The Jews will use all their influence and power to prevent the rise and prosperity of other nations and are resolved to adhere to their historic hopes; i.e., to the conquest of world power." (Le Temps, Paris, September 3, 1897)

3). The Zionist Organization of America was organized in 1897 with Richard Gottheil of Columbia University as its first president, and Rabbi Stephen Wise as the first secretary. Branches for women (Hadassah), and children (Young Judea) were soon organized. (Zionist Network, p. 32)

�� 1898

Dr. Mandelstam, professor of the University of Kiev, Russia, at Basel Zionist Congress in 1898 said: "The Jews energetically reject the idea of fusion with the other nationalities and cling firmly to their historical hope, i.e., of world empire." (The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, by H.S. Chamberlain, Vol. 1, p. 335. Also Democracy and World Dominion, p. 221)

�� 1900

1). Theodore Herzl, the Zionist leader, went to see Abdul Hamid the Sultan of Turkey, to buy land for the Zionists in Palestine. When the Sultan said 'no' he had a revolution on his hands. (Note later item in 1914)

2). Between 1900 and the outbreak of World War I (1914), the United States was flooded by large waves of immigration from Eastern Europe (Almost 100% Jews)

�� 1901

1). Because President William McKinley in the United States refused to be a stooge for I.B., he was killed by the Jewish Russian Zionist, Zolkozh. (Presidents Lincoln (on Good Friday) and Garfield had been previously murdered).

2). Dr. Leopold Kahn summed up these sentiments when speaking about Zionism in a Jewish school at Pozsony (Bratislava) in 1901: "Jews will never be assimilated and will never adopt the customs or morals of strangers. The Jew will remain a Jew under all circumstances." (World Conquerors, p. 21)

�� 1902

1). Lenin joins Trotsky in Switzerland on Editorial Board of Zionist publication ISKRA (The Spark). (It was printed in Munich, Germany)

2). Kuhn Loeb & Co., was one of the founders and chief financiers of the scandalous Panama Canal Co.

�� 1903

1). Dr. Simon Flexner, one of the three busy brothers became director of laboratories of the Rockefeller Institute. (American Mercury, November 1958, p. 105)

2). At the Sixth Zionist Congress in 1903 at Basel, Switzerland, Dr. Max Nordau, an Elder of Zion said, (We quote from the American Jewish News, New York, Vol. 4, No. 2, September 19, 1919) "Theodore Herzl has considered it his duty to maintain valuable relations with this great and progressive power (England). Herzl knows that we stand (in 1903) before the tremendous upheaval of the whole world. Soon, perhaps some kind of World Congress will have to be called, and England, the great, free and powerful England, will then continue the work it has begun with its generous offer to the Sixth (Zionist) Congress in 1903. And if you ask me now what has Israel to do in Uganda, then...let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist (1897) Congress, the English Uganda proposition (1903), the future World War (1914-1918), the peace conference (1919-1920) where with the help of England a Free and Jewish Palestine will be created, like a mighty thunder these last words came to us, and we all were trembling and awe-struck as if we had seen a vision of old."

The above speech was also printed in the Fascist (London) February, 1937. The same speech has been mentioned in a number of books, including "Democracy and World Dominion,� p. 221, " by Edward D. Schoonmaker, publisher, Richard R. Smith, New York City, 1939.

�� 1904

1). Kuhn Loeb & Co. (a Rothschild international banking firm) financed the war of Japan against Czarist Russia. (A planned revolution in Czarist Russia followed one year later).

2). Chaim Weismann commented as follows on Theodore Herzl's Judenstaat: "Four years ago world Jewry was divided into two camps; one on the east and one on the west. And when Herzl arrived and said to us that we must unite Eastern and Western Jewry, we carried out this order accordingly. Our unity today is Theodore Herzl's legacy to the Jewish people."

Theodore Herzl's Judenstaat states: "Wir sind ein Volk!" - "We are one people!" And today this is the only unity existing in a world divided into two hemispheres.

"We are one people despite the ostensible rifts, cracks and differences between the American and Soviet democracies. We are one people and it is not in our interests that the West should liberate the East, for in doing this and in liberating the enslaved nations, the West would inevitably deprive Jewry of the Eastern half of its world power." (Chaim Weizmann statement in World Conquerors, p. 227)

3). International Workers of the World (IWW starts promoting violence and trouble in U.S. Austrian-born, Felix Frankfurter later was counsel for IWW anarchists.

�� 1905

1). Sidney Hillman (Schmoul Gilsman) was educated as a Rabbi. (Who Was Who in America, Vol. II, p. 254)

2). Abortive Revolution in Russia failed. It was led by Sidney Hillman who later came to the U.S. to direct "world operations." Another leader in the same revolution was Leon Trotsky (Leiba Davidovitch Bronstein). During the revolution the Rothschilds helped finance, they had their termites in Russia destroy and sabotage the oil wells and refineries. It took many years to offset this tremendous sabotage. It handicapped Czarist Russia some years later when "Planned World War I" started.

3). Intercollegiate Socialist Society formed. Felix Frankfurter, a founder.

4). A copy of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was recorded in the British Museum, in London.

5). We quote from p. 76 of The World at the Cross Roads, by Boris Brasol: "According to the information of the London Jewish Chronicle, the contribution of International Jewry to the Russian revolutionary cause in 1905 reached the sum of �874,341." (Nearly $4,500,000) U.S.).

No wonder Mr. George von Longerke Meyer, United States Ambassador to Russia during the Russo-Japanese War, stated in an official letter dated December 30, 1905, to Mr. Elihu Root, then U.S. Secretary of State, that: "The Jews have undoubtedly to a large extent furnished the brains and energy in the revolution throughout Russia." Never the less, in 1905, the revolution financed in part by Jacob H. Schiff failed.

�� 1906

1). In 1906, a dissolution suit was brought by the Attorney General, for the U.S. Government, against Rockefeller's Oil Company. The case was closed in 1908. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the Rockefeller interest in May 1911 and fined them $29,000,000. The State of Texas issued an injunction against the Rockefellers doing business in that state. William H. Allen's book, Rockefeller: Giant, Dwarf, Symbol gives some of the details of the Rockefellers' prior questionable operations. When the Rockefellers maneuvered out of the fine of $29 million, Federal Judge Landis, who conducted the government trial, bitterly commented: "You can't convict a million dollars." (American Mercury, November 1958, p. 104) From the beginning the Rockefellers were financed by the Kuhn Loeb & Co., and other Zionist bankers. The Rothschilds advised and guided the Rockefellers. They had a deal to divide the world petroleum markets. (Rothschilds and Rockefellers: Dedicated Monopolists, American Mercury, November 1958, p. 100)

2). In the Jewish Encyclopedia, (1906) we read: "It (Schiff's firm) subscribed and floated the large Japanese war loan in 1904-1905." (The Alien Menace, p. 112) The Rothschilds financed Alliance Israelite Universelle, published in Russia and elsewhere in 1907: "Capture the press! Through it everything will come to you in the natural course of events." (Adolphe Cromioux. Founder, Alliance Israelite Universelle, quoted from A. Shamakoff, Address in defense of T. Dokshin and others, p. 36. Moscow; University Printing Office, 1907)

�� 1907

1). Labor Zionist Organization of America - Poale Zion, was organized in the U.S. to shape labor activities.

2). "There was another great crisis when the Knockerbocker Trust failed because manipulators of the millionaire class wilfully created a run on the banks, from which they emerged incomparably more powerful, having bought up the stock of the ruined victims which held to resell at par. At the same time, the Steel Trust was able to complete its absolute monopoly. Solomon Loeb, of Kuhn Loeb & Co., was a member of the Knickerbockers Trust." (Deadlier Than the H. Bomb, p. 45)

�� 1908

1). The Socialists financed by the International Banking group, said they would, in the future, "bury the whole Capitalists system."

2). On advice of the Rothschilds the Belgian Government acquires the Belgian Congo. Edward Sengier was sent there, to Elizabethtown. War, minerals and other reasons was mentioned later.

3). Abraham Flexner became education "expert" for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (American Mercury, November 1958, p. 106)

4). Federal Council of Churches of Christ organized at suggestion of Rothschild. Rockefeller and Carnegie interests active in it. Their Foundation later flow funds into it. 75 percent of its finances have come from sources outside of its church membership. Congregations don't vote, "Selected" delegates meet only once each four years. During a heated Congressional investigation into White Slavery, The American Jewish Congress was formed. (International Jew, by Henry Ford, Sr., p. 96.� During years that followed, the AJC and FC of C were to work closely together on many projects)

�� 1909

1). Walter Rathenau, Zionist, Financial Director of Germany, selected by I.B. after World War I in The Wierner Free Presse, December 25, 1909: "Only 300 men, each of whom knows all the others, govern the fate of Europe. They elect their successors from their entourage. These Jews have the means in their hands of putting an end to the form of any State which they find unreasonable."

2). The Unseen Empire of Finance, a carefully documented research book by E. Alexander Powell, declared in The Saturday Evening Post, June 19, 1909: "The European peoples are no longer under the Government of respective nations. They have passed under another scepter. They have become the subjects of another Power: a Power unseen, but felt in palace as in cottage, in Russia as in Spain, by every parent and child, by every potentate and every laborer. No nation on the Europe continent has any longer an independence that is more than normal. The Political autonomy of every one of them has been surrendered to the will of a despotism before which every kingdom and empire and republic fawns in the most abject subserviency." (Also recorded in the Zionist Network, p. 6, by Senator Jack B. Tunney)

�� 1911

1). "Mr. Paul Warburg was brother-in-law to Mr. Jacob H. Schiff. Warburg was born in Germany. His brothers conduct the powerful German banking house of M. Warburg and Company, Hamburg, financing the German shipping industry and controlling the Hamburg-American and North German Lloyd lines. Herr Max Warburg, head of this banking house played an important part in German politics, particularly at the time the Kaiser fled to Holland. Dr. Carl Melchoir, a partner in it, was one of the five German delegates-in-chief at the Peace Conference at Versailles (1919), and in later years (1930) was prominent in the founding of the Bank for International Settlements. This was the central bank of the central International Settlements, the central bank of the central banks established in Switzerland, which has been internationalized in peace and war alike, it pays no taxes, and it is above and beyond the law." (All These Things, by A.N. Field, p. 5)

2). Correspondence of the Rothschilds to the German Kaiser reveals Rothschilds wanted World War I delayed. (They needed our Federal Reserve Acto finance World Wars; International Jew , by Henry Ford, Sr., p. 204)

3). The International Group running the Carnegie Foundation trustees' meeting "discussed the advantages of changing our government and institutions through war." Later Alger Hiss was president of this "international" outfit.

4). "I felt constrained to point out (to Kaiser Wilhelm II on his last visit to England in 1911) that the Jews...had captured and controlled the larger part of the German press. He did not dissent." Herbert Henry Asquith, Prime� Minister of England 1908-1918. (The Genesis of the War, New York, 1923, p. 89)

5). The Zionist organization sent a German geologist, Professor Blankenhorn, in investigate the potentialities of the Dead Sea region in Palestine. (The Alien Menace, p. 168)

�� 1912

1). Bernard Baruch ushered into the President's office in the White House his very weak professor, Woodrow Wilson.

2). Richard J.H. Gottheil wrote that "The closer Jews are kept within the fold, the greater their interest in Jewish life and thought."

3). The best pamphleteers, the ablest journalists of Europe, kept on the payroll of the various financial groups, were feverishly preparing public opinion for the future conflict between the European countries. (Boris L. Brasol)

4). "...Finally it should be borne in mind that the press bureaus and the great Eastern dailies exert a disproportionate influence on the American press as a whole...The foreign news which came through these bureaus was primarily composed for the New York papers, so, in the last analysis, the control of the New York press meant the control of the entire American press." (Horace C. Peterson)

5). "...The Northcliffe (Jewish-owned) press did more before and during the war to embitter and deliberately poison the English mind against Germany than any other agency." (Clinton Hartley Grattan)

�� 1913

1). Colonel E. Mandell House wrote a book, Philip Dru, Administrator. (David-Rex-Universe, See American Mercury, November 1953, p. 131; Researchers say that E. Mandell House was an agent of the Rothschilds - this has been proven to be correct)

2). President Wilson (during brief moments when he was not dominated by Brandeis, Baruch, Frankfurter, etc) wrote "we know something intervenes between the people of the U.S. and the control of their own affairs at Washington." (Far and Wide, p. 327) The Hidden Hand put across five related items in 1913:

1). Graduated income tax law was passed. (16th Amendment). A fundamental rule, laid down by The Communist Manifesto, for destroying of society is "A heavy, progressive or graduated income tax."

2). The Federal Reserve Banking Act was passed, December 23, 1913; two days before Christmas. It permitted aliens , through our privately owned Federal Reserve Banks to finance the world wars which were "planned." Elihu Root blasted this dangerous act in the Senate December 13, 1913. (See Money Made Mysterious - 3rd Book) 4,000 pages of fine print was later slipped into it! It was cooked up at Baruch's Jekyll Island in a secret conference.

3). The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was organized by B'nai B'rith. (Its pressure and intimidation record, and the sad events that happened thereafter, speak for themselves).

4). The Rockefeller Foundation was established. Thereafter this outfit and the ADL were to cooperate. (Remember the 2 blades of a pair of scissors).

5). U.S. Senators would no longer be selected by the Legislatures of each of the States. Thereafter Senators would be elected by the masses. This gave the Internationalists and their Controlled Press control of the Senators by their control of all communication media. They already had it on the Congressmen.

From this date forward, we were to be lied to, brainwashed and betrayed. Nationalism was thrown out the window for un-American internationalism. The money properly belonging to the citizen was taken from him by the Marxist graduated income tax and squandered by the internationalists through "their controlled government." Planned and promoted wars followed.

�� 1914

1). As Zionists pushed England into war, U.S. had at the critical Constantinople post (Turkey) Henry Morgenthau, Sr., as Ambassador and Louis Einstein as its special minister.

2). Paul M. Warburg said, at a Congressional hearing: "I only decided to become a citizen after I was convinced the U.S. money system would be reformed." (The Hidden Empire, p. 63)

3) Five men who were later to head various governments (Lenin of Russia, Ebert of Germany, Branting of Sweden, MacDonald of England, Stauning of Denmark) met as members of the International Socialist Bureau of the Second International!

4). Trotsky was introduced and recommended to them (Kuhn, Loeb & Co.) by the publisher of the...revolutionary newspaper, the Jewish Forward of New York. (Henry Coston, Les financiers qut menent le monde, Paris, 1955, p. 114)

5). "One by one the Jews are capturing the principal newspapers of America..." (From a letter of Sir Cecil Spring-Rice, British Ambassador to the U.S. to Sir Edward Grey, British Foreign Minister, November, 1914)

6) At the start of World War I, Edmond Rothschild told Dr. Chaim Weizmann that "It would spread to the Middle East where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur." (Far and Wide, p. 285)

7). Colonel C. Repington recounts a conversation he had (April 5, 1921) with Count Mensdorff, Austrian Ambassador in London in 1914, as follows: "Mensdorff thought that Israel (the Jews) had won the War; they had made it, thrived on it, profited by it. It was their supreme revenge on Christianity." (After the War, p. 155, Constable, 1922)

8). Lloyd George, who was counsel for the Zionists in England was made premier of the English Government and chosen to "perform" during World War I. His secretary was Sir Philip Sasson Rothschild. (American Mercury, Know, December 1958)

9). "The part which Jews all over the world play in white slavery is one of the foulest blots on our people." (Jewish World, March 18, 1914)

10). "Mr. Paul Moritz Warburg practically controls the financial policy of the Administration." (Sir Cecil Spring-Rice, British Ambassador to the U.S. From All These Things, by A.N. Field, p. 5)

"Assimilation is national suicide." (Louis D. Brandeis before Menorah Society, Columbia University)

�� 1915

1). In 1915, while the U.S. was at peace, Bernard Baruch took part of his annual income of $2,000,000 to finance the training of soldiers to fight in a war which Baruch said he knew was "certain." (American Mercury, October 1956, p. 83)

�� 1916

1). After months of terrific battle in Congress, Louis D. Brandeis was confirmed as Supreme Court Justice. He is the uncle of Felix Frankfurter, who years later dominated the Supreme Court. Christopher Sykes, son of Sir Mark Sykes, (who was the Secretary of the British War Cabinet) wrote a book Two Studies in Virtue and, referring to the Balfour Declaration and the part played by his father in advancing Zionism, Sykes said, on page 184 of his book: "He (Mr. James Malcolm - Malkom, a Zionist), then told Sir Mark Skyes of a very curious and powerful influence which Zionists could exert. One of President Wilson's closest advisers and friends was Justice Louis D. Brandeis, a Jew with he passionate Zionist faith of a recent convert.

That Wilson was attached to Brandeis by ties of a peculiar hardness, because, so the story ran, in his earlier days the future President had been saved by this man (Brandeis) from appearing in a damaging lawsuit. It was said that Brandeis was regarded by Wilson as the man to whom he owed his career. (Researchers said President Wilson was involved in "moral problems" at Princeton University, that Samuel Untermeyer had some damaging letters returned to Wilson after Brandeis was put on the Supreme Court. Woodrow Wilson was also a Jew, so he was perfectly fitted for his job in more ways than one. Of Woodrow Wilson the famous Dr. H.J. Boldt wrote as follows: "Woodrow Wilson was a Sephardic Jew...The name of his parents was Wohlson � a German‑Jewish name; they came from Germany, and went to England where they were known as Mr. and Mrs. Wolfson and when they landed here in America they called themselves Wilson."� (Chronology of The Conspiracy, by Willie Martin)

�Re: Mrs. Peck, we quote from others: "Woodrow Wilson's friendship with Mrs. Hulbert Peck (of Princeton, New Jersey)...lasted for seven years...It was wrecked in the end by gossip. The so-called Peck scandal furnished the zest for the whispering campaigns of two Presidential elections...Wilson had written hundreds of letters to the charming divorcee. (George S. Viereck 80.283) It seems that the Peck letters were finally acquired by the Wilson estate. (George S. Viereck)

Mrs. Peck never demanded and Woodrow Wilson never paid hush money or blackmail." (Edward Mandell House) Probably correct, putting Brandeis on the Supreme Court researchers say was the price the American people paid!

2). "A note drawn up by the American official (intelligence) services and transmitted by the High Commissioner of the French Republic in the United States, contained the following passage: 'In February, 1916, it was learned for the fist time that a revolution was being fomented in Russia. It was discovered that the undermentioned persons and concerns were engaged in this enterprise of destruction: (1) Jacob Schiff; (2) Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Directors: Jacob Schiff, Felix Warburg, Otto Kahn, Mortimer Schiff, Jerome Hanauer; (3) Guggenheim; (4) Max Breitung." (From the American Consulate, Elbridge D. Rand, American Consul, Geneva, Switzerland, dated January 21, 1929; National Archives Department of State, Decimal File 1910-1929, No. 861.4016/325)

3). Of the 63 delegates of the Committee of Russian Revolutionists that met in New York City, 50 were veterans of the 1905 revolution.

4). Zionists secretly cook up Palestine "deal." Documents available.

5). The notorious "Sunrise Conference" in Washington. The record of this sinister planning was suppressed (In 1938 the enemy got our Senate Military Affairs Committee to hold a similar conference. Senator Bridges said in the New York Herald Tribune, March 2, 1939, "If the American people ever learned what was said there; the nation would be shocked and stunned." (Democracy and World Dominion, p. 312)

6). President Woodrow Wilson was re-elected on the slogan "He kept us out of war." Yet at the same time, he and his foreign advisers were secretly taking steps to involve us in this unnecessary war.

�� 1917

1). The Bolshevist Revolution was not, as it is called a revolution, but actually an invasion. (Democracy and World Dominion, p. 210)

2). Rabbi Wise said in the New York Times 3/24/17: "I believe that of all the achievements of my people, none has been nobler than the part the sons and daughters of Israel have taken in the great movement which has culminated in free Russia (revolution)."� ( From speech of Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, March 23, 1917 to the mass meeting celebrating the revolution in Russia)

3). (April) Jacob H. Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., made a public declaration that it was thanks to his financial help that the Russian Revolution had succeeded.

4). "I have just had� a long talk with Simonds of the New York Tribune. He is prepared to help us (Zionists) to speak with vigor, editorially, on our behalf, but I think a word of yours to him will be important." (Letter of Rabbi Stephen S. Wise to Justice Louis D. Brandeis, May 10, 1917)

5). We quote from the "Jewish Communal Register of New York City": "The firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Company floated the largest Japanese war loan of 1904-05 thus making possible the Japanese victory over Russia...Jacob Schiff financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia from the money markets of the United States."

6). "...The uprising of July 4, 1917, was intended to overthrow the Provisional Government according to the plans of Lenin and Trotsky. The revolutionaries were disconcerted by the intervention of a solitary regiment which had been withdrawn from the front and scattered themselves Lenin escaped but Trotsky was arrested. Their cause appeared lost. But the Bolshevists had given proof of their courage, and a telegram arrived to bring them news of the financial support of Jacob Schiff, who was determined to push the Russian Revolution to the end. The importance of these funds placed at the disposal of Lenin and Trotsky in order to foment the Bolshevik insurrection of October, 1917, has not been fully realized. This action overthrew the Kerensky government and set up the Soviet regime. How these funds got to them is known. The United States Government published in October, 1918, a series of official documents entitled The German-Bolshevik Conspiracy." (Henry Coston, Les Financiers qui menent le monde, Paris, p. 114)

7). Max Warburg of Hamburg (Sept. 21) opened by cable an account at (Rothschilds) Nya Banken in Stockholm, Sweden for Trotsky (Bronstein).

8). October 17. Zionists dominated England and France, betrayed the Arab-Moslem people and bargained away their Palestine territories. Lawrence of Arabia, an Englishman who was loved, trusted, and respected by the Arabs, returned to the British Government the decorations they gave him. (Shouldn't Eisenhower, as Commander-in-Charge of the U.S. Armed Forces, also return the valuable military decorations he received from Soviet Russia?).

9). "...Wladimir Olaf Aschberg...acted as the intermediary (in Stockholm, Sweden) between Kuhn, Loeb & Co., in New York City and the firm of Max Warburg (in Hamburg) when they were financing the (Bolshevik) revolution of October, 1917. Aschberg was the head of the Nya Banken in Stockholm and later, in 1921, founded the Russian Commercial Bank. Thanks to this institution he became in a sense the dictator of Soviet finances." (Henry Coston, Les financiers qui menent le monde, Paris, p. 115)

"In the match between these two heavyweights (the United States and the Soviet Union) the International Finance of the United States will have trained the adversary." (Comte de Saint-Aulaire, Geneva Versus Peace, London, 1937, p. 75; Library of Congress: JX1975,S.32) He was the French Ambassador to the Court of St. James, London, from 1920 until 1924.

10). From the great book; "World Revolution - The Plot Against Civilization," by the famous English historian, Nesta H. Webster, p. 93, we quote: "In a word, the peasant inherited from the aristocrat; he was disinherited by the usurer. Here is the true history of the disinherited, not in France alone, but in Russia, in Austria, in Poland; everywhere that the worker lives by tilling his own soil the abolition of feudalism has led to the domination of the money-lender, and the money-lender is in most cases a Jew."

11). We quote from page 187 of "Two Studies in Virtue," by Christopher Sykes, as follows: "Sokolow made a simple request, namely that the Zionist Committee should have facilities for communications abroad. He pointed out they were an international body; that they should be granted Governmental privileges. It was agreed that the War Office and the Foreign Office would send Zionist letters and telegrams by way of Embassies, Consulates or Headquarters."

12). Jacob H. Schiff, the leader of the Zionists, finances the complete rewriting of the Bible provided it is done under Jewish auspices. (See his book, p. 63, VII, also American Mercury, July, 1958, p. 120)

13). On Good Friday, April 6, 1917, the conspirators got the United States to foolishly declare World War I on Germany and to become an ally of the Revolutionists who had invaded and now dominate Russia.

14). "Official information emanating from Russia itself informed the world that Communism, while barbarously opposed to every form of Christianity, made it a crime for any comrade to utter a single word of reproach against the Jews. The 1917 list of those who, with Lenin, ruled many of the activities of the Soviet Republic, disclosed that of the 25 quasi-cabinet members, 24 of them were atheistic. Between these same years, 40 billion dollars of Christian property was appropriated by the Lenins and Trotskys, the Zinovieffs and the Kemeneffs, the Litvinoffs and the Lapsinskys; by the atheistic Jews and Gentiles, both of Russia. Those were the desperate days when Christians were not expelled from their native land but were the targets for the machine gun which beat out its tattoo against human hearts; incredible days when the altars of Christ were desecrated and the servants of Christ were massacred by every multiplying Calvaries." (From nationwide broadcast of Rev. Charles E. Coughlin, Sunday, November 29, 1938)

15). Since 1917, Red Russia has been the land base for the conspirators. Later, evil men in the U.S. financed and industrialized it. (American Mercury, January 1959, Mercury's Opinion, p. 110)

�� 1918

1). "...I think that a Jewish Palestine must become a war aim for America..." (Letter of Dr. Chaim Weizmann to Justice Louis D. Brandeis, Supreme Court, dated January 14, 1918)

2). Sixty-Fifth Congress, House Document 1868, Exhibit 243, "Paper Relating to Foreign Relations of the United States" contains a whole series of documents showing that the International Bankers financed Lenin and Trotsky (Bronstein). Transfer of funds started in June, 1917. Document 9 shows that the international banking house of M. Warburg opened an account for Comrade Trotsky to purchase arms, etc." Also Document 12 shows transfer of funds for "agitation against England and France."

3). Soviet Russia law passed. "From 3/1/18 on, the right to possess women having reached the age of 17 and not more than 32, is abolished. Women proclaimed to be the property of the whole nation. The former owners may retain the right of using their wives without waiting for their turn." (The Hidden Empire, p. 47)

4). The United States Secret Service (2nd Army Bureau) named the persons who financed the Bolsheviks in 1916. The State Department, under pressure, destroyed this report. As the report remarks: "All Jews."

5). "We� are living in a highly organized state of socialism. The state is all; the individual is of importance only as he contributes to the welfare of the state. His property is only (his) as the state does not need it. He must hold his life and his possessions at the call of the state." (Bernard M. Baruch, in The Knickerbocker Press, Albany, New York, August 8, 1918)

This ties in with (Rothschilds) Alliance Israelite Universelie which sent out bulletins "Nationalities must disappear, religion must be suppressed. But Israel (i.e., Zionism) must not disappear."

6). The First World War brought to Edward Rothschild, and his associates, more than one hundred billion dollars of profit. (The Secret World Government, by Major General Count Cherep-Spiridovich, p. 29)

7). Bolshevist revolutionaries in Russia murdered adults and children of the royal family, and many others, thus launching their regime, in blood.

8). Bernard Baruch, testifying at a Congressional inquiry, said: "I had more power than any other man in the war."

9). U.S. Government paid Col. E. Mandell House $60,000 for expenses in N.Y.C. (for 6 months, July 1 to December 31, 1918).

10). Bernard Flexner joins Roger Baldwin and his counsel of Zionist delegation in 1919 Peace Conference. (The Record of both of these men speak for themselves).

11). How these subsidized alien revolutionaries, having invaded Russia, proceeded to murder and rob on a wholesale scale has been recorded by many persons who had the misfortune to be in Russia during the Bolshevik Revolution. (The Alien Menace, pp. 113-114)

12). Those who wish to go further in the history of this plot against civilization should consult the books quoted; also "Russia's Ruin," by Wilcox, Chapman & Hall, 1919; and "The Alien Menace," p. 114.

13). See Mercury article, pp. 115-116, February, 1958 entitled Felix Frankfuter and Louis D. Brandeis. On 3/2/18 they, Frankfurter from Paris and Brandeis in the U.S., were raising a million dollars (For Weizmann to use in London).

14). Very few Christians ever read The World Significance of a Jewish State, by Briantruster A.A. Berle. Berle and Herzl had much in common.

�� 1919

1). Of the making of the peace of 1919, Dr. E.J. Dillon of the London Daily Telegraph wrote in his book "The Inside Story of the Peace Conference," (Harpers, 1920) that the delegates to the Conference from Eastern Europe set down the formula: "Henceforth the world will be governed by the Anglo-Saxon people, who in turn are swayed by their Jewish elements'...and who regard it as fatal to the pace of Eastern Europe." (The Inside Story of the Peace Conference, (Harpers, 1920) by Dr. E.J. Dillion of the London Daily Telegraph, p. 497)

2). Between 1919 and 1924, three million recorded immigrants came to the U.S., mostly from Eastern Europe.

3). Professor J.R. Commons of the University of Wisconsin testified before the United States House of Representatives Banking and Currency Committee in 1927 that a member of the Federal Reserve Board had told him that the great inflation of 1919 was deliberately created by the Federal Reserve Board. (All These Things, by A.N. Field, p. 6)

4). Council of Foreign Relations was launched by Rothschild and Rockefeller at the sinister Versailles Peace meeting. The following two groups were set up to do the job:

I. Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.

II. Council on Foreign Relations, New York City.

Annual grants by Rockefeller Foundation provided a direct, continuous method of control of both organizations. Carnegie Foundation and later Rockefeller Foundation were to constitute a gigantic lobby and pressure group serving to brainwash, influence and wap (or "mold") the various nations' policies. Top officials were influenced to come to the Council of Foreign Relations for "advice" and "guidance." (See facts in reprint Weinberg Replaces Baruch)

5). If you read The Inside Story of the Peace Conference (Harpers) by Dr. E.J. Dillion, you will see the characters wo put across the vicious Versailles Peace Treaty. It made s subsequent World War inevitable.

6). In the new constitution recently adopted in the USSR we have another interesting provision which bears upon this passing of Russia. The Christian religion has for centuries been the religion of the Slav, as it has been the religion of the other White people of Europe. We have seen the record of hatred of the Bolsheviki and the Soviet Government in relation to that religion.

7). In article 124 of the new Soviet Constitution we find the following: "Freedom to perform religious rites and freedom of anti-religious propaganda is recognized for all citizens." Significant as this is, it becomes even more significant when taken in connection with a provision in the preceding article 123: "Any direct or indirect restriction of these rights...as well as any propagation of racial or national exceptionalizsm or hatred and contempt, is punishable by law."

8). The following extracts are quotes from the testimony of those who appeared before the U.S. Senate Overman Committee. (Also printed in Democracy and World Dominion): "The leaders of the movement, I should say, are about two-thirds Russian Jews." (William C. Huntington, Commercial Attach� of the United States Embassy at Petrograd from June, 1916, to September, 1918, p. 69)

"In Russia it is well known that three-fourths of the Bolshevist leaders are Jewish." (Mr. Welsh, for two years a junior officer of the National City Bank in Russia, p. 269)

"When the Bolsheviki came into power, all over Petrograd we at once had a predominance of Yiddish proclamations, big posters, and everything in Yiddish." (Dr. Simons, Pastor of the Methodist Church in Petrograd, p. 142)

In the "Yale Review" in an article entitled "The World Menace," Mr. Henry C. Emery LLD., former chairman of the United States Tariff Board supported this testimony. "No one who ever made a visit to Smolny Institute, when that was the headquarters of the Bolshevist government in Petrograd, could fail to understand how easy it is to get the impression that the Jews have at last seized power."

9). "Potent international financial interests were at work (at the Peace Conference) in favor of the immediate recognition of the Bolshevists. Those influences had been largely responsible for the Anglo-American proposal in January (1919) to call Bolshevist representatives to Paris at the beginning of the Peace Conference...The well-known American-Jewish banker, Mr. Jacob Schiff, was known to be anxious to secure recognition for the Bolshevists...and Tehitcherin, the Bolshevist Commissary for Foreign Affairs, had revealed the meaning of the January proposal by offering extensive commercial and economic concessions in return for recognition." (Henry Wickham Steed, Through Thirty Years, New York, 1924, Vol. 2, p. 301, Mr. Steed was the Editor of The Times, London, Library of Congress D 397.S57)

10) Victor Marsden, the (London) Morning Post reporter who spent many months in Russia, stated that "among the 545 leading Bolshevik officials there were 377 Jews at the birth of Bolshevism."

11). The German people were robbed and weakened by inflation. As a result of the international bankers conspiracy it took a billion-mark stamp (5 billion pre-war dollars) to send one letter in Germany.

12). The British War Cabinet issues official "White Paper" listing Kuhn, Loeb & Co., and other Zionist bankers who financed the Red Russian Revolution.

13). In March, the Third International was organized by Zionists. (See H. Fish Report)

14). March 1, Capt. Schuyler reported. Here are exact quotes from document in our possession: "You will think I am hot about this matter (Bolshevism) but it is I feel sure one which is going to bring great trouble on the United States when the judgment of history shall be recorded on the part we have played. It is very largely our fault that Bolshevism has spread as it has..." (From confidential report of Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, Chief United States Army Intelligence Officer, Omsk, Siberia, to Lt. Col. David Prescott Borrows, Intelligence Officer, American Expeditionary Forces, Vladivostok, Siberia, March 1, 1919, p. 2. National Archives, Military Intelligence Files)

15). "...The prime movers (for recognition of the Bolshevists at the Peace Conference in 1919) were Jacob Schiff, Warburg and other international financiers, who wished above all to bolster up the Jewish Bolshevists." (Henry Wickham Steed, Through Thirty Years, New York, 1924, Vol , p. 302, Library of Congress: D 397.S75)

16). "...Trotsky was furnished large sums of money in America and...sent to Russia." (Erich Ludendorff, Kriegshetze und Volkenmorden in den letzten 150 Jahren, Munchen, 1936, p. 149. General Lundendorff was Commander-in-Chief of the German Army in World War I. Library of Congress: D 359.L86, 1939)

17). "The collapse of these three Posers (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia) in their old form represents a considerable gain for the carrying on of a Jewish national policy, and the fact that the same war, which brought about the world-wide recognition of Zionism, also brought about the fall of three anti-Jewish powers, is a unique coincidence which may well give cause for thought." (Der Jude, Vol. 3, p. 449, Dr. Martin Buber, Publisher, Berlin 1918-1919)

18). The Communist Party was set up in the U.S. on September 1, 1919. William Z. Foster (wife, Esther Abramovich) became its first general secretary. The Daily Worker, the Communist New York daily, began its first publication about the same time.

19). The Versailles Peace Conference imposed on Germany the harsh conditions that sent the nation reeling toward Communism, depression and finally despotism.

20). Bernard Baruch was invited to become the Soviet Union's peace-time adviser on industry and resources.

21). Dr. Weizmann said "we do not aspire to found a Zionist State. We cannot hope to rule in a country in which only 1/7th of the population at present are Jews." (Far and Wide, p. 318)

22). In the hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Sixty-Sixth Congress, Document 106, p. 536, we quote:

Senator McCumber questions President Woodrow Wilson: "Do you think if Germany had committed no act of war or no act of injustice against our citizens that we would have gotten into this war?"

President Wilson: "I do think so."

Senator McCumber: "You think we would have gotten in anyway?"

President Wilson: "I do."

23). Poisonous propaganda started to flow into the minds of United States citizens.

24). "Jewish hopes for the future depend on two lynch pins. One is the League of Nations idea, and the other is the British Government, and we need scarcely say that we refer to Jewish hopes in the widest application of the term." (The Jewish World, London, January 15, 1919 (No. 2392), p. 5) "There must be a proper lookout for the civic and political rights and the status of Jews in various countries unless there be established a Power above all nations..." (The Jewish World, London, January 15, 1919 (No. 2392), p. 5)

25). "Peace Conference in Paris in 1919 made the resumption of war inevitable, owing to its impossible financial clauses. At this conference the chief financial adviser to the German delegation was Dr. Carl Melchior, partner of Max Warburg, whose brothers Paul and Felix were partners of Jacob Schiff, in Kuhn, Loeb & Co. The chief economic adviser to the American delegation was Bernard M. Baruch, the dictator of the all-powerful War Industries Board in America during the war and an associate in business of Jacob H. Schiff. The British economic delegation was headed by Lord Cunliffe, former Governor of the Bank of England and a partner in the international Jewish banking house of Goschen (ancestral city - leipzig, Germany). In connection with this conference, Lloyd George wrote in his memoirs: "They (the international bankers) swept statesmen, politicians, jurists and journalists all on one side and issued their orders with an imperiousness of absolute monarchs who knew that there was no appeal from their ruthless decrees." (Deadlier Than the H Bomb, p. 47)

26). The second reason for large scale Communist exploitation of the United States was our traditional lack of any laws prohibiting or regulating immigration into the United States and our negligence or politics in enforcing immigration laws when they had been passed. (Chapter II, Iron Curtain Over America) "The illegal entry of aliens into the United States is one of the most serious and difficult problems confronting the Immigration and Naturalization Service ...Since the end of World War II, the problem of illegal entry has increased tremendously...There is ample evidence that there is an alarmingly large number of aliens in the United States in an illegal status. Under the alien registration act of 1940 some 5,000,000 aliens were registered." (The Immigration and Naturalization Systems of the United States, pp. 629-630)

The third principal reason for the Communist exploitation of the United States was the absence of any effective policy regarding resident foreigners even when their activities are directed toward the overthrow of the government.

Thus in 1950 several hundreds of thousands of foreigners, among the millions illegally in this country, were arrested and released for want of adequate provisions for deporting them.

As shown in Chapter II, "persons of Khazar backgrounds or traditions had entered the United States in large numbers in the waves of immigration between 1880 and the outbreak of World War I in 1914. The Soviet seizure of Russia took place in 1917, however, and the hey-day for Communist-inclined immigrants from Eastern Europe was the five-year period between the end of World War I (1919) and the passage of the 1924 law restricting immigration. Recorded immigrants to this country in that brief span of time amounted to approximately 3 million and large numbers of newcomers were from Eastern Europe." (The Iron Curtain Over America, by John Beaty, p. 45)

27). Lenin said: "The first World War gave us Russia, while the Second World War will hand Europe to us." (Note the certainty of World War II. It came, "as planned" 20 years later). The urging of dual loyalty by Dr. Nahum Goldman, who was the president of the World Zionist Movement and also president of the World Jewish Congress makes real Americans very concerned. (American Mercury, June, 1959, This is What They Said, p. 146)

Events that have confirmed the Research Summarized in the Preceding Manuscript:

1). Five million dollars worth of research by the late Henry Ford resulted in the production of The International Jew. This almost cost Mr. Ford his life and his company.

2). The Outline is consistent with the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, smuggled out of Russia and translated by an English journalist. When the Jews told Mr. Ford that the Protocols were a forgery, he said: "I don't believe they are a forgery, but whatever they are they fit what is going on as the Jew attempts to gain world power."

3). By manipulations involving the First World War and the Second World War, the Jews were able to steel $20 billion worth of real estate, drive millions of helpless Arabs; both Christian and Moslem, into a desert to starve, die and suffer and establish what intelligent observers refer to as the counterfeit State of Israel. In the fulfillment of this project, they indulged in genocide, napalm slaughter and every known form of barbarism that could be meted out to an oppressed and defeated people.

4). In 1967 they seized the entire Holy Land and invaded Jordan and Egypt and announced their purpose through their Number One Zionist spokesman, Ben-Gurion, who said, "We shall make of this the Supreme Court of Mankind."

5). Although the Jewish Zionists helped created the United Nations, shortly before this went to press, they were completely condemned by the United Nations, representing the reaction and the awakening of world-wide sentiment.

6). Jewish Zionists have organized a world-wide screaming and complaining campaign against the Soviet Union because of its alleged mistreatment of the Jews. There is no way to know whether this means that the Jews have now 'fouled their brood' in the Soviet Union or whether it is a false front to mislead the world in preparation for the day when the Soviet Union will join with the Zionists in subduing the Arabs and capturing two-thirds of the world's oil supply. It is important, however, that every reader of this manuscript have a photostatic copy of the Report of Military Intelligence referred to in Item 7 on Page 29 which reveals that out of approximately 300 commissars in the first Communist government of Russia, 284 were Jews from New York and scattered portions of America.

The New World Order by Samuel Zane Batten is published by the American Baptist Publication Society. Founding of Thule Society in Germany; Hitler recruited. League of Nations founded at Paris Peace Conference. Meeting at the Majestic Hotel, Paris, between Wilsonian intellectuals (House, Dulles and Dulles, etc.) and "like‑minded Englishmen" to discuss forming an organization "for the study of international affairs." Royal Institute of International Affairs founded. Freud draws attention to Austrian neurologist Poetzl's experiments with the tachistroscope, an early device for studying subliminal perception. Charles Fort's The Book of the Damned published. Hitler joins the German Workers' Party.

Freud draws attention to Austrian neurologist Poetzl's experiments with the tachistroscope, an early device for studying subliminal perception. Charles Fort's The Book of the Damned published. Hitler joins the German Workers' Party.

�� 1921

Council on Foreign Relations incorporated; founded by Wilsonians House, Dulles and company upon their return from Paris, with the help of the Round Table Group. Marconi states he believes mysterious V code on pre‑WWI radio came from space; Tesla recalls seeing lights, vivid images, when he was a boy. Hitler takes over the NSGWP.

�� 1923

Assassination of Pancho Villa in Mexico. Founding of Hitler's National‑Socialist (Nazi) Party in Germany. International Police (Interpol) founded in Vienna. In the face of the Teapot Dome and other scandals, President Harding visits Alaska and receives a "long ciphered message" which visibly upsets him, causing him to ask what a president could do when friends betrayed him; he died soon after among conflicting rumors about the cause of his death. Fort's New Lands published.

�� 1931

The circle of Friends was formed by twelve prominent German businessmen who promised to donate regularly to the Nazi Party. Baron Kurt von Schroder (Jew), partner of J.H. Stein Co. (Jewish) Cologne Bankers, was the leader of this group. J.H. Stein then became Hitler's personal banker. Hitler's aide, Walther Funk (Jew), met with Schroder to discuss the real views of Hitler on questions concerning the international bankers. Funk was able to satisfy Schroder, and the financial support of the Nazi Party (by the Jews) continued.

�� 1932

"The story I shall unfold in these pages is the story of Germany's two faces, the one turned towards Western Europe, the other turned towards Soviet Russia...It can be said, without any exaggeration, that from 1921 till the present day Russia has been able, thanks to Germany, to equip herself with all kinds of arms, munitions, and the most up-to-date war material for an army of several millions; and that, thanks to her factories manufacturing war material in Russia, Germany has been able to assure herself not only of secret supplies of war material and the training of officers and other ranks in the use of this material, but also, in the event of war, the possession of the best stocked arsenals in Russia...The firm of Krupp's of Essen, Krupp the German Cannon-King (Kanonenkoenig), deserves a chapter to itself in this review of German war-industries in Russia.

It deserves a separate chapter...because its activity upon Soviet territory has grown to tremendous proportions...The final consolidation of the dominating position Krupp's occupy in Russia, was the formation of a separate company 'Manych' to which the Soviet Government granted a liberal conce�ssion...Negotiations concerning these concessions for the company were conducted in Moscow, for several months...Gradually there was formed in Russia a chain of experimental training camps, and artillery parks (ostensibly eliminated by the Treaty of Versailles).

These are under the management of German officers, and they are invariably teeming with Germans either arriving to undergo a course of training, or leaving after the completion of the course...At the time of writing (1932) interest is growing in the rising star of Herr Adolf Hitler, the Nazi Leader. Herr Hitler is regarded as the protagonist par excellence of the Right against the Left in Germany, and, as a Hitlerist regime is anticipated before long, it may perhaps be argued that the Third Reich of the Nazis, the sworn enemies of Communism, would not tolerate the Reichswehr-Red Army connection. Such a conclusion would be inaccurate to the last degree ...Stalin, the realist, would have no qualms in collaboration with the Hitlerist Germany. But more important than this are the following facts: The Reichswehr Chiefs and their political allies amongst the civilian politicians and officials have succeeded in nursing their Eastern orientation, their underground military collaboration with the Soviets, in spite of all the changes of political regime in Germany since the end of the war. It has made little or no difference to them whether the Reich Government has been composed of men of the Right, the Center, or the Left. They have just continued their policy uninfluenced by political change. There is no reason to suppose that they would change their course under a Hitlerist regime, especially when it is remembered that most of the aims, in external policy, of the Nazi leaders, are identical with those of the Nationalists and the military leaders themselves. Furthermore, there are the great German industrialists, of Nationals color, who are amongst the principal collaborators, on the war material side, with the Reichswehr Chiefs, and who are, therefore, hand in glove with the directors of the 'Abmachungen' (Agreements) plot. Many of these great industrialists are contributors on a big scale to the Nazi party funds. A hitlerist Germany would, therefore, have no qualms in continuing the collaboration with Soviet Russia...The Reichswehr chiefs who are conducting the Abmachungen delude themselves that they can use Bolshevist Russia to help them in their hoped-for war of revenge against Europe, and then, in the hour of victory, hold the Bolshevists at bay, and keep them in their place. The more subtle psychologists at the Kremlin, of course, know better, but are wise enough to keep their knowledge to themselves. The fact, however, that this German-Russian plot will, in the end, bring about the destruction of Germany, will not in any way reconcile Europe to its own destruction at the hands of Germany and Russia together." (The Russian Face of Germany, Cecil F. Melville, pp. 4, 102, 114, 117, 120, 173-174, 176)

�� 1933

�Jews, The Power Behind The Throne!" In 1933, the well known and reputable Dutch publishing company of Van Holkema and Warendorf, published a book which contained three conversations between Hitler and the International Jewish financier, Sidney Warburg.

This book was written in the form of a diary and covered interviews given by Hitler in 1929, 1931 and 1933. It clearly revealed Hitler's plan for Jewish finances in rising to power in Germany. On page 15, we read of a decision made by the United States Government, under the direction of the Jewish Presidential advisor to the Jewish President Woodrow Wilson, Edward Mandel House, in which pressure was brought to bear on England and France, to leave Germany alone, so she could become solvent and protect the investments of the International Bankers.

On page 18, we learn that in a secret meeting of important International Jewish Bankers, a plan was made to pressure France by inspiring in her the fear of a Communist revolution in Germany.

It was agreed that a Nationalist Revolution would be the best for the bankers interests, rather than a Communist takeover.� Sidney Warburg, of the New York firm of Kuhn, Loeb and Co., was chosen to go to Germany as a representative of the Internationalists and take charge of the negotiations. He held several series of meetings with Nazi representatives in Munich, where it was agreed that an initial sum of $10‑million would be paid to Hitler's intermediary, a man named Von Frey.

The bank of Mendelsohn and Co., was to issue ten single checks of $1‑million each, endorsed in favor of members of Hitler's trusted staff. Hitler notified Warburg that the bankers would need to create distrust among the German people by increasing unemployment. Which they immediately did. On page 43, of this book, in the copy of a letter penned by Hitler himself to his Wall Street promoters on October 29, 1929, in which he said: "Our movement is growing rapidly...I have spent the sum given to me for the upbuilding of my party and I must find new revenue within a reasonable period." (This letter was datelined in Germany, but mailed in the United States, so it probably was carried by a courier)

At a hasty conference of the International Bankers in New York, attended by Montagne, Norman, Rockefeller, Carter and McDean, it was agreed to send Hitler $15‑million more. Warburg was once again sent to Munich to handle the details. He told the German people that they were not yet mature enough for a democracy and that a nationalist movement was what they needed. He was not at all uneasy about Hitler's Jew baiting, since Hitler had told him that the Nazis aimed only at Galacian Jews.

While it may seem strange to many to see a Jewish banker lining up with an anti‑Semite like Hitler, it is not strange if you read Protocol No. IX, of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. (Whether they are a forgery or not makes no difference, since they are obviously being followed by World Jewry. And if the Protocols are a forgery we sure would like to see the original. They must be something!). It said: "Nowadays if any state should raise a protest against us it is only pro forma (Provided in advance) at our discretion and by our direction, for their anti‑Semitism is indispensable to us for the Management of our Lesser Brethren."

In other words, the International Jewish leaders promote anti‑Semitism to keep the "lesser Jews in fear and thus in line." At this time, the International Zionists were anxious for a European War, through which they could enforce the Balfour Treaty and gain control of Palestine.

The final financial arrangements for aid to Hitler came through the Jewish bank of Mendelsohn and Co., in Amsterdam. In 1933, they advanced Hitler another $7‑million. When this Warburg Manuscript was published, there was an immediate drive underway to put into effect a ban of the book. This was carried out by world Jewry and the German Secret Police. Many publishers, out of fear, recalled as many copies as they could.

The only mention of this book in America appeared in a short item in the New York Times, November 24, 1933, page 14, column 2, in which Felix Warburg, of the New York Warburgs, charged the editor of the Times with perpetrating a hoax. He stated that the Sidney Warburg mentioned in the manuscript was not his son Sidney and that he was not a member of International Jewry. Strange that they would pick one not of themselves for this sensitive mission. It is also strange indeed, when you consider that both International Jewish and Nazis sources sought to suppress the report. The Swiss magazine Der Sperber, published an account of this manuscript in 1936, in Zurich, which carried a detailed report of the facts contained in this outlawed book. It also circulated a book titled Spanischer Sommer, which showed how the International Jews and Bankers had paved Hitler's way into power.

�� 1935

The Russian Communist Government, under Stalin's rule, was so shaky that the Russian Army was on the verge of being defeated by tiny Finland; one of America's most staunch friends. And with the diversion of just a tiny fraction of the millions of tons of war equipment being shipped to Europe daily, America could have saved Finland and dealt a death blow to Stalin and to Communism.

Then just two years later, when Hitler and the Germany Army had cleared Eastern Europe of the Bolshevik plague; and had accepted the eager surrender of millions of Russian soldiers; was knocking at the door of Moscow Russia's Communist rule was once again on the verge of collapse. Thus, America, at the cost of thousands of dead and wounded American Troops, through orders of the Great TRAITOR Roosevelt, in an unheard of frenzy, rushed billions in military aid to Russia. Saving Stalin and with one monstrous Satanic Act, saved the entire Jewish‑ Communist‑Zionist World offensive from extinction.

Prior to WW II the Jewish Zionists enjoyed a visibly protected political status in Germany: "In fact, about 600 newspapers were officially banned during 1933. Others were unofficially silenced by street methods. The exceptions included (The Jewish) Judische Rundschau, the ZVfD's Weekly and several other Jewish publications. German Zionism's weekly was hawked on street corners and displayed at newsstands. When Chaim Arlosoroff visited Zionist headquar�ters in London on June 1, he emphasized, 'The Rundschau is of crucial importance today for the Zionists. Every day it gets fifty to sixty new subscribers.' By the end of 1933 Judische Rundschau circulation had in fact jumped to more than 38,000; four to five times its 1932 circulation.

Although many influential Aryan publications were forced to restrict their page size to conserve newsprint, Judische Rundschau was not affected until mandatory newsprint rationing in 1937. And while stringent censorship of all German publications was enforced from the outset, Judische Rundschau was allowed relative press freedoms. Although two issues of it were suppressed when they published Chaim Arlosoroff's outline for a capital transfer, such seizures were rare. Other than the ban on anti‑Nazi boycott references, printing atrocity stories, and criticizing the Reich, Judische Rundschau was essentially exempt from the so‑called Gleichschaltung or 'uniformity' demanded by the Nazi party of all facets of German society. Juedische Rundschau was free to preach Zionism as a wholly separate political philosophy ‑‑ indeed, the only separate political philosophy sanction by the Third Reich. In 1933, Hebrew became an encouraged course in all Jewish schools. By 1935, uniforms for Zionist youth corps were permitted ‑‑ the only non‑Nazi uniform allowed in Germany. When the Nuremburg Laws in late 1935 stripped German Jewry of their citizenship, it became illegal for Jews to raise the German flag; The same Law, however, stipulated: German Jewry could raise the Star of David-Emblazoned Zionist Flag..."

�� 1939

Attorney Leon Cooke, friend of Jack Ruby and financial secretary of the union which employed Ruby, killed by union president Jack Martin; union subsequently taken over by Mafia. League of Nations suspended. Germany invades Poland; World War II begins. CFR offers it services to U.S. State Dept. Interpol grouped with Gestapo. Amateur radio astronomer Grote Reber receives dot‑dash signal from space. Attempted assassination of Hitler.

Hitler's Rise To Power

Hitler began his rise to power in 1919, but he had a long and stormy road ahead, until he became Chancellor of Germany in 1933. During this time, he expended a tremendous amount of money, most of it coming from non‑German sources, although many wealthy German ladies, intrigued by the little mustached man, sent him their family jewels. It is also rather interesting to note that Hitler sold his idea of anti‑Semitism through the help of very powerful and wealthy Jews.

Some of these Jews used the excuse that they financed Hitler so that they could control him, but it is a known fact, that they made billions of dollars profit by financing both sides in World War II, just as they did in World War I. The Jews who financed Hitler are as much to blame for any Jewish deaths in Germany, as the German people, yet we never hear anything about this in the constant wailing over the so‑called Holocaust.

Most of the men who knew about these transactions between Hitler and the Zionists, met with untimely deaths. Many pages could be written on evidence surrounding their murder and how it was tied to the Internationalists. One of the most prominent of these was Dollfuss, Chancellor of Austria. He was assaulted in his office by a band of Nazi thugs, who wounded him mortally and then left him to bleed to death.

Fritz Thyseen, writing in a book titled I Paid Hitler! described the Dolfuss murder and said the reason the Chancellor was killed was that he had received a copy of the Warburg document and one exposing Hitler's Jewish ancestry. (This story had been in public circulation for a long before this).

If Hitler was such an anti‑Semite, be honest enough to ask yourself this simple question:

* "Why did Hitler keep the war going when he knew Germany was defeated and it would only result in hundred of thousands of German casualties?"

* "Why was it that during the conduct of the war, on many occasions, he refused to accept the advice of his top admirals and generals on how to conduct the war?"

* "Why was it in North Africa, when General Rommell had the Americans and British forces in retreat, that Hitler refused to send Rommell the supplies he needed to complete a victorious campaign?"

If Hitler was an anti‑Communist as some claim, why did he allow the top Communist propagandist to attend the Reichstag Fire Trial in 1933, where he was allowed to harangue the German people in favor of Communism. Why was this man allowed a safe return to Russia?

During this period, German Nationals were being shot down in cold blood in Germany's streets for the smallest misdemeanor against the Nazis. But here we have a powerful Communist allowed to publicize Communism and get away with it. It doesn't make very much sense to me. This man, Dimitroff, later became the President of the Communist World International, so he was no "small fry." And why didn't he arm the millions of Russian troops which had surrendered without firing a shot at the German Army, but requested that they be rearmed and supplied and they would "Kill the Communist S.O.B.'s?"

Treason Against Germany

From 1933 to 1938 Hitler turned from being a creature of the generals and International Jews, into a radical totalitarian dictator. Many of those who were close to him were dismayed by what they saw.

These were "dyed in the wool" German patriots who loved their country with a passionate love. They were true Germans who felt it necessary to stop the madman which was destroying the country they loved. Nearly every one of them that broke with Hitler met a terrible death. Admiral Canaris was slowly strangled to death; General Rommell, the Desert Fox of North Africa was forced to commit suicide; Field Marshall Von Sitzleden was killed and his body was exhibited hanging from a meat hook.

It was no coincidence that Hitler used these sadistic means, since they were the same means used by Communism and came straight from a Judaist‑Talmudic background. There were at least seven assassination plots against Hitler by top ranking officers in the Germany army in 1943 alone.

On March 21, 1939 Representative Jacob Thorkelson made the following speech on the floor of the House of Representatives: �MR. SPEAKER, last night while I was driving, a news flash came over the radio that recalled to my mind events of 22 years ago. It said: �The President has placed a high tariff on German imports and joins with England and France to stop Hitler and save the world for democracy.� I said: �What rot to save the world for democracy.� I recall 22 years ago I heard the same slogan. We stepped to the front and saved the world-for what? For socialism and communism. We are today on the verge of internal war as a result of our departure from constitutional government. Our own Government is undermined with socialism and communism until it is about to be destroyed by these two evils.

The Communist, to camouflage his own activities, shouts �Naziism and fascism.� He waves the swastika to cover the hammer and the sickle. These red-dancing dervishes ought to be exported to go as part of the war materials shipped out of the United States.

A foreign war would bury many blunders committed by the New Deal during the past 8 years. It might even delay disintegration, but it cannot stop it. I do not think for one moment that anything can stop it except the return to constitutional government, and it is apparent that the majority does not favor such procedure. Personally, I do not believe that our people are receptive to this last deal. Our people do not favor meddling with European affairs, and we have no earthly reason to be mixed up in it. We did have cause when Japan sank the Panay, and when Mexico confiscated American property, but Germany has not sunk any of our ships, and she has not confiscated American property. So our bellicose attitude is for some other insidious purpose, and I ask what it is.

I am, of course, opposed to foreign war, and I am firmly convinced that the present attempt to involve us in another European conflict is too much even for those who have faithfully followed the President since he took office.

In the midst of the turmoil of today, let us stop for a moment and review the causes which led to war in I9I4 The World War did not begin in Germany, as a certain minority would have us believe. Poincare carried revenge in his heart because of the War of I 870, and he, with Ivolsky and Count Sergius, of Russia, helped to bring about the war. The Minister of Austria, Count von Bechtoldt, lit the fire when he presented the ultimatum to Serbia after Archduke Ferdinand was killed at Sarajevo.

The whole thing, if the truth were known, might have been instigated. The money interests of England were not averse to war because commercial competition with Germany was rather acute. It is well to bear in mind that when the international money men are squeezed a little too hard, war is sometimes convenient.

We were not threatened by Germany from 1912 to 1916. What happened in 1917? The threat of German invasion was not greater then than it was the year before, but in spite of that, war was declared. Who controlled and disseminated the propaganda that was instrumental in changing the viewpoint of the American public?

We had always been friendly toward Germany, and there was no particular animosity toward that nation in 1916, as I recall it. We must now be careful that the same agency does not prevail again and so lead us into another war, costly in lives and property. The wars raging today are to a great extent the aftermath of the Versailles Peace Treaty. This treaty was not only unjust but it was not based upon sound understanding of central Europe. It left some of the victorious nations dissatisfied, because in the division of the spoils England and France received the lion's share; as a matter of fact, the Lion received the most of it. It is extremely dangerous to deprive a well-organized and patriotic people of their means of livelihood. A highly intelligent people cannot be confined on a small piece of land, for they will overflow - peacefully or by force. That is happening in Germany today. She was deprived of all colonies and even forced to submit to occupation and division of her little empire in the center of Europe. This short-sighted policy on the part of the conquerors brought about a closer union of the German people, and the result may be seen today. It was a case either of submissive disintegration at home or of acquiring sufficient room for healthy expansion. The German nation has chosen the latter. Let us now look facts squarely in the face. Germany is the key to the peace in Europe and in the Orient. Why? Because Germany allied with England will control Europe exactly as she is doing now, and both of these powers would make it unhealthy for any nation to invade China, with the United States in a neutral position.

This, of course, is not new, as I believe it is recognized by every European statesman; but restoration of colonies might have sealed such alliance and established international peace. I grant that it is none of our business; but, in the knowledge of it, it is our business to keep out of a war which might have been settled by transfer of colonies instead of loss of life. Congress alone will be responsible to our people, and it must employ sound judgment and common sense before the final decision is made. In the event of European conflict, which I believe is unavoidable, certain powers will expect our help, and pressure will be brought to bear upon us in the same old way. �Blood is thicker than water,� and �We speak the same language.� When that happens, it is well for Congress to bear in mind that it does not matter what language we speak, destruction and death are realities in spite of sentiment.

The question Congress must consider is our material interest in such conflict, for destruction and death are certain. It is unfortunately held by our people that we do not want colonies, and as we do not own property in Europe, it is unlikely that we will suffer unless we cross the firing line and invite attack. Neither have we sentimental principles at stake, and this is particularly true if we bear in mind the inheritance from the last war which is now insidiously destroying our own Government. The little consideration which has been given to us by he powers we helped in 1917 may have a sobering effect when we recall unpaid or defaulted obligations. Now, my colleagues, with this picture before you, can any one of you find a reasonable excuse for participating in another destructive war if such occasion should arise? I realize, of course, that general war is not declared, but no one can disregard such possibility, and it is our business as Members of Congress to visualize this before it actually happens.

Transportation of troops will not be as easy now as it was in the World War. We have a highly efficient submarine and air force to deal with today. Both of these machines are much more destructive now than in 1917. We may find it very difficult to transport troops across the Atlantic because of these two new weapons. Airplanes, as you know, carry destructive loads of explosives - enough to sink ships carrying troops. Submarines are equally dangerous to such units of the fleet. The loss of one ship will resolve itself into the loss of thousands of lives, and that is a possibility we must not overlook. There is another serious side to hasty action. The west coast of the United States is not protected by outlying fortifications, something that I believe the Members appreciate now more than when we discussed the harbor of Guam. If the Philippines and other islands were fortified, it would in a measure be an effective protection to the west coast of the United States and the Panama Canal, but Congress has been opposed to taking such action. That was my reason for supporting harbor improvement in our outlying possessions. Submarine and air bases in our Pacific islands are of inestimable value to the protection of the west coast of the United States, and for that reason should be encouraged instead of discouraged by Congress. It does not require an expert to visualize what may happen in a simultaneous attack on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, for one side must be left unprotected. The greatest danger, of course, would come from consolidation of bases in a convenient proximity to allow concentration of troops for attack. I believe our fleet is now on the Atlantic coast, and it will no doubt remain there if general war breaks out in Europe. It might even be extremely dangerous to move the fleet from the coast, and this would be particularly true in the event of an unexpected collapse of major powers. In such event it will be necessary for us to prevent occupation of islands and places threatening our vital centers. In the event of another world war it is quite possible that we may be forced to occupy and prepare strategic points with fortifications in order to allow greater mobility of our fleet. This will be the duty of Congress, and my colleagues, as eminent and far seeing statesmen, must aid and encourage such preparation before it is too late. We are now frantically in the midst of introducing legislation to keep us out of war. A most useless procedure, I assure you. Belligerent nations care nothing about our legislation or expostulations. If they are concerned about our attitude and fearful of it, they would not, of course, declare war. But the fact that war is declared proves that we are not considered. That is no more than right, because we would brook no interference with our plans at home. I have always found that it is best never to pull your gun until you are going to shoot. I say it is therefore useless and a wasted effort to threaten and complain, and it does in reality show a weakness within our own Nation. Nothing assures peace to a nation so much as a first-class army and navy. Nothing instills confidence, courage, and spirit in our armed forces more than first-class fighting units. The Constitution provides that Congress furnish and maintain such units for the common defense and the general welfare of the United States.� (A speech titled: Versailles Treaty Prepared Europe for Another War, Representative Jacob Thorkelson of Montana, U.S. Congressional Record)

Then on June 19, 1939 Representative Jacob Thorktlson, of Montana, made another speech: �Mr. Speaker, communism or super-socialism is an insidious disease nourished by hatreds in the minds of those who subscribe to it. It is an Asiatic philosophy diametrically opposed to Christian principles and all that Christianity has accomplished in the past 2,000 years. Communism thrives on immorality and corruption, and is destructive to the family, social, and political life of all people, and to the Nation.

It is international in scope, and directed by an invisible government whose insane desire is the control of gold and the power it wields. The first objective is now a reality, for they have the gold, and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 gave the power of control and ownership to the invisible government. This objective is partly accomplished but much is yet to be done to make the American people swallow this bitter pill. It is quite possible that there are too many good, sound and sensible Americans left, who will in no uncertain manner voice their objections to regimentation by Asiatic Communists. The first step in this conversion, namely, the transfer in ownership of gold, was brought about by servile Members of Congress. It was accomplished by hypnotized Congressmen who enacted communistic legislation.

The second stage, that of control and placing of more Communists in strategic positions, will be attempted by legislation now in force, by appointments, or by contemplated legislation. In this category, I refer to the Wagner Health Act and the Binderup-Voorhis Monetary Control Act, both of which are communistic in principle and in fact.

I have spoken very plainly, with one purpose in mind, which is to inform the American people about actual conditions that should be discussed in our newspapers. I do not believe that any red-blooded patriotic citizen would sit idly by and wait to be enchained by a few communistic super-criminals, whose agents may be found in many of our cities today. It would also be interesting for Congress to know the identity and affiliations of those who are constantly being placed in key positions in our own Government. What is the purpose of these changes, and why is it necessary to reorganize the Government without decreasing personnel or the cost of the pay roll? We are so far on the road of collectivism that little or no regard is given to the fundamental principles of our Government and the rights of the States.

This attempted conversion of our Republic is aided and abetted by radicals in society and in educational

institutions. These radicals, �parlor pinks,� and �reds� are dangerous because they are long on conversation and short on common sense. As a matter of fact, they are irresponsible. Other groups of radicals are comprised of those who become dupes of the money power and willing servants enslaved by gratuities, such as memberships in pretended humanitarian or charitable organizations, which are in reality fronts to shield the Communists and their activities in the invisible government. Many pawns of communism unfortunately do not understand and are incapable of analyzing the mind of an Asiatic. An understanding of it is necessary in order to deal intelligently with its peculiar oriental psychology.

These subservient pawns to the invisible government do not realize that they are used as stooges and, when no longer useful, will be left along the road of oriental intrigues, victims of their own follies. The truth of these statements is evident in the treatment accorded to those who fought for the �red� government in Spain. Many of them are now stranded in France, rejected and ignored by the Soviet Russian Government they fought for. While in the "red" army they killed and destroyed with Asiatic abandon, and now they are left, as I said before, unsung and unclaimed.

Returning again to discuss the dupes of the Communists, I cannot refrain from calling attention to those Members of Congress who are obsessed with the idea of making democracy work. For 1O years they have been willing tools of the invisible government; they have enacted Communist-prepared legislation, which has delegated more and more power to centralized control of the Government. I believe many were involved innocently, yet such ignorance is not an excuse for their actions, because they have sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, an obligation which they have ignored. There is nothing wrong with our Government except that we have not adhered to its cardinal principles, and in such deviation we have brought about rapid deterioration.

No doubt many Members of the House will vote for further extension of the now chronic emergency and monetary power to the President and to the Secretary of the Treasury, a power absolutely unnecessary except as it may be used by the invisible government to destroy American liberties and rights. This, of course should be voted down by all those who have the slightest spark of patriotism and interest of the people at heart.

Other dupes of the invisible government are those in the ranks of labor who are dominated by recognized and self-acclaimed Communists. This was clearly stated on the floor of the House on June 14 by the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Woodrum). He showed clearly that all Federal unionized activities such as the Workers Alliance, Federal Art Projects, and so forth, are practically exclusively communistic. This, of course, is generally known, yet no effort has been made by the Federal Government either to investigate or to check this deplorable state of affairs.

These are the same organizations that call the President Comrade Roosevelt, and here one may find a most unusual situation, in which attempts are made to destroy the Constitution instead of adhering to it. This is particularly true when we analyze those who are directing all subversive activities in the ranks of labor. Are they good Americans or are they better Communists? I am inclined to believe the latter, and I am firmly convinced that everyone will agree with me after close investigation of those who are now directing communistic activities in the United States.

When I was a union man, we worked in the interests of our employer because we considered ourselves a part of the industrial machine in which we were employed. Today, labor is in reality working under direction of the invisible government for destruction of industry and business, and for Federal ownership and control of the Nation's industries. This, of course, is diametrically opposed to the principles of our Government in which all people reserve the right to themselves to be free, not only in operation of business but in their private lives as well. It occurs to me that the general run of workingmen are not aware of the fact that they are used as tools of the very people they belabor in their union halls, that is, the capitalists. It is most extraordinary that the laboring man is allowing himself to be used by the very group he criticizes, to bring about his own destruction. It is not my desire to discuss this further, but I shall instead proceed in the discussion of communism itself, its object, and what is expected of those now engaged in and plotting further communistic activities.

Let us now admit that nearly all the European governments are socialistic, and that they are autocratic or totalitarian in form. I am not concerned with those, but shall proceed to discuss communism as propounded by Heinrich Mordecai, alias Karl Marx. His slogan was, �Whatever is, is worth destroying.� And he must be credited with being open and fearless in destruction. This technique has been refined today. The Communist now promises something which seems perfectly obvious and right, but he does exactly the opposite, as was done with the promises made in the 1932 platform of Roosevelt. For example, I see in the papers, the group now meeting in Washington expresses itself firmly against communism, and yet they know, as well as we do, that there are Communists among them who hide their activities under such expression.

I shall name a few of those who have been leaders in communism so that the American people may visualize who their rulers will be when the zero hour arrives. Heinrich Mordecai advocated class hatreds, riots, and strikes, and stated in his Communist Manifesto: �The Communists refrain from keeping their views and intentions secret. They openly declare that their goal can only be achieved by a forcible destruction of all existing orders of society. The ruling classes shall tremble before the Communist revolution.� This should be plain to all of us and compared with what has taken place for the past 10 years. For you see �it can happen here.�

We have been treated with an appeal to the masses. For what purpose? To gain control, and after having acquired such control, to rule and destroy. We have been treated to propaganda of class hatreds between he have's and the have not's, hatreds in business, and hatreds and dissension in the ranks of labor. Business is gradually being destroyed by Federal invasion and industries are now dormant or idle. Greater power has been delegated by Congress to the President in accord with the communistic plan. What is required now? To shift and place in key positions those in sympathy with communism, who can be trusted to carry out the communistic plan when the time comes.

Heinrich Mordecai was not only a Communist; he was also an anarchist. He lived and thrived upon all things contrary to Christian doctrines. Destruction of life meant nothing to him, as long as his own kind was not destroyed. He was the promoter of the First International, in 1864. He laughed when his dupes became entangled with the law, and he jeered at suffering and poverty. Death and destruction meant nothing to him, for he lived on the suffering of others. Such is the record of the progenitor of communism.

Chaim Goldman, or �Vladimir Ulyanov,� alias Lenin, was the next prominent disciple of Heinrich Mordecai-Marx, and it was he who embraced the communistic doctrines to be used for destruction of the Czarist government. He did this as thoroughly as his predecessor in communism, and drenched Russia with innocent and defenseless people's blood. He also used willing dupes to attain power, and after having reached the objective, he, like others, destroyed those who had befriended and helped him. He was a human being without humanity.� �� I cannot forego mentioning the name of Benjamin Cohen (Bela Kun) who was sent to Hungary by Chaim Goldman (Lenin). In 1919, he is credited with the killing of 12O,OOO innocent Christian people, 30,000 of whom were murdered within 3 months. Later, after returning to Soviet Russia, 40,000 white Russians were killed in the vicinity of the Crimean Peninsula. Records of this are authenticated by various investigating committees; but if anyone should be interested in refreshing his memory with additional information, he might procure the book The World Hoax, by Ernest F. Elmhurst, published in 1938. There is, of course, voluminous evidence to be had dealing with mass murders in Russia and adjoining countries by the disciples of these same communistic philosophies under the control of the same leaders. I have been informed that there are rumors that this same Bela Kun is in Chicago at the present time, no doubt preparing for an American communistic revolution.

One of the most famous disciples of communism, our neighbor now living in Mexico, is Laiber Davidovitch Bronstein, alias Leon Trotsky. I shall not discuss his history, because it is still in the making and no doubt will include leaves from communistic happenings in the United States. This gentleman visits New York at times, which is the headquarters of proletarian communism, and those who are by choice disciples of this most un-Christian philosophy. It is people of this type who are now attempting to rule the United States, first, by money, and, secondly, by destruction of all those things we hold dear to us and which have built our country into a prosperous nation for the past 151 years.

They are exactly the same kind and type who are now ruling in Russia; and if there is any difference, it is in refinement in the method of procedure. This refinement is evidenced in the manner in which avenues of communication are controlled by the invisible government. As to learning the actual truth, we are no better off than we were before we had the telephone, telegraph, radio, and high-speed presses, for today we are allowed to read and hear only those things which are prepared for us by the subsidized power now in control. I want the people to know that the acquisition of all this property and power has been accomplished by the use of the people's money and not in any sense exclusively by the use of private capital. It is this power which is destroying us today, and it is dangerous in the hands in which it now rests. In Soviet Russia the Communists comprise I-7/10 percent of 170,000,000 people, which they are able to rule by sheer force and ruthlessness. That can also happen in the United States if we go to sleep. In this communistic rise to power millions and millions of lives have been sacrificed, and despots have been seated on the ruins of human liberties and rights. Washington warned us of this danger, but here we are confronted with deliberate attempts to destroy the Government. It will begin by strikes, local strife, gradually increasing under well-placed and well-directed leadership of known Communists now in command of proletarian communistic parties. The expense will be paid by those who financed revolutions in Europe and are now seeking power here. The money which is used is the people's credit, now Iying idle in various banks, as it has been used in the past 7 years in destroying industry and business.

Do you want that? Or do you want to return to the republican form of government that you have always had and which guarantees freedom to all people, no matter what race, creed, or color? Is there any necessity for the prevailing conditions within the United States? The answer is, emphatically, �No.� The present condition has been brought about by those now in control of national and international gold and credit. This is a far-reaching attempt by them, a little hurried at the present time, but definitely an attempt to take charge of the United States. And history itself will complete the chapter.� (Tolerance for Communism lnvites Destruction, Congressional Record, June 19th, 1939; Representative Jacob Thorkelson of Montana)

"Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey, Where wealth accumulates, and men decay." -- Oliver Goldsmith

These men realized that Hitler was a "Judas goat" who was leading them to destruction. The facts surrounding these plots have been revealed by British historians after a careful study of captured documents. While some say that Hitler's escapades were acts of God, we personally believe as Goff did, that he was a Satanist and under the protection of that evil one. The Bible tells us, "Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." (Matthew 7:20)

From the moment of his rise to power, Hitler used every means at his disposal to drive Germany into war. As his forces conquered country after country, it was Hitler's direct orders which caused such a hatred of Germany among the conquered people. But Germany must die! this was the word from the "puppet masters" who even then pulled the strings which governed this strange man. It was with Hitler's knowledge and consent which gave the Soviets 70,000 square miles of Polish territory without a fight. By 1940, with German help, the little countries of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia were safely in the Soviet fold. Then Rumania, Northern Bukovania, and portions of Bessarabia fell to the Communists.

When the German armies moved into Poland it gave the Communists the opportunity to do the same from the east and allowed the Soviets to wipe out the cream of the Polish Army Officers Corps at Katyn Forest.

This atrocity was used by the Communists to further hatred against Germany, who in this case was not guilty. It might be interesting to note her, that while both Germany and Russia invaded Poland, England and France only found Germany guilty. Stalin admitted they were using the Germans, saying: "We shall assist the Germans in an European War so that they can offer prolonged resistance to the British and French, and in this way exhaust the Capitalist nations...In this way we will control the decision."

Then on May 24, 1940, the Germany Army was in a position to defeat the British at Dunkirk and very possibly end the war. It was then that Hitler gave his famous order that the left wing of the German assault be halted. Gen. Heinz Guderin in his book "The Panzer Leader," said that when this command came, the German military leaders were utterly speechless.

It went against everything the military stood for. Yet they obeyed and the British were able to make it back to their fortress. Here we see Hitler, with one command, destroy everything the Germany Army had accomplished by their blood, sweat and tears. Dr. Walter Dornberg, German expert on the development of the flying bombs and the brains behind the V‑1 and V‑2, stated that Hitler could have won the war in early 1944, but he held back on development of this new and terrifying means of waging war.

Then to make things even worse, with Britain in his grasp, he turned away and attacked his ally, Russia. Many military experts have tried to figure out the thinking of this devious man. Had he become so drunk with power that he decided he could conquer the world? Or was their a deeper purpose behind it? He was never on the battle front, so did not have to face the hardships of his people. While they were suffering and dying, he was living in Sybarite splendor in Berlin.

It was at this time that the British Government, followed by the United States, came to the aid of the Communist forces. They were able to draw the elite of the German forces into a conflict in which their supply lines was hundreds of miles long. But the real purpose for Hitler's attack soon became obvious to thinking Americans: It allowed Stalin to know who was the hidden enemy in his country and hundreds of thousands of those who fought with the Germans, against the Communist Butchers, were later liquidated. With the defeat of the Germans in Russia, the Communists were able to tighten their control over all of Eastern and Central Europe. Thanks to Hitler they had uncovered almost all the Anti-Communist cells in the countries under its control.

"Real Patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests." (President George Washington's Farewell Address)

The columnist Raymond Clapper, writing for the Scripps-Howard papers, on May 16, 1940, stated in reference to the report of the Senate Naval Affairs Committee, of whom the majority were Democratic Senators: "There is a current rising hysteria in this country, sprouting from the idea that we ought to enter the war as a preventive measure to kill off the danger of later invasion of the Western Hemisphere. Rarely is the proposition stated so badly, but that is the thought behind a good many words that are being uttered today.

That viewpoint, which is steadily gaining ground because of the importance of some who hold it, now finds its thesis sharply opposed by the Senate Naval Affairs Committee in a most significant report which advocated additions to the Navy. Because it is the voice of the Senate Naval Affairs Committee, this report is bound to become a textbook for those who believe the Administration is moving toward deeper involvement in Europe...In effect the committee stands on hemisphere defense. It states that some of our best informed naval experts are of the opinion that the United States should not participate in the European war under any circumstances now conceivable, and that United States soldiers should never again be landed on a foreign continent. The Senate Naval Affairs Committee says we are not prepared to� participate in the European war, that we do not possess the necessary weapons, and that we should not consider our naval needs with any such object in view. We should, the committee says, profit by the experience of the last World War and avoid becoming too greatly involved in European affairs. The committee said that if we are to remain at peace, we must avoid becoming interested financially in the outcome of the European War, and our industries must not become too greatly compromised by foreign war orders. This is a statement which seems to have come a little late, since American industry, particularly aviation, already is deeply involved...

The naval committee report is based upon the argument that adequate naval power, supplemented by air strength and a relatively small Army, gives us complete protection. The report goes into some detail to make the point that if Germany can, by air and submarine, subdue Britain's vast naval force around the British Isles, the same fate would be in store for any naval force we would send over. On the other hand, our Navy, operating at home, and protected by air strength, is immune to anything except a superior battle fleet.

As to Japan, the committee states baldly that at the present time the U.S. Navy could not undertake a war in far eastern waters. We should have to increase our fleet perhaps 100 percent, and build an impregnable naval base in the Philippines. Says the committee: 'The cost to us of such a war would be so great that we must, by every means in our power, avoid the necessity of having to undertake it.'"

This remarkable report, coming unanimously in May, 1940 from the Senate Naval Affairs Committee, should have been read by every American who had the interest of his own country first at heart. So little publicity was given to it by the Jewish controlled newspapers and radio that it could be said to have been suppressed, as so much vital information has been withheld from the American people. It stated: "Why should we go to war to defend freedom, if we must begin by destroying it with our own hands? We need not do this. The cold, hard military facts is this: Our Navy, if adequate, supplemented by a highly efficient Army and air force, will be so effective that few nations, not excluding victorious totalitarian nations, will challenge its power; and if any does we shall be the deliverer and not the recipient of the terrible hammer strokes of war. The naval military, and air forces necessary to prevent any foreign nation or group of nations from challenging us in our part of the world are well within the power of this Nation to create and maintain without regimenting all our vast resources under a single control, without wiping out our democracy, and without abandoning our American way of life and free government.

If we realize that the important causes of war in human minds and emotions; that force cannot change materially human nature; give up the illusion that American armed force can bring permanent peace to a warring world and confine our military objectives to the defense of this country, we shall find that our problem of national defense becomes relatively simple. An impregnable defense for America will be costly, but infinitely less costly in the long run than engaging in another futile attempt to 'save the world for democracy' and certainly less costly than conquest and consequent confiscation of resources and enslavement of all our people. It is believed that the American people are ready and willing to make any sacrifices necessary to protect their birthright and their liberties, but that they are not willing to endure the horrors of war to take part in the age-old quarrels of Europe and the game of power politics...

No attack of a serious nature can be made upon our country, unless an enemy secures command of the waters which wash our shores to such an extent that he can bring troops or aircraft within striking distance for assault, or unless his blockading forces can operate effectively against our vital trade routes to the countries bordering upon the Caribbean Sea to South American countries and to Hawaii and Alaska. So long as our Nation possesses an adequate fleet, an adequate air force, and the necessary number of secure bases from which these forces may operate effectively, there is little chance of a successful attack upon us.

Our fleet, including the fleet air force, however, must be kept concentrated, and must be superior in fighting power to any fleet or combination of fleets which can be brought against us...We alone, of all great peoples, are so fortunately situated that we can remain at peace and be secure in our homes and our means of livelihood. 'In the words of George Washington: Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?'

Why not take advantage of our peculiar situation, develop the sources of raw materials available in this hemisphere and construct the instrumentalities or war which will enable us to pursue our way in peace, free from the horrors of invasion, the perils of bombs from the sky above us, the burdens of supporting vast armies, and the perils to our liberties which any involvement in war would bring? The committee's attention has been directed to articles and items which have appeared in the public press alleging that military and naval experts are of the opinion that it is inevitable that the United States will become involved in the European war and that the United States should take an active military part in the war.

The committee can state that some of our best informed naval experts are of the opinion that the United States should not participate in the present European war under any circumstances now conceivable and that United States soldiers should never again be landed on a foreign continent. None of the naval experts or civilian witnesses who appeared before the committee recommended that this country participate actively in the present European war. Privately some military and naval officers may believe that we should enter the war, but they have not so recommended publicly to the committee.

The United States at the present time is not vulnerable to direct attack by any means whatsoever save those with which a thoroughly modern navy and air force can deal adequately.

Air power, due to its limited radius of action, has not yet changed the fact that in a military sense we are an insular nation and that we are not vulnerable to direct attack if we prevent the establishment of air bases in this hemisphere. Military power can always be exercised more efficiently and to much greater effect within a reasonable radius of action than it can by fighting thousands of miles away. We are more fortunately situated than any other peoples. We should take advantage of our fortunate situation and avoid entangling our peace and prosperity in the quarrels of Europe or Asia.

We should make every effort to preserve peace in the Far East. We can, if we have to, defeat Japan, but the effort required would be enormous. At the present time, due to lack of United States naval bases in this area, a war in the Far East could be undertaken only in conjunction with Great Britain, France, and Holland.

No circumstances were presented to the committee which would indicate the necessity for United States naval forces being sent to operate in European waters or United States air forces being sent to operate from bases in Europe. Our naval forces should not be subjected to the hazards of European shore-based aircraft and small submarines. Our naval and air forces should be preserved for our own defense if and when needed. We should face the basic military and economic facts that we do have the power or the means to police the world; that we cannot bring peace to a warring world, but that we do have the power and the means to prevent others from transporting their wars to this hemisphere.

�� Thoughtful consideration should be given its conclusions that the best interests of our country will be served if we remain at peace; that we very probably can remain at peace, be free from the horrors of war, the fear of invasion, the crushing burdens of vast armies, the fear of bombs from the sky above us, and be able to work out our own domestic problems in a sensible American way; and that should any unscrupulous aggressor attack us, we will be able to meet and defeat him quickly and decisively far from our homes and our firesides, if we provide ourselves with ample sea and air power to command the seas which wash our own shores and the sea approaches to the Panama Canal and the Caribbean Sea." (Report of the Senate Committee on Naval Affairs, No. 1615, 76th Congress, 3d Session)

One of the best and most patriotic editorials ever written was stated in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, on September 3, 1940: "Dictator Roosevelt Commits an Act of War: Mr. Roosevelt today committed an act of war. He also became America's first dictator. Secretly, his Secretary of State, Mr. Hull, entered into an agreement with the British Ambassador that amounts to a military and naval alliance with Great Britain. This secretly negotiated agreement was consummated yesterday September 2. Today Congress is informed of the agreement. Note well the word 'informed.' Although the President referred to his under-cover deal as ranking in importance with the Louisiana Purchase, he is not asking Congress - the elected representatives of the people - to ratify this deal. He is telling them it already has been ratified by him - America's dictator. (In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the Goyim lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public. This is the first secret. No one will dare to demand the abrogation of a matter once settled, all the more so as it will be represented as an improvement...And immediately the press will distract the current of thought towards new questions {have we not trained people always to be seeking something new?}. Into the discussion of these new questions will throw themselves those of the brainless dispensers of fortunes who are not able even now to understand that they have not the remotest conception about the matters which they undertake to discuss. Questions of the political are unattainable for any save those who have guided it already for many ages, the creators. (Protocol 5:10; 13:1))

�� Hitler�s Jewish Army

�Not every victim was a Jew but every Jew was a victim.� (Elie Wiesel (weasel) speaking of World War Two. �If there were Jews in (Hitler�s) armed forces...who served knowing what was going on and made no attempt to save (lives), well then that is unacceptable and dishonorable.� (Rabbi Marvin Hier, director of Simon Wiesenthal Institute)

Thousands of men of Jewish descent and hundreds of what the Nazis called �full Jews� Served in the German Military with Adolf Hitler�s knowledge and approval.

Cambridge University researcher Bryan Rigg has traced the Jewish ancestry of more than 1200 of Hitler�s soldiers, including two field marshals and fifteen general (two full general, eight lieutenant generals, five major generals), �men commanding up to 100,000 troops.�

In approximately 20 cases, Jewish soldiers in the Nazi army were awarded German�s highest military honor, the Knight�s Cross. One of these Jewish veterans is today an 82 year old resident of Norther Germany, an observant Jew who served as a captain and practiced his religion within the Wehrmacht throughout the war. One of the Jewish field marshals was Erhard Milch, deputy to Luftwaffe Chief Hermann Goering. Rumors of Mitch�s Jewish identity circulated widely in Germany in the 1930s.

In one of the famous anecdotes of the time, Goering falsified Milch�s birth record and when met with protests about having a Jew in the Nazi high command, Goering replied, �I decide who is a Jew and who is an Aryan.�

Rigg�s research also shed light on stories surrounding the rescue by German soldiers of the Lubavitcher grand rabbi of that time, who was in Warsaw when the war broke out in 1939. Joseph Isaac Schneerson was spirited to safety after an appeal to Germany from the United States. Schneerson was assisted by a German officer Rigg has identified as the highly decorated Maj. Ernst Bloch, whose father was a Jew.

Jews also served in the Nazi police and security forces as ghetto police (Ordmmngdienst) and concentration camp guards (kapos).

So what happens to the claim that Hitler sought to exterminate all Jews, when he allowed some of them to join in his struggle against Bolshevism and International finance capitalism?

Sources: William D. Montalbano, �The Jews in Hitler�s Military,� Los Angeles Times, December 24, 1996; Tom Tugend, �Grad student uncovers Jews who fought for Adolf Hitler,� Jewish Telegraph Agency; Lenni Brenner, �Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.�

The President has passed down an edict that compares with the edicts forced down the throats of Germans, Italians and Russians by Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin. He hands down an edict that may eventually result in the shedding of the blood of millions of Americans; that may result in transforming the United States into a goose-stepping, regimented slave state.

Under our Constitution, treaties with foreign powers are not legal without the advice and consent of the Senate. This treaty, which history may define as the most momentous one ever made in our history, was put over without asking the Senate either for its advice or its consent. The authority which the President quotes for his fatal and secret deal is an opinion from the Attorney-General. Whatever legal trickery this yes-man may conjure up, the fact is that the transfer of the destroyers is not only in violation of American law, but is also in violation of the Hague Convention of 1907, solemnly ratified by the United States Senate in 1908. It is an outright act of war.

Undeterred by law or the most primitive form of common sense, the President is turning over to a warring power a goodly portion of the United States Navy, against the repeated statements of Senators, Navy Department officials and officers of the Navy that the ships are needed for our own defense...But, in doing so, he commits an act of war. He strips our navy of fifty valuable ships and he enters into leases which might not be worth the paper they are written upon in a month's time. And all this is done in utmost contempt of democratic processes and of the Constitution of the United States (which is not surprising for the Jews have always been the most traitorous people who have ever existed on earth since the dawn of time!).

If this secretly negotiated deal goes through, the fat is in the fire and we all may as well get ready for a full-dress participation in the European war. If Roosevelt gets away with this, we may as well say good-by to our liberties and make up our mind that henceforth we live under a dictatorship. If Congress and the people do not rise in solemn wrath to stop Roosevelt now, at this moment, then the country deserves the stupendous tragedy that looms right around the corner."

Colonel Charles A. Lindberg, a fine, honest, able and patriotic young American, a recognized authority throughout the world on aviation and defense by air, in an address stated: "In times of war and confusion, it is essential for our people to have a clear understanding of the elements upon which our national safety depends...Judged by aeronautical standards, we in the United States are in singularly fortunate position...

From the standpoint of defense, we will still have two great oceans between us and the warring armies of Europe and Asia. In fact, there is hardly a natural element contributing to air strength and impregnability that we do not now possess. Aviation is for us an asset. It adds to our national safety. With a firm and clear cut policy we can build an air defense for America that will stand above these sifting sands of war...Let us not be confused by this talk of invasion by European aircraft. The air defense of America is as simple as the attack is difficult when the true facts are faced. We are in danger of war not because European people (read that Jews) have attempted to interfere with the internal affairs of America, but because the American people (read that Jews) have attempted to interfere with the internal affairs of Europe (the Jewish Bolshevik revolution in Russia).

A foreign power could not conquer us by dropping bombs in this country unless the bombing were accompanied by an invading army. And an invading army requires thousands of small bombers and pursuit planes. It would have little use for huge transatlantic aircraft.

No, the advantage lies with us, for great armies must still cross oceans by ship. Only relatively small forces can be transported by air today, and over distances of a few hundred miles at most. This has great significance in Europe, but it is not an element that we have to contend with in America. Such a danger can come, in any predictable future, only through division and war among our own peoples. As long as American nations work together, as long as we maintain reasonable defense forces, there will be no invasion by foreign aircraft. And no foreign navy will dare to approach within bombing range of our coasts. Our danger in America is an internal danger.

We need not fear a foreign invasion unless American peoples bring it on through their own quarreling and meddling with affairs abroad. Our eyes should not search beyond the horizon for problems which lie at our feet...The greatest inheritance we can pass on to our children is a reasonable solution of the problems that confront us in our time, a strong nation, a lack of debt, a solid American character free from the entanglements of the Old World. Let us guard America today as our forefathers guarded it in the past. They won this country from Europe with a handful of Revolutionary soldiers. We certainly can hold it now with a population of 130,000,000 people. If we cannot, we are unworthy to have it.

But the course we have been following in recent months leads to neither strength nor friendship nor peace. It will leave us hated by victor and vanquished alike, regardless of which way the tide of battle turns. One side will claim that we aided its enemies; the other, that we did not help enough.

Let us turn again to America's traditional role, that of building and guarding our own destiny. We need a greater air force, a greater Army, and a great Navy; they have been inadequate for many years. Let us form with our neighboring nations a clear-cut and definite policy of American defense. But above all, let us stop this hysterical chatter of calamity and invasion that has been running rife these last few days. It is not befitting to the people who built this nation.

That the world is facing a new era is beyond question. Our mission is to make it a better era. But regardless of which side wins this war, there is no reason, aside from our own actions, to prevent a continuation of peaceful relationships between America and the countries of Europe. If we desire peace, we need only stop asking for war. No one wishes to attack us, and no one is in a position to do so.

The only reason that we are in danger of becoming involved in this war is because there are powerful elements in America who desire us to take part (read that Jewish elements). They represent a small minority of the American people by they control much of the machinery of influence and propaganda. They seize every opportunity to push us closer to the edge. It is time for the underlying character of this county to rise and assert itself, to strike down these elements of personal profit and foreign interests. This underlying character of America is our true defense. Until it awakes and takes the reins in hand once more, the production of airplanes, cannon and battleships is of secondary importance.

Let us turn our eyes to our own nation. We cannot aid others until we have first placed our own country in a position of spiritual and material leadership and strength."

�� Chapter Eight

�� Public Law 102‑14 and

�� Its Implications To Christian Americans

105 STAT. 44 Public Law 102‑14; March 20, 1991

Joint Resolution To designate March 26, 1991, as "Education Day, U.S.A."

Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded;

Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws;

Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands� in serious peril of returning chaos;

Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society;

Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future;

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty‑ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;

Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, "the rebbe," this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of "education and giving," the year in which we turn to education charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and

Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the world‑wide Lubavitch Movement, is designated as "Education Day, U.S.A." The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. (Approved March 20, 1991)

It is apparent that the "Seven Noahide Laws" are the real purpose behind the Resolution and Public Law 102‑14. The Seven Noahide Laws themselves were not included in the Resolution nor in the Law itself, And for good reason.

Since they are not commonly known to the average citizen, we should endeavor to learn what they are; and more about the so‑called "Rebbe" Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the Lubavitch Movement; and what effect, if any, these laws will have upon Christian Americans in general. Particularly now that we have a New "law of the land."

They are not easy to find, but some encyclopedias mention them briefly. Noahide Laws, also called Noachian Laws, A Jewish Talmudic designation for seven [so‑called] Biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently on all mankind [There is no Biblical nor Secular Proof for this statement].

Beginning with Genesis 2:16, the Babylonian Talmud [supposedly] listed the first six commandments as prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, and robbery and the positive command To Establish Courts of Justice (with all that this implies). After the flood a seventh commandment given to Noah, forbade the eating of flesh cut from a living animal. (Genesis 9:4)

Though the number of laws was later increased to 30 with the addition of prohibitions against castration, sorcery, and other practices, the 'seven laws,' with minor variations, retained their original status as authoritative commandments and as the source of other laws. As basic statutes safe‑guarding monotheism and guaranteeing proper ethical conduct in society, These Laws provided a legal framework for alien residents (Non-Jews) in Jewish Territory [When did the United States become Jewish territory?]. Maimonides thus regarded anyone who observed these laws as one 'assured of a portion in the world to come.'

Throughout the ages scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity [Which is totally false. Judaism and Christianity are total opposites and are deadly enemies], as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept in International Law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all.

�The current expression 'Judeo-Christian' is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men's mind, if by it one is meant to understand the Jewish origin of Christianity; for by abolishing the fundamental distinctions between Jewish and Christian messianism, it seeks to bring together two ideas that are radically in opposition. By laying the accent exclusively on the 'Christian' idea to the detriment of the 'Judean' it conjures away monotheistic messianism - a valuable discipline at all levels of thought, and reduces it to a purely confessional messianism, preoccupied like Christian messianism with the salvation of the individual soul. If the term 'Judeo-Christian' does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea.

It is based on a 'contrdictio in adjecto' which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath two ideas which are completely irreconcilable, it seeks to demonstrate that there is no difference between day and night or hot and cold or black and white, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavoring to construct a civilization. Christianity offers to the world a limited messianism which it wishes to impose as the only valid one ...Even Spinoza, who was further than any other thinker from the historic messianism of Israel, wrote: 'As for what certain churches say, that God assumed human nature, I must confess that this seems to me as absurd as saying that a circle assumed the shape of a square...'

The dogmatic exclusiveness professed by Christianity must finally end...It is the obstinate Christian claim to be the sole heir to Israel which propagates-anti-Semitism. This scandal must terminate sooner or later; the sooner it goes, the sooner the world will be rid of the issue of lies in which anti-Semitism shrouds itself." (Joshua Jehouda, l'Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde, pp. 135-136; Judaism and the Vatican, Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 30-31)

The Jewish Encyclopedia describes Christianity as a religion espousing "ascetic monasticism," which means believing in a life of sacrifice and-self-denial in order to help others.� However, it describes Judaism as teaching the exact opposite of Christianity} in that "life is good and should be endowed with material worth" {or riches}. Also, while Christianity believes in forgiving ones enemies and even loving them, the motto of Judaism is - "Never Forgive - Never Forget."

Thus the "Judeo-Christian" ethic spoken of by Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggert, Kenneth Copeland and most other misled ministers is a false religion. Note that "The Jewish Voice" ridicules it but suggest that if Christians want to subject themselves to Jewry they may do so. However, the idea of a "Judeo-Christian" faith is alien to Jewry and rejected by them.

"Judeo-Christian tradition' is a term increasingly employed to achieve a closer identification between Judaism and Christianity and may seem a most ungracious act to decline, with thanks, this invitation is a New 'acceptance.' It is called for that we who are Jews be wary of this new affection. There is no such thing as Judeo-Christianity...the 'other-world' philosophy which served as an excuse for tolerating inequities and ignorance in this world; the heavy stress on a savior...all of these philosophies are alien to judaism, but make up a vast part of that Christianity which is today rejected by Asia and Africa. Let us not be so stupid as to get inter-twined with this rejected way of life...." (The Jewish Voice, Friday, August 4, 1961, Awakening, by Rabbi Jacob Steinberg)

The following is a summary of the Seven Noahide Laws. (Institute of Judaic-Christian Researcher, Jan. 1992; The Talmud, Sanh. 56a-59b; Yad Melakhim 8:10, 9, 10)

1). Thou shalt not engage in idol worship.

2). Thou shalt not blaspheme God.

3). Thou shalt not shed innocent blood of any human nor fetus nor ailing person who has a limited time to live.

4). Thou shalt not engage in bestial, incestuous, adulterous or homosexual relations nor commit the act of rape.

5). Thou shalt not steal.

6). Thou shalt establish laws and courts of law to administer [enforce] these laws, including the death penalty.

7). Thou shalt not be cruel to animals.

As we make a cursory examination of the "Seven Noahide Laws" one would see nothing objectionable. In fact, one would applaud any effort to remove the evil from among us; because that is what the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of God directs us to do. But there is more, much more, to these laws than first meets the eye!

The Jews say these "Seven Laws of Noah" known as the "Noahide Laws" or "Noachian Laws," (actually there are only six laws with one provision for enforcement which makes up the "Seven Noahide Laws").

So, how does the resolution passed by Congress relate to these laws? The United States is considered by many Jews as "Their" stronghold and "Their" headquarters for eventual world domination.

In a recent article published in "Wellsprings" the head rabbi of Hasidic Jewry stated: "...America has become the focus and fountain-head of Jewish survival. Providence has prepared a new home for Torah and Yiddishkeit in this country...The largest concentration of our best elements are in America. We must lead the smaller Jewish communities in other countries and continents, even in Erety Israel [Israel-Palestine], which must learn heavily on American support for its economic and spiritual survival."

The "Seven Laws of Noah," according to Hasidic Jews, should be enforced upon all non-Jews [this means the Blacks, Mexicans, Chinese, Japanese, Arabs, and etc., as well as Christians] by the Jews themselves: "... the entire context of the Talmudic discussion of the Noachide Laws is that of actual enforcement by Rabbinic Courts."

The Jews say these laws were given to Noah by their god for the orderly government of all people, but Jews were given another set of Laws at Mount Sinai much later, so they are not subject to the Noahide Laws but rather to the later ones, except, of course, for those Noahide Laws that were repeated at Sinai. Also the Jews would not pay the same penalty for violating these laws.

The Jewish Encyclopedia, page 649 states: "In the case of murder, if the Noachide slay a child in its mother's womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of ('terefah'), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self‑defense, the Noachide is guilty of murder and must pay the death penalty, although under the same circumstances an Israelite [Jew] would not be executed."

According to the Encyclopaedia Judaica the death penalty would be: "...violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to Capital Punishment by Decapitation."

Notice Congress and the President are giving acclamation to a Talmudic Jewish Rabbi called "the rebbe." Menachem Mendel Schneerson, whom the "Current Biography Yearbook 1983" states on page 355: "[Born] April 18, 1902 [Not March 26 as stated in Public Law 102‑14]; leader of Habad (Lubavitch) Hasidim...' As Rebbe, or spiritual head, of the Lubavitch Hasidim, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson is one of the most important figures in American and world Jewry...

Hasid and the hasidic community from his own all‑pervasive radiance, attained through his mystic union with God. This union and the ensuing enrichment of his soul are used for the sake of the people, to lead them lovingly to their creator. The zaddik is a Mystic who employs his power within the social community and for its sake. A wonder‑healer and miracle‑worker, in the eyes of his followers he is a combination of confessor, moral instructor, and practical adviser. Also a theoretical teacher and exegetical preacher, with a style of preaching peculiar to zaddikim, he expounds his hasidic torah (Hebrew for the teaching of the zaddimim) at his table (in hasidic parance der tish) surrounded by his followers, generally during the third meal on the Sabbath (se'ndah shelishit). For the individual Hasid, joining the court of his zaddik is both a pilgrimage and a revitalizing unification with the brotherhood gathered at the court, united around and through the zaddik.

The Hasid journeyed to his zaddik's court at least for the High Holidays (although this practice later weakened) to seek his blessing, which was also entreated from afar. He submitted a written account of his problems (known as a kvitl), usually accompanying this with a monetary contribution (pidyon, short for pidyon nefesh, 'Redemption of the Soul')...

Basic ideas of Hasidism: Creator and Universe. While it is true that many of the basic ideas of Hasidism are grounded in earlier Jewish sources, the Hasidim did produce much that was new if only by emphasis.

With few exceptions, hasidic ideas are not presented systematically in the hasidic writings, but an examination of these writings reveals certain patterns common to all the hasidic masters.

Central to hasidic thought is an elaboration of the idea found in the Lurianic Kabbalah, that God �withdrew from himself into himself� in order to leave the primordial �empty space� into which the finite world could eventually emerge after a long process of emanations. The redemption of the 'holy sparks' was one of the rea�sons given for hasidic fondness for tobacco. Smoking a pipe served to release subtle sparks� not otherwise accessible.

Jewish Zaddik said to bring Jews closser to their God!: Kavannah and Zaddikism. Is this program of sustained contemplation, attachment, and utter devotion to God really possible for all men? The hasidic answer is generally in the negative.

This is why the doctrine of zaddikism is so important for Hasidism. The holy man, his thoughts constantly on God, raises the prayers of his followers and all their other thoughts and actions. In the comprehensive work on zaddikism, R. Elimelech of Lyzhansk's No'am Elimelekh, the zaddik appears as a spiritual superman, with the power to work miracles.

He is the channel through which the divine grace flows, the man to whom God has given control of the universe by his prayers. The Zaddik performs a double task: He brings man nearer to God and he brings down God�s bounty to man. [In other words, on every hand the so-called Zaddik is trying to replace the Lord Jesus Christ.

Thus denying the Word of God] The zaddik must be supported by his followers.This financial assistance is not for the sake of the zaddik but for the sake of those privileged to help him. By supporting the zaddik with their worldly goods his followers become attached to him through his dependence on them, which he readily accepts in his love for them.

Jewish Zaddik has power over life and death (but he died when his time came just as all other men): Their welfare thus becomes his and his prayers on their behalf can the more readily be answered. The Zaddik even has powers over life and death. God may have decreed that a person should die but the prayers of the Zaddik can nullify this decree.

This is because the Zaddik�s soul is so pure and elevated that it can reach to those worlds in which no decree has been promulgated since there only mercy reigns. But if such powers were evidently denied to the great ones of the past how does the Zaddik come to have them? The rationale is contained in the parable attributed to the Maggid of Mezhirech. (No'am Elimelekh to Genesis 37:1)

Rabbi Michael Katz, a well known student of the Talmud, states that it is the considered opinion of acclaimed Talmudic scholars that there are actually thirty commandments that are Noadic and apply to all non‑Jewish people but that only the �Seven Noahide Laws� are punishable by execution of Christians by Jews through Jewish Noahide� Courts! The Talmud says that the first six of these precepts were given originally by God to Adam, and the seventh afterward to Noah. These precepts were designed to be obligatory on all the Noachide, or descendants of Noah, and consequently, from the time of Moses, the Jews would not suffer a stranger to live among them unless he observed these precepts and never gave quarter in battle to an enemy who was ignorant of them."

Now we turn once again to the Jewish Encyclopedia: HADAD: "Name of an Arama�ic...Edomitish, Deity..." (Taken from the 1971 edition of the Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. XII, pp. 1189‑1191)

"Noachide Laws, the seven laws considered by rabbinic tradition as the minimal moral duties enjoined by the Bible on all men (Sanh. 56‑60; Yad. Melakhim, 8:10; 10:12)...The seven Noachide laws as traditionally enumerated are; the prohibitions of idolatry, blasphemy, bloodshed, sexual sins, theft, and eating from a living animal, as well as the injunction to establish a legal system. (Tosef., Av. Zar. 8:4; Sanh. 56a) Except for the last, all are negative, and the last itself is usually interpreted as commanding the enforcement of the other. (Maim. Yad, Melakhim, 9:1) They are derived exegetically from divine demands addressed to Adam (Genesis 2:16) and Noah, (See Gen. R. 34; Sanh. 59b) i.e., the progenitors of all mankind, and are thus regarded as universal.

The attempt of Finkelstein (op. cit.) to date the formulation of the seven Noachide commandments during the Hasmonean era would also suggest a rabbinic concern with the actual legal status of the non‑Jew in a sovereign Jewish state. It might even be the case that the substitution by the tanna of the school of Manasseh of emasculation and forbidden mixtures of plants for the establishment of a judicial system and blasphemy (Sanh. 56b) itself reflects a concern with the regulation of the life of the resident alien already under the jurisdiction of Jewish courts.

Of course, the seven commandments themselves are subject to either interpretation; e.g., the establishment of courts of justice can mean either an independent non‑Jewish judiciary and legal system or can simply bring the non‑Jew under the rubic Jewish civil law and its judicial system.

Liability For Violation of The Laws. While committed to the principle that 'There is nothing permitted to an Israelite yet forbidden to a heathen,' (Sanh. 59a) the seven Noachide Laws were not as extensive as the parallel prohibitions applicable to Jews, and there are indeed situations in which a non‑Jew would be liable for committing an act for which a Jew would not be liable. As to the latter point, as a general rule, the Noachide is criminally liable for violation of any of his seven laws even though technical definition limitations would prevent liability by a Jew performing the same act. Thus a non‑Jew is liable for blasphemy ‑‑ even if only with one of the divine attributes; murder even of a foetus (Embryo): robbery ‑‑ even of less than a perutah; and the eating of flesh torn from a living animal ‑‑ even of a quantity less than the size of an olive. In all these cases a Jew would not be liable. (Sanh. 56a‑ 59b; Yad. Melakhim, ch. 9, 10) One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the Seven Laws subjects the Noachide (non-Jew) to capital punishment by decapitation. (Sanh. 57a)

The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 8, pages 648‑649, describes the Noahide Laws as follows: "Laws, Noachian: Laws which are supposed by the Rabbis to have been binding upon mankind at large even before the revelation at Sinai and which are still binding upon non‑Jews. The term Noachian indicates the universality of these ordinances, since the whole human race was supposed to be descended from the three sons of Noah who alone survived the flood...The Noachide are required to establish coutts of Justice in every city and province; and these courts are to judge the people with regard to the six laws and to warn them against the transgression of any of them. In the case of murder, if the Noachid slay a child in its mother's womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of ('terefah'), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or by putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self‑defense the Noachid is guilty of murder and must pay the death penalty, although under the same circumstances a Jew would not be executed. (Sandh. 57b; 'Yad.' l.c. ix.4)

The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, by Massa DGH, p. 1178 relates: "Laws of Noah: Seven laws which the rabbis hold binding upon all mankind, derived from early chapters of Gen. (e.g., 9:4‑7). Six of these laws are negative, prohibiting idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, robbery, and the eating of flesh cut from a living animal. The single positive commandment is that requiring the establishment of courts of justice. The 'Noachide Laws' were much discussed by European scholars in the 17th century in connection with the Laws of Nations."

When we study the Lubavitch Movement we can begin to understand the depths of the conspiracy. We can now understand why the understanding of the Millennium had to be changed.

We can now more completely understand the true meaning of the multitude of quotes made by famous Rabbis and other Communists. We can now understand the true meaning of the term Judeo‑Christianity. The Lubavitch Movement is one of the guiding influences in the concept of the Jewish Millennium and their messiah.

The Lubavitch Movement, as we have shown, teaches that the Seven Noahide Laws are applicable to all non‑Jews and that the Jews of the world are obliged to enforce those laws. The penalty for breaking those laws is Death by Decapitation. At the same time, the Jews themselves are under Talmudic Laws and not the Noahide Laws they say. Thus, they can violate the Noahide Laws without punishment. Now we can understand why it was so important for the doctrines of the Christian church to be changed to declare that the Laws, Statutes and Judgments of God done away with by the advent of Christ. For the longest period of time during the Christian Kingdom, we believed and practiced the Mosaic Laws. It was imperative that they relegate us to the Noahide Laws while only the Jews will keep the Talmudic Laws.

The Lubavitch Movement under Rabbi Menachem Schneerson teaches from the Talmud that any Jewish man can be the messiah. Further, they teach that the Jewish Millennium is to be ushered in at any moment with the naming of their messiah. If we combine the works of the Lubavitch Movement with the final drive for the one world movement that is now being pushed, we are seeing the final preparations for the Jewish utopia or millennium.

Now we can understand what the term Judeo-Christianity means: The submission of Christianity to the social, economic and religious precepts of Judaism. The Economic Factor in the Conspiracy. The proposed Jewish Millennium must have an economic system. The Christian Kingdom of God here on Earth had an economic system and it was called money capitalism. There is a vast difference between the two systems.� They speak of high and lofty morals but where are they? How did we wind up with sex execution in schools; with Queers and perverts handing out Condoms in the schools; pornographic stores; filthy movies on the screen and on television; free love; etc.?

Why do we have fourth generation families on welfare? where is this "Motivating impulse for the welfare of the common man?" �Yes the preachers of today are cowards. They are afraid to speak the truth so they lie every Sunday morning and night. They cowardly hide behind such statements as: �He/She is a radical" "A Right-Wing Fanatic" "A Neo-Nazi" "An Anti-Semitic" or some other such stupid nonsense because they are afraid to even look upon the truth!

These are the ones the Lord Jesus Christ was speaking of when He said: �Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.� (Matthew 7:21‑23)

Some of the greatest philosophers of recent times, and those the Talmudic system hates with a passion, give us the clues. Oswald Spengler, Francis Yockey and Hegel all tell us of nationalism. That means ethnic, morality, racial and tribal. Each of them taught of the one great folly of the White, Celto‑Saxon, Teutonic Christian West. As a people we have gone to the four corners of the world and brought other cultures to live with us and we have tried to make them over in our own image. We have tried to play God.

Lubavitch sect claims its leader is the Messiah: The followers of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, claim that he is the "Messiah." As evidence of this claim, followers cite Schneerson's predictions of the fall of Communism, the exodus of Soviet Jews to Israel, and the relatively little damage suffered by Israel during Iraq's Scud attacks on the Zionist State during the so‑called Gulf War. The fact that the "Rebbe" as Schneerson is called, has recently suffered a stroke has not diminished his appeal as the "Messiah" in the eyes of his followers. This is not surprising as the Jews trout out a new "Messiah" every 200‑300 years, as can be seen by an examination of the Jewish Chronology in the Jewish Encyclopedia.

400 A.D. Moses, the false Messiah of Crete.

721 A.D. Appearance of the false Messiah Serenus in Syria causes many Spanish Jews to emigrate to Palestine.

1117 A.D. Persecution at Rome; appearance of a false Messiah at Cordova.

1156 A.D. Jews of Persia persecuted on account of pseudo‑Messiah, David Alroy.

1502. A.D. Appearance of the pseudo‑Messiah Asher L�mmlein.

1568. A.D. Isaac Luria Levi (1534‑72), a cabalist, pretends to be the Messiah, son of Joseph.

1665. A.D. Shabbethai Zebi (1626‑1676) publicly accepted as the Messiah at Smyrna.

1678. A.D. Appearance of the pseudo‑Messiah Mordecai Moshiah of Eisenstadt.

1992. A.D. And now - Menachem Schneerson (who has, since this was originally written, died), the leader of The Lubavitch Movement in the U.S.

"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races, that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them into the program of the Communist Party. In America, we {Jews} aim for several victories. While inflaming the Negro minorities against the whites, we will instill in the whites A guilt complex for their supposed exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Blacks to rise to prominence in every walk of life and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige,, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and will begin the process which will deliver America to our cause." (Jewish Playwright Israel Cohen, A Radical Program For The Twentieth Century. Also entered into the Congressional Record on June 7, 1957, by Rep. Thomas Abernathy)

�� Chapter Seven

�� More Jewish Lies Exposed!

For more than fifty years, since the end of World War II, the Talmudic, Zionist Jews have sought to manipulate through Jewish Socialization, White Western public opinion by crying, "Poor, persecuted Jew," while systematically victimizing White Christian culture. This constitutes a perfect description of the Jewish Socialization or Jewish Socialism. Both atheistic, Jewish, Socialism and atheistic, Communist, Socialism are ideas predicated upon the practice of engineering society along atheistic and Jewish ideas. This has been the method of operation of the atheistic, Talmudic, Zionist Jew even before the first century or the time of Christ.

Truth at Last: Israeli history textbooks are now being rewritten, reports Ethan Bronner in �The New York Times� (August 14, 1999) as a new generation of historians are replacing myths with facts about the nation�s founding. �Schoolchildren have long been taught that Jews have always been surrounded by enemies and that their victory over five Arab states in the 1948 War of Independence was a new miracle of David-and-Goliath proportions.� The Times reports. �But...now officially approved textbooks make plain that many of the most common Israeli beliefs are as much myth as fact. The new books say, for example, that it was the Israelis who had the military edge in the War of Independence.�

They admit that Palestinians did not voluntarily leave their land, as has been taught, but that they were expelled by Israeli soldiers. One ninth grade text, �Passage To The Past,� mentions the 1948 massacre carried out by radical Zionist forces in the village of Deir Yassin.

This is from a report of The American Council for Judaism, December 99. In the Councils publication, �Issues,� is the surprising admission that �the rise of the Holocaust to the top of the Jewish agenda was by no means a spontaneous development� but rather the �consequence of decisions made by communal leaders in response to their appraisals of current communal needs� meaning the need for support for Israel, as pointed out further in the article: �the Holocaust framework has promoted as well a belligerent stance toward any criticism of Israel.�

The article states, �Examples of how the Holocaust has been used as a weapon to promote policies favorable to Israel are extensive.� Yet to be published by the Council is the fact that the 6 million figure is a myth, invented in 1945 by Llya Ehrenburg, Stalins Jewish propaganda chief during World War II. Since then the figures have been systematically reduced:

(1) May 7, 1945: The Soviet Jewish anti-Fascist Committee announced that the number gassed at Auschwitz was 4,00,000;

(2) September 1, 1998: Director of Holocaust studies, Yeduha Bauer of Yad Vashem, Holocaust Center at Jerusalem, set the number of deaths at Auschwitz at 1,600,000;

(3) 1989: Professor Raul Hilberg, Professor of Holocaust Studies in Tel Aviv, Israel, lists the Auschwitz total at 1,250,000;

(4) July, 1990: Polish Historians replaced the plaque at Auschwitz with a new one stating that those who died of all causes and of all nationalities is 1,100,000; and

(5) In 1991: Mikhail Gorbachev opened the KBG archives and gave Elizabeth Dole the complete official German register of all deaths, which totaled 74,000. No gas chamber for the extermination of humans has ever been found at any camp. The atheistic Jew has relentlessly sought to impose his materialistic, atheistic ideas upon the Western White man, both religious and political. He has systematically invaded the White Man's schools of theology, seeking to destroy any lingering first century ideas of Christianity, and in turn pervert Christianity against itself, enabling the Jew to use Christianity as a tool to destroy the White Race. Thus, Judeo-Christianity is nothing more than Judaized versions of so-called Christianity. This becomes a tool of the Jewish Socialist.

"The Gnostics derived their leading doctrines and ideas from Plato and Philo, the Zend-avesta, the Kabbalah, and the Sacred books of India and Egypt; and thus introduced into the bosom of Christianity the cosmological and theosophical speculations, which had formed the larger portion of the ancient religions of the Orient, joined to those of the Egyptian, Greek, and Jewish doctrines, which the Neo-Platonists had equally adopted in the Occident..It is admitted that the cradle of Gnosticism is probably to be looked for in Syria and even in Palestine. Most of its expounders wrote in that corrupted form of the Greek used by the Hellenistic Jews...and there was a striking analogy between their doctrines and those of the Judeo-Egyptian Philo of Alexandria; itself the seat of three schools, at once philosophic and religious, the Greek, the Egyptian, and the Jewish. Pythagoras and Plato, the most mystical of the Grecian philosophers (the latter heir to the doctrines of the former), and who had traveled, the latter in Egypt, and the former in Phoenicia, India, and Persia, also taught the esoteric doctrine...The dominant doctrines of Plutonism were found in Gnosticism...

The Jewish-Greek School of Alexandria is known only by two of its chiefs, Aristobulus and Philo, both Jews of Alexandria in Egypt. Belonging to Asia by its origin, to Egypt by its residence, to Greece by its language and studies, it strove to show that all truths embedded in the philosophies of other countries were transplanted thither from Palestine. Aristobulus declared that all the facts and details of the Jewish Scriptures were so many allegories concealing the most profound meanings, and that Plato had borrowed from them all his finest ideas. Philo, who lived a century after him, following the same theory, endeavored to show that the Hebrew writings, by their system of allegories, were the true source of all religions and philosophical doctrines. According to him, the literal meaning was for the vulgar alone...The Jews of Syria and Judea were the direct precursors of Gnosticism; and in their doctrines were ample Oriental elements.

These Jews had had with the Orient, at two different periods, intimate relations, familiarizing them with the doctrines of Asia and especially of Chaldea and Persia...Living nearly two-thirds of a century, and many of them long afterward, in Mesopotamia, the cradle of their race; speaking the same language, and their children reared with those of the Chaldeans. Assyrians, Medes, and Persians, they necessarily adopted many of the doctrines of their conquerors...and these additions to the old doctrine were soon spread by the constant intercourse of commerce into Syria and Palestine...From Egypt or Persia the new Platonists borrowed the idea, and the Gnostics received it from them, that man, in his terrestrial career, is successively under the influence of the Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, until he finally reaches the Elysian Fields." (Morals and Dogmas, Albert Pike)

The Jews have also systematically invaded the schools of learning. Today, the atheistic Jew continues to Jewish/socialize little, White, Christian children by teaching his atheistic and communistic holocaust (holohoax) propaganda in the American schools, all the while denying White, Christian Americans their freedom of speech and freedom to rebut or dispute the blatant Jewish liars who come to the American school system to tell their demonic lies, and thereby Jewish/socialize our American White children.

"'The Jewish Establishment": 'In the early 1930s, Walter Duranty of the New York Times was in Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted to be covered. To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was famine in Ukraine even while millions of Ukrainian Christians were being starved into submission. For his work Duranty won the Pulitzer Prize for journalism. To this day, the Times remains the most magisterial and respectable of American newspapers.

Now imagine that a major newspaper had had a correspondent in Berlin during roughly the same period who hobnobbed with Hitler, portrayed him in a flattering light, and denied that Jews were being mistreated, thereby not only concealing, but materially assisting the regime's persecution. Would that paper's respectability have been unimpaired several decades later?

There you have an epitome of what is lamely called 'media bias.' The Western supporters of Stalin haven't just been excused; they have received the halo of victim hood for the campaign, in what liberals call 'the McCarthy era,' to get them out of the government, the education system, and respectable society itself.

Not only persecution of Jews but any critical mention of Jewish power in the media and politics is roundly condemned as 'anti-Semitism.' But there isn't even a term of opprobrium for participation in the mass murders of Christians. Liberals still don't censure the Communist attempt to extirpate Christianity from Soviet Russia and its empire, and for good reason, liberals themselves, particularly Jewish liberals, are still trying to uproot Christianity from America.

It's permissible to discuss the power of every other group, from the Black Muslims to the Christian Right, but the much greater power of the Jewish establishment is off-limits. That, in fact, is the chief measure of its power: its ability to impose its own taboos while tearing down the taboos of others, you might almost say its prerogative of offending. You can read articles in Jewish-controlled publications from the Times to Commentary blaming Christianity for the Holocaust or accusing Pope Pius XII of indifference to it, but don't look for articles in any major publication that wants to stay in business examining the Jewish role in Communism and liberalism, however temperately." (The Jewish Establishment, Joseph Sobran, September 1995 issue)

The holocaust is taught in schools, and the Jew is allowed to come in and teach his religious views in the context of teaching about the holocaust, and he influences our children into believing that Jews are the chosen people of God. In reality, true White Christians are the Chosen People of God.

Atrocity propaganda is nothing new to the Jews. It has accompanied every conflict of the 20^th century and doubtless will continue to do so. During the First World War, the Germans were actually accused of eating Belgian babies, as well as delighting to throw them in the air and transfix them on bayonets. The British also alleged that the German forces were operating a �Corpse Factory,� in which they boiled down the bodies of their own dead in order to obtain glycerine and other commodities, a calculated insult to the honor of the German Army. After the war, however, came the retractions: Indeed, a public statement was made by the Foreign Secretary in the House of Commons apologizing for the insults to German honor, which were admitted to be war-time propaganda.

No such statements have been made after the Second World War (The Jews had obtained absolute control of the news papers, magazines and etc., by the end of the war). In fact, rather than diminish with the passage of years, the atrocity propaganda concerning the German occupation, and in particular their treatment of the Jews, has done nothing but increase its virulence and elaborate its catalogue of horrors. Gruesome paperback books with lurid covers continue to roll from the presses, adding continuously to a growing mythology of the concentration camps and especially tot he story that no less than Six Million Jews were exterminated in them. This study will reveal this claim to be the most colossal piece of fiction and the most successful of deceptions; but here an attempt may be made to answer an important question: What has rendered the atrocity stories of the Second World War so uniquely different from those of the First? Why were the former retracted while the latter are reiterated louder than ever? Is it possible that the story of the Six Million Jews is serving a political purpose; that it is a form of political blackmail?

So far as the Jewish people, themselves, are concerned, the deception has been an incalculable benefit. Every conceivable race and nationality had its share of suffering in the Second World War, but none has so successfully elaborated it and turned it to such great advantage. The alleged extent of their persecution quickly aroused sympathy for the Jewish national homeland they had sought for so long; after the War the British Government did little to prevent Jewish emigration to Palestine which they had declared illegal, and it was not long afterwards that the Zionists wrested from the Government the land of Palestine and created their haven from persecution, the State of Israel.

�� Massacres Committed by the Jews

�� in Palestine A Partial List

The worst of the massacres were the King David Hotel, the Semiramis Hotel, Deir Yassin, Dawayma, Kibya, Kafr Kassim, the attack against the USS Liberty and the Libyan Boeing 727 Airliner, and the massacres against Sabra and Shatila and other� refugee camps in Lebanon. Following are just a few of the many massacres committed by the Jewish/Zionists; specifically the Hagana, Irgun and Stern Gangs of Israel: The Massacre of

1. King David Hotel, July 22, 1946.

2. Sharafat, Feb. 7, 1951.

3. Deir Yassin, April 10, 1948.

4. Naseruddine, April 14, 1948.

5. Carmel, April 20, 1948.

6. Al‑Qabu, May 1, 1948.

7. Beit Kiras, May 3, 1948.

8. Beitkhoury, May 5, 1948.

9. Az‑Zaytoun, May 6, 1948.

10. Wadi Araba, May 13, 1950.

11. Falameh, April 2, 1951.

12. Quibya, Oct. 14, 1953.

13. Nahalin, March, 28, 1954.

14. Gaza, Feb. 28, 1955.

15. Khan Yunis, May 31, 1955.

16. Khan Yunis Again, Aug. 31, 1955.

17. Tiberia, Dec. 11, 1955.

18. As‑Sabha, Nov. 2, 1955.

19. Gaza Again, April 5, 1956.

20. Houssan, Sept. 25, 1956.

21. Rafa, Aug. 16, 1956.

22. Qalqilyah, Oct. 10, 1956.

23. Ar‑Rahwa, Sept. 12, 1956.

24. Kahr Kassem, Oct. 29, 1956.

25. Gharandal, Sept. 13, 1956.

26. Gaza Strip, Nov. 1956.

July 2, 1946: The King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed. Killing 91 people. Menachem Begin, who was recently given the so‑called Nobel Peace Prize (It seems this prize is given to the people who can kill the most Christians and get away with it!), and is the same Begin who planned the destruction of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin. Ex prime minister, Shamir, was originally a member of the Jewish terrorist gang called Irgun, which was headed by none other than Menachem Begin. Shamir later moved over to the even more radical "Stern Gang," which committed many vicious atrocities. Shamir himself has defended the various assassinations committed by the Irgun and Stern gangs on the grounds that "it was the only way we could operate, because we were so small. So it was more efficient and more moral to go for selected targets." The selected moral targets in those early days of the founding of the state of Israel included bombing of the King David Hotel and the massacre of Deir Yassin.

1946: Treaty. President Truman ordered the augmentation of U.S. Troops along the zonal occupation line and the reinforcement of air forces in Northern Italy after Yugoslav forces shot down an unarmed U.S. Army transport plane flying over Venezia Giulia. Earlier U.S. Naval units had been dispatched to the scene. The Irgun Gang murdered almost 100 British by bombing the King David Hotel. Terrorism also was (and still is) routinely practiced against Arabs to stampede them out of Palestine, thereby reducing their demographic strength even as uninvited Jews stream into the country.

The King David Hotel explosion of July 22, 1946, which resulted in the deaths of 92 Britons, Arabs and Jews, and in the wounding of 58, was not just an "extremist act" of "Jewish extremists," but a premeditated massacre conducted by the Irgun in agreement with the highest Jewish political authorities in Palestine, the Jewish Agency and its head David Ben-Gurion. According to Yitshaq Ben-Ami, a Palestinian Jew who spent 30 years in exile after the establishment of Israel investigating the crimes of the "ruthless clique heading the international Zionist movement." "The Irgun had conceived a plan for the King David attack early in 1946, but the green light was given only on July first. According to Dr. Sneh, the operation was personally approved by Ben-Gurion, from his self-exile in Europe. Sadeh, the operations officer of the Hagnah, and Giddy Paglin, the head of the Irgun operation under Menachem Begin agreed that thirty-five minutes advance notice would give the British time enough to evacuate the wing, without enabling them to disarm the explosion." (Yitshaq Ben-Ami, Years of Wrath, Days of Glory (New York: Speller, 1982), p. 377)

The Jewish Agency's motive was to destroy all evidence the British had gathered proving that the terrorist crime waves in Palestine were not merely the actions of "fringe" groups such as the Irgun and Stern Gang, but were committed in collusion with the Haganah and Palmach groups and under the direction of the highest political body of the Zionist establishment itself, namely the Jewish Agency.

That so many innocent civilian lives were lost in the King David massacre is a normal part of the pattern in the history of Zionist outrages: A criminal act is committed, allegedly by an isolated group, but actually under the direct authorization of the highest Zionist authorities, whether of the Jewish Agency during the Palestine Mandate or of the Government of Israel thereafter.

It is a remarkable fact that the Jews emerged from the Second World War as nothing less than a triumphant minority. Dr. Max Nassbaum, the former chief rabbi of he Jewish community in Berlin, stated on April 11, 1953: �The position the Jewish people occupy today in the world; despite the enormous losses, is ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago.� It should be added, if one is to e honest, that the strength has been much consolidated financially by he supposed massacre of the Six Million, undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity allegation of all time.

To date, e staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid out in compensation (For a HoloHoax that never happened) by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly to the State of Israel (Which never existed until after the Second World War), as well as to individual Jewish claims.

Discouragement of Nationalism: In terms of political blackmail, however, the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second World War has much far-reaching implications for the people of Britain and Europe than simply be advantages it has gained for the Jews. Here one comes in the crux of the question: Why the Big Lie? What is its purpose? In the first pace, it has been used quite unscrupulously to discourage any form of nationalism. Should the people of Britain or any other European country attempt to assert their patriotism and preserve their national integrity in an age when the very existence of nation-states is threatened, they are immediately branded as�new-Nazis.�

Because, of course, Nazism was nationalism, and we all know what happened then; Six Million Jews exterminated! So long as the myth is perpetuated, peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to, the need for international tolerance and understanding will be hammered home by the United Nations until nationhood itself, the very guarantee of freedom, is abolished.

A classic example of the use of the �Six Million� as an anti-national weapon appears in Manvell and Frank�s book, �The Incomparable Crime� (London, 1967), which deals with �Genocide in the Twentieth Century.� Anyone with an ounce of pride in being British will be surprised by the vicious attack made on the British Empire in this book.

The authors quote Pandit Nehru, who wrote the following while in a British prison in India: �Since Hitler emerged from obscurity and became the Fuhrer of Germany, we have heard a great deal about racialism and the Nazi theory of the �Herrenvolk�...but we in India have known racialism in all its forms ever since the commencement of British rule.

The whole ideology of this rule was that of the �Herrenvolk� and the master race...India as a nation and Indians as individuals were subjected to insult, humiliation and contemptuous treatment. The English were an imperial race, we were told, with the God given right to govern us and keep us in subjection; if we protested we were reminded of the �tiger qualities of an imperial race.��

The authors Manvell and Franki then go on to make the point perfectly fear for all: �The White races of Europe and America,� they write, �have become used during the centuries to regarding themselves as a �Herrenvolk.� The twentieth century, the century of Auschwitz, has also achieved he first stage in the recognition of multi-racial partnership.� (The Incomparable crime, by Manvell and Franki, p.14)

�� The Race Problem Suppressed

One could scarcely miss the object of this diatribe, with its insidious hint about �multi-racial partnership.� Thus the accusation of the Six Million is not only used to undermine the principle of nationhood and national pride, but it threatens the survival of the Race itself. It is wielded over the heads of the populace, rather a the threat of hellfire and damnation was in the Middle Ages.

Many countries of the Anglo-Saxon world, notably the United States and Britain, are today facing the gravest danger in their history, the danger poised by the alien races in their midst.

Unless something is done in America to halt the immigration and assimilation of Africans and Asians into their country, we are faced in the near future, quite apart from the bloodshed of racial conflict, with the biological alteration and destruction of the American people as they have existed here since we have been a nation.

In short, we are threatened with the irrecoverable loss of our European culture and racial heritage. But what happens if a man dares to speak of the race problem, of its biological and political implications? He is branded as that most heinous of creatures, a �racialist.� And what is racialism, of course, but the very hallmark of the Nazi. They (So everyone is told, anyway) murdered Six Mission Jews because of racialism, so it must be a very evil thing indeed. When Enoch Powell drew attention to the dangers posed by colored immigration into Britain in one of his early speeches, a certain prominent Socialist raised the specter of Dachau and Auschwitz to silence his presumption.

Thus any rational discussion of the problems of Race and the effort to preserve racial integrity is effectively discouraged. No one could have anything but admiration for the way in which the jews have sought to preserve their identity through so many centuries, and continue to do so today. In this effort they have frankly been assisted by the story of the Six Million, which, almost like a religious myth, has stressed the need for greater Jewish racial solidarity. Unfortunately, it has worked in quite the opposite way for all other peoples, rendering them impotent in the struggle for self-preservation.

The American historian Harry Elmer Barnes once wrote that �An attempt to make a competent, objective and truthful investigation of the extermination question...is surely the most precarious venture that an historian or demographer could undertake today.� In attempting this precarious task, it is hoped to make some contribution, not only to historical truth, but towards lifting the burden of a Lie from our own shoulders, so that we may freely confront the dangers which threaten us all.

�� German Policy Towards The Jews

�� Prior To The War

Rightly or wrongly, the Germany of Adolf Hitler considered the Jews to be a disloyal and avaricious element within the national community, as well as a force of decadence in Germany�s cultural life. This was held to be particularly unhealthy since, during the Weimar period, the Jews had risen to a position of remarkable strength and influence in the nation, particularly in law, finance and the mass media, even though they constituted only one percent of the population. The fact that Karl Marx was a Jew and that Jews such as Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht were disproportionately prominent in the leadership of revolutionary movements in Germany, also tended to convince the Nazis of the powerful internationalist and Communist tendencies of the Jewish people themselves.

It is no part of the discussion here to argue whether the German attitude to the Jews was right or not, or to judge whether its legislative measures against them were just or unjust. Our concern is simply with the fact that, believing of the Jews as they did, the Nazis� solution to the problem was to deprive them of their influence within the nation by various legislative acts, and most important of all, to encourage their emigration from the country altogether. By 1939, the great majority of German Jews had emigrated, all of them with a sizeable proportion of their assets. Never at any time had the Nazi leadership even contemplated a policy of genocide towards them.

�� Jews Called Emigration �Extermination�

It is very significant, however, that certain Jews were quick to interpret these policies of internal discrimination as equivalent to extermination itself. A 1936 anti-German propaganda book by Leon Feuchtwanger and others entitled �Der Gelbe Fleck: Die Ausrotung von 500,000 deutschen Juden,� (The Yellow Spot: The Extermination of 500,000 German Jews, Paris, 1936)� presents a typical example. Despite its baselessness in fact, the annihilation of the Jews is discussed from the first pages; straightforward emigration being regarded as the physical �extermination� of German Jewry.

The Nazi concentration camps for political prisoners are also seen as potential instruments of genocide, and special reference is made to the 100 Jews still detained in Dachau in 1936, of whom 60 ad been there since 1933. A further example was the book by the German-Jewish Communist, Hans Beimler, called �Four Weeks in the Hands of Hitler�s Hell-Hounds: The Nazi Murder Camp of Dachau,� which was published in New York as early as 1933. Detained for his Marxist affiliations, he claimed that Dachau was a death camp, though by his own admission he was released after only a month there. The East German Regime issued a Hans Beimler Award for services to Communism.

The fact that anti-Nazi genocide propaganda was being disseminated at this impossibly early date, therefore, by people biased on racial or political grounds, should suggest extreme caution to the independent-minded observer when approaching similar stories of the war period.

The encouragement of Jewish emigration should not be confused with the purpose of concentration camps in pre-war Germany. These were used for the detention of political opponents and subversives; principally liberals, Social Democrats and Communists of all kinds, of whom a huge proportion were Jews such as Hans Beimler. Unlike the millions enslaved in the Soviet Union, the German concentration camp population was always small; Reidinger admits that between 1934 and 1938 it seldom exceeded, 20,000 throughout the whole of Germany, and the number of Jews was never more than 3,000. (The S.S. Alibi of a Nation, London, 1956, p. 253)

�� Zionist Policy Studied

The Nazi view of Jewish emigration was not limited to a negative policy of simple expulsion, but was formulated along the lines of modern Zionism. The founder of political Zionism in the 19^th century, Theodore Herzl, in his work �The Jewish State,� had originally conceived of Madagascar as a national homeland for the Jews, and this possibility was seriously studied by the Nazis. It had been the party platform before 1933 and was published by the party in pamphlet form. This stated that the revival of Israel as a Jewish state was much less acceptable since it would result in perpetual war and disruption in the Arab world, which has indeed been the case.

The Germans were not original in proposing Jewish emigration to Madagascar; the Polish Government had already considered the scheme in respect of their own Jewish population, and in 1937 they sent the Michael Lepecki expedition to Madagascar, accompanied by Jewish representatives, to investigate the problems involved.

The first Nazi proposals for a Madagascar solution were made in association with the Schacht Plan of 1938. On the advice of Goering, Hitler agreed to send the President of the Reichsbank, Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, to London for discussions with Jewish representatives Lord Bearsted and Mr. Rublee of New York. (Reitilinger, The Final Solution, London, 1953, p. 20) The plan was that German Jewish assets would be frozen as security for an international loan to finance Jewish emigration in Palestine, and Schacht reported on these negotiations to Hitler at Berchresgaden on January 2, 1939. The plan, which failed due to British refusal to accept the financial terms, was first put forward on November 12, 1938 at a conference convened by Goering, who revealed that Hitler was already considering the emigration of Jews to a settlement in Madagascar. (Reitilinger, The Final Solution, London, 1953, p.20) Later, in December, Ribbentrop was told by M. Georges Bonnet, the French Foreign Secretary, that the French Government itself was planning the evacuation of 10,000 Jews to Madagascar.

Prior to the Schacht Palestine proposals of 1938, which were essentially a protraction of discussions that had begun as early as 1935, numerous attempts had been made to secure Jewish emigration to other European nations, and these efforts culminated in the Evian Conference of July, 1938.

However, by 1939 the scheme of Jewish emigration to Madagascar had gained the most favor in German circles. It is true that in London Helmuth Wohitat of the German Foreign Office discussed limited Jewish emigration to Rhodesia and British Guiana as late as April 1939; but by January 24^th, when Goering wrote to Interior Minister Frick ordering the creation of a Central Emigration Office for Jews, and commissioned Heydrich of the Reich Security Head Office to solve the Jewish problem �by means of emigration and evacuation,� the Madagascar Plan was being studied in earnest.

By 1939, the consistent effort of the German Government to secure the departure of Jews from the Reich had resulted in the emigration of 400,000 German Jews from a total population of about 600,000 and an additional 480,000 emigrants from Austria and Czechoslovakia, which constituted almost their entire Jewish populations. This was accomplished through Offices of Jewish Emigration in Berlin, Vienna and Prague established by Adolf Eichmann, the head of the Jewish Investigation Office of the Gestapo. So eager were the German to secure this emigration that Eichmann even established a training center in Austria, where young Jews could learn farming in anticipation of being smuggled illegally to Palestine. (Manvell & Frankl, S.S. and Gestapo, p. 60) Had Hitler cherished any intention of exterminating the Jews, it is inconceivable that he would have allowed more than 800,000 to leave Reich territory with the bulk of their wealth, much less considered plans for their mass emigration to Palestine or Madagascar. What is more, we shall see that the policy of emigration from Europe was still under consideration well into the war period, notably the Madagascar Plan, which Eichmann discussed in 1940 with French Colonial Office experts after the defeat of France had made the surrender of the colony a practical proposition.

�� German Policy Towards The Jews

�� After the Outbreak off War

With the coming of the war, the situation regarding the Jews altered drastically. It is not widely known that world Jewry declared itself to be a belligerent party in the Second World War, and there was therefore ample basis under international law for the Germans to intern the Jewish population as a hostile force. On September, 1939 Chaim Weizmann, the principle Zionist leader, had declared war against Germany on behalf of the world�s Jews, stating that �the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the side of the democracies...The Jewish Agency is ready to enter into immediate arrangements for utilizing Jewish manpower, technical ability, resources etc...� (Jewish Chronicle, September 8, 1939) This was only a reiterating of a state of war which already existed between Germany and the Jews. For the war between the two was first announced "Judea declares War on Germany." (Daily Express, March 24, 1934)

�� Detention Still Favored

It is a remarkable fact, however, that well into the war, the Germans continued o implement the policy of Jewish emigration. The fall of France in 1940 enabled the German Government to open serious negotiations with the French for the transfer of European Jews to Madagascar. A memorandum of August, 1942 from Luther, Secretary of State in the German Foreign Office, reveals that he had conducted these negotiations between July and December 1940, when they were terminated by the French. A circular from Luther�s department dated August 15^th, 1940 shows that the details of the German plan had been worked out by Eichmann, for it is signed by his assistant, Danecker. Eichmann had in fact been commissioned in August to draw up a detailed Madagascar Plan, and Danecker was employed in research on Madagascar at the French Colonial Office. (Reitilinger, The Final Solution, p. 77) The proposals of August 15h were that an inter-European bank was to finance the emigration of four million Jews throughout a phased program.

Luther�s 1942 memorandum shows that Heydrich had obtained Himmler�s approval of this plan before the end of August and had also submitted it to Goering. It certainly met with Hitler�s approval, for as early as June 17^th his interpreter, Schmidt, recalls Hitler observing to Mussolini that �One could found a State of Israel in Madagascar.� (Schmidt, Hitler�s Interpreter, London, 1951, p. 178)

Although the French terminated the Madagascar negotiations in December, 1940, Poliakov, the director of the Center of Jewish Documentation in Paris, admits that the Germans nevertheless pursued the scheme, and that Eichmann was still busy with it throughout 1941. Eventually, however, it was rendered impractical by the progress of the war, in particular by the situation after the invasion of Russia, and on February 10^th, 1942, the Foreign Office was informed that the plan had been temporarily shelved. This ruling, sent to the Foreign Office by Luther�s assistant, Rademacher, is of great importance, because it demonstrates conclusively that the term�Final Solution� meant only the emigration of Jews, and also that transportation to the eastern ghettos and concentration camps such as Auschwitz constituted nothing but an alterative plan of evacuation. The directive reads: �The war with the Soviet Union has in the meantime created the possibility of disposing of other territories for the Final Solution. In consequence the Fuhrer has decided that the Jews should be evacuated not to Madagascar but to the East. Madagascar need no longer, therefore, be considered in connection with the Final Solution.� (Reitilinger, The Final Solution, p. 79) The details of this evacuation had been discussed a month earlier at the Wannsee Conference in Berlin, which memorandum which we shall examine below.

Reitilinger and Poiakov both make the entirely unfounded supposition that because the Madagascar Plan had been shelved, the Germans must necessarily have been thinking of �extermination.� Only a month later, however, on March 7^th, 1942, Goebbels wrote a memorandum in favor of the Madagascar Plan as a �final solution� of the Jewish question. (Manvell & Frankl, Dr. Goebes, London, 1960, p. 165) In the meantime he approved of the Jews being �concentrated in the East.� Later Goebbels memoranda also stress deportation to the East (i.e., the Government-General of Poland)and lay emphasis on the need for compulsory labor there; once the policy of evacuation to the East had been inaugurated; the use of Jewish labor became a fundamental part of the operation. It is perfectly clear from the foregoing that the term �Final Solution� was applied both to Madagascar and to the Eastern territories, and that therefore it meant only the deportation of the Jews

Evan as late as May 1944, the Germans were prepared to allow the emigration of one million European Jews form Europe. An account of this proposal is given by Alexander Weissberg, a prominent Soviet Jewish scientist deported during the Stalin purges, in his book Die Geschiche von Joel Brand (Cologne,1956). Weissberg, who spent the war in Cracow though he expected the Germans to intern him in a concentration camp, explains that on the personal authorization of Himmler, Eichmann had sent the Budapest Jewish leader Joel Brand to Istanbul with an offer to the Allies to permit the transfer of one million European Jews in the midst of the war.(If the �extermination�writers are to be believed, there were scarcely one million Jews left by May, 1944). The Gestapo admitted that the transportation involved would greatly inconvenience the German war-effort, but were prepared to allow it in exchange for 10,000 trucks to be used exclusively on the Russian front. Unfortunately, the plan came to nothing; the British concluded that Brand must be a dangerous Nazi agent and immediately imprisoned him in Cairo, while the press denounced the offer as a Nazi trick. Winston Churchill, though orating to the effect that the treatment of the Hungarian Jews was probably �the biggest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world,� nevertheless told Chaim� Weizmann that acceptance of the Brand offer was impossible, since it would be� a betrayal of his Russian allies. Although the plan was fruitless, it well illustrates that no one allegedly carrying out �thorough� extermination would permit the emigration of a million Jews, and it demonstrates, too, the prime importance placed by the Germans on the war-effort.

�� Population And Emigration

Statistics relating to Jewish populations are not everywhere known in precise detail, approximations for various countries differing widely, and it also unknown exactly how many Jews were deported and interned a any one time between the years 1939-1945. In general, however, what reliable statistics there are, especially those relating to emigration, are sufficient to show that not a fraction of six million Jews could have been exterminated.

In the first place, this claim cannot remotely be upheld on examination of the European Jewish population figures. According to �Chamers Encyclopedia� the total number of Jews living in pre-war Europe was, 6,500,000. Quite clearly, this would mean that almost the entire number were exterminated. But the �Baseler Nachrichten,� a neutral Swiss publication employing available Jewish statistical data, establishes that between 1933 and 1945, 1,500,000 Jews emigrated to Britain, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Australia, China, India, Palestine and the United States.

This is confirmed by the Jewish journalist Bruno Blau, who cites the same figure in the New York Jewish paper �Aufbau,� August 13^th, 1948. Of these emigrants, approximately 400,000 came from Germany before September 1939. This is acknowledged by the World Jewish Congress in its publication �Unity in Dispersion,� p. 377, which states that: �The majority of the German Jews succeeded in leaving Germany before the war broke out.�

In addition to the German Jews, 220,000 of the total 280,000 Austrian Jews had emigrated by September, 1939, while from March 1939 onwards the Institute for Jewish emigration in Prague had secured the emigration of 260,000 Jews from former Czechoslovakia. In all, only 360,000 Jews remained in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia after September 1939.

From Poland, an estimated 500,000 had emigrated prior to the outbreak of war. These figures mean that the number of Jewish emigrants from other European countries (France, the Netherlands, Italy, the countries of Eastern Europe etc.) was approximately 120,000.

This exodus of Jews before and during hostilities, therefore, reduces the number of Jews in Europe to approximately 5 million. In addition to those emigrants, we must also include the number of Jews who fled to the Soviet Union after 1939, and who were later evacuated beyond reach of the German invaders.

It will be shown below that the majority of these, about 1,250,000 were migrants from Poland. But apart from Poland, Reitilinger admits that 300,000 other European Jews slipped into Soviet territory between 1939 and 1941.

This brings the total of Jewish emigrants to the Soviet Union to about 1,550,000. In �Colliers Magazine,� June 9^th, 1945, Freiling Foster, writing of the Jews in Russia, explained that �2,200,000 have migrated to the Soviet Union since 1939 to escape from the Nazis,� but our lower estimate is probably more accurate.

Jewish migration tot he Soviet Union, therefore, reduces the number of Jews within the sphere of German occupation to around 31/2 million, approximately 3,450,000. From these should be deducted those Jews living in neutral European countries who escaped the consequences of the war. According to the 1942 �World Almanac� p. 594 the number of Jews living in Gibraltar, Britain, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland and Turkey was 413,128.

�� Three Million Jews in Europe

A figure, consequently, of about a million Jews in German-occupied Europe is an accurate as the available emigration statistics will allow. Approximately the same number, however, can be deduced in another way if we examine statistics for the Jewish populations remaining in countries occupied by the Reich. More than half of those Jews who migrated to the Soviet Union after 1939 came from Poland.

It is frequently claimed that the war with Poland added some 3 million Jews to the German sphere of influence and that almost the whole of this Polish Jewish population was �exterminated.�

This is a major factual error. The 1931 Jewish population census for Poland put the number of Jews at 2,732,600. (Reitilinger, Die Endtosung, p. 36) Reitilinger states that at least 1,170,000 of these were in the Russian zone occupied in the autumn of 1949, about a million of whom were evacuated to the Urals and south Siberia after the German invasion of June 1941. (Reitilinger, Die Endtosung, p. 50)

As described above, an estimated 500,000 Jews had emigrated from Poland prior to the war. Moreover, the journalist Raymond Arthur Davis, who spent the war in the Soviet Union, observed that approximately 250,000 had already fled from German-occupied Poland to Russia between 1939 and 1941 and were to be encountered in every Soviet province. (Odyssey through Hell, N.Y. 1946) Subtracting these figures from the population of 2,732,600, therefore, and allowing for the normal population increase no more than 1,100,000 Polish Jews could have been under German rule at the end of 1939. (Gutachendes Instituts fur Zeitgeshichie Munich,1956, p. 50)

To this number we may add the 360,000 Jews remaining in Germany, Austria and Czechoslovakia (Bohemia-Moravia and Slovakia) after the excessive emigration from three countries prior o the war described above. Of the 320,000 French Jews, the Public Prosecutor representing that art of the indictment relating to France at the Nuremberg Trials, stated that120,000 Jews were deported, through Reitilinger estimates only about 50,000.

Thus the total number of Jews under Nazi rule remains below two million. Deportations from the Scandinavian countries were few, and from Bulgaria none at all. When the Jewish populations of Holland (140,000), Belgium (40,000), Italy (50,000), Yugoslavia (55,000), Hungary (380,000) and Roumania (725,000) are included, the figure does not much exceed 3 million. His excess is due tot he fact that the latter figures are pre-war estimates unaffected by emigration, which from these countries accounted for about 120,000 (see above). This cross-checking, therefore, confirms the estimate of approximately 2 million European Jews under German occupation.

�� Russian Jews Evacuated

The precise figures concerning Russian Jews are unknown, and have therefore been the subject of extreme exaggeration. The Jewish statistician Jacob Leszczynski states that in 1939 there were 2,100,000 Jews living in future German-occupied Russia, i.e., Western Russia. In addition, some 260,000 lived in the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. According to Louis Levine, President of the American Jewish Council for Russian Relief, who made a post-war tour of the Soviet Union and submitted a report on the status of Jews there, the majority of these numbers were evacuated east after the German armies launched their invasion.

In Chicago, on October 30h, 1946, he declared that: �At the outset of the war, Jews were amongst the first evacuated from the western regions threatened by the Hitlerite invaders, and shipped to safety east of the Urals. Two million Jews were thus saved.� This high number is confirmed by the Jewish journalist David Bergelson, who wrote in the Moscow Yiddish paper �Ainikeit,� December 5^th, 1942, that �Thanks tot he evacuation, the majority (80%) of he Jews in the Ukraine, White Russia, Lithuania and Latvia before the arrival of the Germans were rescued.�

Reitilinger agrees with the Jewish authority Joseph Schechtmann, who admits that huge numbers were evacuated, through he estimates a slightly higher number of Russian and Baltic� Jews left under German occupation, between 650,000 and 850,000. (Reitilinger, The Final Solution, p. 499)

In respect of these Soviet Jews remaining in German territory, it will be proven later that in the war in Russia no more than one hundred thousand persons were killed by the German Action Groups as partisans and Bolshevik commissars, not all of whom were Jews. By contrast, the partisans themselves claimed to have murdered five times that number of German troops.

�� �Six Million� Untrue

�� According to Neutral Swiss

It is clear, therefore, that the Germans could not possibly have gained control over or exterminated anything like six million Jews. Excluding the Soviet Union, the number of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe after emigration was scarcely more than 3 million, by no means all of whom were interned. To approach the extermination of even half of six million would have meant the liquidation of every Jew living in Europe.

Nothing better illustrates the declining� plausibility of the Six Million legend than the fact that the prosecution at the Eichmann trial deliberately avoided mentioning the figure. Moreover, official Jewish estimates of the casualties are being quietly revised downwards. Our analysis of the population and emigration statistics, as well as the studies by the Swiss �Baseler Nachrichten� and Professor Rassinier, demonstrate that it would have been simply impossible for the number of Jewish casualties to have exceeded a limit of one and a half million.

Doubtless, several thousand Jewish people did die in the course of the Second World War, but this must be seen in the context of a war that cost many millions of innocent victims on all sides. To put the matter in perspective, for example, we may point out that 700,000 Russian civilians died during the siege of Leningrad, and a total of 2,050,000 German civilians were killed in Allied air raids and forced repatriation after (Operation Keelhaul) after the war.

The question most pertinent to the extermination legend is, of course: Ho many of the 3 million European Jews, under German control, survived after 1945? The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee estimated the number of survivors in Europe to be only one and half million, but such a figure is now totally unacceptable. This is proven by the growing number of Jews calming compensation from the West German Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945. By 1965, the number of these claimants registered with the West German Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000. (Aufbau, June 30^th, 1965)

Nothing could be a more devastating proof of the brazen fantasy of the Six Million. Most of these claimants are Jews, so there can be no doubt that the majority of the 3 million Jews who experienced the Nazi occupation of Europe are, in fact, very much alive. It is a resounding confirmation of the fact that Jewish casualties during the Second World War can only be estimated at a figure in thousands.

�� The New Jewish Religion,

�� The �Supposed� Jewish Holocaust

Today, at this late hour of the history of White Christianity, the Jew has sought to brainwash uneducated and ignorant generations into the misplaced pity and sorrow of what can only be called The Jewish Holocaust Religion.

Jews are allowed to teach people to hate Jesus Christ and blaspheme Almighty God, yet they are admired and pitied by most people in the world, while they tell blatant lies about the so-called German "death camps." These lies cannot be proven scientifically and are lies designed only to be cheap, Jewish public relation propaganda to invoke pity for the Jews, while they pick the American White Man's pockets and raid White America like a corporate lawyer.

The pity heaped on them is misplaced pity that should be directed to Jesus Christ, as He was the only innocent person ever to walk the face of the earth, and yet was put to death by the Jewish people. Now, however, even though the Jews believe and teach in their synagogues that Jesus is boiling in excrement in Hell, to call a Jew a Christ-killer is an offense that has put people in jail for much of their lives.

The Holocaust He was first fabricated by the head of the KGB, the Jew Lavrenty Beria. Since then, week after week, for almost fifty years, the television, radio, and media have continued to brainwash the American public with scores of historically inaccurate anti-Nazi and anti-German movies, claiming a German conspiracy to commit genocide against the Jewish people.

Yet, no conspiracy or so-called "Final Solution" has ever been proven to have existed among the Nazi leadership. It is true that hundreds of thousands of people died during World War II, and yes, a small percentage of them were Jews. It is true that thousands died in the internment camps, many of whom were confessed enemies of the national state. Some were gypsies, Communists, Baptists, Masons, homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses, Germans, Poles, Czechs and Frenchmen.

The Jews have been exposed to claim that those non-Jews who died in the camps were Jewish in order to further exaggerate the numbers of Jews who died in concentration camps. It is very important, for the sake of truth, to remember that the work or industrial camps were continuously exposed to rampant diseases.

At the time that these camps existed throughout Europe, there were no magic drugs like our antibiotics. Most people in the European camps died of dysentery, influenza, or perhaps hepatitis B, tuberculosis, cholera, typhus, or even old age. So it may be said that while the majority of deaths were of natural causes or disease, they were nevertheless premature because of the war.

Talking about numbers let us examine a few here:

1). How long does it take to cremate a body?

Answer: According to crematory operators today, it takes more about two hours to completely cremate a body.

2). How long did it take to cremate a body during World War II?

Answer: Cremation was a relatively new thing in the early 40s and therefore it took more than four hours to cremate a single body. It would have been impossible to cremate more than one body at a time, for with more bodies the time needed to create the bodies would increase with each body. From one body and four hours to three bodies and eight hours, four bodies and 12 hours and etc.

3). How much residue and ashes are left after a body is cremated?

Answer: Today there is about 10 to 12 pounds of residue, depending upon the size of the body; and that is with the residue being run through a grinder to reduce the larger bone fragments into smaller one. In the 40s there would have been 40 to 50 pounds of residue and no grinding to reduce the larger bone and meat fragments, so there would have no other reduction in the size of the body.

3). How much weight in ashes and bone fragments would it take to fill a box car or hopper car?

Answer: The European rail cars are about � the size of the ones in the United States, then and now. So it would have taken about 20,000 pounds of residue to fill a box car.

4). How many men would it have taken to transfer the residue from the ovens to the rail siding where they would have been loaded out on?

Answer: With one man and one wheel borrow which would have held about 50 pounds of residue it would have taken about 200 hundred men to transfer the 20,000 pounds that would fill the box car. These men would have had to move constantly and therefore would have had to be relieved every few hours to let them rest so that they could work again. Thus the number of men would have to be 600 at the rate of 200 men changing shifts every 8 hours.

Now slave labor, as history has shown, is the worst sort of labor; because there is no incentive to produce more and more. Instead the slaves move less and less as time progresses. This would have added another 600 to the work force thus causing the Germans to have use 1200 men for one box or hopper car per day, just to move the residue from the ovens to the rail sidings. Of course we have not taken into consideration the distance that the men would have to travel with their wheel barrow; and thus would have added substantially more men to the work force.

5). How many men would have taken to load the residue in the box or hopper cars after the transfer from the ovens?

Answer: Due to the fact that the European cars are about � the size of American ones, it would have take at least 4 men on each side of the car shoveling the residue up into the car. Then it would have taken 4 men, two on each side to throw the residue from the door to the back of the car.

This would have taken at least 8 men, and since they would have to be relieved every few hours that would increase the work forces from 8 to 24 men. Then just as we had to double the work force because of the slowdown in the movement of the slave labor, it would therefore take 72 men to load the cars. Again we are not taking into consideration the sickness and accidents which would necessarily happen because of humans being just that: humans. Which would also increase the work force.

6). How many cars could be loaded at the same time? And how many cars would a siding hold?

Answer: Only about 10 cars could be loaded at one time because if more than that were loaded, the workers would be getting into each others way, thus causing both a slowdown and additional workers to the work force. Therefore, it would take about 1300 men to load 10 cars in one days 24 hours time.

7). How many pounds of residue would 4,000,000 bodies produce?

Answer: At the rate of 40 to 50 pounds per body; and we will use the lesser weight of 40 pounds, it would produce 4,000,000 x 40 pounds = 160,000,000 millions of pounds of residue.

8). How many rail cars would it take to move 160,000,000 pounds of residue?

Answer: At the rate of 20,000 pounds per car, and that is really filling the car up because the car would probably not hold more than 15,000 pounds, it would take about 16,000 cars. Which would not have been possible because the allied bombers were bombing everything in sight day and night and would have destroyed that many cars in raids.

9). How long would it take at the rate of 10 cars per day to move 16000 cars?

Answer: It would have taken 16000 days.

10). How many years would it have taken to move these cars at the rate above mentioned?

Answer: it would have taken 16000 days divided by 365 days in a year = 54 years.

Therefore, it would not have been possible to cremate 4,000,000 people and move their ashes and residue in 3 years time.

The movies give the false impression that only Jews were interned in the work and labor camps. The Jews have claimed hundreds of thousands of non-Jews in order to fabricate their numbers and claim that 6 million Jews purposely were killed at the hands of the SS, simply because they were Jewish. In recent years, whenever a White Christian would speak up to point out the irrefutable and blatant facts about the atheistic Jewish Holocaust Myth. The Jews have done everything they can to stifle the American man's freedom of speech in his own country.

This is a one-sided presentation of World War II that belittles the American fighting man's part in the war and gives undue credit to the Jews and exaggerates the Jewish deaths at the expense of other more deserving minorities such as the Ukrainian people.

As incredible as it may sound, if it can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Jews themselves were responsible for the excessive and insane bombing policies of the Americans and the British over Germany in World War II, then that would mean that the Jews themselves are directly responsible for the incredible numbers or deaths in the Nazi labor camps. For it is an indisputable fact that what has been called the "atrocities" of the camps did not occur until after the Allied bombers had destroyed the railway systems that shipped food and medical supplies to these camps. If the Nazis had been able to bomb the transportation systems of the Americans and prevent them from shipping medicine and foodstuffs to the Japanese internees and German prisoners of war in American concentration camps, then unsanitary living conditions and malnutrition would certainly have had the same results in extraordinary numbers of Japanese internees dying from dysentery and cholera.

But as of this date, not a single American nor British soldier has been tried for war crimes or crimes against humanity, even though thousands of such incidents did occur in the American victimization of Japanese, Germans and people of other nationalities during World War II.

To fail to present an objective and truthful look at the events of World War II is to fail to learn from the mistakes of that era. Today, Zionist and Talmudic organized Jewry knowingly and willfully continue to present and perpetuate atheistic, Communist propaganda only because it paints the Jews as the victims of the Nazis. Many courageous Americans such as Senator Taft and many Supreme Court Justices spoke out against the travesty of justice called the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials against the leaders of the German government after World War II.

"World War II was a war to renew Jewish domination of Germany and Central Europe and for the maintenance of the power and glory of the British/Jewish Empire. The conspirators in America, England and France are responsible for the greatest tragedy the world has ever known and their names will be dishonored and execrated in history.

It never would have started had not Roosevelt and the half Jew Bullitt guaranteed to Britain and France all of America's resources, which meant, first, repeal of our neutrality act and supplying them with munitions and bombers without stint; second, in time the extension of unlimited credit; third the use of our fleet in the Pacific to protect British, French and Dutch interests; if these did not suffice for victory, then our young men as air pilots and our fleet to be sent to Europe; and lastly, if World Jewry and the British/Jewish Empire could not win without them, millions of our lads to die in Europe's babbles.

The premeditated killing of human beings by another, save in self defense, is murder, a crime against Christianity, morality, humanity, and civilization, and this applies with greatest guilt to the wholesale slaughter by one nation of the people of another who have not attacked or harmed them. After this illegal, secret plot was negotiated, Roosevelt, the Jews and the war-mongers of this country, of England and France sought to overthrow the Chamberlain government and to replace it with the Jews Churchill, Eden, Hore-Belisha and Duff Cooper.

They plotted to get Bonnet out of the French Cabinet and to substitute the Jews Reynaud, Blum and Mandel. The ardent but unsuccessful courtship of Stalin and Soviet Russia was insisted upon by Roosevelt, World Jewry and war-mongers of America, England and France.

One of the reasons for the Roosevelt/Eden plot to overthrow the Chamberlain government and remove Bonnet from the French Cabinet was because they would not agree to pay the price Stalin demanded to encircle and defeat Germany. At Roosevelt's and the Jews' insistence, England and France guaranteed the boundaries of Poland in order to encircle Germany and renew Jewish control. This guarantee of the boundaries of Poland was the direct cause of World War II, it knowingly necessitated it." (War! War! War!, by Cincinnatus, pp. 188-189)

Many courageous and patriotic Americans knew that the so-called war crimes and the changes against the German government officials were nothing more than Communist propaganda designed to blame the Germans for many Communist atrocities that Stalin had engineered and perpetrated. It is certainly un-American to be afraid of the truth, and no truth-loving American can possibly stand by and watch the Communist propaganda of World War II continue to be taught in our public school systems.

Today, fifty years after Adolf Hitler, there is hardly a week or a day that goes by without an anti-Nazi film or propaganda movie being shown on television channels that one would think they should be no longer political.

Moreover, the Jews have made Nazi memorabilia and Nazi member organizations a big business in America. No true American can afford to stand by and allow the Communist, Jewish Zionist, Antichrist Jews to continue imposing their version of history and their atheistic values upon what was once a White Christian Nation.

If the holocaust is to be discussed in our schools as legitimate history, then let it be discussed objectively and truthfully, based upon fact instead of Jewish fiction that is designed only to protect the reputation of Joe Stalin and the Jews behind the Bolshevik revolution of world Communism. To insist upon fair play is truly an American idea. If we must hear the Jews side, let us also hear the Arabs' side. We Americans are innately hateful toward anyone who seeks to rob us of our freedom of thought, but today that is exactly what the atheistic, Communistic Jews, and Hollywood one-worlders are seeking to do.

Stifling freedom of speech through their Communist tactic of so-called political correctness, they seek to brainwash the next generation of Americans through drug abuse and relentless Communist propaganda. They seek to create a police state wherein freedom of speech is completely stifled, and when freedom of speech is a crime, soon freedom of thought also becomes a crime.

The Jews, through the ACLU and other Communist Jewish front groups have, when it is convenient, defended freedom of speech as long as it is a Communist or a dissenter seeking to tear down White America. But when the shoe is on the other foot, they will not defend the rights of White, Christian Americans, which our forefathers fought for and embodied in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. The Jews are currently using federal and state money that they have conned form the American people to fund their one-sided Communist views of World War II. So, in effect, every state sponsored holocaust program is but another Jewish con game designed to rob the working man and the American tax payer, while enslaving these White people's children into Jewish Socialism.

Think of this travesty of freedom in these terms. A group of atheistic, Christ-hating, Devil-worshipers comes to your school system and demands the right to teach your children their God-hating, atheistic values while making no secret of their ulterior motives to undermine your Christian values and your authority as a parent. In addition to this, these same Devil-worshiping pagans claim that Nero of Rome was right to burn the Christians on crosses in his nocturnal garden and to slaughter Christian women and children by throwing them to the vicious, man-eating lions of the Roman circus. What if these same people dared to say that the Jews were absolutely correct in putting Jesus Christ to death and viciously murdering Him? Would you, as a God-fearing person speak up against such an obvious abuse of American freedom?

Well, that is exactly what the jews are doing throughout the school systems of America by sending their Jewish evangelists into your classrooms to preach the establishment of their holocaust religious cult. That is exactly what the Jews have made of the Jewish deaths of WW II. They have used the Nazi work camps as an excuse to extort billions of dollars from the American tax payer, all in support of their Antichrist, world domination philosophy known as Zionism, and all for the purpose of supporting the illegal state of so-called Israel in Palestine.

We Americans have no objection to the truth, but we do object to liars and to half-truths being promoted in our school systems for the express purpose of manipulating and brainwashing our children. Let us remember that the school teachers and the Jews who sponsor these programs do not invite the local Neo-Nazis to defend their position, nor do they invite the scholars of The Institute for Historical Review, whose address is POB 1306, Torrance, CA 90505. They only present one-sided arguments based upon fabrications and lies first put forward by the Stalinist Communist regime, namely the Jew head of the KGB Lavrenty Beria, mentioned earlier.

There are many honest and competent historians who disagree with the Communist line of propaganda. One outstanding example of orchestrated, modern, Jewish propaganda is the Hollywood versions of the Simon Wiesenthal stories. Mr. Wiesenthal is portrayed by the Jewish Hollywood crowd as the foremost Nazi hunter in the world. He is literally presented as a Jewish hero, and as a wonderful humanitarian, when in fact, the man is a liar and a hypocrite. He has openly lied and confused the truth, but our children have never been taught the truth about this lying Jew agent, who even admitted that he was fighting for the Communists. What our children are taught is that the Simon Wiesenthal Center was named after this "great man," and that two American presidents awarded this liar with honorary awards for his so-called work in tracking down Nazis.

Our children are not taught that this man has consistency lied in his report about what he saw during WW II. In 1948, this lying Jew testified under oath that from 1939-1941 he was a "Soviet Chief engineer working in Lvov and Odessa." But in his very own biography, he claims that he was a "mechanic in a factory that produced bedsprings" during those same years. This example may seem trivial, but Wiesenthal has lied about far worse than this. For example, Wiesenthal published a book in 1946 in which he presented his view of history, which he supposedly obtained facts� from the confession of Mauthausen Commandant Franz Zieris.

In his book, he claimed that four million people were gassed at this camp. Later, he told USA Today in April, 1983, "I was one of 34 prisoners alive out of 150,000 who had been put there." Not only did he lie twice about this number, he lied a third time in his own autobiography, in which he wrote: "almost 3,000 prisoners died in Maunhausen after the Americans liberated us on May 5, 1945."

This is just like a Communist Jew to lie when it suits his needs. Worse, Wiesenthal has been allowed to teach our children these lies, without any questioning. Why has this Jew, who has consistently lied in print, never been questioned? Why have our children not been presented with the fact that this man has been consistently proven to be a liar?

Finally, the most flagrant propaganda that has been spread by Wiesenthal is the "human soap" myth. The myth is that Germans used the fat form dead Jews to make soap. Wiesenthal wrote in Der Neue Weg, an Austrian Jew paper that 900,000 dead Jews were shipped to a factory and used to make soap. Wiesenthal claimed that the letters RIF on German soap made at that time stood for Rein juedisches Fett, which means "Pure Jewish Fat." In fact, the letters stood for Reichstelle Fuer industrielle Fettversorgung or "National Center for Industrial Fat Provisioning." In fact, no historians have ever acknowledged this claim to be true. It was merely a fabrication of Mr. Wiesenthal a proven liar.

One example of this is the difficulties of the historian David Irving, who after once being persuaded of the facts, changed many of his views regarding the history of World War II. Mr. Irving found it virtually impossible to find a publisher to publish his new-found convictions, which contradicted the Jewish version of World War II.

Yet, the hysterical Jewish exaggerations became so blatant that the more sane Jews have found it necessary to admit there could have been no more than 3.5 million Jews to have died in that period of time, and certainly not the exaggerated 6 million. The following is reprinted from the New York Post, March 26, 1992:

Auschwitz death toll is reduced to 1.5M: Warsaw, Poland (UPI) - Newly released documents confirm that 1.5 million victims died at the Nazi concentration camp of Auschwitz-Birkenau during World War II, not 4 million - as claimed by the former Soviet Union; Jewish and Polish officials said yesterday.

Wladyslaw Bartoszewski, a member of the Council for Dialogue between Poles and Jews, said the official account of the number of victims was reduced following verification of archives recently returned by Soviet authorities to Poland. Polish Communist authorities used the 4 million figure because it was established by a postwar Soviet commission on Nazi crimes." This would reduce the total number of so-called victims, even using the 6 million figure to 3.5 million.

Some prominent Jews, when confronted with the indisputable facts, have even admitted that the so-called gas chambers were fabrications of the Russian Communist Jews, just as the number of 4 million dead at Auschwitz was a fabrication. Notice in the above article that the information proving that only 1.5 million died at Auschwitz-Birkenau was found in archives returned to Poland by the 'soviets.

Also, "Polish Communist authorities used the number because it was established by a postwar Soviet commission on Nazi crimes." In addition to this, the soviets have admitted that they "rebuilt" the "original buildings" that were supposedly destroyed by them after "liberation." Even the curator and director of Auschwitz museum has admitted that the "gas chambers" were altered and reconstructed by the Russians after the war. The Communist Soviets provided the figures and held the evidence.

Everyone admits that the Germans were meticulous record keepers, and the actual records of those people that died in the camps were confiscated by the Soviets. When the Soviets finally allowed the Red cross access to the records in 1989, it was revealed in 46 books the names of those that died at Auschwitz and the causes of death. The Total: 70,000.�The Soviets did not allow them access to the books for the year of 1944, but those books could account for the remaining dead. Even then, however, it is probably true that the numbers may not even add up to the new 1.5 million figure. Now that this is released, we find that they inflated the number from 1.5 million to over 4 million (Keep in mind that the 1.5 million dead is cited as the number of "victims," not Jews alone).

The Soviets purposely lied about the 4 million dead, and they built the buildings now standing at the camps (This information should come as no surprise, as the Jews have been the absolute rulers of Russia since 1917. And it would be expected that the Jews ruling Russia would help the other Jews of the world to foster and perpetuate their holocaust lie). Most historians agree that it is impossible that six million people were gassed in gas chambers and then burned in a crematorium. The fact shows that it would have taken 68 years to gas 6 million people, and that it would take 35 years to cremate 6 million bodies if the crematoriums at the camps operated 24 hours a day, every day, cremating the maximum number of bodies that they could hold.

Much of the misinformation was fabricated by the Stalin regime of Soviet Russia during the post-war years. Stalin (being Jewish himself)knew how to feed the hysteria of the Russian Jew population. On one hand he backed them with exaggerated holocaust stories, pretending to be in sympathy with their world Zionist cause, which induced the Jews to steal state secrets about atomic energy and even their modern missile technology form the United States to give to the Soviets (And since the Jews are the most traitorous people on earth, it would come natural for them to betray the United States and its people, for they have betrayed every people and nation they have ever lived in and among). Yet, history shows that whenever a great number of Jews (who were not of the proper lineage or beliefs) began to rise to prominence in the Communist government, Stalin did not hesitate to liquidate them by periodic purges of the intellectual Zionistic Jews in Communist Russia. In the late 1930s Stalin began a campaign against influential members of the Communist Party; even those who had put him in power were murdered. His political enemies were numbered in the "tens of millions." (The New Encyclopedia Britannica)

Since 1945 there have been many conflicting claims concerning the numbers of Jewish people (and others) who died at Auschwitz‑Birkeneu (Oswiecim, concentration camp). However, it is only recent research and access to hitherto unavailable documents, that these numbers have drastically lowered, possibly indicating that more of our people survive. Perhaps the 6 mills often publicized (though our best figure is 4.3 million) may also need to be revised lower, we hope so.

Dr. Nathan Nussbaum,

Honorary Director,

Center for Jewish Holocaust Studies.

According to official documents in the French Republic (institute for the Examination of War‑criminals) the number that died in Auschwitz was: 8,000,000

According to the French daily newspaper "Le Monde" (20 April, 1978): 5,000,000

According to the memorial plaque on the gas‑chamber monument at Auschwitz‑Birkenau (later removed in 1990 by the Polish Government): 4,000,000

According to the "confession" of Rudolf Hoess, the last commandant of Auschwitz. G.V. interrogation record and written statement before his "suicide": 3,000,000

According to a statement by Yeduha Bauer, Director of the Institute for Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem: 1,600,000

According to "La Monde" (1 September 1989): 1,433,000

According to Prof. Raul Hilberg (Professor for Holocaust Research, and author of the book, "The Annihilation of European Jewry," 2nd. ed. 1988: 1,250,000

According to Polish historians, G.V. DPA ‑ Report of July 1990 and corresponding public announcements: 1,100,000

According to Gerald Reitilinger, author of "Die Endlbsun": 850,000

In the autumn of 1989 the Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev opened Soviet archives, and the public saw for the first time, the complete register of deaths at Auschwitz ‑ which speaks as a key document of 74,000 dead.

There were, no doubt a considerable number of individuals who were put to death as enemies of the German government. Nevertheless, the majority of people who died in the concentration camp labor system died first of natural causes and old age, or secondly, they died of dysentery, dehydration, typhus and other such diseases relating to our caused by malnutrition. Tuberculosis was s contributing factor, and it is to be remembered that we did not have the sophisticated medicines then as we have today. Those in the concentration camps died, just as many Germans, of malnutrition and disease.

The internment camps in the United States that were filled with Japanese internees suffered many of the same problems as the German concentration camps. Japanese internees lost their property, their businesses and a great number of them lost their lives due to natural causes and diseases while interned in the American concentration camps.

It is to be remembered that if the Germans had been able to bomb the American food supply, which usually came by railroad and prevent the Americans from feeding the Japanese concentration camps, the death rate among the Japanese would have been far greater.

It is also to be remembered that if the Japanese had been left in their communities it is more than likely that they would have fallen victim to rioting mobs of Americans, especially after the Bataan death march and the Japanese murders of thousands of defenseless prisoners. A poll taken at that time proves the fact that Americans hated the Japanese. The poll showed that Californians would have voted 10 to 1 against allowing the Japanese in the camps back on the street. (The Journal of Historical Review) Roosevelt may (unwittingly) have saved many Japanese lives by interning them in these camps.

In addition to these facts, while the Japanese interned in American camps were accused of committing no crimes and were legally established citizens of America, the Jews interned in the German camps were convicted criminals. They were guilty of murder, theft, arson, and sabotage. Also, the Jews living in Germany were truly foreigners, as they had not been full citizens of Germany before the war. (The Journal of Historical Review)

Why, when a considerably greater injustice was done to the Japanese of America during that time, have not been showered with sympathy and money? Why are there no memorials to these people, when there are fifty Jewish holocaust memorials in America alone? Why were the Americans not indicted for crimes against humanity, as they tore Japanese Americans from their homes and businesses, even though they were charged with no crime, just as it is claimed the Germans did with the Jews?

The answer is that the Jews are telling lies and playing on the sympathy of American taxpayers because they know that they are getting all of the ignorant population to fund the creation of the Zionist state they so desire. But more so than this, they know that they are also keeping True White Christians from speaking the truth about the Jew and his ways. No longer can White Christians speak the truth about the Jew without fear of persecution, imprisonment, or death.

If the American government had not interned the American Japanese population, it is more than likely that there would have been no Japanese population at the end of World War II. Much the same argument must be made in regards to the German Jew. Resentment of the materialistic criminal Jew had gained such force in Germany that those Jews who had not fled the country were in danger of systematic murder by the German population who, in most cases, the Jew had personally victimized. It was therefore expedient for the German government, for the sake of protecting the Jew, to place the remaining Jews in controlled surroundings, fundamentally protecting them from the Germans, Polish, Ukrainian populations.

In exactly the same way, it was necessary for the American government to intern the American Japanese population. The difference in the outcome may be seen only in understanding that the Americans and British willfully bombed the trains of Germany that supplied much needed food and medicine to the internment camp workers and thereby escalated starvation, and those diseases accompanying shortages of food and water. The record showed clearly that it was the intention of the Germans to feed, clothe and house the detainees until such time as they could be repopulated safely to either Madagascar or the Middle East. When we look at this period of history it is important to remember that Hitler employed an entire division of the German army for the express purpose of collecting and preserving Jewish antiquities during the war.

And so, telling the truth about history is a subject that must never be stifled or prevented in a land that seeks to preserve its heritage of freedom of speech. It is the atheistic Jew who would destroy the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in order to impose his atheistic, materialistic insane values upon the modern world. Thus, the Jew has invented, along with his Jewish Communist brothers, the blatant lie that 6 million holocaust victims were Jews.

Moreover, he has used this lie to create a Jewish hysteria regarding the National Socialist government of Germany, which is based on half-truths and the Zionistic Jewish hysterical point of view. The tragedy is that White Americans, whose armies and nations rescued the Jew form his European fate, are now the ones being charged with hate crimes if they dare to speak the objective truth in their own country. The Jew would have it be a crime to even dare to disagree with the Jew, regardless of one's nationality. Whenever Americans are told that they cannot hold dissenting opinions with world Jewry, then freedom of speech and freedom of thought has ceased to exist in the "land of the free."

While it is possible to lament and feel sorry for the millions of Americans who sacrificed and died during World War II, and it is even possible to have the same sympathy for the millions of Russians and Germans, the Jew would like the American people to only exercise pity and empathy for the Jews who succumbed to dysentery and malnutrition.

The Jew would like the White Man to forget about all the Americans solders who died fighting the Germans and Japanese and who now lay in hundreds of graveyards on foreign soil. The Jews would like to continue presenting a historically inaccurate view of World War II, so that they might reap a present political advantage in manipulating public opinion to continue taking from the American tax payers billions of dollars for� Israel. Let us assume that 3.5 million Jews did die of disease and malnutrition at the hands of the Germans. What is that compared to the tens of millions of Ukrainian Russians who died at the fiendish hands of Stalin and his brother Jews?

The Encyclopedia Britannica cites that Stalin forced 25,000,000 households of Russian peasants to move onto collective farms.

Those who resisted were collected, shot, attacked, exiled, or placed in Russian concentration camps. This system, called collectivism, also resulted in a great famine in the Ukraine. Although Stalin had provisions he could have sent there, he instead decided to export them.

The Britannica claims that 10,000,000 perished under the system of collectivism, however the numbers show that the death toll over Stalin's total regime rings closer to 18,000,000. Today, mass graves in Russia are still uncovered monthly, and yet, no mass graves are being discovered in Germany.

Should we not have a Russian Holocaust memorial in Washington, D.C. to remember the millions of Ukrainians starved to death by Stalin and his brother Jews? When asked how many Jews died in the concentration camps, almost everyone will give the number 6 million, even though most historians acknowledge this to be a fabricated number.

How many can tell you the number of Ukrainians that perished or the number of Germans, or even the number of American soldiers that died in the war? There are millions of Americans who questioned why American tax payers' money should be used to build a holocaust memorial on American soil.

The answer comes back that we should never forget the tragedies of World War II. By that they mean the death of some Jews. If we are looking to commemorate cases of willful genocide, then there is no more of a clear case of willful genocide than Stalin's starvation of millions of Ukrainians. Or more recently, Paol pot's murders of millions of Cambodians.

We are forced to ask, "Why is there such special treatment for an atheistic, materialistic people who are self-professed Christ-hating Antichrists and who have done little more in history than act as parasites against the host nations where they have lived?�

"The Jews as outcasts: Jews have been a wondering people from the time of the beginning. History is filled with peremptory edicts, expelling Jews from where they had made their homes. At times the edicts were the result of trumped up charges against the Jews or Judaism, and later proved to be false. At other times they were the consequence of economic situation, which the authorities believed would be improved if the Jews were removed. Almost always the bands were only temporary as below. The culminate impact on the psychic on the Jewish people however, has been traumatic. And may very well be indelible. The following is a list, far from complete. Hardly a major Jewish community has not been expelled by its Host Country. Only to be let back in again, later to be expelled once more." (Jewish Almanac 1981, p. 127)

Some ignorant and naive person may speak the Jewish line that they, the Jews, are God's Chosen People. But this too is a Jewish myth, perpetrated by the atheistic Jews for political advantage. The Christian Scripture declares that it is the True Israelite People who are the Chosen People of Almighty God.

The Scriptures clearly show that the Jews are not to be allowed into your household. Those who speak favorably of the Jews are participating in their evil of denying Christ as the Son of God. And Jesus Himself has already denied the Jews to be the Father for He said: "But whoever will deny me before men, I also will deny Him before my Father Who is in heaven." (Matthew 10:33 AST) This also includes those who participate in their evil of denying Christ.

It is very strange that when we turn to our Bibles, we begin to get an entirely different perception of world politics than what we are receiving from our television sets. If indeed 3.5 million atheistic, Christ-hating Jews had been systematically murdered by the Nazis, and we remind you that this by no means has been proven to be the case, would that indeed be so great a crime against mankind as was the Jews murdering the Lord Jesus Christ?

Which of the two was innocent and unworthy of death? The 3.5 million Jews, or the Lamb of God, Who was innocent and without a spot or wrinkle? The Jew would like the deceived Christian to believe that the blood of Christ is worthless and meaningless when compared to the blood of an atheistic Jew.

But the truth, is, if all the Jews and gypsies and God-hating Communists, put together, were sacrificed upon some pagan alter, all their blood together could not do what one drop of the innocent blood of Christ can do.

In other words, there is no comparison between the blood of a billion Christ-hating Jews and the blood of Jesus Christ. In most cases the God-hating wretches reaped what they had sown upon and against White Christian Nations.

The Bible does not teach White Christian men and women to feel sorry for the guilty, but only to have pity for the innocent. Anything else is a blatant miscarriage and perversion of the very meaning of justice. Thus, it must be said that too many Christians have taken their eyes off the blood sacrifice of Calvary, and they have allowed the atheistic, Talmudic and Zionistic Jew to manipulate their feelings of compassion and pity away form the Son of God, and to invest that pity in the enemies of God.

In 1936 a speech before the Royal Commission in Jerusalem, Chaim Weizmann, president of the World Zionist Organization and Jewish Agency of long years� standing, 1948 first President of the State of Israel, defined the �Six Million� as a symbolic figure for the Jewish fate. (Chaim Weizmann, �Reden + Aufs�tze 1901 - 1936,� j�d. Buchverlag Erwin L�we, Berlin 1937) �The world is taciturn, and it was only recently that we heard the Polish Foreign Minister, Col. Beck, say in many interviews in Geneva and in his own country and in Berlin that there were one million Jews too many in Poland...

I do not wish to dwell on this subject any longer. I am not going to engage the Commission�s time more than necessary in order to describe what is going on in Germany. It is too well known that I would have to go into more precise details. This is the situation of roughly 3,600,000 Jews. Just over three million of them are living in Poland, 600,000 were living in Germany in 1932, but this figure has decreased since.

If we go on and take the Jews of Roumania, Lithuania and Austria into consideration, then we have practically the same picture, and it is therefore no exaggeration at all when I say that today six million; I am not talking about the Jews in Persia and Marocco and in such countries which can only give very uncertain information and about which very little is heard nowadays, that in this part of the world six million Jews are condemned to be crowded in places where they are not wanted, human beings for whom the world is divided into countries in which they cannot live and countries which they are not allowed to enter.

Just one word about Russia: There are around three million Jews in Russia. We have only very little contact with them. Russia is at present a closed country. The situation there has, I think, materially improved, namely due to the fact that many people who could not be incorporated into Russia�s present society are about to disappear...� (Chaim Weizmann, �Reden + Aufs�tze 1901 - 1936,� j�d. Buchverlag Erwin L�we, Berlin 1937, page 272)

But in the meaning in which the term Jewry is understood by us, it is disappearing in Russia. Zionism is not allowed in Russia, it is regarded as a counter-revolutionary movement, a stooge of British imperialism. From time to time a Zionist escapes from Russia; younger people, and the Commission will perhaps have occasion to see several groups of these young Russian men and women who managed to escape from Russia under great sacrifices and at the risk of their lives. But a regular emigration of Jews from Russia to Palestine does not exist.

With great effort we succeeded in getting one thousand or twelve hundred Zionist families out of Russia, who had been arrested there and were incarcerated in Siberia prisons. We continue to attempt under enormous difficulties to get them out and into Palestine, but in reality a Russian Jewry as part of the World Jewry does not exist...(Chaim Weizmann, �Reden + Aufs�tze 1901 - 1936,� j�d. Buchverlag Erwin L�we, Berlin 1937, page 273)

The six million whom I mentioned before, are condemned to live from hand to mouth; they do not know today what will happen tomorrow, I am not talking about organized anti-Semitism and will assume for a moment that most countries are behaving quite amicably, but there are a number of objective reasons, purely objective reasons, leading to a situation in those parts of the world where the Jewish community is crushed and the Jews are made the flotsam of the world, where they are economically ground to dust.

When saying this to you, I do not wish to involve your emotions, but these things are not widely known. Although it is common knowledge that the situation of the Jews is not a very happy one. I think that the real circumstances are not understood; this is why I have taken the liberty to dwell a little more comprehensively on this subject. This involves, after all, the fate of six million human beings.� (Chaim Weizmann, �Reden + Aufs�tze 1901 - 1936,� j�d. Buchverlag Erwin L�we, Berlin 1937, page 274)

On August 25, 1939; before the commencement of the war, the same man handed over to the British government the military declaration of war of the World Jewish Congress on Germany. In his own words this sounded somewhat more subtle as follows: �I took it upon myself to convey to the British government in writing and verbally the resolution of mutual assistance passed by the Geneva conference...� (Chaim Weizmann, �Memoiren� Das Werden des Staates Israel� Z�rich 1953)

When war began in 1939, he had a conversation with Winston Churchill: �He received me not only cordially, but he was also full of confidence with respect to the war. His first words, after he welcomed me, were about as follows: �Well, Dr. Weizmann, we have as good as beaten them already.�

I was not quite of the same opinion at the time, but I did not say so. I just changed the subject, spoke about our own affairs and thanked him for his constant support for the Zionist course. �You were standing at the cradle of this enterprise,� I said to him, �and hopefully you will live to see that we have succeeded.� Adding that after the war we would build up a state of three to four million Jews in Palestine, whereupon he implied: �Yes, go ahead, I am full in agreement with this idea.� (Chaim Weizmann, �Memoiren� Das Werden des Staates Israel� Z�rich 1953, p. 611)

About November, 1945, he said: �The British government refused to believe that six million Jews had been killed in Europe.� (Chaim Weizmann, �Memoiren� Das Werden des Staates Israel� Z�rich 1953, p 642) And this was in November 1945!

This was the first time in his voluminous �memoirs� that he expressed himself on the subject of �extermination of European Jewry by Hitler-Germany.� Just as in the memoir-volumes of Nahum Goldmann, the president of the World Jewish Congress and of the American section of the Jewish Agency of long years� standing there is also nothing at all on the so-called �Holocaust� as in Chaim Weizmann�s book, nothing about what the Jewish world organizations had learned during the war and how they had reacted on that information. Still in November 1945, the British government did not know anything about this either.

Only later on it was considered necessary in terms of power politics to join the chorus of the other agitators or at least not to contradict them. This total silence on the part of the two decisive representatives of International Jewry in their memoirs concerning the outrageous accusations raised against the German people is highly important evidence in terms of world history!

�� The American Hebrew

�� October 31, 1919

�� The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!

�� By MARTIN H. GLYNN

�� (Former Governor of the State of N.Y.)

From across the sea six million men and women call to us for help, and eight hundred thousand little children cry for bread. These children, these men and women are our fellow-members of the human family, with the same claim on life as we, the same susceptibility to the winter's cold, the same propensity to death before the pangs of hunger. Within them reside the illimitable possibilities for the advancement of the human race as naturally would reside in six million human beings. We may not be their keepers but we ought to be their helpers.

In the face of death, in the throes of starvation there is no place for mental distinctions of creed, no place for physical differentiations of race. In this catastrophe, when six million beings are being whirled toward the grave by a cruel and relentless fate, only the most idealistic promptings of human nature should sway the heart and move the hand.

Six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life; eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. And this fate is upon them through no fault of their own, through no transgression of the laws of God or man; but through the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.

�� In this threatened holocaust of human life....

The Most Debated Question of Our Time ‑‑

�� Was There Really A Holocaust?

�� By Dr. E. R. Fields

"Since the Second World War, Jews have been treated with silk gloves. Without Auschwitz, there would be no Israel." (by Nathan Goldmann, the Founder of Israel as quoted from Paris Match, December 29, 1979)� The "Holocaust" has given Israel a tremendous psychological advantage over the Gentile world, particularly America and Germany. By exploiting the guilt complex instilled in non‑Jews, they have obtained:

Over $65 billion in aid from Germany. Over $55 billion in aid from America. Israel, a prosperous country, receives $3.2 billion, (or $8 million a day) in foreign aid ‑ more than any other country.

The 45,000 Jewish immigrants from Russia have the highest annual quota after Mexico. They enter as "refugees" without having to prove persecution! As "refugees" they are automatically entitled to full welfare benefits not subject to welfare reform cuts.

Nonstop holocaust brainwashing in schools, TV, movies and books has placed Israel and organized Jewry above criticism!

�� Official Holocaust Figures Reduced

Immediately after World War II, Allied authorities declared that "Jews had been gassed" in all German concentration camps. It later discovered that the many bodies photographed in the camps died during the waning days of the war; from typhus, cold and starvation.

Simon Wiesenthal, of the "Holocaust Center" in Los Angeles, stated in Books and Bookmen, April 1975, page 5, "No gassing took place in any camp on German soil." The Jew L.P. Beria headed the Soviet NKVD secret police from 1938 to 1953. In 1945, he announced that they had discovered a "holocaust" of six million Jews. This conveniently occurred only in camps in Poland! Beria would not allow any outside investigators to examine these sites.

The Jewish‑owned New York Times reported in 1945 that Soviet Russia supplied the figure of four million Jews having been put to death, "in the gas chambers of Auschwitz." However, in July of 1990, the Polish government reduced this figure to 1.1 million and it was accepted by Jewish groups. Despite this evidence, the "official figure" of six million dead was not lowered to three million! (It should also be noted that Elizabeth Dole, president of the American Red Cross, and wife of former Sen. Bob Dole, revealed that the official death records from Auschwitz had been uncovered in the Soviet Archives. It listed 70,000 deaths from all causes.)

�� No Holocaust Order Ever Given

The Germans are noted for being meticulous record keepers. There was no attempt made to destroy wartime records, 1,100 tons of which were seized in the U.S. Zone of occupation alone. British Historian, Colin Cross, writes in his biography of Hitler, on page 313: "There does not exist then, anything like a written order signed by Hitler for the extermination of the Jews in Europe."

Madagascar is a vast island off the coast of Africa in the Indian Ocean, then owned by France. Thousands of pages of German documents have been located providing a thorough study of the feasibility of establishing a Jewish homeland on the island of Madagascar. Plans were made for the reimbursement of the 25,000 French citizens who lived there. Even the government of France studied the plan. Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, considered Madagascar a possible site for a Jewish state. He also considered Kenya, Africa, the Sinai from the Suez Canal to the Gaza Strip, and a huge area in southern Poland, but they really wanted Palestine.

The German Foreign Ministry on January 25, 1939 issued a document on the solution to the Jewish problem which stated: "The end policy in regard to the Jews is the emigration of all Jews living in the territory of the Old Reich."

In Auschwitz Notebooks, we read that all of the top German leadership supported this plan. "On November 12, 1938, Goring had mentioned the question of Madagascar. Himmler himself had dreamed of that since 1934, a witness assures us. After the armistice of June 1940 (surrender of France), the idea was propounded by the Foreign Ministry and approved by Himmler as well as by Hitler himself."

For these reasons SS official Reinhard Heydrich organized the Central Office for Jewish Emigration on February 11, 1939. Once the war began, this was no longer possible. Thus Hitler ordered the internment of Jews as enemy aliens and deported them to the east. On January 27, 1942, Hitler said: "The Jews must leave Europe. The best thing is that they go to Russia."

Roosevelt did the same thing as Hitler by ordering 120,000 Americans of Japanese descent living on the West Coast interned in concentration camps. In March 1942 Roosevelt accused them of being "security risks." The Japanese men, women and children were imprisoned behind barbed wire fences and armed guard towers in the blazing hot desert.

The Nuremberg War Crimes Trial heard testimony from Hans Lammers as to what he considered the "Final Solution of The Jewish Problem." Lammers was Chief of the Reich Chancellery and personally close to Himmler and Hitler. Lammers said he asked Himmler what was the "final solution." Himmler replied: "The Jews must be evacuated from Germany!" He said that Hitler told him the same thing. In other words, "The Final Solution" was ‑‑ emigration!

When asked, "when did you first learn that five million Jews had been exterminated," Lammers replied that it was "here" at the Nuremberg trials! Herman Goring also told the court that the first time he had heard anything about a holocaust was, "right here at Nuremberg!"

Auschwitz was a massive military‑industrial complex of 39 camps of which 19 mainly employed Jews. The factories at the "Monowitz No. 16 Camp" alone employed 126,000 workers. Holocaust expert, Leon Poliakov of Paris, in Breviary of Hate, page 134, in 1979 wrote that the Jewish Warsaw Ghetto was one of the Germans' "most important supply centers. The second in economic importance was the Lodz ghetto because it manufactured all kinds of goods, and, in particular, its textile industries constituted support of great value to the German economy." Heinrich Himmler feared a typhus epidemic in the camps. Eastern European Jews were very unhygienic and were often blamed for the spread of typhus. On December 28, 1942, Himmler ordered that, "the death rate in the camps must be reduced at all costs." (Source, Reitilinger's book, The Final Solution)

On January 20, 1943, chief inspector of the camps, Richard Glucks, answered Himmler, "Every means will be used to lower the death rates." (Source, Nuremberg Trial Document No. 1523) The death rate had indeed been reduced from 8.5% in July 1942 to 2.8% in June 1943.

On April 17, 1943, Hitler asked Admiral Horthy, regent of Hungary for, "100, 000 Jews to work on a new pursuit plane program." (Source, Reitilinger's book, Die Endlosung, 1956, page 478)

In May 1944 Hitler personally ordered that 200,000 more Jews be put to work in construction and "other important military works."

The Jews were vital to the German war industry. It would have been counter productive to exterminate them. In fact, the SS arrested Karl Koch, commandant of Buchenwald, for mistreating and unjustly executing some prisoners. After being found guilty by a military court, Koch was sentenced to death and shot. If there was actually a "holocaust" he would have been honored instead of executed.

Shindler's List features Commandant Amon Goeth, who in reality did abuse prisoners. However, the film fails to inform viewers that he had been arrested by the SS and was in prison awaiting trial at war's end.

Most of the gruesome pictures of bodies we see in "made for TV" holocaust dramas are those who died of starvation and disease during the final chaotic months of the war. An example is Dachau. Some 54 died in January 1944 and 101 in February 1944.

When food and medical supplies could not be delivered due to Allied bombings, 2,888 died in January and 3,977 in February 1945.

The Impossibility of Mass Gassings Auschwitz had no mass graves. The cremation of four million bodies would have left 15,000 tons of ash which was never found. Many tons of coal would have been necessary for such mass cremations. Initially, the Soviets told conflicting stories about how the six million perished in the camps under their control. At first they claimed that the inmates had been "steamed" to death. On December 5, 1945, a Communist judge issued the following "Accusation No. 6" against defendant Hans Frank at Nuremberg: "A large boiler for the production of superheated steam was injected into the interior of the rooms. The doors are closed hermetically and the long asphyxiation of the victims by the steam begins. At the start, screams came from inside, they die down slowly; after 15 minutes, the executions are completed."

This story was not believable. It was then changed to allege that trucks were backed up to the "death chambers" and carbon monoxide gas was pumped into the rooms. This claim too was "forgotten" and the Soviets then charged that the

Germans changed the "steam chambers" into "gas chambers."

The Soviets came up with a novel idea of how the Jews were exterminated at the Belzec camp. "The Jews were ordered to undress as though to take a bath. They were led in fact into a building that could hold hundreds of people. The water was filled up to their necks. Then a powerful electric current was sent into the metal flooring and within a few seconds all the Jews, thousands at a time, were dead."

Soviet prosecutor L.N. Smirnov actually read this accusation into the record at the December 19, 1945, session of the Nuremberg trial. This story finally evolved to execution by "Zyklon B" gas. This was a widely used pesticide to kill lice� which was the biggest health threat in the camps. Had the Germans actually wanted to perform mass exterminations, they had products one‑thousand times more deadly such as Sarin and Tabun nerve gas!

Austrian Engineer Walter Luftl issued a report in March 1992, in which he found that, "Zyklon B is utterly unsuited for the purposes of systematic mass murder."

Fred Leuchter, America's foremost expert on executions, took a team of investigators to Auschwitz in 1988 and reported: "I traveled to Poland to investigate the alleged execution gas chamber facilities at the three concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. My forensic analysis and subsequent report proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that there were no gas execution facilities operated by the Nazis at these sites." Leuchter also examined the capacity of the so‑called "gas chamber building" at Birkenau. The Nuremberg Tribunal's document No. L‑022 stated: "1,765,000 Jews were gassed at Birkenau between April 1942 and April 1944." However, Leuchter found that even if used at full capacity "only 105,688" persons could have been "gassed." His team scraped forensic samples from brick, mortar and concrete to find traces of cyanide compounds which would be present for centuries. They were submitted to the Alpha Analytical Laboratories of Ashland, Massachusetts.

In March 1988, the Alpha report found that no cyanide elements, consistent with what could be expected to be found in a gas chamber, were present.

A retired German judge, Dr. Wilhelm Staglich said: "The extermination thesis stands or falls with the allegation that Auschwitz was a 'death factory.'"

Fred Leuchter's finding: "We have provided the definitive proof that there were no execution gas chambers utilized for genocidal purposes by the Germans at these wartime camps. The simple fact is that the holocaust story is not true."

�� How Many Jews Actually Died?

The World Almanac for 1947, in quoting figures supplies by the American Jewish Committee states that the world Jewish population in 1939 was 15,688,259. The New York Times of February 22, 1948, stated that the world Jewish population ranged from 15,600,000 to 18,700,000, excluding some 600,000 to 700,000 living in Palestine. How could the Jewish population have increased so rapidly after losing six million during World War II?

Walter Sanning, the author of Dissolution of European Jewry, says that no less than 2,200,000 Jews had emigrated out of Europe leaving 2,847,000 Jews residing there at the height of the German occupation in June 1941. After the war, 3,375,000 Jews, according to the Red Cross, applied for holocaust reparations. This figure included many of the emigrants. Thus, the actual number of those who died at the camps from all causes ranges between 150,000 and 300,000.

�� "Holocaust" Silences Opposition

Hardly a week goes by without a new holocaust story in the media. Bernard Postal wrote in Jewish Week, July 14, 1979: "Not until the Holocaust, did anti‑Semitism become taboo. There was a time when anti‑Semitic speeches were an open factor in national (political) campaigns. The Holocaust puts a taboo on overt anti‑Semitism among upper‑level statesmen and publicists."

Zionist spokesmen have often boasted that, "The shattering effect of the holocaust on the Christian conscience results in a feeling of collective indebtedness to the Jews."

The Red Cross issued a massive, three volume, 1,600 page report on the camps after the war, part of which reads: "In the final moths of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims." ...Gen. Kaltenbrunner...Allowed the Red Cross to distribute relief packages and one (Red Cross) delegate was authorized to stay in each camp (as an observer). Does this sound like a holocaust?

�� What About Real Holocausts?

Why doesn't the film industry or news media produce documentaries about the numerous true holocausts during the century such as:

The Soviet Holocaust of Christian Russian Kulak farmers. (1924 ‑ 1930) ‑ 15 million exterminated!

The Holocaust of the Ukranian farmers, (1930‑ 1933) ‑ 7 million starved to death.

The Holocaust of Russian political prisoners, (1919 ‑ 1949) ‑ 12 million perished.

The Pol Pot Communist Holocaust in Cambodia (1975) ‑ 2.5 million slaughtered.

Armenian Holocaust by the Turks, (1915) ‑ 1.5 million people killed.

Bear in mind that the Jews are the only racial group with an organization like the World Jewish congress which wields fearsome power! This is just a few of the many reasons that people, around the world, are beginning to deny the "Holocaust." Which brings on the question of just what is a "Holocaust Denial?" For in recent years, more and more attention has been devoted to the supposed danger of "Holocaust denial." Politicians, newspapers and television warn about the growing influence of those who reject the Holocaust story that some six million European Jews were systematically exterminated during the Second World War, most of them in gas chambers. In several countries, including Israel, France, Germany and Austria, "Holocaust denial" is against the law, and "deniers" have been punished with stiff fines and prison sentences.

Some frantic Jewish community leaders are calling fro similar government measures in the United States against defiant "revisionists." In Canada, David Matas, Senior Counsel for the "League for Human Rights" of the Zionist B'nai B'rith organization, says: "The Holocaust was the murder of six million Jews, including two million children. Holocaust denial is a second murder of those same six million. First their lives were extinguished; then their deaths. A person who denies the Holocaust becomes part of the crime of the Holocaust itself." (Globe and Mail (Toronto), January 22, 1992)

Often overlooked in this controversy is the crucial question: Just what constitutes "Holocaust denial?" Should someone be considered a "Holocaust denier" because he/she does not believe, as Matas and others insist, that six million Jews were killed during World War II? This figure was cited by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945-1946. It found that "the policy pursued {by the German Government} resulted in the killing of six million Jews, of which four million were killed in the extermination institutions." (Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (IMT "blue series"), Vol. 22, p. 496)

Yet if that is so, then several of the most prominent Holocaust historians could be regarded as "deniers." Professor Rual Hilberg, author of the standard reference work, "The Destruction of the European Jews," does not accept that six million Jews died.

He puts the total of deaths (by all causes) at 5.1 million. Berald Reitilinger, author of "The Final Solution," likewise did not accept the six million figure. He estimated the figure of Jewish wartime dead might be as high as 4.6 million, but admitted that this was conjectural due to a lack of reliable information.

Human Soap?: Is someone a "Holocaust denier" if he/she says that the Nazis didn't use Jewish fat to make soap? After weighing all the evidence (including an actual bar of soap supplied by the Soviets), the Nuremberg Tribunal declared in its Judgment that "in some instances attempts were made to utilize the fat from the bodies of the victims in the commercial manufacture of soap." (IMT "blue series," Vol. 22, p. 496) In 1990, though, Israel's official "Yad Vashem" Holocaust memorial agency "rewrote history" by admitting that the soap story was not true. "Historians have concluded that soap was not made from human fat. When so many people deny the Holocaust ever happened, why give them something to use against the truth?," said Yad Vashem official Shmuel Krakowski. (Globe and Mail Toronto), April 25, 1990; See also: M. Weber, "Jewish Soap," The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1991)

Wannsee Conference?: Is someone a "Holocaust denier" if he does not accept that the January 1942 "Wannsee Conference" of German bureaucrats was held to set or coordinate a program of systematic mass murder of Europe's Jews? If so, Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer must be wrong, and a "Holocaust denier," because he recently declared: "The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at." In Bauer's opinion, Wannsee was a meeting but "hardly a conference" and "little of what was said there was executed in detail." (Canadian Jewish News (Toronto), January 30, 1992)

Extermination Policy?: Is someone a "Holocaust denier" if he/she says that there was no order by Hitler to exterminate Europe's Jews? There was a time when the answer would have been Yes. Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg, for example, wrote in the 1961 edition of his study, "The Destruction of the European Jews," that there were two Hitler orders for the destruction of Europe's Jews: the first given in the spring of 1941, and the second shortly thereafter. But Hilberg removed mention of any such order from the revised three-volume edition of his book published in 1985. (Barbara Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million Really Die: Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Z�ndel (Toronto: Samisdat, 1992), pp. 192, 300, 349)

As Holocaust historian Christopher Browning has noted: "In the new edition, all references in the text to a Hitler decision or Hitler order for the 'Final Solution' have been systematically excised. Buried at the bottom of a single footnote stand the solitary reference: 'Chronology and circumstances point to a Hitler decision before the summer ended.' In the new edition, decisions were not made and orders were not given." (The Revised Hilberg, Simon Wiesenthal Annual, Vol. 3, 1986, p. 294)

A lack of hard evidence for an extermination order by Hitler has contributed to a controversy that divides Holocaust historians into "intentionalists" and "functionalists." The former contend that there was a premeditated extermination policy ordered by Hitler, while the latter hold that Germany's wartime "final solution" Jewish policy evolved at lower levels in response to circumstances.

But the crucial point here is this: notwithstanding the capture of literally tons of German documents after the war, no one can point to documentary evidence of a wartime extermination order, plan or program. This was admitted by Professor Hilberg during his testimony in the 1985 trial in Toronto of German-Canadian publisher Ernist Z�ndel. (B. Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million Really Die (Toronto: 1992), pp. 24-25))

Auschwitz: So just what constitutes "Holocaust denial?" Surely a claim that most Auschwitz inmates died from disease and not systematic extermination in gas chambers would be "denial." But perhaps not. Jewish historian Arno J. Mayer, a Princeton University professor, wrote in his 1988 study "Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?": The Final Solution in History:" "...From 1942 to 1945, certainly an Auschwitz, but probably overall, more Jews were killed by so-called 'natural' causes than by 'unnatural' ones." (A. Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The "Final Solution" in History (Pantheon, 1988), p. 365) Even estimates of the number of people who died at Auschwitz, allegedly the main extermination center, are no longer clear cut. At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. (Nuremberg document 008-USSR.; IMT "blue series," Vol. 39, pp. 241, 261) Until 1990, a memorial plaque at Auschwitz read: "Four Million People Suffered and Died Here at the Hands of the Nazi Murderers Between the Years 1940 and 1945." (B. Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million Really Die (Toronto: 1992), p. 441))

During a 1982 visit to the camp, Pope John Paul II (a Jewish Pope) stood before this memorial and blessed the four million victims. Is it "Holocaust denial" to dispute these four million deaths? Not today. In July 1990, the Polish Government's Auschwitz State Museum, along with Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust center, conceded that the four million figure was a gross exaggeration, and references to it were accordingly removed from the Auschwitz monument. Israeli and Polish officials announced a tentative revised toll of 1.1 million Auschwitz dead. (Y. Bauer, Fighting the Distortions, Jerusalem Post (Israel), September 22, 1989; Auschwitz Deaths Reduced to a Million, Daily Telegraph (London), July 17, 1990; Poland Reduces Auschwitz Death Toll Estimate to 1 Million, The Washington Times, July 17, 1990)� In 1993, French Holocaust researcher Jean-Claude Pressac, in a much-discussed book about Auschwitz, estimated that altogether about 775,000 died there during the war years. (J.C. Pressac, Les Cr�metoires d'Auschwitz: La machinerie du meurtre (Paris: CNRS, 1993). See also: R. Faurisson, Jean-Claude Pressac's New Auschwitz Book, The Journal of Historical Review, Jan.-Feb. 1994, p. 24)

Professor Mayer acknowledges that the question of how many really died in Auschwitz remains open. In "Why did the Heavens Not Darken?" he wrote: "...Many questions remain open...All in all, how many bodies were cremated in Auschwitz? How many died there all told? What was the national, religious, and ethnic breakdown in this commonwealth of victims? How many of them were condemned to die a 'natura' death and how many were deliberately slaughtered? And what was the proportion of Jews among those murdered in cold blood among these gassed? We have simply no answers to these questions at this time." (Why Did the Heavens Not Darken? p. 366)

Having seen the success of the British propaganda about the Germans using the skins of dead babies as lamp shades in World War I [which the British later apologized for after the end of the war and admitted it was only propaganda to get the troops to fight harder]. They conceived of the "Six Million Jew Lie" and spared no amount of expense to forward this program [They even executed several thousand of the so-called lesser Jews: so as to further their diabolical plans after all what was a few thousand lesser Jews compared to the master plan of World Control!].

The Zionists who have always been very far sighted saw in it a chance to accomplish two things:

(a) To destroy Nationalism by claiming that the Germans killed "SIX MILLION JEWS" in an effort at exterminating them, and the Germans were extremely nationalistic, then it must follow, that Nationalism must be very evil if millions of people can be murdered in its name! [In other words do not be too Patriotic because if you do you will have Six Million or more Dead Jews. And if you don't believe it they will show you another holocaust movie, then another, then another until you do]. Do you see what I am saying?

(b) Their claim to Palestine which came soon after the end of the War has enabled them [the Jews] to replace God and the Lord Jesus Christ and become the Chosen People: a triple counterfeit, to most of the Christian World!

Thus it is clear for all to see if they will look with any honesty at all America fought World War II so that World Jewry could dominate the Financial Money Markets of the world; Expose any existing opposition to their designs for world conquest and destroy such opposition; destroy Nationalism, Patriotism, in the major countries of the world. Perhaps William Anderson in his Afterword in a book "WAR WAR WAR!" by Cincinnatus describes it best:

�� How The Jews Forced

�� America Into World War II

In the years before World War II, the American public had no desire to go to war in either Europe or Asia. We, as Americans, had no interest in warring with Germany, Italy or Japan. Yet America was forced to battle the Axis Powers for four long years at the sole behest of International Jewry. In fact, World Jewry commenced its war against Germany in 1933, the year Hitler came to power, even before he had time to begin implementing a program for pulling Germany out of its own economic depression.

Jewry's declaration of a 'holy war' against Germany was issued by Samuel Untermeyer of the World Jewish Federation, who said in the New York 'Times' August 7, 1933, that it would be means of an 'economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends.'

The Toronto 'Evening Telegram' February 26, 1940, quotes Rabbi Maurice Perlzweig of the World Jewish Congress as telling a Canadian audience that 'the World Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years' [i.e. 1933]. Jews were obviously willing to back up their threats, for the London 'Sunday Chronicle' of January 2, 1938, reported that 'leaders of International Jewry' had met in Geneva, Switzerland to set up a $2.5 BILLION fund to undermine the economic stability of Germany.

However, Jewish boycotts against Germany failed to bring that nation to its knees as [because] Hitler had already freed Germany from dependence on Jewish usury. Since economic pressure by World Jewry could not break the back of Germany, it was determined that an actual war would be necessary to destroy Hitler [the German People for they had thrown off the control of the International Banks]. This desire to decimate Germany is understandable when one recognizes that Jews are a parasitic race and as parasites will fight to the death when the host attempts to expel them.

The Jewish desire for war was admitted by Rabbi Felix Mendelssohn in the Chicago "Sentinel" of October 8, 1942, where he states: "The Second World War is being fought for the Defense of the Fundamentals of Judaism." Thus, Rabbi Mendelssohn flatly expresses the view that WW II was a Jewish War. This Jewish scheme came to fruitation in 1939, Germany invaded Poland. Britain and France, under Jewish domination, then declared war on Germany, conveniently ignoring the fact that the Soviet Union [Under Jewish Rule] also invaded Poland.

Think about it Damn it; use your head, if England and France declared war on Germany just because they invaded Poland then why did they not also declare war against Russia, as they also invaded Poland when Germany did?��

James Forestall, later to become Secretary of Defense in his diary of December 27, 1945, notes that he played golf with Joseph Kennedy FDR's Ambassador to Britain, who told him that ex‑Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain 'stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into war.' For his candor and later opposition to the bandit state of Israel, Forestall was murdered in 1949 [ruled a 'suicide']. Jews throughout the world screamed that Germany was intent on ruling the world, but General George C. Marshall admitted after the war, in testimony before Congress [it is recorded in the Congressional Record], that No Proof could be found that Hitler Planned any Conquest of the World.

In fact, Hitler's actions against Czechoslovakia over the Sudentenland and Poland over Danzig were just part of Hitler's long stated desire to re‑acquire the territory taken from Germany after WW I in the Treaty of Versailles [is that not what the Jews claim to be doing in Palestine at the present time?].

While stones are being cast, it should be recalled that after Germany took back the Sudentenland from Czechoslovakia, Poland seized the territory of Treschen from the Czechs which it had no claims toward it. So, after the Jews had ignited a war in Europe, it was found to be necessary to draw America into that war as France had fallen and Britain tottered on the brink of defeat.

To bring the U.S. into this Jewish war, International Jewry had the services of a master at corrupt politics ‑‑ the one and only Franklin Delano Roosevelt [Who will without doubt, someday go down as the greatest traitor America has ever known]. Interestingly enough, Col. Curtis Dall who was once FDR's son‑in‑law accused Roosevelt of being partly Jewish. In any event, Roosevelt was surrounded by plenty of Jew advisors such as Bernard Baruch, S.I. Rosenman, Sidney Weinburg, Sidney Hillman and Felix Frankfurter.

For the first time, Jewry had a President who was totally subservient to them and they spared no effort to keep him in office. For example, when it appeared that Senator Huey Long would defeat Roosevelt for the 1939 Democratic nomination, he was assassinated by Dr. Carl Weiss, a Jew. Nevertheless, American public opinion was overwhelmingly opposed to any involvement in WW II. Many Americans realized they had been duped into WW I and were not interested in losing the lives of their loved ones in a war that offered no benefits to the U.S.

In effect, Americans were heeding the advice of George Washington in his 'Farewell Address' [that is why the current campaign to discredit our founding fathers is being waged, so that we will disregard their God given advice ‑‑ just as the Prostitute Clergy of Organized Religion of today are bringing disgrace and shame upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ ‑‑ so that the younger generations will disregard the teachings of the True Men of God] where he warned that Americans must not become involved in entangling alliances with foreign nations.

Those Patriots who followed Washington's sound advice were disparagingly referred to as �isolationists,' but they were, in actuality, neutralists. Thus Congress, acting on the will of the people, passed the Neutrality Act of 1935 which embargoed any U.S. arms from being sent to a warring nation.

About three years later, in 1938, Representative Louis Ludlow of Indiana introduced a resolution requiring a public vote of support of any declaration of war by Congress. Roosevelt and the Jews knew this measure could easily destroy their efforts, so an all out attack on the resolution was launched. As a result, the Ludlow bill was narrowly defeated. The Jews had good reason to block the resolution for the American Institute for Public Opinion [AIPO] released at that time a poll showing 83% of the citizens opposed to U.S. intervention in an European war.

Moreover, in April 1939, during the height of war fever, a whopping 95% opposed American entry into a war against Germany. That's right, virtually every citizen was soundly against the U.S. involving itself in a foreign war [but unfortunately this fact has been forgotten as a result of a deluge of false propaganda by our controlled news media]. As a result, Congress strengthened the Neutrality Act by barring commerce and travel, as well as arms, to any belligerent power.

At this point, the Jews began to show signs of desperation but these wily manipulators of world events still had a few tricks up their collective sleeve. So, in 1939 an immense propaganda campaign, the likes of which had never before been seen, was launched. No stone was left unturned in Jewry's assault on the minds of the American people. One was bombarded with the most outlandish lies about Hitler and Germany from all sides ‑‑ in newspapers, magazines, books, radio and motion pictures. FDR also unleashed the powerful, persuasive techniques of the federal government in the blitz to 'hate Germany.'

To get an idea of just how far this propaganda attack went, one should note that Jew Theodore Kaufman wrote a book entitled 'Germany Must Perish,' which outlined a plan to exterminate Germans by sterilizing 48 million of them. Believe it or not, this call for genocide by a Jew was well received in many influential circles. Conversely, Germany never carried out a 'holocaust' against the Jews, but after the war, was accused of doing so any way. This 'holocaust' hoax trumped up by Jewry has been used since WW II to divert attention from their own machinations to plunge America into the maelstrom of yet another war.

The Jew orchestrated assault of hate against Germany was successful in cowering Congress into lifting the arms embargo and allowed the free flow of weapons to Britain and later to the Soviet Union.

This action made U.S. ships carrying the arms fair targets for German subs; but no attacks occurred [but American submarines were attacking German shipping in violation of the Neutrality Act], which is certainly odd behavior for a 'madman' [Hitler] bent on 'world rule.'

While Congress succumbed to the barrage of hate propaganda, the public remained totally against the war. For instance, in October 1940 about 83% polled were opposed to U.S. involvement. In April 1941, it was 85% against and in July 1941, opposition was pegged at a healthy 79%. Not surprisingly, the pollsters quit asking the question at this point, as FDR and Jewry had all but gotten war officially declared.

By 1940, Roosevelt had rammed through Congress a draft and conscription although polls indicated at least 50% of the public was against such a move. By now it should be perfectly obvious that World Jewry had begun planning for U.S. entry into the war at least three years before Pearl Harbor, despite overwhelming opposition.

Speaking of Peal Harbor, it is important to understand the complete facts surrounding the 'surprise attack.' While 95% of all respondents were opposed to war in 1939, about 90% indicated they were willing to fight if directly attacked. Operating on this information, Jewry did everything possible to goad either Germany or Italy into attacking America. However, the bait was refused as Hitler was attempting at that time to negotiate a peace with England, which was flatly rejected by the Jew lackey Churchill.

Thus Jewry's attention turned toward Japan, which had a mutual defense pact with Germany and Italy. Japan had been engaged in a war with China which FDR and the Jews tried to use as an excuse for American intervention, even though the events in Asia were of no concern to America. Jewish, not American, interests however were what concerned Roosevelt and in July 1941, he froze Japanese assets in the U.S. and embargoed trade. This was reason enough to declare war, but Japan humbly proposed to sit down and negotiate U.S.‑Japanese differences. Instead of accepting the offer, FDR insulted Japanese Ambassador Nomura and refused to meet with

Prime Minister Konoye.

As a result, Konoye and his 'peace party' were replaced by General Tojo and his 'war party,' yet Japan continued to make peace overtures only to have them all flatly rejected. Finally, on November 26, 1941, Roosevelt sent an ultimatum to Japan which amounted to a virtual Declaration of War. This ultimatum, according to Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, was actually drafted by the Jew Harry Dexter White [Weiss] in collaboration with Jew Treasury Secretary Harry Morgenthau. It was this ultimatum, penned by two Jews, that forced Japan to attack or else 'lose face,' which to Oriental thinking is a fate worse than death.

The final, sorry episode of this disgusting chain of events is that Washington knew of the impending attack on Pearl Harbor at least 12 hours before the blow fell, but refused to warn military officers there [What other name could this be known other than Treason]. The U.S. had been forewarned since the Japanese message code had been broken and America was thus able to monitor Japanese dispatches. No word was sent to Pearl Harbor by FDR and the Jews as the messages revealed that the attack should be called off if it appeared that the Americans were prepared.

So International Jewry by going through the 'back door' had successfully ensnared America into WW II; a war that would cost millions of lives and billions of dollars. The bottom line of the war would be a world under the total subjugation of Jewry through its twin arms of Communism and Zionism. These facts have been covered up and ignored in the mass media, Charles Lindberg, for one, recognized where the finger of proof pointed. In his 'Wartime Journals,' he states that 'the Jews, the Roosevelt administration, and British sympathizers combined to encourage the U.S. to enter World War II.'

Lindberg and other patriots sought to stop Jewry's war plans by setting up the America First Committee. The committee found widespread support, but could not overcome the billions spent by Jews to brainwash the public into accepting war after Pearl Harbor.

And it is Jewry which best recognized why the U.S. entered WW II. 'The American Hebrew,' in an editorial of July 24, 1942, declared that; "Whenever an American or a Filipino fell at Bataan or Corrugator or at any other of the now historic spots where MacArthur's men put up their remarkable fight, their survivors could have said with truth: The real reason that boy went to his death was because Hitler�s Anti-Semitic movement succeeded in Germany. [can you not see it? World War II was because Germany and its people were being successful in their attempts to throw off the International Jewish Bankers Rule of their country ‑‑ God what does it take for America to understand?]."

The above quotation from a Jewish newspaper is an admission that the U.S. entered WW II only at the behest of World Jewry ‑ a war Jewry declared all the way back in 1933!!! Of course, this admission was intended only for consumption by a Jewish audience to keep them in the know, which tends to make it all the more revealing. Any American involvement in a foreign conflict should be judged as to whether it is in the best interest of the American nation; yet the U.S. entered WW II because it was in the best interest of International Jewry. Thus, the Jews forced the U.S. into war against the public's will in 1941 and the $64 million question is will it happen again? Events are already pointing towards a build‑up of war hysteria. Without a doubt, Jewry is leading America by the nose towards war in the Middle East on behalf of the bandit state of Israel. Will we learn from the lesson of the past or will we once again find ourselves forced into war for the benefit of World Jewry?

The Biggest Lie: The biggest lie in modern times has been told by the controlled propaganda machine. It has to do with the number of Jews who died during World War II. Jewish periodicals and periodicals controlled by them usually set the figure between six million and nine million.

A research student, who has given the matter much though, explodes this lie with some very devastating logic and statistics. The following is a summary of his research. "Tabu," or "taboo" implies that certain persons or things are unsafe for casual contact and are not to be lightly approached, and this definition of the ancient custom of many savage tribes made by the Encyclopedia Britannica describes most exactly the attitude of practically all American "media" toward the fantastic figure of the "Six Million Jewish Victims" who, allegedly perished in Nazi concentration camps of Buchenwald, Sachsenhousen, Auschwitz, etc.

During the past years this "tool" was so much used, and abused, by the World Jewry and its mouthpieces that it began to lose its cutting edge, and many bitter complaints were voiced that the world had "swept those poor 'victims' under the rug" and does not want to remember them anymore. The Eichmann Trial gave a splendid opportunity to brush off the dust from the ghosts of those "victims," and the world press did it really with a vengeance; every day one could read the screaming headlines about the killer of those "Six Million Jews" and this sacramental figure was repeated "ad Nauseam" in all possible combinations. Let us dare, however, to approach this sacred "Taboo" without prejudice, fear and trepidation. Let us treat it rather as a simple arithmetic problem using for our calculations only such data which nobody who is of a sane mind can call as being "Anti‑Semitic" in origin.

Returning back to the same Encyclopedia Britannica, we find there in Vol. XIII, p. 63‑B, [1953 Ed.] such an interesting, if somewhat ambiguous, sentence about those "victims": "If but a fraction of the atrocities reported were accurate, then many thousands of defenseless Jewish non‑combatants, men, women and children were butchered after September 1939." The authors of this article mention thousands and not millions of the possible "victims," and put a cautious "IF" at the beginning of the sentence. Had they some ground to put in doubt the veracity of those reports? Apparently yes, and this can be proved by the following revealing information: "Dr. Aaron Ohrenstein, Chief Rabbi of Bavaria, was sentenced to one year in prison for fraud, falsification of sworn statements of the non‑existent 'victims' of Nazi terrorism." (S.C. Sunday Post, July 11, 1954)

We don't know, unfortunately, how many phony "dead souls" this honorable doctor included in his report, and how many other doctors and common mortals did follow in his steps but were not caught in the act. It is safe to guess, however, that this Rabbi was not alone, because only by concentrated and highly organized efforts of many willing collaborators could it be possible to create and to sustain such an absurd myth. Just for the sake of comparison it might be mentioned here that Japan which fought for many years was mercilessly bombed and was the victim of the first two atomic blasts, lost in dead during the past war was 3.1 million "only." Right from the start of our investigations we are confronted with such a puzzling problem: which of the figures of "victims" mentioned by the American press is the exact one: four million? six million? nine million? or still more?

Time Magazine once dared to publish the lowest figure of four million.

The Los Angeles Mirror in an article of April 19, 1961 tells us as follows: "The actual [?] count exceeds 6 million victims."

Newsweek Magazine assured quite a few times its credulous readers that the number of "victims" should be at least seven million.

Rabbi Schultz of New York adds to the six million Jews killed by Nazis 3.4 million of the Soviet Jewry liquidated during the post‑war purges thus bringing the total to the staggering figure of 9.4 million "victims."

The generally admitted number, as every child in America knows, is Six Million, which is easy to remember and to repeat. But the so‑called "official" estimate released once by the joint Anglo‑American Committee fixes with a surprising accuracy the number of "victims" at exactly 5,721,000!

Let us admit for a moment that this is the correct answer to our question, and let us see how the Jewish‑owned statistics comply with it.

Total number of the World Jewish population in 1938 as per information of the Jewish statistical Bureau in the U.S. 15.7 million

Natural increase in two decades information of, the Jewish World Congress �� 1.0 million

Total�� 16.7 million

Less the "victims"�� 5.7 million

Should be now [May 1974]�� 11.0 million

But in accordance with the data supplied by the same Congress there are:

Jews in the Soviet Union�� 2.0 million

Jews in the U.S.� 5.2 million

Jews in other countries�� 4.6 million

Or a total of�� 11.8 million (Time, February 18, 1957)

It is already 0.8 million more than it should be in accordance with the first calculation. Consequently the World Jewish Congress itself tacitly agrees that the number of "victims" cannot be even 5.7 million, but should be about 4.9 million. Since it would be quite difficult for us to check up on the number of Jews now residing all over the world outside the Soviet Union and the U.S., let us admit the figure of 4.6 million as given by the Congress is the correct one.

But according to the last Soviet census of population the number of Jews living there is slightly above 3 million, and NOT 2 million as claimed by the Congress. (See the Soviet statistics published by the Jewish‑edited newspaper New Russian World of N.Y.C., September 30, 1960) Subtracting this "lost" million of Jews "found" now in the USSR from the above number of "victims" we shall get our second "corrected" figure: 4.9 million, minus 1 million, equals 3.9 million.

But if the said Congress could "adjust" the Soviet Jewish population by one third, should we admit without questioning the suspiciously low figure of 5.2 million Jews now, allegedly, residing in the United States?

According to the figures released once by the American Jewish Committee the Jewish population of the U.S. was in 1917 3.27% of the total; in 1927 3.58%; and in 1937 3.69%. Everybody knows that besides the normal natural increase there was during the last two decades a tremendous influx of Jewish immigrants, both legal and illegal, to the hospitable American shores.

But, surprisingly enough, the relative proportion of Jews to other populations of the U.S. registered a sharp DROP and is now, if we have to believe the Congress estimate, only 2.9% of the total. [5.2 million of 180 million]. HOW could such a "miracle" happen?!!

Would it not be more logical to suppose that this ever‑ increasing in the past years percentage should be now somewhere between 4.5%‑5%, [i.e. 8‑9 million of Jewish population], but by no possible means could it drop BELOW the 1937 level?

Let us approach the same question from another angle. Time, (October 31, 1960), quoting the Yearbook of American Churches for 1960, reported that there are 5.5 million of "practicing" Jews in the States. Or, in other words, since the total officially admitted number of Jews is only 5.2 million in America, more than a hundred percent of the Jews are registered with their religious communities?! HOW could such a second "miracle" happen?

That not all the Jews residing in the States are the "practicing" ones proves the footnote in the same Time Magazine of February 11, 1957 where it is stated that only 10.6% of the New York City population profess Jewish Faith, although the total percentage of Jewry in that City is about 28%. So, admittedly, more than one half of the N.Y.C. Jews are religiously indifferent and are not registered with their synagogues. According to the statistics, out of 100 Americans 62 belong to one or another church group.

Assuming that other Jews residing in the States are more religious than their New York confreres, we shall apply that average rule to the whole American Jewish community. Then, if there are 5.5 million of "practicing" Jews [62%], there should be besides a balance of about 3.3 million [38%] of those who are not "practicing." Adding those two figures together we get 8.8 million which should be, approximately, the actual number of Jews now residing in the States.

This figure, being about 4.9% of the total American population, is in accord with our first calculation based on the percentage.

It is, without any doubt, far more plausible than the ridiculously low figure of 5.2 million as given by the Congress. This excess of the Jewish population in the States, [8.8 million, minus 5.2 million, equals 3.6 million], gives us the full right to cut down drastically the number of the "victims" for the third, and last, time because, as it is quite obvious from the above calculations, the number of the American Jews was also "adjusted" by more than one third. Otherwise it would be simply impossible to sustain for so many years the myth of the millions of Jewish "victims."

And thus, finally, we get: 3.9 million, minus 3.6 million "found" in the States equals: 0.3 million ‑‑ which is the actual approximate number of Jews who �probably� perished in Europe during the last war.

It might happen, of course, that we are here a few tens of thousands "victims" off the mark, but, in all probability, the figure cannot exceed 0.4 million and should be between 200 and 400 thousand. Consequently the world Jewish population at present should be such:

In the Soviet Union�� 3.0 million

In the U.S.�� 8.8 million

In other countries�� 4.6 million

Total�� 16.4 million

As an additional, if indirect, proof of the massive forgery of the number of "victims" let us quote here a few revealing passages taken from the pages of the American press:

Reuter, (Sept. 13, 1958), reported that in the famous Buchenwald camp where, allegedly, MILLIONS of Jews alone perished, a memorial was dedicated to the 56,000 prisoners of all nationalities who died there during the war. How is it possible for millions of Jews to have died there when only 56,000 of all nationalities: which would have included the Jews who said to have died there???

Newsweek, (Oct. 27, 1958), said that a certain Sorge Schubert, who was in charge of the Sachsenhousen camp, was accused of murdering 198 Jews and 10,000 Russians. Isn�t it amazing the Jews claim millions died at Sachen-Housen but Newsweek reports that only 198 Jews died there.

Time, (March 23, 1959), stated; "Erich Koch, (Gauleiter of Ukraine)...stood accused of responsibil�ity or complicity in gas‑chamber and concentration camp death of 4,000,000 Russians, 160,000 Jews and 72,000 Poles."

The director of Auschwitz has been filmed on video-tape admitting that the so-called gas chambers, there, was constructed after the war. In a dramatic and unprecedented filmed interview, Dr. Franciszek Piper, senior curator and director of archives at the Auschwitz State Museum; admits on camera that "Krema I," the alleged "homicidal gas chamber" shown off to hundreds of thousands of tourists every year at the Auschwitz main camp, is, in fact, a reconstruction, fabricated after the war by the Soviet Union: apparently on the direct orders of dictator Joseph Stalin. What Piper said, in effect - and on camera - was that the explosive Leucher Report was correct: No Homicidal Gassings took place in the buildings designated �homicidal gas chambers� at Auschwitz!

Ironically, for someone to even suggest such a thing could bring a jail sentence in more than one country, including enlightened nations like France, Canada and German. {Just ask British historian David Irving}. The videotape on which Piper makes his revelations was taken in mid-1992 by a young Jewish investigator, David Cole. It has just been released, on January 1, 1993, although Cole announced his project at the 11th International Revisionist Conference at Irvine, California last October.

Like most Americans, since his youth Cole had been instructed in the "irrefutable fact" that homicidal gassings had taken place at Auschwitz. The number of those so executed - also declared irrefutable - was 4.1 million. Then came the Leuchter Report in 1988. This was followed by a "re-evaluation" of the total deaths at Auschwitz {down to 1.1 million}. As a budding historian, and a Jew, Cole was intrigued.

Previous to 1992, anyone who publicly doubted the 4.1 million "gassing" deaths at Auschwitz was labeled an anti-Semite, neo-Nazi skinhead {at the very least}. Quietly, because of revisionist findings, the official figure has lowered to 1.1 million. No mention of that missing 3 million.

In the words of Dr. Wilhelm Staglich, another internationally known historian, "The extermination thesis stands or falls with the allegation that Auschwitz was a �Death Factory.'"

With the Leuchter Report in mind, Cole took his video equipment to Auschwitz and interviewed official personnel there. Piper was the most important of these interviewees. Following his comment that the "homicidal gas chambers" were fabrications, Piper reveals, on camera, how walls were knocked down, holes made in the ceiling and "Zyklon B induction chimneys" installed on the roof so that the building could be exhibited to tourists from all over the world as proof of the "final solution."

And Piper doesn't stop there. He describes other "proofs" of the "final solution," which are also "reconstructions." He discusses the routine use of Zyklon B to delouse buildings and the personal effects of internees, and he admits, on camera, that the Leuchter Report's findings concerning Zyklon B residues in the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz are right. He then, paradoxically, affirms his belief, not only in homicidal "gassing chambers," but also in the "human soap" tales and the stories about "human skin" lampshades, both of which allegations which long ago have been totally debunked. And the revelations go on.

In the video, you tour Auschwitz with Cole and hear him being told that the main camp "gas chamber" {Krema I} is in its "original state." You will see the undaunted Cole ask so many questions about the obviously ridiculous nature of this "gas chamber" that the guide feels it necessary to call her supervisor over to answer the young historian.

The Cole videotape proves that the people who run the Auschwitz State Museum had made a practice of fabricating "proofs" of homicidal gassings. Keep in mind that over the years, millions of tourists have been told that Krema I is in its original state, while the officials knew that this "original state" was/is a lie. The political, religious, financial and historical ramifications of this proof of no gas chambers at Auschwitz cannot be measured. Coupled with the Leutcher Report, the Cole videotape proves that what every Western Government has taught since World War II is a lie. (The Spotlight, January 18, 1993, p. 21, by P. Samuel Foner)

We believe, all that is stated above should be more than sufficient to prove that the cautious approach of the Encyclopedia Britannica to the number of Jewish "victims" was, indeed, quite understandable. We are also inclined to agree with this usually reliable source of information that the total number of those Jewish "victims" should be expressed in thousands and not in millions which are the result of the most shameless and arrogant Jewish propaganda machine which increased the actual number of Jews who perished during the last war at least fifteen-fold! (This article was written when all American press supported the Jewish myth that there are only 5.2 million Jews residing in the States; finally on Jan. 13, 1964, the Jewish‑owned Newsweek Magazine in its article "Only WASHS?" admitted the actual number of American Jews in the following sentences: 'By contrast, Jews make up about 5 percent of the population [in the States] and more than 8 percent of all college graduates.' Which is exactly the same percentage which we calculated above)

This is but one of three problems which have plagued the propagandists who want to claim that Hitler exterminated the Jews of Central Europe, "Six Million" of them: The second is that despite snooping all over Europe and elsewhere they have not found any Third Reich order to exterminate the Jews; the third is that the "Six Million" exterminated Jews nowhere left any skeletons, not even any ashes.� Even if the six million had been cremated they would have piled up a mountain of 60,000 metric tons [2240 lbs. per metric ton] of ashes. When the Soviet‑Bolshevik‑Jewish‑Russians murdered the Polish POW's at Katyn, a few years later the corpses of 4,200 were found with a bullet in their necks. But of the six million allegedly "gassed Jews" No remains, no graves, no bones, no ashes, no fragments of any kind have been found!!!

Where the Jews of Central Europe Went: But what has been found is hundreds of thousands of Jews in countries where they had not been in 1939. On June 11, 1973, the International Tribune, a Jewish‑controlled paper, boasted that; "About 500,000 of Israel's 2.6 million Jews had been in a Nazi concentration camp."

Obviously if there had been a Hitler order to exterminate the Jews their bones [or their ashes] would be in Central Europe. Some other examples: in 1939, France had 200,000 Jews, but now it has 900,000; Great Britain then 300,000, now 600,000 Canada then less than 150,000, now 400,000; Argentina then 200,000, now 800,000.

In the U.S. where there were perhaps five million, there are now, according to what Ben Gurion, while he was alive, estimated, from nine to twelve million, so many in fact that the Census Bureau has been forbidden to count them, as the sheer numbers of them would be embarrassing for the Jews, and would completely destroy the "Six Million" MYTH!

The fact is Jewish casualties during the war can only be compiled by equating the Jews in the various countries of the world now [or in 1950] with those in 1933‑1939. Instead propagandists subtract the Jews in Central Europe after the war from those there before and call the difference "massacred."

Even reputable historians, as for example John Gunther, fall into this elementary fallacy: of dishonesty. He wrote: "Of the 3,500,000 Polish Jews who lived in that country before the war, not less than three million were murdered by the Germans. The total number of Jews surviving in Poland is only between 70,000 and 80,000." (Philadelphia Inquirer, February 10, 1949)

The millions of Jews who retreated into Soviet‑Russia and who fled into other countries Gunther simply� writes off as "massacred." In 1930 there were 2,488,000 Germans in East Prussia.

When by 1946 the Soviet‑Russians and Poles got finished raping and looting and terrorizing, only a few thousand East Prussians were left there. Do the likes of Gunther conclude that the Russians and Poles "massacred" the other two plus million East Prussians??? They do not. Even though in fact over 200,000 were murdered by the expulsionist Poles and Russians, they blithely pass over these and assume all the 2,488,000 are safe in Germany!

What happened to the Germans of East Prussia, Silesia, Sudetenland?: The propagandists, who call every Jew no longer in Central Europe "exterminated," do not call the 4,558,041 Germans no longer in Silesia after the Poles terrorized them in 1945‑1946 murdered, though twenty percent of them were; they smugly call them "transferred" to Germany; so with the 1,895,015 Pomeranians, the 407,500 Danzigers; and the 3,912,849 Germans of the Sudetenland, of whom 210,000 were clubbed and raped to death, and only 100,000 remain in the Sudetenland!

But when the 600,000 Jews in Germany in 1933, only some 30,000 were found there in 1945, the propagandist scream that the other 570,000 had been exterminated! When in fact, they were in most cases all the while collecting indemnities from the West German people, safely in New York, Israel and Argentina!

For more than thirty years hordes of official and official snoopers have sniffed at every document of the Third Reich, and they have cross‑examined and threatened and blackmailed every possible German in the search for some document or order in which Hitler ordered the extermination of Jews.

And the more they scratched around the more they came up with the opposite. At least three historians in the last few years may be thought to have unwittingly frustrated the last hope of finding any Third Reich order to exterminate the Jews.

Historians find no third Reich order for �exterminating� the Jews: Dr. John Lukacs, writes; "No document, no written or even spoken evidence connects Hitler directly to the Wannsee decision." (The Last European War (1976), p. 165)

Nor does he anywhere else cite any such document. And in fact the Wannsee Conference, held January 20, 1942, itself does not at all contemplate extermination, but the deployment of "the Jews capable of work," like road‑building, in the East, but "It is not intended to evacuate Jews over 65 years of age" nor "Jews who are serious war‑wounded cases and Jews with war decorations" [presumably from World War I]. (Quoted from Dr. A.R. Butz, The Hoax, p. 211‑212)

As for the block‑busting Hoax of the Twentieth Century, so the Los Angeles Herald, June 11, 1977, reports, it "presents the massacre of six million Jews...(as) a myth perpetrated by Jews to elicit sympathy" for a Palestine homeland. The latest to frustrate all hope of finding a document authorizing the massacre of Jews is Professor David Irving's Hitler's War (Viking Press, N.Y. 1977, 926 pates).

Irving writes categorically: "...the incontrovertible evidence is that Hitler ordered on November 30, 1941, that there was to be 'no liquidation' of the Jews" (Hitler's War, David Irving, p. xiv)

And, in October, 1943; "Hitler was still forbidding liquidations..." (Hitler's War, David Irving, p. xiv)

Gas Chambers: What about denying the existence of extermination "gas chambers?" Here too, Mayer makes a startling statement: "Sources for the study of the gas chambers are at once rare and unreliable." (Why Did the Heavens Not Darken? p. 362)

While Mayer believes that such chambers did exist at Auschwitz, he point out that: "...most of what is known is based on the depositions of Nazi officials and executioners at postwar trials and on the memory of survivors and bystanders. This testimony must be screened carefully, since it can be influenced by subjective factors of great complexity."

H�ess Testimony: One example of this might be the testimony of Rudolf H�ess, an SS officer who served as commandant of Auschwitz. In its Judgment, the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal quoted at length from his testimony to support its findings of extermination. (IMT "blue series," Vol. 22, p. 485; Nuremberg document 3868-PS(USA-819), in IMT "blue series," Vol. 33, pp. 275-279)

It is now well established that H�ess' crucial testimony, as well as his so-called "confession"� which was also cited by the Nuremberg Tribunal, are not only false, but were obtained by beating the former commandant nearly to death. (Rupert Butler, Legions of Death (England, 1983), pp. 235-237; C. Hitchens, Whose History is it?, Vanity Fair (New York), December 1993, p. 117) H�ess's wife and children were also threatened with death and deportation to Siberia. In his statement, which would not be admissible today in any United States court of law, H�ess claimed the existence of an extermination camp called "Wolzek." In fact, no such camp ever existed. He further claimed that during the time that he was commandant of Auschwitz, two and a half million people were exterminated there, and that a further half million died of disease. (R. Faurisson, How the British Obtained the Confession of Rudolf H�ss, The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1986-87, pp. 389-403) Today no reputable historian upholds these figures. H�ess was obviously willing to say anything, sign anything and do anything to stop the torture, and to try to save himself and his family.

Forensic Investigations: In his 1988 book, Professor Mayer calls for "excavations at the killing sites and in their immediate environs" to determine more about the gas chambers. In fact, such forensic studies have been made. The first was conducted in 1988 by American execution equipment consultant, Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. He carried out an on-site forensic examination of the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek to determine if they could have been used to kill people as claimed. After a careful study of the alleged killing facilities, Leuchter concluded that the sites were not used, and could not have been used, as homicidal gas chambers.

Furthermore, an analysis of samples taken by Leuchter from the walls and floors of the alleged gas chambers showed either no or minuscule traces of cyanide compound, from the active ingredient of Zyklon B, the pesticide allegedly used to murder Jews at Auschwitz. (A deluxe edition of The Leuchter Report is available from the Institute For Historical Review, P.O. Box 2739, Newport Beach, California 92659, for $20.00, plus $2.00 shipping)

A confidential forensic examination (and subsequent report) commissioned by the Auschwitz State Museum and conducted by Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow has confirmed Leuchter's finding that minimal or no traces of cyanide compound can be found in the sites alleged to have been gas chambers. (The complete text of this report was published in English in The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1991)

The significance of this is evident when the results of the forensic examination of the alleged homicidal gas chambers are compared with the results of the examination of the Auschwitz disinfestation facilities, where Zyklon B was used to delouse mattresses and clothing. Whereas no or only trace amounts of cyanide were found in the alleged homicidal gas chambers, massive traces of cyanide were found in the walls and floor in the camp's disinfestation delousing chambers.

Another forensic study has been carried out by German chemist Germar Rudolf. On the basis of his on-site examination and analysis of samples, the certified chemist and doctoral candidate concluded: "For chemical-technical reasons, the claimed mass gassings with hydrocyanic acid in the alleged 'gas chambers' in Auschwitz did not take place...The supposed facilities for mass killing in Auschwitz and Birkenau were not suitable for this purpose..." (G. Rudolf, Gutachten �ber die Bldung und Nachweisbarkeit von Cyanidverbindungen in den "Gaskammern" von Auschwitz (London: 1993). See: The Journal of Historical Review, Nov.-Dec. 1993, pp. 25-26)

Finally, there is the study of Austrian engineer Walter L�ftl, a respected expert witness in numerous court cases, and former president of Austria's professional association of engineers. In a 1992 report he called the alleged mass extermination of Jews in gas chambers "technically impossible." (The 'L�ftl Report', The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1992-93)

Discredited Perspective: So just what constitutes "Holocaust denial?" Those who advocate criminal persecution of "Holocaust deniers" seem to be still living in the world of 1946 where the Allied officials of the Nuremberg Tribunal have just pronounced their verdict. But the Tribunal's findings can no longer be assumed to be valid. Because it relied so heavily on such untrustworthy evidence as the H�ess testimony, some of its most critical findings are now discredited.

Therefore, we can clearly see why so many scholars continue to challenge the Holocaust story. Such scholars as Dr. Arthur Butz of Northwestern University, Professor Robert Faurisson of the University of Lyon in France and best-selling British historian David Irving, have been vigorously challenging the widely-accepted extermination story.

They do not dispute the fact that large numbers of Jews were deported to concentration camps and ghettos, or that many Jews died or were killed during the Second World War. Revisionist scholars have, however, presented considerable evidence to show that there was no German program to exterminate Europe's Jews and that the estimate of six million Jewish wartime dead is an irresponsible exaggeration.

As presented above, the revisionists point out that the Holocaust story has changed quite a lot over the years. Many extermination claims that were once widely accepted have been quietly dropped in recent years. In early 1995, CNN quietly reported, during one of the many Jewish propaganda campaigns, stated that only one million Jews died in Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, thinking no one would notice the change in numbers, and most Americans did not.

At one time it was alleged that the Germans gassed Jews at Dachau, Buchenwald and other concentration camps in Germany proper. But that part of the extermination story proved so untenable that it was abandoned more than twenty years ago. No serious historian now supports the once supposedly proven story of "extermination camps" in the territory of the old German Reich. Even famed "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal was forced to acknowledge in 1975 that "There were no extermination camps on German soil." (Books & Bookmen, London, April 1975, p. 5)

In addition, more and more striking evidence has been presented in recent years which simply cannot be reconciled with the allegations of mass exterminations at these camps. For example, detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979. They show no trace of the piles of corpses, smoking chimneys and masses of Jews awaiting death, all of which have been alleged and would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz had indeed been an extermination center. At one time it was also seriously claimed that the Germans exterminated Jews with electricity and steam, and that they manufactured soap from Jewish corpses. For example, at Nuremberg the United States charged that the Germans killed Jews at Treblinka, not in gas chambers, as is now claimed, but by steaming them to death in "steam chambers." (Nuremberg document PS-3311 (USA-293). IMT "blue series," Vol. 32. pp. 153-158; Imt. Vol. 3. pp. 566-568; NMT "green series," Vol. 5, pp. 1133-1134) These bizarre stories have also been quietly abandoned in recent years.

Disease Claimed Many Inmates: The Holocaust extermination story is superficially plausible. Everyone has seen the horrific photos of dead and dying inmates taken at Bergen-Belsen, Nordhausen and other concentration camps when they were liberated by British and American forces in the final weeks of the war in Europe. These people were unfortunate victims, not of an extermination program, but of disease and malnutrition brought on by the complete collapse of Germany in the final months of the war. Indeed, if there had been an extermination program, the Jews found by Allied forces at the end of the war would have long since been killed.

In the face of advancing Soviet forces, large numbers of Jews were evacuated during the final months of the war from eastern camps and ghettos to the remaining camps in western Germany. These camps quickly became terribly overcrowded, which severely hampered efforts to prevent the spread of epidemics. Furthermore, the breakdown of the German transportation system, as a result of the carpet bombing of the allied forces made it impossible to supply adequate food and medicine to the camps.

Captured German Documents: At the end of the Second World War, the Allies confiscated a tremendous quantity of German documents dealing with Germany's wartime Jewish policy, which was sometimes officially referred to as the "final solution." But not a single German document has ever been found which even refers to an extermination program. To the contrary, the documents clearly show that the German "final solution" policy was one of emigration and deportation, not extermination.

Consider, for example, the confidential German Foreign Office memorandum of August 21, 1942. (Nuremberg document NG-2586-J. NMT "green series," Vol. 13, pp. 243-249) "The present war gives Germany the opportunity and also the duty of solving the Jewish problem in Europe," the memorandum notes. The policy "to promote the evacuation of the Jews (from Europe) in closest cooperation with the agencies of the Reichsf�hrer SS {Himmler} is still in force."� The memo noted that "the number of Jews deported in this way to the East did not suffice to cover the labor needs."

The document quotes German Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop as saying that, "at the end of this war, all Jews would have to leave Europe. This was an unalterable decision of the F�hrer {Hitler} and also the only way to master this problem, as only a global and comprehensive solution could be applied and individual measures would not help very much."

The memorandum concludes by stating that the, "deportations {of Jews to the East} are a further step on the way of the total solution...The deportation to the {Polish} General Government is a temporary measure. The Jews will be moved on further to the occupied {Soviet} eastern territories as soon as the technical conditions for it are given."

This unambiguous document, and others like it, are routinely suppressed or ignored by those who uphold the Holocaust extermination story.

Unreliable Testimony: Holocaust historians rely heavily on so-called "survivor testimony" to support the extermination story. But such "evidence" is notoriously unreliable. As one Jewish historian has pointed out, "most of the memoirs and reports {of Holocaust survivors} are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks and apologies." (Samuel Gringauz in Jewish Social Studies (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12. p. 65)

Hitler and The �Final Solution": There is no documentary evidence that Adolf Hitler ever gave an order to exterminate the Jews, or that he knew of any extermination program. Instead, the record shows that the German leader wanted the Jews to leave Europe, by emigration if possible and by deportation if necessary.

A document found after the war in the files of the Reich Ministry of Justice records his thinking on the Jews. In the spring of 1942, State Secretary Franz Schlegelberger noted in a memorandum that Hitler's Chief of Chancellery, Dr. Hans Lammers, had informed him: "The F�hrer has repeatedly declared to him {Lammers} that he wants to see the solution of the Jewish problem postponed until after the war is over." (Nuremberg document PS-4025. David Irving, Goering: A Biography (New York: 1989), p. 349)

And on July 24, 1942, Hitler emphasized his determination to remove all Jews from Europe AFTER the war: "The Jews are interested in Europe for economic reasons, but Europe must reject them, if only out of self-interest, because the Jews are racially tougher. After this war is over, I will rigorously hold to the view...that the Jews will have to leave and emigrate to Madagascar or some other Jewish national state." (H. Picker, Hitlers Tischgespr�che in F�hrerhauptquartier (Stuttgart: 1976), p. 456)

Himmler�s SS and The Camps: Jews were an important part of Germany's wartime labor force, and it was in Germany's interest to keep them alive. The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated December 28, 1942, to every concentration camp, including Auschwitz. It sharply criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps." Furthermore, it ordered: "The camp commandants...The camp doctors are to see to it that the working conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as possible."

Finally, the directive stressed that, "The Reichsf�hrer SS {Heinrich Himmler} has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced." (Nuremberg document PS-2171, Annex 2; NC&A "red series," Vol. 4, pp. 833-834)

The head of the SS department that supervised the concentration camps, Richard Gl�cks, sent a circular letter to each camp commandant dated January 20, 1943. In it he ordered: "As I have already pointed out, every means must be used to lower the death rate in the camp." (Nuremberg document NO-1523; NMT "green series," Vol. 5, pp. 372-373)

One-Sided �Holocaustomania": Even after more than forty years, the stream of Holocaust films and books shows no sign of diminishing. This relentless media campaign, which Jewish historian Alfred Lilenthal calls "Holocaustomania," portrays the fate of the Jews during the Second World War as the central event of history. There is no end to the heavy-handed motion pictures, the simplistic television specials, the vindictive hunt for "Nazi war criminals," the one-sided "educational courses," and the self-righteous appearances by politicians and celebrities at Holocaust "memorial services."

Britain's chief rabbi, Immanuel Jakobovits, has accurately described the Holocaust campaign as, "an entire industry, with handsome profits for writers, researchers, film-makers, monument builders, museum planners and even politicians." He added that some rabbis and theologians are "partners in this big business." (H. Shapiro, Jakobovits, Jerusalem Post (Israel), November 26, 1987, p. 1)

Non-Jewish victims just don't merit the same concern. For example, there are no American memorials, "study centers," or annual observances for Stalin's victims, who vastly outnumber Hitler's.

Who Benefits?: The perpetual Holocaust media blitz is routinely used to justify enormous American support for Israel and to excuse otherwise inexcusable Israeli policies, even when they conflict with American interests. The sophisticated and well-financed Holocaust media campaign is crucially important to the interests of Israel, which owes its existence to Massive annual subsidies from American taxpayers.

As Professor W.D. Rubinstein of Australia has candidly acknowledged: "If the Holocaust can be shown to be a 'Zionist myth,' the strongest of all weapons in Israel's propaganda armory collapses." (Quadrant (Australia), September, 1979, p. 27)

Jewish history teacher Paula Hyman of Columbia University has observed: "With regard to Israel, the Holocaust may be used to forestall political criticism and suppress debate; it reinforces the sense of Jews as an eternally beleaguered people who can rely for their defense only upon themselves. The invocation of the suffering endured by the Jews under the Nazis often takes the place of rational argument, and is expected to convince doubters of the legitimacy of current Israeli government policy." (New York Times Magazine, September 14, 1980, p. 79)

One major reason that the Holocaust story has proven so durable is that the governments of the major powers also have a vested interest in maintaining it. The victorious powers of the Second World War, the United States, the Soviet Union and Britain, have a stake in portraying the defeated Hitler regime as negatively as possible. The more evil and satanic the Hitler regime appears, the more noble and justified seems the Allied cause. The Soviet Union and the Jews also benefit, because the "Six Million" HoloHOAX hides the millions of Christians murdered by the Jews after the Bolshevik takeover of Russia in 1917.

For many Jews, the Holocaust has become both a flourishing business and a kind of new religion, as noted Jewish author and newspaper publisher Jacob Timerman points out in his book, "The Longest War." He reports that many Israelis, using the word Shoah, which is Hebrew for Holocaust, joke that "There's no business like Shoah business." (The Longest War (New York: Vintage, 1982), p. 15) The Holocaust media campaign portrays Jews as totally innocent victims, and non-Jews as morally retarded and unreliable beings who can easily turn into murderous Nazis under the right circumstances. This self-serving but distorted portrayal greatly strengthens Jewish group solidarity and self-awareness.

A key lesson of the Holocaust story for Jews is that non-Jews are never completely trustworthy. If a people as cultured and as educated as the Germans could turn against the Jews, so the thinking goes, that surely no non-Jewish nation can ever be completely trusted. The holocaust message is thus one of contempt for humanity.

Holocaust Hatemongering: The Holocaust story is sometimes used to promote hatred and hostility, particularly against the German people as a whole, eastern Europeans and the leadership of the Roman Catholic church.

The well-known Jewish writer, Elie Wiesel, is a former Auschwitz inmate who served as chairman of the official U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council. He received the 1986 Nobel Peace Prize. This dedicated Zionist wrote in his book, "Legends of Our Time": "Every Jew, somewhere in his being, should set apart a zone of hate-healthy, virile hate-for what the German personifies and for what persists in the German." (Legends of Our Time (New York: Schocken Books, 1982), chap. 12. p. 142)

If a non-Jew were to write such a thing about the Jews, one would be able to hear them scream from the earth to the furthest reaches of the universe, and their propaganda arm, the mass media in America would fill the world with hundreds of thousands of pages of anti-Semitic hate mongering.

Watchman Willie Martin Archive